Adam Liptak to Replace Linda Greenhouse for NYT Supreme Court Coverage: Somehow, It Seems Fitting
Yes, it’s old news, but it happened while I was on vacation (around April 4). So I just noticed it.
In June 2007, I wrote a post titled: Does Adam Liptak Really Get Paid to Write About Legal Matters?? (Plus a Defense of Peremptory Challenges).
I think I made a pretty strong case that he completely misrepresented the state of the law on peremptory challenges.
I should have guessed they’d pick him.


As a prosecutor, I always kick journalists off my juries.
I remember a newspaper reporter for the Daily News writing a column about 20 years ago. He wrote about his experience on a jury and about how dumb the jurors were. The vote was 11 to 1, he revealed.
Comment by Alta Bob — 4/18/2008 @ 10:05 pm
Too bad there aren’t more Jan Crawford Greenburgs out there.
Comment by DRJ — 4/18/2008 @ 10:18 pm
I’ll second that.
Comment by Patterico — 4/18/2008 @ 11:55 pm
Liptak is just another reason not to read the NYT.
Except for the examples of faulty reasoning.
Comment by Jack — 4/19/2008 @ 7:08 am
The NEW YORK SILMES is just looking for a better left-wing propegandist they can afford to get
Comment by krazy kagu — 4/19/2008 @ 7:43 am