Patterico’s Pontifications

5/27/2005

Free Wine! Getcher Free Wine!

Filed under: Judiciary — Patterico @ 5:19 pm

Frequent commenter Paul Deignan has agreed to enter into a bet with me. The best part: he is certain to lose. That means a free $20 bottle of wine for yours truly. Details here.

There are three spots left, for you free wine lovers out there.

UPDATE: Here are the terms. I am betting that the Democrats successfully filibuster at least one judge during the rest of the Bush presidency (defined as the presidency of any Republican in office through January 2009). A successful filibuster is one that is not shut down by a procedural device such as a successful cloture vote, or the successful deployment of the nuclear option. If there is a successful filibuster during the rest of Bush’s presidency — including even Saad or Myers — I win. If there is no successful filibuster — I’m doing my best not to snicker as I say this — Paul wins.

It’s a lock.

Anyone interested a side bet as to how long it will take me to win?

UPDATE x2: Xrlq was the first to make the bet.

6 Comments

  1. My oh my but you are a confident one.

    Of course, the recent Bolton fiasco does not bode well for me. This could be a windfall for the brave henny pennies out there (or not?)

    Comment by Paul Deignan — 5/27/2005 @ 5:53 pm

  2. Flap wants in.

    Side bet….yes!

    Want to start a pool?

    Comment by Flap — 5/28/2005 @ 9:06 pm

  3. Bottle of Wine, Fruit of the Vine - When You Gonna…

    Paul Deignan that very brilliant worthy who writes Info Theory and the subject of an earlier “Newly Discovered Blogs” has sent me an e-mail: GM, I got two spots open for this: Wine For Winners Challenge Interested? Paul Imagine that, a fellow blogger…

    Trackback by GM's Corner — 5/29/2005 @ 2:53 am

  4. [...] you going to stand for this? My guess is: you will. It’s going to take more than a single free bottle of wine to drown the sorrows I am going to feel when this &# [...]

    Pingback by Patterico’s Pontifications » That Wonderful Filibuster Compromise — 6/3/2005 @ 10:18 am

  5. Afte looking at the text of the law, it seems to me that a person *in the business of selling alcoholic beverages* is prohibited from shipping alcoholic beverages to residents of Indiana.

    [Thanks for the comment. The spam URL has been altered, however. Thanks for playing. -- P]

    Comment by wine — 10/10/2006 @ 8:34 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Powered by WordPress.