Susan Roesgen Is Out at CNN
And in . . . where? Allahpundit drops a hint:
She’s openly contemptuous of conservatives; she eagerly recycles Obama talking points; and she uses “Fox” as if it’s some type of invective. Golly, I wonder which cable news network she’ll land at.
When you put it like that . . .


MSNBC or ABC must be panting for this delusional creature. She makes used car salesmen seem like saints.
Comment by Thomas Jackson — 7/17/2009 @ 1:25 am
David Schuster is going to love working with her.
Comment by daleyrocks — 7/17/2009 @ 4:54 am
Fox? Oh wait no that’s the mirror.
Comment by imdw — 7/17/2009 @ 4:59 am
I’m ready for a patchouli party at MSNBC. How about you?
I’ll bring the social justice and the hummus. JD can bring the serial denouncements and white chocolate lattes.
Comment by BJTexs — 7/17/2009 @ 5:29 am
She’ll make an excellent Keef Overbite correspondent. If not at PMSNBC, I hear “Granma” is always hiring.
Comment by KingShamus — 7/17/2009 @ 5:41 am
I can find her a job. (Dirty old man laugh)
Comment by nk — 7/17/2009 @ 5:55 am
Oh goody, MSNBC gets another news networks sloppy seconds.
Comment by tango — 7/17/2009 @ 6:22 am
she’s going to w*rk at the White House?
Comment by redc1c4 — 7/17/2009 @ 6:22 am
Put her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Comment by Dmac — 7/17/2009 @ 7:12 am
There came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they willhave sense enough not to hire Roesgen.
Comment by tim maguire — 7/17/2009 @ 7:40 am
10.There came a point when MSNBC was embarrassed enough with their election coverage that they shuffled their line up. Maybe they will have sense enough not to hire Roesgen.
Comment by tim maguire
Keep dreamin’. You can’t shame the shameless, you can only slow them down a little. Roesgen is probably good for a 10:00 PM weeknight timeslot at this point.
Comment by KingShamus — 7/17/2009 @ 8:33 am
Maybe Letterman needs someone?
Comment by Thomas Jackson — 7/17/2009 @ 9:27 am
Put her on with the arch lesbo Maddow; they can braid each other’s hair on – air
Dmac, have you seen Maddow’s hair…or lack thereof?
Comment by Dana — 7/17/2009 @ 10:16 am
From what I’ve read about her here, I predict she will be going to Fox News. It would be the easiest, simplest change for her.
All she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees. No need to tinker with approach, style or technique. Apparently she already has the Fox fair-and-balanced way very much down pat.
Comment by Larry Reilly — 7/17/2009 @ 12:03 pm
Conservatives will believe her ‘biases’ nudged her out. More likely it was economics. CNN is cutting costs and shedding producers and reporters. Miles O’Brien was let go in December an CNN’s technology production unit was disbanded.
Comment by DCSCA — 7/17/2009 @ 12:49 pm
Mawy – Why change 180 degrees when she could effectuate no changes and fit right in at MSNBC?
Comment by JD — 7/17/2009 @ 1:03 pm
Plus she wouldn’t have to do any thinking. Just pick up Keef Olderman’s script and read it with a higher voice.
Comment by steve miller — 7/17/2009 @ 1:04 pm
Only Larry could find a way to blame a CNN / MSNBC reporter’s bias on Fox.
Incoherently, of course.
Comment by SPQR — 7/17/2009 @ 1:09 pm
All she needs do is switch direction 180 degrees.
That would cost extra.
Comment by nk a/k/a Sarah — 7/17/2009 @ 1:13 pm
Leisuresuit Larry needs to get his head examined. But at least he’s done us the favor of making our argument for us, that Susan Roesgen was a biased hack. Gracias O’Reilly.
Comment by KingShamus — 7/17/2009 @ 1:14 pm
#13: maybe he meant armpit hair?
Comment by redc1c4 — 7/17/2009 @ 2:03 pm