Maybe This Guy Can Get an Appointment Too
[Posted by The Angry Clam]
I mean, he’s worked in the White House for three whole years, that’s got to count for something.
[Posted by The Angry Clam]
I mean, he’s worked in the White House for three whole years, that’s got to count for something.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
Powered by WordPress.
He’ll get appointed to Leavenworth.
EagleSpeak (f6d463) — 10/5/2005 @ 7:00 pmHeckuva job, Leandro!
Geek, Esq. (0834ba) — 10/5/2005 @ 7:10 pmAfter two days’ reflection, I think that you and I, as lawyers, have the same problem with this nomination. We are realizing that all the talk of “originalist”, “strict constructionist”, “non-activist”, “won’t legislate from the bench”, is all a bunch of b______t. There is a political agenda, fully as dishonest as anything Clinton ever did. This is not the nomination of a judge — it is the nomination of a political hack who will continue to do what she has always been doing. Sure, if you like school vouchers, a vote against Roe v. Wade and upholding the Patriot Act, she’s our girl. But if you like competent and honest interpretation of our Constitution and laws …?
nk (d7a872) — 10/5/2005 @ 8:39 pmAmazing.
I hate to take everything back to immigration, but this person’s loyalty was to the Philipines first and maybe the US second. The government failed when he became a citizen as much as it failed when he was assigned to the Whitehouse and/or Cheney’s office.
jpm100 (06f700) — 10/5/2005 @ 8:49 pm