[guest post by Dana]
Last week, a great number of news media outlets ran the heartbreaking photo of Syrian toddler, Aylan Kurdi, whose little body washed ashore in Turkey after the boat his family was in capsized. Almost immediately after the publication of the hauntingly sad picture, little Aylan became the human face of the refugee crisis we are now facing.
For the media, a story was born :
[A] fuller portrait emerged of a family rendered desperate by fighting in their hometown, Kobani, and their slender hope of finding refuge in Canada.
The family was called Kurdi, and relatives said 3-year-old Aylan, sometimes called by the Kurdish variant Alan, drowned along with his 5-year-old brother, Galip, and their mother, Reyhana. The child’s father, Abdullah, survived to break the terrible news by phone to family members at home and abroad, plunging even their loss-racked hometown in northern Syria into mourning.
The haunting episode put an unforgettably human face to the tragedies at sea that have killed more than 2,500 migrants and refugees this year, many of them Syrians fleeing a civil war that has raged since 2011. Tens of thousands more are on an arduous trek across Europe, making their way through fields and cities and across barbed-wire border fences to try to reach one of the wealthier northern nations such as Germany or Sweden.
Propelled by the grim and graphic images, the story of Aylan and his family was front-page news across Europe, provoking particular soul-searching in Britain, which has taken in only a fraction of the 800,000 migrants Germany expects to receive this year. The London-based Independent published the pictures, along with a strongly worded editorial headlined: “Somebody’s Child.”
“If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don’t change Europe’s attitude to refugees, what will?” it asked.
Following the publication of little Aylan’s photo, the Los Angeles Times explained to readers why they believed publishing the picture was a “moral imperative”.
They began with a discussion about the standard decision making process wherein editors weigh out using a graphic photo and decide whether it will further the story. This was followed by the justification of using such an image:
These kinds of debates in newsrooms are not unusual. Foreign correspondents, a job I held for a number of years, often argue with editors that we have an obligation as journalists to make readers — and voters — more keenly aware of the costs of the wars the U.S. fights in foreign lands. Editors most often err on the side of protecting readers’ sensibilities, and whatever fragile privacy those wars’ victims manage to maintain.
We then find out that the image also provided the perfect vehicle for the Los Angeles Times to further their particular political point of view:
We have written stories about migrants suffocated in trucks, run over by trains, drowned in capsized boats, but these tragedies have unfolded largely unwitnessed; here was a boy — 3-year-old Aylan, we learned later — whose fate forced anyone who saw him to confront the magnitude of the migrant crisis unfolding in Europe and the Middle East. A crisis that our nation, through the wars it has fought in the region, had a hand in igniting. A human drama that has seen European nations struggle to confront the streams of refugees, some of them fleeing horrific violence, who have turned up pleading at their doors — while the U.S. admitted just 36 Syrian refugees in fiscal 2013.
Unsurprisingly, the blame for all of this human suffering belongs to the United States. Syria, little Aylan, untold numbers of migrant refugees, it is we who caused the problem and it is we who are still the problem. The United States: “We’re just too big, we’re too powerful, we’re everywhere, we take what we want, we leave poverty in our wake.” Yet at the same time, there is no mention in the article of seven years of President Obama’s disinterested and disengaged foreign policy, nor is there any mention of his own cynical observation that: “It’s not the job of the president of the United States to solve every problem in the Middle East. We must be “modest in our belief that we can remedy every evil.” Nor is there any mention of the vacuum of power left behind when U.S. troops were pulled out of the region and the subsequent destabilization, the rise of the “J.V. team”, nor any number of other troubling aspects which speak to this administration’s lack of strategy and resolve.
As we can see, instead of letting the image universally speak for itself, the Los Angeles Times used the image of a lifeless, little body to push their slanted blame-and-shame America narrative. If you are surprised at the Los Angeles Times’ exploitation of a dead child to advance a political point of view, you really shouldn’t be.
It bears noting that there are now questions being raised about the veracity of the Kurdi story, along with other related issues. And now, little Aylan has even become the face of a “climate refugee”.
–Dana