Arnold will be vetoing the Legislature’s measure to give licenses to illegal immigrants, according to this report in the L.A. Times. Gil Cedillo is not happy:
That doesn’t change anything. We still expect him to sign it, to do his constitutional duty and his moral obligation.
Constitutional duty?? What in the world is he talking about?
Xrlq has more.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Powered by WordPress.
Say What?
I have news for Gil Cedillo. There are folks in California, who do think Arnold has both a moral obligation and a duty to VETO this pernicious and subversive legislation. And, some of us also think pandering politicians should be exposed for the damage they propose to do to us, and the dangers they would inflict on us.
Black Jack (ee3eb6) — 9/10/2005 @ 8:52 amHow, exactly, do undocumented people prove they have no documentation to authorities at the time they sign up for one of these things?
Shredstar (532850) — 9/10/2005 @ 10:50 am