Patterico's Pontifications

1/11/2016

David Brooks: Ted Cruz Is Satanic

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 8:26 pm

BROOKS: Yes, Ted Cruz is making headway. You begin to see little signs of liftoff. Trump’s sort of ceilinged out [sic], Carson’s collapsing, and Cruz is somehow beginning to get some momentum in Iowa and elsewhere And so people are either mimicking him, which Rubio is doing a little by adopting some of the dark and satanic tones that Cruz has, and so . . . It is an ugly world in Ted Cruz’s world.

Cruz needs to work on his pants crease.

NCAA Football Championship

Filed under: General — JD @ 6:41 pm

[guest post by JD]

This is turning out to be a better game than I expected, Clemson 14 Alabama 14 with 8 minutes to go in the first half. 

I thought with Clemson defenders Lawson and Alexander being less than 100%, that Bama might just roll. 

Interesting stat I heard earlier – Bama is 8-5 when the opponent has a TD pass over 20 yards, which Clemson already has. 

Clemson has Dabo, who is simply damn near impossible to not love. His enthusiasm and love for his players is infectious. Saban is simply a master. 

Should be a great Championship game, for a change. 

—–JD

GOP Primaries Open Thread

Filed under: General — Dana @ 6:12 pm

[guest post by Dana]

There are 98 delegates that will be doled out tonight.

Arizona has 58 delegates up for grabs, winner-take-all. Trump is favored to win.

Utah has 40 delegates up for grabs. A candidate needs to get more than 50% of the vote for the winner-take-all rule to kick in. Cruz is favored to win. If Cruz doesn’t break 50%, the 40 delegates will be split proportionally among the candidates.

Decision Desk here.

–Dana

Fox’s Outrageous Debate Decision

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 6:08 pm

Unbelievable:

Republican presidential candidates Rand Paul and Carly Fiorina have been cut from the next mainstage debate on Thursday.

According to a newly-announced lineup by debate host Fox Business Network, only seven candidates will appear in the main debate: Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and John Kasich.

This is an outrage. Not that Paul and Fiorina have been cut; I don’t care much about that. The outrage is that John Kasich is still in.

I honestly don’t think I can stomach watching this twitchy self-righteous squish-head interrupt his way through another debate. I really don’t. I’m serious.

It becomes more curious when you look at ABC’s characterization of the state of polling. Look at Kasich’s standing as it relates to the folks who got tossed out:

Full averages, according to an ABC News analysis, are below:

National: Trump: 35.0 Cruz: 19.6 Rubio: 11.0 Carson: 9.4 Christie: 4.0 Bush: 3.6 Paul: 2.8 Fiorina: 2.2 Kasich: 1.8 Huckabee: 1.2 Santorum: 0.5 Gilmore: 0.3

Iowa: Cruz: 27.8 percent Trump: 26.4 Rubio: 14.0 Carson: 9.4 Bush: 4.8 Paul: 4.2 Christie: 3.2 Fiorina: 2.0 Huckabee: 1.8 Kasich: 1.4 Santorum: 0.6 Gilmore: 0.1

New Hampshire: Trump: 29.6 percent Rubio: 12.8 Cruz: 11.6 Christie: 9.6 Kasich: 9.0 Bush: 8.0 Carson: 4.4 Fiorina: 4.0 Paul: 3.8 Huckabee: 0.6 Santorum: 0.2 Gilmore: 0.2

Kasich ranks under Paul and Fiorina nationally and in Iowa. So he outranks them in the insane state of New Hampshire . . . who cares?

Get that guy off the stage!

David Bowie, RIP

Filed under: Music — Patterico @ 12:16 am

Well, this is a shock.

David Bowie, the infinitely changeable, fiercely forward-looking songwriter who taught generations of musicians about the power of drama, images and personae, died Sunday, two days after his 69th birthday, according to his publicist.

Mr. Bowie’s death was reported in posts on Facebook and Twitter, and confirmed by the publicist, Steve Martin, on Monday morning.

“David Bowie died peacefully today surrounded by his family after a courageous 18-month battle with cancer,” according to a statement on Mr. Bowie’s social media accounts.

More than 10 years ago, I described David Bowie as “one of my all-time favorite performers.” He is a “musicians’ musician” — and I know this because the musicians I like always want to cover his stuff. He had a reputation as this sort of non-serious “glam” artist, but he was a hell of a songwriter and had a hell of a voice.

One of the first times I went out with Christi — at a time when I think we were friends, and not “dating” — I invited her into the bedroom of my one-bedroom apartment (where the stereo was!) and dimmed the lights while I put on “Sweet Thing” from the “Diamond Dogs” album. I told her I wanted her to hear the range in the singer’s voice, beginning with a low gravelly sound to a controlled soprano wail.

She told me later that she thought I was trying to make a move on her. Dimmed lights, sitting together on the bed, playing music . . . yeah, I can see why she thought that. But I just wanted her not to have any visual distractions — so she could concentrate on how great David Bowie’s voice was.

He was 69 years old. It’s a horrible loss for music.

UPDATE: If I’m going to talk up “Sweet Thing” then I should let you listen to it, shouldn’t I?

Give this 90 seconds. You’ll hear Bowie’s full vocal range in a way no other song of his quite displays.


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.3921 secs.