LAT Publisher “Abruptly” Fired
Los Angeles Times Publisher Austin Beutner was abruptly fired Tuesday after leading a yearlong drive to reshape the media company by emphasizing digital experimentation, a deeper connection with the community and efforts to cultivate ardent readers in the belief that advertising would follow.
Jack Griffin, chief executive of Tribune Publishing Co., parent company of The Times, met with Beutner in Los Angeles on Tuesday morning to give him the news.
Beutner’s successor, Timothy E. Ryan, is the 15th publisher in the 134-year history of The Times.
Neither Beutner nor Tribune Publishing officials would elaborate on what triggered the leadership change, but people familiar with the situation said it stemmed from a fundamental clash over whether The Times and its recently acquired sister paper, the San Diego Union-Tribune, should remain within the newspaper chain.
It was done the old-fashioned way: get out, and get out now:
In the end, Beutner’s departure was quick and unceremonious. He presided over his normal 8 a.m. start-of-week meeting with senior staff, at the end of which he said, “This is the last one of these I’ll be doing for a while.”
Shortly afterward, Griffin told him he was being terminated.
By midmorning, a human resources officer was asking Beutner to surrender his company badge and quickly vacate his second-floor office.
It’s part of a long, slow death for the newspaper industry as a whole, and this paper in particular.
Few will be shedding tears when the funeral finally happens.
Thanks to Kevin M.
Dong!
The Dana trying to get in the first comment (f6a568) — 9/9/2015 @ 8:02 am🙂 Well, I’m always a bit sorry when someone loses his job, but he probably got a better separation payment than do most people. But, in the end, newspapers are 18th entury technology, and once the last generation which grew up reading print newspapers every day dies, so will the industry.
The Dana who got in the first comment (f6a568) — 9/9/2015 @ 8:04 amAt least he won’t starve as he still has most of his $100 million.
Leftist media barons eat each other for lunch.
Mike K (90dfdc) — 9/9/2015 @ 8:07 amSo you’re claiming they’re all vegetarians?
John Hitchcock (81341d) — 9/9/2015 @ 8:20 amMcClatchy, which is something like the 3rd largest newspaper chain, stock sold for around $75 a share in 2005 and now they struggle to stay above a dollar a share. Couple of weeks ago they actually hit 75 cents a share.
This is the chain that owns the Sacramento Bee. What is amazing is that most of the papers they own are monopolies in the cities and towns where they publish and they still can’t make it. What is more amazing is that almost all of these papers have a business section that tells other people how to run a business.
Sigh…..
Anchovy (a8ec7a) — 9/9/2015 @ 9:19 amI found this part of the article to be quite interesting:
So Beutner had hoped to re-shape the newspaper by bringing in Democrat party hacks in key digital roles, and he perhaps had his own plans to seek public office in this left-wing state. One wonders why he didn’t go whole hog and just get a content-sharing agreement with the Daily Kos. Somehow I don’t think the paper will be worse off not having Austin Beutner at the helm.
JVW (ba78f9) — 9/9/2015 @ 9:42 amAnd the drain circling continues unabated…..
Bill M (906260) — 9/9/2015 @ 10:07 amLooks like liberals will have to get their mythology from another source now.
CrustyB (69f730) — 9/9/2015 @ 10:09 amWith the acquisition of the SD U-T by Tribune Co, only the OCR is a relatively independent voice in print media within CA – you have to wonder how long they can last?
askeptic (efcf22) — 9/9/2015 @ 10:48 amThe Publisher does not matter. The rag is infested by mediocrities, like “Half Truth Hiltzik,” Boring Banks, and Maura Dolan. As resistant to change as the former MLK hospital, while staffed by those hard core union employees.
Harcourt Fenton Mudd (5e0a82) — 9/9/2015 @ 2:21 pm” only the OCR is a relatively independent voice in print media within CA”
No they aren’t. They may publish Libertarian editorials and some conservative columnists on the editorial page, but their news staff is garden-variety leftwing progressives through and through. Their “news” stories read like “progressive conventional wisdom” – pursue every liberal leftwing angle, ignore and mischaracterize conservative angles. The front “National” section is just copy from the usual sources: NYT, AP, WP, etc., etc. The paper is a joke.
MikeHs (03abc5) — 9/9/2015 @ 2:55 pmadvertisers want establishment views presented to readers, this is why limbaugh is loosing large corporate sponsors. It does not matter how many readers you have if the advertisers don’t like what your saying.
newshawk (f967e2) — 9/9/2015 @ 3:19 pmI thought the OCR was bought out a few years back. Yes, indeed. From Wikipedia:
Seems like if the Kochs want a voice in SoCal, this would be a way to go about it.
Kevin M (25bbee) — 9/9/2015 @ 3:39 pmTrue. Because every reporter writes from a leftist perspective. It’s ingrained, it’s the way they have been taught since grade school, it’s insurmountable.
Patricia (5fc097) — 9/10/2015 @ 9:13 am