Patterico's Pontifications


Michael Hiltzik Deep-Sixes Blog Posts? Or Mere Technical Glitch? (UPDATED: It’s a Glitch)

Filed under: Blogging Matters,Dog Trainer,Hiltzik — Patterico @ 7:12 am

[Note: Make sure to see the UPDATE at the end. The missing posts are indeed the result of a technical glitch.]

L.A. Times columnist Michael Hiltzik has a new blog, hosted by the paper. It has comments, and Hiltzik responds to many of the comments. Like most L.A. Times staffers, he leans left — this much is obvious both from his blogroll and from a recent interview he did with Hugh Hewitt (transcript here). But I am thrilled to see an L.A. Times staffer interacting with the public in this way.

However, I am a little baffled that several recent blog posts of his appear to have disappeared without explanation. I hasten to say, up front, that it may be a mere technical glitch. I have written Hiltzik to ask. But there are definitely several posts — and comments to those posts — missing from the site.

If you look at the Google cache of his site, you see that there was a post titled “Mickey Kaus stoops to condescend” published on December 12. It’s gone, as is a seemingly innocuous post from December 11 titled “Golden State Column: Who Owns Your CD/DVD Collection?” The cache doesn’t have it, but there was also a post yesterday announcing Hiltzik’s column on immigration. That’s gone too.

A fourth post that disappeared was particularly interesting: an after-action report about Hiltzik’s interview with Hewitt. (Hiltzik’s pre-interview announcement of the upcoming interview remains on the site, but the post-mortem, previously available at this link, is gone.) The cached version of the post-mortem is here, but several comments didn’t make it into the cache.

One of the comments missing from the cache was a (perhaps overly) blunt comment by me, asking Hiltzik why he was so reluctant to say who he had voted for in the presidential election. Hiltzik responded with a long comment that largely responded to an argument I hadn’t made: that knowing one’s presidential vote tells you everything you need to know about that person. Hiltzik was eager enough to have me read his response that he reproduced it as a comment to this blog in a tangentially related thread; you can read that here. Here’s the text (it’s long, so I’m putting it behind the extended entry):


Meeting Hezbollah

Filed under: International,Terrorism — Patterico @ 6:18 am

After writing a blog post that seemed to say maybe Hezbollah isn’t so bad, Michael Totten writes a piece for L.A. Weekly saying that, yes, they are that bad after all.

“We know who you are, we read everything you write, and we know where you live.”

Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0542 secs.