Trump Whines, Luttig Shines
[guest post by Dana]
While Trump whines that he is the target of the special counsel’s criminal probe, former federal Judge Michael Luttig helpfully reminds him that this “is a consequence of the former president’s own provocation”:
“There is not an Attorney General or Special Counsel of either party who would not bring charges against the former president for his efforts on January 6 to overturn the 2020 presidential election. He has dared, taunted, provoked and goaded DOJ to prosecute him for his offenses on and relating to January 6 for two and a half years,” Luttig said.
“The former president has left Jack Smith no choice but to bring charges, lest the former president make a mockery of the Constitution of the United States and the Rule of Law.”
P.S. Unsurprisingly, Republicans are defending Trump after he made public that he is a target of the criminal probe into Jan. 6:
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) suggested…that the government was targeting Trump out of fear he could win next November. “Recently President Trump went up in the polls and was actually surpassing President Biden for reelection. So what do they do now? Weaponize government to go after their No. 1 opponent…This is not equal justice. They treat people differently and they go after their adversaries,” said McCarthy, who after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol said Trump “bears responsibility” for what happened.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) also questioned the timing of the new development in the Jan. 6 investigation and whether there was a double standard being applied to the former president…not[ing] that the news comes as the House Oversight Committee is slated to hear testimony from two IRS whistleblowers this week who alleged an investigation into Hunter Biden was slow-walked by prosecutors…“Now you see the Biden administration going after President Trump once again, it begs that question — is there a double standard? Is justice being administered equally?” he said at the House GOP conference presser.
And crazy Marge suggested that because Smith has, in her words, “weaponized” the DOJ by these “ridiculous” charges, “we are worse than Russia, we are worse than China. We are worse than some of the most corrupt third world countries.”
Today’s Republican Party uh, at work…
–Dana
I would quibble with Luttig that Trump made a mockery of the Constitution and the Rule of Law when he attempted to overturn the 2020 election. But I take his point here.
Dana (560c99) — 7/18/2023 @ 11:38 amGreat title.
Kudos to Judge Luttig.
DRJ (083c28) — 7/18/2023 @ 11:44 amI’ve added a P.S. to the post regarding the Republicans defending Trump after his announcement.
Dana (560c99) — 7/18/2023 @ 11:51 amTrump is proof that many Americans aren’t discerning when it comes to politics. Those who are discerning, like all of the commenters here, are tired of the Trump show.
norcal (e5b4c8) — 7/18/2023 @ 12:19 pmI feel like playing a game of “Is this a politician defending Trump or is it ChatGPT”. The GOP pols all deliver the same rote outrage stuff, except MTG gets in a few cuss words.
Appalled (91c80e) — 7/18/2023 @ 1:19 pmWasit a provocation when our VP had a fund supporting antifa criminals that engaged in trrterrorism?
NJRob (eb56c3) — 7/18/2023 @ 1:39 pm“He has dared, taunted, provoked and goaded DOJ to prosecute him for his offenses on and relating to January 6 for two and a half years,” Luttig said.
Politically, I think Trump’s slow reaction to address the riot was impeachment/removal worthy.
But, what, exactly was his “offenses on and relating to January 6 for two and a half years” are we talking about? What penal code that Trump should be punished for?
I don’t want “conspiracy to commit fraud” or some banal generality. Lay it out, with puppets if necessary.
whembly (5f7596) — 7/18/2023 @ 1:57 pmThe real battle will be where the trials held and jury selection. First juror question what do you think of trump? Removed for cause.
asset (4ae4f2) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:10 pmMore digging, in defiance of the First Rule of Holes.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:13 pm@6: Those folks are just banally corrupt. Trump is in a class by himself.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:15 pmMy guess is that it will be another “talking indictment”, similar to the Espionage Act indictment.
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:17 pmMy guess is that it will be another “talking indictment”, similar to the Espionage Act indictment.
And I suspect that some of the evidence of Trump’s deep involvement will shock.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:24 pmIt probably was a provocation that Harris tweeted in support of a fund (not “had a fund”) that helped bail out rioters (no evidence they were Antifa), which is not a good thing but, unlike Trump’s criminal acts, the tweet wasn’t illegal.
Paul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:29 pmwhembly, suborning electoral fraud would be an easy call, provided that Smith can tie Trump to the Fake Electors scheme. Beyond that, I can’t say, but seditious conspiracy could be on the table.
Paul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:32 pmwhembly (5f7596) — 7/18/2023 @ 1:57 pm
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:37 pm@14
What does that mean exactly? Why would that be easy?
I’m not sure if that’s illegal either. “Alternate” Electors (not “Fact”) is a thing. BUt, those slates must be voted on by the individual states, and demanding (or even politically twisting arms) isn’t illegal either.
I’m dubious of this as well, because if they had something like that, they’ve would’ve brought it up during the 2nd impeachment or shortly afterwards.
whembly (5f7596) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:43 pm12. Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 2:24 pm
I suspect you’ll be disappointed.(He was involved a little, but he was roped into aiding somebody else’s conspiracy)
I think they had the idea they could get Trump to reverse himself and agree to declare some form of martial law if they made enough of a commotion. But Trump knew that was suicide.
The indictment will focus on the idea he knew what he wanted Congress to do was unjustified both under the facts and in the law) And it’ll show that he repeated claims that he had been told by people he had picked to advise him – not to mention that he also claimed that everybody knew it, a nuance indicating he was lying that most people have missed) Everybody>
Including his campaign people? And members of his family? And friends? And appointees? What is Bill Barr? Chopped liver?
He would drop allegations and then repeat them again at another time.
And he seemed to have little discrimination in what he would allege.
If it was real, if he really believed some of that, he just wouldn’t do that.
The indictment will say that, on occasion, he seemed to admit privately that he had lost the election. (You could even throw in, if you wanted to, as proof, that at least that he knew he would not likely remain in office much longer, if not that he knew his claims of massive vote fraud were unfounded, the consideration of an attack on Iran’s nuclear program.)
And then argue that, given his true opinion, anything he did to attempt to continue in office for another term was illegal.
Just organizing the critical vote in Congress would be enough to convict. I think the indictment will probably argue that.
I don’t think we want to go there.
If he ever gets convicted on the basis of something like that, it’ll be thrown out, after several years, by the Supreme Court, which has thrown out “violation of honest services” bribery type charges.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/18/2023 @ 3:03 pm* he repeated claims that he had been told were unfounded by people he had picked to advise him.
So how could he claim that everybody knew his victory was stolen? And that he won by a lot?
But I think the indictment will miss that point.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/18/2023 @ 3:07 pmThat was done because the ekectirs had tovote by a certain date.
What he’s really saying is they had no case to be declared Electors and knew it.. But that is not fraud. Everybody knew who was who.
It’s this kind of thing that I don’t like.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/18/2023 @ 3:49 pmHow is not fraud to send in fake documents to the National Archives claiming that you are the duly appointed electors?
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/18/2023 @ 4:11 pmBecause nobody is relying on these signed statements and they had some hopes they could be retroactively certified.
In 1960,there was a real question in Hawaii. Not here of course but fraud if the wrong word for this.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/18/2023 @ 4:33 pmi think mr. former president donald trump, who could save hundreds of dollars on his impeachment insurance by switching to geico, is finally getting what he has wanted since he was a little boy
when he says that this or that person hates him, millions of people believe him
not like mommy and daddy and that mean old nanny
nk (bb1548) — 7/18/2023 @ 5:44 pmProfile in Courage:
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/18/2023 @ 5:47 pmGropey MacPenthouse only backs off when his rally-goers boo him. He has no sensibility that advice could influence, and no moral sense to make him repent.
nk (bb1548) — 7/18/2023 @ 6:15 pm@27 as long as AOC and the squad along with bernie and his bros are willing to hold their nose and support biden and not vote green party biden’s tilt to the left is working. Only the left can cost biden the election as the democrat establishment has to support him at all cost.
asset (1ebaec) — 7/18/2023 @ 6:29 pmHere is a archived general discussion of 18 USC Section 371 — conspiracy to defraud the government.
DRJ (531157) — 7/18/2023 @ 7:02 pmHeeding McCarthy’s prompts… is there no end to this nuttery:
On the semi-upside though:
Dana (560c99) — 7/18/2023 @ 8:35 pmI’m dubious of this as well, because if they had something like that, they’ve would’ve brought it up during the 2nd impeachment or shortly afterwards.
All those folks looking at 20 years in prison might have developed looser tongues. James McCord might have kept silent if he wasn’t sentenced to 20 years for the Watergate job.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 11:41 pmIt’s this kind of thing that I don’t like.
Indeed. Piling on the little fish, for arguable crimes that defrauded no one only serves to give credence to Trump’s claims of persecution.
But still, there WERE Trump electors in each of those states, duly enrolled, Had the election result been overturned, they would have been “duly elected.” I’m not sure why this other group had to get involved.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/18/2023 @ 11:45 pmThis same brand of assholes invaded the Michigan Capitol while armed and plotted to kidnap the Governor. Feel sorry for the homeowner, not the cockroaches.
nk (bb1548) — 7/19/2023 @ 5:07 amAsset,
your girls continued their racist attack against Israelis. How do you feel about that?
NJRob (eb56c3) — 7/19/2023 @ 5:24 amThe second impeachment didn’t have the benefit of the evidence developed by the January 6 Select Committee or the Justice Department investigation.
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 8:30 amYou don’t think the US government can be defrauded, only individuals?
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 8:34 amThe charges against the fake electors in Michigan are being brought by the State’s Attorney General under state law.
nk (4e04ed) — 7/19/2023 @ 8:51 amInterfering with government process is fraud, Kevin. Interfering with our free elections is the worst possible fraud because it defrauds everyone.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 9:57 amYou don’t think the US government can be defrauded, only individuals?
Of course it can, but this effort would not have defrauded a 5yo.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 10:57 amIt was also pointless, as there was already a slate of Trump electors in each of those states. No one had to do anything, if the state result was overturned.
Is it fraud if I claim something that is patently false, and I know that you know it is patently false? For example, I claim to be John Wilkes Booth and ask for an advance on my autobiography?
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:03 amTrump is RAPIST, says civli court judge, in denying Trump request to lower jury’s award.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:05 am@39
I don’t think any of that would stick, as Smith is likely to run headlong into the SCOTUS’s admonition that prosecutors refrain from invoking fraud and other vague statutes to criminalize deplorable behavior by public officials, in PERCOCO v. UNITED STATES and CIMINELLI v. UNITED STATES .
I think Smith only has a case, if there are financial implications, such as fundraising to “stop the steal” and the likes.
Frankly, all these indictments is working in Trump’s favor. There’s more coming in GA as well. This means, Trump’s defense team has a good argument to delay these cases till after ’24 election.
Not sure if that’s what Democrats wanted.
whembly (5f7596) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:31 amRyan Goodman calls the MI Fake Elector Scheme a “strong case“, and I can’t argue otherwise. There’s a problem when people fraudulently sign documents with titles like “Certification of the Votes of the 2020 Electors From Michigan” to fool the voting public into thinking those papers were legitimate.
Paul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:45 amThe fake electors weren’t a backstop to a court overturning a result, they were submitted to the National Archives and Pence as alternatives for the Biden electors.
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 12:49 pmLOL!
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 12:54 pmSource
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 1:00 pmI’m sure they would rather run against a Donald Trump who has been indicted on dozens of federal and state felonies than a candidate who hasn’t.
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 1:04 pmLooking at this carefully, this was purely because they wouldn’t commit to taking and proving biohazard security precautions. Aimed at the future.
They gave them a lot of time.
Apparently, this was a compromise position by the Biden Administration.
They would disregard the past but they would want to be sure of the future. How could you argue against it, even if you would not want to imply the possibility of an origin at the lab.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 1:41 pmNumber 40 should have been in the other thread.
41. Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:03 am
But the regular Trump electors weren’t about to vote.
This was insurance against the possibility that the state would be able to appoint new electors or that Congress would accept these electors but they wouldn’t have voted on the proper date so they needed to vote. They had some legal theory.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:03 pmI mean number 49 was supposed to be in the Wuhan lab thread,
I think you also need the people who carry out the obstruction to have a corrupt purpose.
Trump would need to break character in urging other people do things.
Otherwise he’s only insisting on what he says are his rights. He’s not blatantly asking other people to do something wrong or illegal.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:11 pmLOL!
Agreed. The state cases, particularly the silly NY “felony” case, can damn well wait on the federal trials. i think Florida goes first, then DC. Both can be concluded by early 2024.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:12 pmTrump never gave an “order” to Mike Pence. He couldn’t. He wanted Pence to do something.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:12 pm@34 Half the people in Israel agree that netanhayu and the likud coalition has racist/fascist policy and a few have called for the expulsion of palestinians. Some of the squads views are different then mine on peace settlement as I want to have Egypt take over the gaza strip which we will have to pay for so their soldiers can stop attacks on israel.
asset (a5e512) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:15 pmBTW, I think that if Trump is convicted of insurrection, he is disqualified. If he happens to win an appeal later, the can run again then. While a prison sentence might be stayed due to an appeal, the disqualification is instant at time of conviction and persists as long as the conviction exists.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:16 pmPaul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/19/2023 @ 11:45 am
You can fool the voters without having to sign anything at all.
You could even lie about signing.
They signed that in the hopes that what the statement said would later be upheld. There was no good basis for that, but that was the purpose – not to fool anyone that the Governor or whoever agreed that they were electors.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:16 pmHalf the people in Israel agree that netanhayu and the likud coalition has racist/fascist policy
Yet they voted for him. Maybe some of them view it as a feature.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:17 pm54. asset (a5e512) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:15 pm
Menachem Begin wanted Egypt to take over the Gaza Strip. Sadat wasn’t interested and neither is Egypt today. Israel doesn’t want to occupy it either.
The West Bank is like Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek – they can’t hold elections. And besides, what Israel is worried about is that Hamas could have over Ramallah government whenever Abbas leaves office – he’s 87 years old and in about the 18th year of his 4 year term. No elections because half their territory id not under control of official government. Its like one of those former Soviet breakaway territories. or maybe Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek
Gaza is considered part of an independent Palestinian state (news articles are datelined: Gaza, Palestine) but the Ramallah government is the one that issues passports. And nobody wants Hamas to. It’s considered a terrorist group also by the EU
Gaza is considered hostile territory by Israel and partially blockaded.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:29 pm@58 I said we will have to make (BUY) egypt and it wont be cheap. @57 Half voted for netanhayu and the religious parties which have plenty of racism the other half voted against that corrupt fraud.
asset (a5e512) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:36 pmTalk about a Palestinian state is like they are talkig about another reality. It is not the problem- just a problem for how the world is organized. The crucial problem in the Middle East is hatred and vilification of Israel. Almost all issues are created by the conflict
The Arab side must state that they have done wrong. They have lied, they have schemed, they have killed, they have rewarded killers and they must state that they do not want to be enemies of Israel. Not even that they are no longer enemies. That they don’t want to be enemies. That would be a beginning.
If you want. Israel could issue a reciprocal statement that they do not want to be enemies but that’s getting into mirror-imaging. You csn come up with some mirror image tests that work.
Sammy Finkelman (d007a3) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:37 pmhttps://twitter.com/TAftermath2020/status/1681752463437889536
No matter what you think of MTG…
The look of Jamie Raskin looking helpless as she brings the receipts almost makes her deranged positions worth it. Almost.
whembly (5f7596) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:37 pmEgypt won’t take Gaza — well I can’t say you couldn’t pay them enough.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:39 pmNothing in the indictments reduces the reputation of Trump because his reputation is already as low as it can get (for purposes of voting for or not for him) among those who do not listen to what he says, but they can reduce the reputation of the Democrats slightly if anything seees off about any of it..
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:43 pmBut what you really want to do is get Iran’s agents out of Gaza.
Sammy Finkelman (1d215a) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:43 pmI’ll pass on mindreading what their intentions were, Sammy, and stick to the fraud they actually perpetrated.
Paul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:46 pmThe only “Certification of the Votes of the 2020 Electors From Michigan” was the one signed by the actual Electors in an officially convened legislature. Any other document that asserts otherwise is fraudulent, i.e., vote fraud.
Even more LOL! As pointed out by Judge Cannon, the government’s schedule is too aggressive to start the Espionage Act trial by December, so it won’t begin until probably spring. Trump hasn’t even been indicted yet for the election fraud case, so that probably won’t start until late summer.
Based on various reports of what is in the target letter, insurrection is not mentioned.
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:52 pmTrump Civil Litigation Watch:
Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 3:50 pmRip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 7/19/2023 @ 2:52 pm
Good luck getting the government to act quickly in trying Trump.
Even people in deportation proceedings can delay them for years.
norcal (e5b4c8) — 7/19/2023 @ 4:23 pmKevin 41,
That is why I linked the of defrauding the government at 21. From the link:
Interfering with government functions when you know your basis is false is enough. Trump (and his syncophants) interfered with the election certification, despite knowing he had lost the election. That is the crime f defrauding the government.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 4:45 pmThat is why I linked the discussion of defrauding the government at 21.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 4:46 pmKevin,
Like all the engineers I know, you view the law through your engineers’ logic. You think the law works in a linear way, i.e., you decide where you want to go and carefully analyze each step to get there.
That isn’t how the law works. (Yes, I know, you think that is why the law sucks. But consider that engineering practices and principles developed for good reasons, and so have legal practices and principles m)
The law has requirements — what we call elements — that prosecutors must produce evidence on in order to prove specific crimes. The elements for defrauding the government are straightforward. I discussed them above. IMO Trump loses.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 4:57 pm@60 Some good ;but now unattainable points. Also some hopefully not many want palestinians deported to arab countries. My short term solution is doable and costs money. Lots and lots of money and some arm twisting.
asset (664b93) — 7/19/2023 @ 5:24 pm@64 difficult unless we pay $$$ egypt and their army to do it. These unsolvable problems get solved with enough of are money. Look what we are paying now and saudis don’t like Iran either.
asset (664b93) — 7/19/2023 @ 5:29 pmIn October 2022, Trump’s aides testified that Trump knew he lost the election. Alyssa Farah and Cassidy Hutchinson testified that he admitted it. There wasn’t any real question about the loss. Instead, Trump could not handle being publicly humiliated, and his bruised narcissistic ego couldn’t take such a hammering. And given that he had spent his career doing whatever was necessary, whether legal or not, to get his way (and frequently succeeding), why would he think the U.S. government would be impervious to his tactics? Bullying, harassing, intimating poll workers, colleagues, secretaries of state, and anyone in a position to turn things his way was targeted.
It would appear that he has more than met the standard.
Dana (560c99) — 7/19/2023 @ 5:31 pmAnd see here for why Trump’s retention of government NDI and classified documents is not a minor crime. It’s covered by the Espionage Act because it is a “profound compromise of security.”
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:33 pmIMO Trump loses.
OK, I can live with that.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:41 pmso have legal practices and principles
There seems to be a lot of accident and unfortunate precedent too. Slaughterhouse screwed up quite a few things which had to be patched with kludges. Engineers don’t operate by precedent. “what works” is the only truth.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:44 pmJudge Cannon is going to get an awful lot of bipartisan pushback if she sets the trial date much past December. She will be forever seen as “that Trumpist shill” and find she eats lunch alone a lot.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:48 pminterfering with government functions when you know your basis is false is enough.
I don’t disagree that it’s criminal, but is it “fraud”? The word starts to lose meaning. The “public service fraud” statues have been pretty much gutted, and this isn’t even that. There are things about maladministration and misbehavior (“misdemeanor” in 1789), but those are mostly impeachment things, not criminal charges.
Was Nixon’s impoundment of appropriations “fraud”? I doubt it.
Was Iran/Contra fraud? Yeah, particularly on Ollie North’s part.
This isn’t an engineer’s viewpoint, but an epidemiologist’s. Words need to have meaning. Sure, the law can define anything as fraud, but that’s why we have juries.
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:58 pm* statutes
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:59 pm@75: did someone deny that?
Kevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 8:00 pmThe closest that Trump got to committing a crime with regard to his election reversal attempts was maybe when he wanted a new Acting Attorney General to declare that DOJ had found evidence of fraud – which was the exact opposite of the truth.
Trump backed down when the entire upper echelon of DOJ threatened to resign. He even did not replace the Acting Attorney General with Jeffrey Clark – a White House log already listed him as that.
Trump had been hoping this statement would have some effect on state legislatures.
He argued that all he wanted was this (patently false) statement — Republican members of Congress etc would take care of the rest.
The whole thing was a screwball plan anyway — but this itself would have been fraud. Because whether or not you believed there was fraud, DOJ had not found it.
Sammy Finkelman (9a0217) — 7/19/2023 @ 9:18 pmI think Whembly was talking about NDI charges elsewhere, Kevin. It wasn’t being discussed here.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 9:28 pmTypically. Th elements of fraud are:
1) a false statement
2) an intent to deceive
3) reasonable reliance on the statement by the injured party and
4) injury sustained as the result of the reliance.
As I understand the DOJ discussion, it concludes that in government fraud: the 3rd element is interference with government function, and 4 is presumed.
DRJ (531157) — 7/19/2023 @ 9:38 pmSammy, I think you’re missing Trump’s involvement in the Fake Electors scheme across multiple battleground states.
Paul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/19/2023 @ 10:02 pmDRJ – Thanks for your legal explanations. They add a lot to the discussions here.
Jim Miller (301a58) — 7/20/2023 @ 4:31 amIt sure beats waxing on(or off) about Kari Lake’s hairstyle, Jim.
BuDuh (4ae305) — 7/20/2023 @ 5:08 amWho did that? Talked about Kari Lake’s hairstyle?
nk (4e04ed) — 7/20/2023 @ 6:38 amKevin M (2d6744) — 7/19/2023 @ 7:58 pm
No money ever went to the contras, and Reagan was never told about any profits……….
Oliver North used a little money himself.
He claimed it came from savings.
– from the Broadway musical Fiorello.
It was said that money intended for the contras was deposited in the wrong bank account — off by one digit.
This isn’t an engineer’s viewpoint, but an epidemiologist’s. Words need to have meaning. Sure, the law can define anything as fraud, but that’s why we have juries.
Sammy Finkelman (ee07f1) — 7/20/2023 @ 9:22 amPaul Montagu (8f0dc7) — 7/19/2023 @ 10:02 pm
That was not a crime. Just invalid.
Sammy Finkelman (ee07f1) — 7/20/2023 @ 9:24 amOh, Sammy. Sigh.
DRJ (531157) — 7/20/2023 @ 10:05 amThanks, Jim. I try to provide reliable information but Trump does things that are very different. Maybe Patterico can weigh in someday, when the cases are farther along. He is much smarter about these things than I am, but he works so I have more time.
DRJ (531157) — 7/20/2023 @ 10:44 am