Patterico's Pontifications

7/17/2009

Susan Roesgen Is Out at CNN

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 12:26 am



And in . . . where? Allahpundit drops a hint:

She’s openly contemptuous of conservatives; she eagerly recycles Obama talking points; and she uses “Fox” as if it’s some type of invective. Golly, I wonder which cable news network she’ll land at.

When you put it like that . . .

21 Responses to “Susan Roesgen Is Out at CNN”

  1. MSNBC or ABC must be panting for this delusional creature. She makes used car salesmen seem like saints.

    Thomas Jackson (8ffd46)

  2. David Schuster is going to love working with her.

    daleyrocks (718861)

  3. Fox? Oh wait no that’s the mirror.

    imdw (423488)

  4. I’m ready for a patchouli party at MSNBC. How about you?

    I’ll bring the social justice and the hummus. JD can bring the serial denouncements and white chocolate lattes.

    BJTexs (a2cb5a)

  5. She’ll make an excellent Keef Overbite correspondent. If not at PMSNBC, I hear “Granma” is always hiring.

    KingShamus (4fabb2)

  6. I can find her a job. (Dirty old man laugh)

    nk (2fa2d4)

  7. Oh goody, MSNBC gets another news networks sloppy seconds.

    tango (88da7c)

  8. she’s going to w*rk at the White House?

    redc1c4 (fb8750)

  9. Put her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    Dmac (e6d1c2)

  10. There came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they willhave sense enough not to hire Roesgen.

    tim maguire (4a98f0)

  11. 10.There came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they will have sense enough not to hire Roesgen.

    Comment by tim maguire

    Keep dreamin’. You can’t shame the shameless, you can only slow them down a little. Roesgen is probably good for a 10:00 PM weeknight timeslot at this point.

    KingShamus (4fabb2)

  12. Maybe Letterman needs someone?

    Thomas Jackson (8ffd46)

  13. Put her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air

    Dmac, have you seen Maddow’s hair…or lack thereof?

    Dana (57e332)

  14. From what I’ve read about her here, I predict she will be going to Fox News. It would be the easiest, simplest change for her.
    All she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees. No need to tinker with approach, style or technique. Apparently she already has the Fox fair-and-balanced way very much down pat.

    Larry Reilly (45e7a4)

  15. Conservatives will believe her ‘biases’ nudged her out. More likely it was economics. CNN is cutting costs and shedding producers and reporters. Miles O’Brien was let go in December an CNN’s technology production unit was disbanded.

    DCSCA (9d1bb3)

  16. Mawy – Why change 180 degrees when she could effectuate no changes and fit right in at MSNBC?

    JD (7510a7)

  17. Plus she wouldn’t have to do any thinking. Just pick up Keef Olderman’s script and read it with a higher voice.

    steve miller (0fb51f)

  18. Only Larry could find a way to blame a CNN / MSNBC reporter’s bias on Fox.

    Incoherently, of course.

    SPQR (5811e9)

  19. All she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees.

    That would cost extra.

    nk a/k/a Sarah (2fa2d4)

  20. Leisuresuit Larry needs to get his head examined. But at least he’s done us the favor of making our argument for us, that Susan Roesgen was a biased hack. Gracias O’Reilly.

    KingShamus (4fabb2)

  21. #13: maybe he meant armpit hair?

    redc1c4 (fb8750)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0730 secs.