Yagman to Finally Be Incarcerated?
Regular readers know I have been following the saga of Stephen Yagman’s bid to avoid incarceration for months. It looks like he may be finally going in on St. Patty’s Day:
According to the U. S. Attorney’s spokesman Thom Mrozek, Federal Judge Stephen V. Wilson is being asked to order the incarceration of convicted Civil Rights Attorney Stephen Yagman who has been free on Appeal following his conviction earlier this year of 19 felony counts, including tax evasion, bankruptcy fraud and money laundering. The hearing in Los Angeles Federal Court is scheduled for Monday, March 17, 2007 at 11 a.m. Judge Wilson had acquitted Yagman on six counts, after the jury conviction on all counts and now is being asked to order incarceration following the denial of Yagman’s appeal.
My last post about this ongoing saga was on January 31, when I noted that Yagman’s surrender was once again being delayed, while a federal motions panel ruled on his appeal of Judge Wilson’s denial of his motion for bail pending appeal. At the time, it appeared that Yagman’s appeal would only buy him a couple of weeks, but it has bought him about a month and a half. I nevertheless observed:
You can’t stay out forever, Yagman. The day will come when you have to surrender and head off to the pokey.
I’ll be here to gloat about it.
I’m still here, Yagman. And when you get taken into custody on Monday, I’ll be wearing green as I pop the cap on a bottle of beer to celebrate.
Do they have beer in prison, Yagman? I don’t think they do.
You should mix up a glass of Kool-Aid, make a mystery meat sandwich, throw ’em both out and then crack that beer. And send him pics. 🙂
Pablo (99243e) — 3/16/2008 @ 6:53 amHow about him and other of these scoundrels like MORRIS DEES and J. TONY SEIRRA
krazy kagu (b1eb84) — 3/16/2008 @ 7:01 amDo you think his path will cross that of Dickie Scruggs?
Another Drew (8018ee) — 3/16/2008 @ 12:41 pmThey could open a law school.
From the cited article:
Is “Civil Rights Attorney” some sort of official title, as one might infer from the capitalization used?
Dana (3e4784) — 3/17/2008 @ 4:44 am