Patterico's Pontifications


“Yeah, I Guess So”: Donald Trump Supported Invading Iraq in 2002

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 6:59 pm

At 3:38:

HOWARD STERN: Are you for invading Iraq?

TRUMP: Yeah, I guess so . . . uh, you know, I wish it was — I wish the first time it was done correctly.

Congratulations to BuzzFeed on the find.

UPDATE: In tonight’s town hall Trump said “Senior Bush did the right thing” which is a little different from “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”

Even better: Trump likes ObamaCare’s mandate: “Well I like the mandate. Here’s where I’m a little bit different. I don’t want people dying on the streets.”

UPDATE x2: Something positive: Jim DeMint praises Ted Cruz.

Hillary Clinton: Desperate Hypocrite Spews Word Vomit In Harlem

Filed under: General — Dana @ 6:58 pm

[guest post by Dana]

Hillary Clinton, who once joined then-Senator Obama in an attempt to filibuster the nomination of Samuel Alito, exposed her hypocritical underpants for all the world to see when she spewed out a vile rant accusing Republicans of being racist for their opposition to President Obama choosing the replacement for Scalia. Clinton, who keeps losing the support of key demographic groups, shamefully pandered to a black audience in Harlem. And sadly, they fell for it. Being true to her party’s adage, she wasn’t about to let a crisis like the passing of Justice Scalia go to waste:

“Now the Republicans say they’ll reject anyone President Obama nominates no matter how qualified,” Mrs. Clinton said in remarks before a predominantly black audience in Harlem. “Some are even saying he doesn’t have the right to nominate anyone! As if somehow he’s not the real president.”

Doing so, Mrs. Clinton added, is in keeping with a longstanding pattern of mistreatment.

“They demonize President Obama and encourage the ugliest impulses of the paranoid fringe,” she said. “This kind of hatred and bigotry has no place in our politics or our country.”

It would have been great had her audience demanded the name of the Republican who said that President Obama didn’t have the right to nominate anyone.

Anyway, the report from the New York Times has a number of interviews with black Americans who agree with Clinton that opposition to Obama in this is nothing more than racism at work. Of course.

I find it amazing that the NYT publishes an article focusing on Supreme Court nominations and racism, yet somehow totally manages to not mention Justice Clarence Thomas. Funny that.


Required: An Originalist to Replace Scalia, No Matter Who Is Elected

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 7:40 am

I am about to say something I’ve not heard from anyone on the right. A position so bold, so shocking, and so unthinkable that you haven’t ever heard it uttered out loud — unless you already read the headline of this post.

As long as the Senate is controlled by Republicans, the only candidate they should accept as a replacement for Antonin Scalia is an originalist — even if a Democrat wins the next presidential election.

I often hear people on the right say that we need to adopt the tactics of the left. When this means deception, trickery, and other dishonest tactics — and yes, some people on the right do advocate this — I cannot agree. But there is one thing that I think the left does better than we do, and I think that needs to change, and that is: using the power they possess, as ruthlessly as necessary to achieve their objectives.

This is not to say that Democrats don’t worry about how their actions look. It is to say that they don’t change what they do based on concerns about how their actions will look. So they do what they want anyway, and just portray it in the best possible light — an easier task for them than for the GOP, to be sure, since Democrats know that Big Media will have their back.

I think Republicans need to be like the left, and say: we’re doing what we think is right, and damn the consequences. Republicans need to step up and say:

Antonin Scalia was an originalist. We need to maintain the balance of the Court, and therefore we will not accept anyone, in any adminstration, that does not continue his important originalist role. To do anything less would disrupt the balance of the Court and sacrifice our fundamental rights, mostly notably under the Second Amendment.

But you can’t do that! people will say. You can’t say that! It’s certain electoral suicide!

Maybe it is and maybe it isn’t. I’ll leave the bit about making it look pretty to others. Power for power’s sake is for those who want nothing out of life besides perks. For the rest of us, power is a tool to be used. There’s precious little that really matters: preventing our children from inheriting crushing debt, fighting the expansion of welfare programs like ObamaCare, and the Court. For these things, if you have power, follow the example of the Democrats and use it.

Saying this out loud may help move the “Overton window” — the narrow range of things that society considers acceptable to say out loud. I’m not interested in hearing about how we can’t do this. Revolutions aren’t started by people who worry what people will think.

As long as Republicans hang tight — and I maintain there’s no real reason to think they won’t — this is a moot point until next year. But it’s worth saying now, because those who want to take this position should lay the groundwork now by making these arguments now, so they won’t have to say anything different in a Hillary or Bernie administration.

P.S. This should go without saying, but I’ll say it for the sake of thoroughness. Originalism is the only legitimate judicial philosophy. So we should always demand it when we can. At all times.

But especially now.

A Nice Long Compilation of Hillary Clinton Lies

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 6:33 am

This is pretty good.

Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0649 secs.