Susan Roesgen Is Out at CNN
And in . . . where? Allahpundit drops a hint:
She’s openly contemptuous of conservatives; she eagerly recycles Obama talking points; and she uses “Fox” as if it’s some type of invective. Golly, I wonder which cable news network she’ll land at.
When you put it like that . . .
MSNBC or ABC must be panting for this delusional creature. She makes used car salesmen seem like saints.
Thomas Jackson (8ffd46) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:25 amDavid Schuster is going to love working with her.
daleyrocks (718861) — 7/17/2009 @ 4:54 amFox? Oh wait no that’s the mirror.
imdw (423488) — 7/17/2009 @ 4:59 amI’m ready for a patchouli party at MSNBC. How about you?
I’ll bring the social justice and the hummus. JD can bring the serial denouncements and white chocolate lattes.
BJTexs (a2cb5a) — 7/17/2009 @ 5:29 amShe’ll make an excellent Keef Overbite correspondent. If not at PMSNBC, I hear “Granma” is always hiring.
KingShamus (4fabb2) — 7/17/2009 @ 5:41 amI can find her a job. (Dirty old man laugh)
nk (2fa2d4) — 7/17/2009 @ 5:55 amOh goody, MSNBC gets another news networks sloppy seconds.
tango (88da7c) — 7/17/2009 @ 6:22 amshe’s going to w*rk at the White House?
redc1c4 (fb8750) — 7/17/2009 @ 6:22 amPut her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Dmac (e6d1c2) — 7/17/2009 @ 7:12 amThere came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they willhave sense enough not to hire Roesgen.
tim maguire (4a98f0) — 7/17/2009 @ 7:40 am10.There came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they will have sense enough not to hire Roesgen.
Comment by tim maguire
Keep dreamin’. You can’t shame the shameless, you can only slow them down a little. Roesgen is probably good for a 10:00 PM weeknight timeslot at this point.
KingShamus (4fabb2) — 7/17/2009 @ 8:33 amMaybe Letterman needs someone?
Thomas Jackson (8ffd46) — 7/17/2009 @ 9:27 amPut her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air
Dmac, have you seen Maddow’s hair…or lack thereof?
Dana (57e332) — 7/17/2009 @ 10:16 amFrom what I’ve read about her here, I predict she will be going to Fox News. It would be the easiest, simplest change for her.
Larry Reilly (45e7a4) — 7/17/2009 @ 12:03 pmAll she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees. No need to tinker with approach, style or technique. Apparently she already has the Fox fair-and-balanced way very much down pat.
Conservatives will believe her ‘biases’ nudged her out. More likely it was economics. CNN is cutting costs and shedding producers and reporters. Miles O’Brien was let go in December an CNN’s technology production unit was disbanded.
DCSCA (9d1bb3) — 7/17/2009 @ 12:49 pmMawy – Why change 180 degrees when she could effectuate no changes and fit right in at MSNBC?
JD (7510a7) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:03 pmPlus she wouldn’t have to do any thinking. Just pick up Keef Olderman’s script and read it with a higher voice.
steve miller (0fb51f) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:04 pmOnly Larry could find a way to blame a CNN / MSNBC reporter’s bias on Fox.
Incoherently, of course.
SPQR (5811e9) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:09 pmAll she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees.
That would cost extra.
nk a/k/a Sarah (2fa2d4) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:13 pmLeisuresuit Larry needs to get his head examined. But at least he’s done us the favor of making our argument for us, that Susan Roesgen was a biased hack. Gracias O’Reilly.
KingShamus (4fabb2) — 7/17/2009 @ 1:14 pm#13: maybe he meant armpit hair?
redc1c4 (fb8750) — 7/17/2009 @ 2:03 pm