Patterico's Pontifications

2/19/2025

A Few Observations About Trump Calling Zelensky a “Dictator” and Other Dumbassery

Filed under: General — Dana @ 11:49 am



[guest post by Dana]

From the President of the United States:

Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and “TRUMP,” will never be able to settle. The United States has spent $200 Billion Dollars more than Europe, and Europe’s money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back. Why didn’t Sleepy Joe Biden demand Equalization, in that this War is far more important to Europe than it is to us — We have a big, beautiful Ocean as separation. On top of this, Zelenskyy admits that half of the money we sent him is “MISSING.” He refuses to have Elections, is very low in Ukrainian Polls, and the only thing he was good at was playing Biden “like a fiddle.” A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left. In the meantime, we are successfully negotiating an end to the War with Russia, something all admit only “TRUMP,” and the Trump Administration, can do. Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring Peace, and Zelenskyy probably wants to keep the “gravy train” going. I love Ukraine, but Zelenskyy has done a terrible job, his Country is shattered, and MILLIONS have unnecessarily died – And so it continues…..

I just want to make a few points about this bucket full of smoldering slop that Trump has served up. You can do your own investigation into the balance of things he said above.

First, it’s hilarious that a TV reality host, who has never been tested by war, believes that he has more stature and gravitas than a comedian who has been tested by war, and after almost 3 years of it, still maintains a robust 63% approval rating, while the reality host’s approval rating slipped to 44%. [The share of Americans who disapprove of his presidency has risen more substantially, to 51% in the latest poll, compared with 41% right after he took office.]

Second, Trump, repeating Russian propaganda, continues to blame the victim. He doesn’t even mention the obvious fact that it is PUTIN who began the war with his illegal invasion of Ukraine. And it is PUTIN who continues the war. For the thousandth time, defending one’s homeland from a ruthless invader is not starting a war.

Third, to Trump’s greedy little mind, recouping monetary “losses” and then some, is the only priority. His priorities render him unable to understand that by us aiding a sovereign nation which embraces democracy and also preventing it from being subsumed by one of the world’s leading anti-democratic murderous regimes, helps keep the rest of the Western world safe. It also sends a powerful warning to other evil authoritarian leaders around the world.

Fourth, Trump’s stupidity is mind-numbing: no accusations made about Putin being a dictator, but accusations made that Zelensky, who was freely elected by the Ukrainian people, is the dictator. Additionally, Trump ignores that because Ukraine is under Martial law, elections cannot be held. Moreover, Zelensky has said that he doesn’t even know if he will run again, as it depends on the outcome of the war.

Importantly:

We looked closely at the question of elections in Ukraine when I was at the NSC. To state the obvious it is highly problematic when parts of the country are occupied, there is displacement of people from other parts, & Russia is bombing it constantly.

The main worry wasn’t that Zelenskyy would lose but that his victory would not be seen as legitimate because of the disruption of the war. The opposition had concerns. It would also likely hamper wartime decision making.

Elections are often suspended for countries at war— e.g. UK during WW II. One of Putin’s main talking points is that Zelenskyy is not legitimate. This is because he wants to undermine and ultimately remove him. It’s important we are clear eyed about what’s happening.

It should also be noted that all parties considering a run in the next presidential election agree that the next election shouldn’t take place until six months after Martial law is lifted.

Fifth, as Trump touts the ongoing negotiations to end the war, which Ukraine is not even involved in, he fails to mention that the war could end RIGHT NOW if Putin just stopped doing what he is doing. That’s all. Just call it a day, hand back occupied territories, take his troops home, and never look back. That’s the fastest way for this war to end. This unnecessary war that PUTIN alone started, could end immediately if Putin CHOSE to end it. And why doesn’t Trump ever mention this? Because that isn’t what Putin wants him to say. So, as Trump prostrates himself in submission to Putin, there is silence from his supporters and silence from Republicans in Congress because they are all too are busy prostrating themselves before Trump. [Ed. I saw a slightly different version of the “prostrating themselves” comment by someone pointing out the report in The Atlantic, but lost my bookmark to link it. Apologies.]

Our betrayal of Ukraine before the world is shameful and embarrassing. That Americans elected a president who sides with Russia and parrots their propaganda is still shocking. Everyone, except for Trump and his cronies, understand that Putin is evil and not to be trusted at any cost:

It’s a hellish thing to have one’s country be invaded by a madman. It’s an almost equally hellish thing to be abandoned by a madman of a different stripe, who leads the most powerful nation in the world, and yet deceitfully continues to blame the victim for starting the war in the first place.

—Dana

149 Responses to “A Few Observations About Trump Calling Zelensky a “Dictator” and Other Dumbassery”

  1. Hello.

    Dana (56aa6a)

  2. ooof, that Truth Social post was rough.

    Yeah, he’s blaming the girl with a too short skirt here.

    Hopefully Rubio and Kellogg can be the “good cop” enough for Trump to walk it back.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  3. Hopefully Rubio and Kellogg can be the “good cop” enough for Trump to walk it back.

    whembly (b7cc46) — 2/19/2025 @ 12:11 pm

    Rather than walking it back, they will probably find a way to defend it in softer language. They don’t make policy, they merely implement whatever Trump says. He’s the boss.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  4. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-polls-2033036

    A SurveyUSA poll of 2,000 adults showed that a majority (51 percent) said they approve of Trump’s job as president. A total of 45 percent said they disapprove, giving Trump a net approval score of plus 6 points.

    When broken down further, the results show Trump has stronger approval ratings in rural areas (59 percent) than in suburban (48 percent) and urban areas (51 percent).

    The SurveyUSA poll was conducted between February 13 and 16, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.

    A Morning Consult poll, also released Tuesday, showed that 50 percent of voters approve of the job Trump is doing as president, compared to 47 percent who disapprove.

    In other results.

    No reason to walk back anything. It’s important to make clear what our goals are.

    NJRob (492de5)

  5. No reason to walk back anything. It’s important to make clear what our goals are.

    So you don’t find anything wrong or inaccurate with what Trump said?

    And what do you think are Trump’s goals?

    Dana (cbe6d5)

  6. No reason to walk back anything. It’s important to make clear what our goals are.

    I think it’s pretty clear, it’s openly stated and you want it.

    You want to ally with Russia, China, et all.

    You want to invade Panama, force Canada to become part of the US, force Greenland to become part of the us.

    You want NATO to fail.

    You want Ukraine to cease to exist.

    You want China to invade Taiwan.

    You want to destroy America’s healthcare system.

    You want to destroy America’s military.

    Basically, you think it’s hilarious to switch sides in the world. Instead of being a good guy, you think it’s funny that now we’re on the side of the bad guys.

    Cool story bro.

    Just a bunch of wannabes, really curious about all the great ideas of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, just a bunch of great leaders.

    All the best people.

    MAGAts, not quite mature enough to be the flies flitting around to different piles of shyte; just crawling around under this one pile not bothering to wondering why there’s a giant orange jeebus ring doing the public WC hover over them.

    Colonel Klink (ret) (96f56a)

  7. To be loud and boisterous to suck all the oxygen out of the room then to allow his people to negotiate and come back to him with a plan.

    NJRob (492de5)

  8. I want to hear him say that.

    NJRob, what you said is t very clear. Can you be specific like Klink? Which of those items he’s listed do you disagree with?

    Dana (dc6d2c)

  9. @6 Not NJRob… but I think I have the pulse of MAGA voters.

    I think it’s pretty clear, it’s openly stated and you want it.

    You want to ally with Russia, China, et all.

    Wanting the Ukraine/Russian war to end doesn’t mean Trump wants to ally Russia/China.

    It’s truly a myopic outlook.

    You want to invade Panama, force Canada to become part of the US, force Greenland to become part of the us.

    “invade” and “force” is doing a herculean lift here.

    You want NATO to fail.

    Demanding that NATO countries spends more on the alliance does not mean Trump wants the alliance to fail.

    You’re presuming that these countries would RATHER have NATO fail because they’d rather NOT increase spending and essentially call the US’ bluff.

    Frankly, if that’s their attitude, maybe we should reconsider the alliance and reform a new one.

    You want Ukraine to cease to exist.

    Again, wanting cessation of hostilities doesn’t necessarily mean “Ukraine ceases to exist”.

    You want China to invade Taiwan.

    Where are you getting this? This seems like some parade of horribles being pulled from your nether regions.

    You want to destroy America’s healthcare system.

    Destroy what now?

    You want to destroy America’s military.

    lol. Insane.

    Basically, you think it’s hilarious to switch sides in the world. Instead of being a good guy, you think it’s funny that now we’re on the side of the bad guys.

    Cool story bro.

    Your TDSism is on display here.

    Just a bunch of wannabes, really curious about all the great ideas of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, just a bunch of great leaders.

    All the best people.
    Colonel Klink (ret) (96f56a) — 2/19/2025 @ 1:10 pm

    …and the inevitable Godwin’ed this thread.

    Good job.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  10. I’m stuck in moderation… I think it’s because I used the acronym of Tango Delta Sierra…?

    whembly (b7cc46)

  11. I think Klink is insane and his Nazi gimmick has gone on too long.

    I don’t waste time with his over the top garbage.

    NJRob (492de5)

  12. talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won

    What he talked the United States into doing was preventing a defeat.

    As for the war not being able to be won, Ukraine always claimed that if they got more weapons quickly or had a no-fly zone they would do better.

    Maybe there is no plan, but then Israel has been said to have no plan for victory in Gaza. But the alternative is unacceptable. And they may yet get it – it’ll need Arab states to persuade Hamas to leave. Or Iran to do it.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  13. I don’t pay attention to every tweet for the same reason I don’t watch TikTok.

    It’s a waste of time and brain matter.

    NJRob (492de5)

  14. To pull off his pull up; to smear the contents all over his playroom; to have Nanny give him him a nice bath and dress him in a fresh pull up and a cute little sailor suit; to have the maids clean up his playroom throwing away all the smeared toys; and to have Mommy buy him all new toys and kiss him and tell him what a wonderful little man he is.

    nk (04b9c3)

  15. A Dictator without Elections,

    There is a Parliament, and the Ukrainian constitution prevents an election under martial law. Most countries don’t have general elections in the middle of a war. Great Britain did not during World War II. Of course that was in a Parliamentary system

    Donald Trump doesn’t like public criticism

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  16. The United States has spent $200 Billion Dollars more than Europe,

    The United States benefitted, or can potentially benefit from much cheaper military technology developed by Ukraine.

    Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.

    Is that a threat to betray Ukraine? It’s probably just a general threat by Trump as he wouldn’t want to be seen as a contemporary Neville Chamberlain. Trump wants to end this like the Korean War.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  17. [The share of Americans who disapprove of his presidency has risen more substantially, to 51% in the latest poll, compared with 41% right after he took office.]

    The MAGAsphere keeps on saying he has an approval rating of 53%, higher than anything he had in his first presidency. Of course that’s an early poll and also won’t last as he goes on doing things and especially if he betrays Ukraine.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  18. he fails to mention that the war could end RIGHT NOW if Putin just stopped doing what he is doing.

    That would be a a ceasefire in place, which Zelensky opposes.

    There at least has to be a Russian demobilization with Ukraine continuing to have the capacity to defend itself.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  19. Rubio sort of walked back the Gaza plan, saying to Arab states if that’s no good, what’s your plan? They are working frantically to get rid of Hamas Gaza – and all h??? meant, at a minimum, that there would be an attempt to kill their leadership there and they went back into hiding and are to release hostages faster.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  20. @17

    The MAGAsphere keeps on saying he has an approval rating of 53%, higher than anything he had in his first presidency. Of course that’s an early poll and also won’t last as he goes on doing things and especially if he betrays Ukraine.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:00 pm

    Yeah, I’m not sure I believe that poll.

    Sure seems like it’s a “honeymoon” bump because America avoided a Harris/Walz administration.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  21. Impeach him.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  22. Munich 1938.

    asset (a455fc)

  23. @19

    Rubio sort of walked back the Gaza plan, saying to Arab states if that’s no good, what’s your plan? They are working frantically to get rid of Hamas Gaza – and all h??? meant, at a minimum, that there would be an attempt to kill their leadership there and they went back into hiding and are to release hostages faster.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:08 pm

    Egypt is leading an Arab coalition in early March to see if they can hammer something out.

    Seems like they only jumped when Trump offered to acquire Gaza and turn it into the Taj Mahal of the Mediterranean.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  24. @21

    Impeach him.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:09 pm

    Good luck.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  25. I thought I heard 53% but it might be 51% Also the people who say they are Democrats vs Republics was plus 5 Democrats in 2017, they say. plus 6 Democrats in 2021 and now plus two Republicans. This does not look at neither.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  26. Rubio should resign. See who takes the job next. MTG?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  27. Good luck.

    Impeach him again and again until they vote to convict.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  28. 22% of voters approve congressional democrats job performance. (ace cnn)

    asset (a455fc)

  29. Rubio sort of walked back the Gaza plan, saying to Arab states if that’s no good, what’s your plan?

    Rubio also has said that Gazans wouldn’t be permanently relocated, only to shot down by the Boss. What Rubio says is worthless.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  30. whembly (b7cc46) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:11 pm

    Seems like they only jumped when Trump offered to acquire Gaza and turn it into the Taj Mahal of the Mediterranean.

    Well it is actually when he threatened to have Israel resume bombing and an offensive.

    Trump said he wanted no U.S. forces engaged. It was basically to have Gaza handed over to the United States. It came across as: OK you don’t want an Israeli occupation and you don’t have any Arab rule proposed so the United States will volunteer.

    And if you don’t like it, what’s your idea? But Hamas cannot rule or have a military presence in Gaza and neither can the Palestinian Authority in its current condition (as if it could even hold onto it)

    They’ve got Hamas talking about a unity government or a technocratic government, so there’s movement, and they are even freeing two Israelis held for ten years (emotionally disturbed people who went into Gaza)

    Israel has offered free passage to exile for the Hamas top leadership and even money for the release of all hostages.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  31. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraines-military-urges-tough-response-after-attacks-draft-officers-2025-02-03/

    Summary
    -Army draft officer shot dead in central Ukraine on Friday
    -Explosions reported at two draft offices over weekend
    -Ukraine army chief demands thorough investigations
    -Incidents pile pressure on troubled call-up campaign
    KYIV, Feb 3 (Reuters) – Ukraine’s army chief condemned on Monday a spate of violent attacks on draft officers, rallying in defence of a national call-up effort that has fuelled anger among some Ukrainians and struggled to generate sufficient frontline manpower.

    The incidents, including the fatal shooting of a draft officer and explosions at two draft offices in three days, pile pressure on an already-troubled national campaign to draft civilians despite faltering enthusiasm for service.

    While we can expect Russian disinformation and provocateur having a hand, it seems that public support in general for the mobilization is seriously waning.

    Here’s the thing… almost every war in history had ended with a negotiated peace. It’s the logical, most humane way to end a war. You fight for awhile and then you sit down and end it.

    The only other alternatives is to prolong the war that depletes national treasures and lives, or one side totally conquers the other side.

    Franly, the issue isn’t NATO, really… it’s the UN.

    Russia is a permanent member of the UN.

    Does Europe (and the US for that matter) kick Russia out of UN? Or, disband the entity and create a NEO-UN w/o Russia?

    whembly (b7cc46)

  32. @27

    Good luck.

    Impeach him again and again until they vote to convict.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:14 pm

    Cool, let’s make the impeachment process even more of a mockery.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  33. Good luck.

    Impeach him again and again until they vote to convict.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:14 pm

    As I have noted, it is unlikely that Speaker Johnson would allow an impeachment resolution to go to the floor because the House Republicans support what the President is doing. I don’t see any Republicans joining the Democrats to do so either.

    Good luck is right.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  34. Rip Murdock (d2a2a8) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:19 pm

    What Rubio says is worthless.

    Bot everything he says is shot down, and if he gets acceptable results, Trump ill approve/

    Now what Trump wants in Ukraine is an ending like the Korean War, which was talked about (in newspaper columns) during the Biden Administration.

    Better in fact, as Putin’s family will not rule for 70 plus years more, and if they did they’d want better relations with Ukraine and Europe.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  35. It’s a waste of time and brain matter.

    I will pass on the obvious response.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  36. Russia is a permanent member of the UN.

    Then kill the thing. Veto everything, including the agenda and time to meet.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  37. Meanwhile two wars are almost being ignored: The civil war in Sudan and the war in northeast Congo with which Rwanda is involved.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  38. the House Republicans support what the President is doing.

    I very much doubt that, at least on this issue. Over 100 GOP congressfolk and 31 GOP Senators voted for the last Ukraine aid bill.

    How pissed off are they?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  39. Meanwhile two wars are almost being ignored

    Both sides bad.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  40. @36

    Russia is a permanent member of the UN.

    Then kill the thing. Veto everything, including the agenda and time to meet.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:29 pm

    I wouldn’t put it pass Trump if things don’t go his way with Russia/Ukraine.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  41. Look, here’s my 30,000 ft view.

    His approach is to loudly berate and threaten the weaker party while quietly pressuring the stronger party so that they can save face (he just did the same thing with Israel and Hamas).

    To those who believes Trump wants Putin to win because he likes him…

    If that’s the case, he could announce that he oppose all US aid to Ukraine in any form or even arms sales, then.

    If Zelensky keeps airing is grievance like this, I wouldn’t be too shocked that it would happen tho.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  42. The man punches down.

    If Zelensky keeps airing is grievance like this

    You make an incredible effort to find a way to avoid changing your opinion.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  43. @42 Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:51 pm
    Are you new?

    Trump wallows in the mud.

    He punches in every direction…

    whembly (b7cc46)

  44. New polling:

    “An overwhelming majority of voters (81 percent) think the United States should not trust Russian President Vladimir Putin, while 9 percent think the United States should trust him.”

    Dana (f2a888)

  45. Whembly and all commenters,

    Unless TDS is being used ironically, your comments will remain in moderation, per the boss.

    Dana (978aa9)

  46. My view is that on February 25, 2022, when Russian troops blitzkrieged Kyiv, the Ukrainians, knowing nothing about what help they would get from the rest of the world, decided that if the Russians wanted their country they would have to buy it with blood.

    The war will end when the Ukrainians lose that determination or when the Russians decide that they have shed enough blood.

    Mind must be firmer, heart the more fierce,
    Courage the greater, as our strength
    diminishes — Battle of Maldon poem fragment

    The Saxons knew that surrender to the Vikings was worse than death in battle. Will the Ukrainians feel the same way?

    nk (04b9c3)

  47. the House Republicans support what the President is doing.

    I very much doubt that, at least on this issue. Over 100 GOP congressfolk and 31 GOP Senators voted for the last Ukraine aid bill.

    How pissed off are they?

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/19/2025 @ 2:33 pm

    Apparently not very much, as few Republicans who voted to support Ukrainian aid are complaining publicly about Trump’s and Vance’s comments.

    As President Trump makes an abrupt pivot toward Russia, upending generations of American foreign policy, he is also defying members of his own party in Congress, many of whom have spent their careers arguing for a hawkish stance against Moscow and strong backing for allies in Europe facing its most immediate threats.

    But the response from Republicans on Capitol Hill has been muted, in some cases to the point of silence. There has been little G.O.P. pushback on Mr. Trump’s efforts to draw closer to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia or blame Ukraine as he seeks to bring a quick end to the war that began when Russia invaded the country.

    While some Republicans have expressed dismay at Mr. Trump’s moves and statements, there has been no concerted effort to challenge him from G.O.P. leaders or senators who play pivotal roles in overseeing military and foreign policy in Congress.

    “Right now, you have got to give him some space,” Senator John Thune, the South Dakota Republican and majority leader, said at a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday after a closed-door Senate lunch with Vice President JD Vance.

    …………A few senators expressed a desire to use at least part of the time to press Mr. Vance about Mr. Trump’s apparent willingness to abandon American allies, draw nearer to Mr. Putin and denounce President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine as a “dictator.”

    But when the time came, the topic did not come up, according to several attendees.
    …………
    Even Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former party leader who worked to establish himself as a principal Republican voice in support of Ukraine and a counterweight to Mr. Trump’s “America First” approach to foreign policy, has remained publicly silent in the face of the president’s move toward Russia.

    It is a striking turn for Republicans, who for decades defined themselves as the party of a strong defense and argued that the United States had a pivotal role to play as a beacon of freedom and defender of democracies around the globe.
    …………
    A year ago, nearly two dozen Republican senators defied Mr. Trump’s wishes and voted in favor of continuing to send tens of billions of dollars in military and other aid to Ukraine to fight off Russia. Few of those lawmakers have spoken out against his current stance, and those who have mostly offered carefully worded criticism aimed at Mr. Putin — but not Mr. Trump.
    …………
    When asked if she supported the idea of Mr. Trump holding an in-person meeting with the Russian president, Senator Joni Ernst, Republican of Iowa, simply shrugged her shoulders.

    Last year, Ms. Ernst was among the contingent of Republicans who voted in favor of sending billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine. At the time, she said her support was to project American strength on the world stage, something she said President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was not doing.

    “By strengthening and equipping America to push back against our adversaries’ aggression, Congress has stepped up to do the job this president will not,” Ms. Ernst said in a statement then.
    ………..

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  48. 44. No one in their right mind trusts him.

    But no deal is going to be done without him. If you want a deal with someone you can’t stand, you don’t sart by telling him how much you detest him. You don’t insult him like Biden did the Saudi guy, only to eat crow when he wanted more oil pumped. You try to get him to the table, like FDR did with Stalin. Like Nixon did with the USSR guys.

    Like ordering from a French waiter, you don’t say “when are you going to pay your war debts?” (Did no one here deal with cliques in high school?)

    You definitely impress on the squeaky wheel, like we reminded the South Vietnamese, that w/o us they are toast, and to go along because we are not in for the duration if they are going to be unreasonable. And yes, acting like we will fund this for a decade is unreasonable.

    It would be nice if Ukraine had limitless soldiers. If Russia didn’t have nukes, and NATO was not stuffed with laison officers with no combat experience. (and if bravado was a precursor to military readiness). But this is real world.

    Trump is acting in the real world. Just as he was in 2018 when he hectored NATO to beef up their military budgets and was excoriated for that.

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd (0c349e)

  49. If Russia didn’t have nukes

    Nukes will never matter. Use one, might as well use them all because they won’t be there in 30 minutes.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  50. WSJ:

    Last week Mr. Trump said Ukraine can’t join NATO and must give up much of its territory to Russia—concessions to Mr. Putin with nothing in return. Mr. Putin’s response this week has been more drone attacks on Ukraine. And here we thought Mr. Trump doesn’t like being played.

    The better strategy than beating up Ukraine is making clear to Mr. Putin the arms and pressure he’ll face if the Russian doesn’t wind down the war to accept a durable peace. As it stands now, Mr. Trump’s seeming desperation for a deal is a risk to Ukraine, Europe, U.S. interests—and his own Presidency.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  51. 49: Can’t agree: using theatre-grade nuclear weapons has been toyed with for years, even by the US. 10-1 that P would use one before slinking home to defeat, as some naively think he might. Or to force a defeat.

    No NATO power would react to use of a “small” nuke by letting theirs fly–that’s nuts. No US president would risk Seattle and NY for Kiev.

    Too bad NATO didn’t beef up their air forces etc when they had a chance before 2022.

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd (0c349e)

  52. Russia is wining.
    Ukraine is loosing.

    Nobody is willing to pay the price to change that.
    Given that its better to end it now.

    Joe (584b3d)

  53. Update to post:

    It should also be noted that all parties considering a run in the next presidential election agree that the next election shouldn’t take place until six months after Martial law is lifted.

    Dana (809871)

  54. Ukrainian MP Lesia Vasylenko, “I’m an opposition MP.. Still we are speaking with one voice”

    Krishnan Guru-Murthy, “Would you describe Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a dictator?”

    Lesia Vasylenko, “We are living in martial law because Russia has attacked Ukraine.. We have no choice but to live in martial law to protect ourselves”

    “If President Zelensky a dictator? No”

    “He is a president of a free democratic country which is fighting for its survival”

    Dana (eaaf2e)

  55. 11 year old texas girl commits suicide after being bullied in school about being deported with other students pretending to arrest her for deportation. (DU CNN)

    asset (5e7699)

  56. This is exactly how duplicitous Putin is, and Trump bought it hook, line and sinker.
    Yes, Putin had an election, a sham election because he jailed and killed his opposition.

    The one person preventing Ukraine from having another election isn’t Zelenskyy, it’s Putin, because Putin invaded, forcing the Ukrainian parliament to declare martial law. Under their constitution, elections cannot take place while the country is under martial law.

    If Putin or Trump were honest about wanting democracy in Ukraine, Putin would end his unjustified, illegitimate unlawful invasion, and Trump would be calling for Putin to end his unjustified, illegitimate unlawful invasion.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  57. Russia is wining.
    Ukraine is loosing.

    In October 2022, Putin occupied 17.6% of Ukraine. Today, he occupies 18.1% (link). Sounds more to me like a quagmire for Putin, not “wining”.
    Putin is evil, and Trump just put himself on the side of evil.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  58. Regarding the Ukrainian constitution…

    These regularly scheduled elections were disrupted by the state of martial law declared in 2022, at the start of the full-scale Russian invasion. This can be expected from a country fighting for its very existence, where significant portions of its territory are occupied. Martial law is established as a concept in the Ukrainian Constitution and last updated by the national legislature in 2015, before Zelensky entered politics.

    Article 83 of the Ukrainian Constitution states that if the term of the Verkhovna Rada expires under martial law, it shall automatically be extended until a new Rada is seated following the end of martial law. Article 19 of Ukraine’s martial law legislation specifically forbids conducting national elections. Thus, for Ukraine to conduct elections while under martial law would be a violation of legal norms that predate Zelensky and the full-scale Russian invasion.

    Kox acknowledged this in a subsequent conversation with Olha Aivazovska, the head of Ukraine’s top election watchdog, stating that “it is clear that [Ukraine’s] constitution does not allow you to organize elections when martial law is applicable.”

    Trump’s complaining about Ukrainian elections, which mirrors Putin’s concern trolling about Ukrainian, is Russian duplicity that would make any KGB proud.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  59. If Zelensky keeps airing is grievance like this, I wouldn’t be too shocked that it would happen tho.

    This blaming the victim business is contemptible.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  60. Just like it’s too late for McConnell to go against Trump after refusing to convict him, it’s too late for a coward like Thom Tillis to go against Trump after confirming the fully unqualified Tulsi for DNI. Even McConnell and Tillis are right currently, but history won’t be kind to either…

    GOP Sen. Tillis with strong pushback after Trump attacks on Zelenskyy:

    “There is no more equivalency between Vladimir Putin and President Zelenskyy. President Putin is evil, and he has to be stopped”

    “Vladimir Putin is a murderous dictator who started this war, ordered the occupation, and now the souls of 10s of 1000s of Ukrainians are lost on his watch.”

    “He has lied every step of the way, and I believe any resolution in Ukraine that makes him feel like he won or just pushed to a tie is a bad idea.”

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  61. Eh. Even though McConnell and Tillis…

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  62. Here’s some real truth from a front-line Ukrainian freedom fighter.

    Bully Putin whispers into Bully Trump’s ear, and they both agree that it’s all Zelenskyy’s fault, the victim’s fault.

    That’s how BizarroWorld this all is, as Trump has now just joined Putin on the side of evil, on the side of war crimes, on the side terrorist attacks, on the side of mass child abductions, on the side of unprovoked, unjustifed unlawful invasions.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  63. Hey Dan, you’ve been chumped by your president, so what are going to do about this betrayal?

    Dan Crenshaw: “There is absolutely no way that Donald Trump will be seen — he will not let himself go down in history as having sold out to Putin. He will not let that happen.” (Bookmark this one.)

    Oh, it’s bookmarked, that Trump just pulled a Helsinki 2.0, only the stakes are monumentally worse in 2025.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  64. Trump is the Baddie, therefore America, my country, is the Baddie, and it pisses me off to no end…

    The rap on Americans is that they don’t care about foreign policy unless and until U.S. boots are on the ground. They care about domestic policy because it bears on them directly and because the partisan media they consume obsesses about it, particularly its cultural flashpoints. But foreign policy? The conflicts, combatants, and issues at stake are too distant and esoteric to keep track of. Who cares?

    What I think Americans do care about, though, is their belief that the United States isn’t just a force for good in the world, it’s the force for good.

    How could they not? It’s a bedrock conviction of every child of the Cold War (except the one in the White House, oddly). The United States was a bulwark of freedom against Nazism, then against communism, then against jihadism. Totalitarian scumbags of every stripe eventually find themselves at odds with Uncle Sam because we oppose their programs of subjugation. Americans are proud of that, and should be.

    We’re the good guys. Which is a problem for Donald Trump’s plans for Ukraine.

    Ukraine’s war is the exception to the rule about foreign policy in that it’s not esoteric at all. Nothing could be simpler than the moral equities involved in a fascist power invading a smaller neighbor and attempting to pulverize it into submission. The fascist power in this case is an American enemy of long standing; its leader exudes the sort of cartoonish malevolence typically seen in movie villains; and the war it’s waging is against the entire population, up to and including kidnapping the other side’s children.

    That other side has fought gallantly, against long odds. Its highest ambition is simply to join the United States in an alliance in hopes of keeping its neighbor’s boot off its neck.

    I think it will be very hard under those circumstances, even for a salesman as practiced as Trump, to convince Americans that their sense of good and bad in Ukraine is scrambled. It’s one thing to argue that the U.S. can no longer afford to support Kyiv. It’s another to argue, as the president has now begun to do, that Ukrainians are responsible for the war and are the chief obstacle to peace.

    Trump and his allies have been remarkably successful at muddying the moral waters around domestic matters like presidential elections, separation of powers, and, soon, the authority of judicial rulings. On any given night you can turn on Fox News and find some rich degenerate arguing semi-intelligibly that we don’t live in a democracy unless the president gets to do whatever he wants. Too many modern Americans lack the civic foundation and basic constitutional knowledge to see through postliberal political sophistry. If Trump attains dictatorial power, he’ll do so having convinced half the population that the Founders would have wanted it that way in the name of “saving the country.”

    But the MAGA movement hasn’t done as well at persuading Americans that the bad guys abroad aren’t actually bad. The degree of difficulty is too high: No amount of sophistry can obscure the wickedness Russia has practiced in Ukraine, even to otherwise docile Republicans in Congress and Trump toadies in right-wing media. Despite the best efforts of authoritarian “ass-lickers” like Tucker Carlson, a poll taken last year found Putin’s favorable rating in the United States down to 8 percent, lower than it was in 2022 when the war began.

    Ukraine versus Russia is basic, basic good-versus-evil stuff. The president is asking Americans to take sides with evil—to help make the world safe for autocracy, to borrow a phrase.

    How will voters weaned on the idea that their country is a force for good react to seeing their leader renounce that idea and buddy up to ruthless villainy?

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  65. When r.w. emerson askrf what H.D. Thoreau was doing in there (jail) Henry david thoreau asked emerson what he was doing out there! Both opposed the mexican war. Pastor Nemoller said it best. What can be done? Ever here of the white rose?

    asset (5e7699)

  66. I think everyone’s misunderstanding this. Trump is an authority and scumbag who loves dictators he’s being complementary.

    He’s probably a little envious, he hates democracy because it doesn’t give him what he wants when he wants. He and many of his supporters look at authoritarian leaders who abuse the power of government to do what they want and punish their enemies with envy, calling Z a dictator is praise for maga.

    Time123 (5733bf)

  67. I’ve started using voice to text for comments. I definitely start need to proofreading them better.

    Time123 (5733bf)

  68. @43 Wembley, you say he punches in every direction, but that doesn’t seem to be true. Trump and many of his supporters don’t punch at Russia. They dropped to their knees.

    Time123 (5733bf)

  69. @64

    Trump is the Baddie, therefore America, my country, is the Baddie, and it pisses me off to no end…

    Nobody was allowed to blame Blinken and Biden for the war. That was un-American, anti-American. Shameful.

    What complete utter hypocrisy… and totally expected.

    lloyd (bb38f5)

  70. The Russia that Trump protects:

    Ukrainian women taken as prisoners of war are being tortured and humiliated by Russian soldiers in a systematic campaign of abuse, survivors have revealed.

    Some have been subjected to cruel degradations, including being forced to march naked in the snow and expose themselves to their captors.

    Their testimonies reveal the brutality with which Moscow’s forces treat the Ukrainians they have captured, providing evidence of what are almost certainly war crimes.

    Dana (024181)

  71. Bringing this here from 2/14 Weekend Open Thread so it doesn’t get lost.

    Bove take’s Sassoon’s letter to the woodshed.

    @45/Dana

    Whembly @ 33,

    My biggest beef was the timing, as strong evidence of partisanship.

    Sassoon’s addressed your point regarding the timing:

    As Mr. Bove’s memo acknowledges, and as he stated in our meeting of January 31, 2025,the Department has no concerns about the conduct or integrity of the line prosecutors whoinvestigated and charged this case, and it does not question the merits of the case itself. Still, it bears emphasis that I have only known the line prosecutors on this case to act with integrity and in the pursuit of justice, and nothing I have learned since becoming U.S. Attorney has demonstrated otherwise. If anything, I have learned that Mr. Williams’s role in the investigation and oversightof this case was even more minimal than I had assumed. The investigation began before Mr. Williams took office, he did not manage the day-to-day investigation, and the charges in this case were recommended or approved by four experienced career prosecutors, the Chiefs of the SDNY Public Corruption Unit, and career prosecutors at the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department. Mr. Williams’s decision to ratify their recommendations does not taint the charging decision. And notably, Adams has not brought a vindictive or selective prosecution motion, nor would one be successful. See United States v. Stewart, 590 F.3d 93, 121-23 (2d Cir. 2009); cf.United States v. Biden, 728 F. Supp. 3d 1054, 1092 (C.D. Cal. 2024) (rejecting argument that political public statements disturb the “‘presumption of regularity’ that attaches to prosecutorialdecisions”).

    Dana (1b0877) — 2/14/2025 @ 12:18 pm

    Here’s Bove’s response:
    https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/letter-from-acting-deputy-attorney-general-emil-bove-iii-us-attorney-for-the-southern

    Ms. Sassoon:

    In response to your refusal to comply with my instruction to dismiss the prosecution of Mayor Eric Adams, I write to notify you of the following:

    First, your resignation is accepted. This decision is based on your choice to continue pursuing a politically motivated prosecution despite an express instruction to dismiss the case. You lost sight of the oath that you took when you started at the Department of Justice by suggesting that you retain discretion to interpret the Constitution in a manner inconsistent with the policies of a democratically elected President and a Senate-confirmed Attorney General.

    Second, you indicated that the prosecution team is aware of your communications with the Justice Department, is supportive of your approach, and is unwilling to comply with the order to dismiss the case. Accordingly, the AUSAs principally responsible for this case are being placed on off-duty, administrative leave1 pending investigations by the Office of the Attorney General2 and the Office of Professional Responsibility, both of which will also evaluate your conduct. At the conclusion of these investigations, the Attorney General will determine whether termination or some other action is appropriate.

    Based on attendance at our recent meetings, I understand the relevant AUSAs to be Hagan Scotten and Derek Wikstrom. If either of these AUSAs wished to comply with my directive but was prohibited from doing so by you or the management of your office, or if these AUSAs wish to make me aware of other mitigating considerations they believe are relevant, they can contact my office directly. The Justice Management Division and EOUSA have taken steps to remove access to electronic devices, and I ask that you and the AUSAs cooperate with those efforts and preserve all electronic and hard copy records relating to this matter whether they are stored on official or personal devices.

    Third, under your leadership, the office has demonstrated itself to be incapable of fairly and impartially reviewing the circumstances of this prosecution. Therefore, the prosecution of Mayor Adams is transferred to the Justice Department, which will file a motion to dismiss the charges pursuant to Rule 48 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. My prior directive regarding no further targeting of Mayor Adams or additional investigative steps related to this matter remains in place.

    I. Background

    On January 20, 2025, in Executive Order 14147, President Trump established the following policy: “It is the policy of the United States to identify and take appropriate action to correct past misconduct by the Federal Government related to the weaponization of law enforcement.” In a February 5, 2025 memorandum setting forth the Department’s general policy regarding zealous advocacy on behalf of the United States, the Attorney General stated:

    [A]ny attorney who because of their personal political views or judgments declines to sign a brief or appear in court, refuses to advance good-faith arguments on behalf of the Administration, or otherwise delays or impedes the Department’s mission will be subject to discipline and potentially termination, consistent with applicable law.

    Your Office was not exempted from the President’s policy or the Attorney General’s memorandum.

    On February 10, 2025, I directed you to dismiss the prosecution of Mayor Adams based on well-founded concerns regarding weaponization, election interference, and the impediments that the case has imposed on Mayor Adams’ ability to govern and cooperate with federal law enforcement to keep New York City safe. My February 10, 2025 memorandum indicated that I acted pursuant to the authorization of the Attorney General. The mechanism for seeking dismissal is Rule 48 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Note 2 to Rule 48 explains that “[t]he rule confers the power to file a dismissal by leave of court on the Attorney General, as well as on the United States attorney, since under existing law the Attorney General exercises ‘general superintendence and direction’ over the United States attorneys.” See 28 U.S.C. § 509 (“All functions of other officers of the Department of Justice and all functions of agencies and employees of the Department of Justice are vested in the Attorney General….”); see also 28 C.F.R. § 0.15(b).

    Prior to issuing the February 10, 2025 memorandum, I reviewed public filings in this matter, and your office’s prosecution memoranda and classified submissions. I met with you and the prosecution team, held a separate meeting that involved you, the prosecution team, and defense counsel, and then met with you privately in my office.3 During those meetings, I invited written submissions from both sides, and I carefully reviewed those submissions. Thus, your recent suggestions about a lack of process around the Justice Department’s decision are not grounded in reality.

    You have not complied with the clear directives in my February 10, 2025 memorandum. Further, you made clear that you did not intend to do so during telephone calls with myself and Chad Mizelle, the Attorney General’s Chief of Staff, on February 11, 2025, as well as in a written submission to the Attorney General that day. You also stated that the prosecution team had reviewed your letter to the Attorney General, and that they would not file a motion to dismiss the case.

    At approximately 1:50 p.m. today, you tendered your resignation via email.

    II. Discussion

    The weaponization finding in my February 10, 2025 memorandum was made pursuant to a policy set forth by President Trump, who is the only elected official in the Executive Branch, in connection with a decision that was authorized by the Senate-confirmed Attorney General of the United States, and entirely consistent with guidance issued by the Attorney General shortly after that confirmation. Your Office has no authority to contest the weaponization finding, or the second independent basis requiring dismissal set forth in my memorandum. The Justice Department will not tolerate the insubordination and apparent misconduct reflected in the approach that you and your office have taken in this matter.

    A. Improper Weaponization

    You are well aware of the Department’s weaponization concerns regarding the handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mayor Adams. Those concerns include behavior that supports, at minimum, unacceptable appearances of impropriety and the politicization of your office. The investigation was accelerated after Mayor Adams publicly criticized President Biden’s failed immigration policies, and led by a former U.S. Attorney with deep connections to the former Attorney General who oversaw the weaponization of the Justice Department. Based on my review and our meetings, the charging decision was rushed as the 2024 Presidential election approached, and as the former U.S. Attorney appears to have been pursuing potential political appointments in the event Kamala Harris won that election.

    After President Trump won the election, in late-December 2024, the former U.S. Attorney launched a personal website—which closely resembles a campaign website—that touts articles about the ongoing prosecution of Mayor Adams with titles such as “U.S. Attorney Damian Williams has come for the kings,” “A mayor, a rapper, a senator, a billionaire: Meet the man who has prosecuted them all,” and “Federal Prosecutor Damian Williams Flexes SDNY Power Against Eric Adams and Sean Combs.” The former U.S. Attorney increased the appearances of impropriety by releasing an op-ed on January 16, 2025 entitled, “An indictment of the sad state of New York government.” In that piece, he disparaged Mayor Adams with the following comment: “America’s most vital city is being led with a broken ethical compass.” The former U.S. Attorney also made what I reasonably interpreted as a reference to himself in that piece when he suggested that there was a need for “elected officials” willing to “disrupt the status quo.

    You did not directly defend the former U.S. Attorney’s behavior in response to a recent defense motion. Nor could you. His actions inappropriately politicized and tainted your office’s prosecution, potentially permanently. Instead of addressing these concerns with the district court, you simply claimed that these actions were “beside the point.” ECF No. 102 at 1. Not true. The actions by the former U.S. Attorney implicate the concerns that President Trump raised in Executive Order 14147, in connection with the prosecution of an elected official “who voiced opposition to the prior administration’s policies.” Id. The fact that the district court denied the defense motion does not establish that continuing the prosecution of Mayor Adams reflects an appropriate exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Similarly, the fact that AUSAs convinced a grand jury to return an indictment based on a one-sided and inherently partial presentation of the evidence does not establish that the case was appropriate at the time, much less that it would be appropriate to continue to pursue the case based on events that occurred after the True Bill was returned.

    The Justice Department will not ignore the fact that the timing of charges authorized by a former U.S. Attorney with apparent political aspirations interferes with Mayor Adams’ ability to run a campaign in the 2025 election. Your reference to the schedule underlying the prosecution of Senator Robert Menendez is not in any way persuasive in light of the evidence-handling issues that arose in connection with that trial. If anything, that experience counsels in favor of more caution in these matters, not less. But the record does not reflect such caution. In October 2024, an AUSA responsible for the prosecution of Mayor Adams represented that the “first batch” of discovery in the case included “about 560 gigabytes” of data. ECF No. 31 at 18. Thus, as a trial date was negotiated, Mayor Adams was faced with an impossible choice between seeking to defend himself at a pre-election trial in the hopes that he could campaign based on exoneration, and taking a reasonable amount of time to review the discovery and prepare his defense at a post-election trial. His acquiescence in the former option does not justify your office’s decision.

    In your letter to the Attorney General, you made the dubious choice to invoke Justice Scalia. As you are likely aware from your professional experience, Justice Scalia fully understood the risks of weaponization and lawfare:

    Nothing is so politically effective as the ability to charge that one’s opponent and his associates are not merely wrongheaded, naive, ineffective, but, in all probability, “crooks.” And nothing so effectively gives an appearance of validity to such charges as a Justice Department investigation and, even better, prosecution.

    Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 713 (1988) (Scalia, J., dissenting). While the former U.S. Attorney is not a special counsel, Justice Scalia’s Morrison dissent aptly summarized the Department’s weaponization concerns here.

    There is also great irony in your invocation of the famous speech by former Attorney General Robert Jackson. His remarks are unquestionably relevant here, but not in the way you have suggested. Jackson warned that “some measure of centralized control” over federal prosecutors was “necessary.” Robert H. Jackson, The Federal Prosecutor, 24 J. Am. Jud. Soc’y 18, 18 (1940). The senior leadership of the Justice Department exercises that control. Moreover, one of Jackson’s concerns was that “the most dangerous power of the prosecutor” arises from the risk that the prosecutor would “pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.” Id. at 19.

    It is in this realm—in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass … that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.

    Id. Regardless of how the investigation of Mayor Adams was initiated, by 2024 your office’s work on the case was extremely problematic in that regard.

    Finally, your suggestion that President Trump should issue a pardon to Mayor Adams reveals that your office’s insubordination is little more than a preference to avoid a duty that you regard as unpleasant and politically inconvenient. Your oath to uphold the Constitution does not permit you to substitute your policy judgment for that of the President or senior leadership of the Justice Department, and you are in no position to suggest that the President exercise his exclusive Article Il authority to make your job easier.

    For all of these reasons, dismissal is necessary in the interests of justice. Your refusal to recognize that fact and comply with my directive has only exacerbated the concerns I raised initially.

    B. Interference With Mayor Adams’ Ability To Govern

    Your objections to the second basis for my February 10, 2025 directive—that the “pending prosecution has unduly restricted Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to illegal immigration and violence crime”—are based on exaggerated claims that further illustrate your office’s inability to grapple with the problems that this case actually presents.

    As a result of the pending prosecution, Mayor Adams is unable to communicate directly and candidly with City officials he is responsible for managing, as well as federal agencies trying to protect the public from national security threats and violent crime. Mayor Adams has been denied a security clearance that limits his access to details of national security issues in the City he was elected to govern and protect. He cannot speak to federal officials regarding imminent security threats to the City. And he cannot fully cooperate with the federal government in the manner he deems appropriate to keep the City and its residents safe. This situation is unacceptable and directly endangers the lives of millions of New Yorkers. My directive to you reflected a determination by the Justice Department that these public safety risks greatly outweigh any interest you have identified. It is not for local federal officials such as yourself, who lack access to all relevant information, to question these judgments within the Justice Department’s chain of command.

    You claim to find my reference to Viktor Bout to be “alarming,” but you have missed the fundamental point. Presidents frequently make policy decisions that the Justice Department is charged with implementing. In connection with the case against Bout, President Biden made a questionable decision to release the “Merchant of Death” from prison. Once the decision was made, it was the responsibility of the Department and your office to execute it. Regardless of anyone’s personal views of the policy choice, an AUSA from your office filed a motion to assist in effectuating the decision. See ECF No. 130, United States v. Bout, No. 08 Cr. 365 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2022). That was your job here, and the job of the AUSAs assigned to the case. You have all violated your oaths by failing to do it. In no valid sense do you uphold the Constitution by disobeying direct orders implementing the policy of a duly elected President, and anyone romanticizing that behavior does a disservice to the nature of this work and the public’s perception of our efforts.

    You have also strained, unsuccessfully, to suggest that some kind of quid pro quo arises from my directive. This is false, as you acknowledged previously in writing. The Justice Department is charged with keeping people safe across the country. Your office’s job is to help keep the City safe. But your actions have endangered it.

    C. Rule 48 Dismissal

    More broadly, you are simply incorrect to contend that there is no “valid” basis to seek dismissal. The contention is a dereliction of your duty to advocate zealously on behalf of the United States.

    The main citation you have offered, United States v. N.V. Nederlandsche Combinatie Voor Chemische Industrie, 428 F. Supp. 114 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), involved a motion based on “expense and inconvenience.” Id. at 117. Those issues are not the drivers of this decision, as you know. Moreover, as you and your team undoubtedly learned during the research that led you to rely on a 57-year-old district court case:

    The government may elect to eschew or discontinue prosecutions for any number of reasons. Rarely will the judiciary overrule the Executive Branch’s exercise of these prosecutorial decisions.

    United States v. Blaszczak, 56 F.4th 230, 238 (2d Cir. 2022). In other words, the Attorney General has “a virtually absolute right” to dismiss this case. United States v. Salim, 2020 WL 2420517, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. 2020). Any judicial discretion conferred by Rule 48(a) is “severely cabined” and likely limited to instances of “bad faith.” United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 863 F.3d 125, 141 (2d Cir. 2017) (cleaned up); see also In re Richards, 213 F.3d 773, 786 (2000) (*[T]he substantive reach of … [R]ule [48] appears to be effectively curtailed by the fact that even if the judge denies the motion to dismiss, there seems to be no way to compel the prosecutor to proceed.”). Accordingly, any concerns that you and your office had about the prospects of a Rule 48 motion were not a valid basis for insubordination.

    D. Additional Issues To Be Addressed

    Finally, and to be clear, while I elected to address two particular dispositive concerns in my February 10, 2025 memorandum, I have many other concerns about this case.

    The case turns on factual and legal theories that are, at best, extremely aggressive. For example, the district court explained that “[i]t is not inconceivable that the Second Circuit or the Supreme Court might, at some point in the future, hold that an ‘official act’ as defined in McDonnell is necessary under § 666, at least as to government actors.” ECF No. 68 at 18-19. The district court also acknowledged that there is “some force” to Mayor Adams’ challenges to the office’s quo theories in the case. The “thing[s] of value” in this case are campaign contributions, which require heightened proof under McCormick, as the office knows from the challenges you encountered in connection with the decision to dismiss the Benjamin case.

    There is also questionable behavior reflected in certain of the prosecution team’s decisions, which will be addressed in the forthcoming investigations. Witnesses in the case do not appear to have been treated in a manner that is consistent with your claims about the seriousness of your allegations against Mayor Adams. It is my understanding that, around the time the charges were filed, the prosecution team made representations to defense counsel regarding Mayor Adams’ status in the investigation that are inconsistent with the Justice Manual’s definitions of “target” and “subject.” Justice Manual § 9-11.151. In the same period, despite having already started to draft a prosecution memo proposing to charge Mayor Adams, the prosecution team invited Mayor Adams to a proffer—in effect, baiting him to make unprotected statements after the line prosecutors had already decided to try to move forward with the case.

    * * *

    I take no pleasure in imposing these measures, initiating investigations, and requiring personnel from the Justice Department to come to your District to do work that your team should have done and was required to do. In this instance, however, that is what is necessary to continue the process of reconciliation and restoration of the Department of Justice’s core values, as the Attorney General explained on February 5, 2025.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  72. @45

    Whembly and all commenters,

    Unless TDS is being used ironically, your comments will remain in moderation, per the boss.

    Dana (978aa9) — 2/19/2025 @ 3:11 pm

    Roger that.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  73. A Tesla Showroom has been SH0T UP in Oregon, per local media

    This is the SECOND criminal incident at this location in recent weeks, as they were also the victims of an ARSON attack on January 20.

    THIS is the result of Democrats and legacy media calling Elon Musk “HitIer.”

    SOMEONE IS GOING TO BE KlLLED.

    Also this month, “protestors” put stickers on the windows of another Tesla showroom in New York saying “KlLL ELON MUSK.”

    THIS NEEDS TO STOP. Authorities need to make a VERY clear example out of these criminals.

    Just a reminder who the real Nazis are and their marching orders.

    NJRob (eb56c3)

  74. @68

    @43 Wembley, you say he punches in every direction, but that doesn’t seem to be true. Trump and many of his supporters don’t punch at Russia. They dropped to their knees.

    Time123 (5733bf) — 2/20/2025 @ 5:00 am

    I dunno where you’re getting this from, but from my circles at home and online, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

    We all realize that Putin is *the* bad guy in this scenario.

    The debate, if you will, is how much we should be involved. There’s this resigned exasperation from supporters *I* know that it seems like the US is expected to be the tip of the spear in that conflict. It’s tiring that it appears that the EU isn’t matching the rhetoric with actual funding/materials. The US shouldn’t be nearly doubling Ukrainian war efforts. The EU should be the ones doubling that of the US’ efforts, as it is in their back yard.

    Those are valid concerns and are NOT “dropping their knees to Putin”.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  75. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/hamas-holds-deranged-rally-to-celebrate-handover-of-bibas-family-bodies/
    That further cements my position that Israel needs to do whatever possible to get the remaining hostages and then destroy all of Hamas.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  76. whembly (b7cc46) — 2/20/2025 @ 7:12 am

    Well, the boss isn’t always right. But he’s always the boss. — Rudolf Abel (portrayal), Bridge of Spies (2015)

    nk (7727c6)

  77. @71 whembly, given the available information do you believe the DOJs statement is credible and consistent with past practices?

    Time123 (424bb0)

  78. How will voters weaned on the idea that their country is a force for good react to seeing their leader renounce that idea and buddy up to ruthless villainy?

    No comment on the voters, but it prompts me to look at Putin’s point of view:

    — Putin’s grandfather fought in the Revolution which overthrew the Czar and was a member of Stalin’s household staff;
    — Trump’s grandfather lost his Bavarian citizenship for draft evasion and ran a brothel for gold miners in the Klondike.
    — Putin’s father was a Chekist (NKVD/MVD/KGB) who was very likely presumed dead (KIA or purged) at Putin’s birth for Putin to have been named after him;
    — Trump’s father was a WWII and post-War profiteer who left Donnie a sizeable trust fund.
    — Putin rose to the rank of KGB colonel during the Cold War and navigated the post-Soviet chaos to become Czar of Russia;
    — Trump … well we know what he navigated and what he became.

    What would Putin feel like if he let the likes of Trump get the best of him in what may be the capstone of his and his family’s legacy?

    nk (7727c6)

  79. The voters! Pah! The voters don’t know sh!t from Shinola.

    nk (7727c6)

  80. The voters! Pah! The voters don’t know sh!t from Shinola.
    nk (7727c6) — 2/20/2025 @ 8:16 am

    “Save Democracy”

    lloyd (e8ec7c)

  81. The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.

    nk (7727c6)

  82. “And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”

    lloyd (62b299)

  83. At least “democracy” is a time-honored word even when misused.

    “Weaponization” is a Trumpie neologism for crooks getting caught. (Trumpologism?)

    What is the criminal justice system if not a weapon? A sword and a shield for the protection of society.

    Or is it supposed to be used only against inner city teens shoplifting soap and shampoo from Walgreens?

    nk (7727c6)

  84. using theatre-grade nuclear weapons has been toyed with for years, even by the US

    Yet we did not use them in Vietnam, we did not use them at Tora Bora to kill Bin Ladin, and the Russians never used them in Afghanistan either. We won’t use them in Iran and we won’t use them in WW3 either. Nor will the Russians.

    They are Samson-in-the-temple weapons, to be used if attacked with them, or if the bosses are so effing brain-dead that it’s their last Hail-Satan play.

    Sure there is always someone who say it’s a good idea. Does not make it a good idea.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  85. He punches in every direction…

    Often his own chin.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  86. @71:

    How about implementing a “more” function for long posts.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  87. “He is a president of a free democratic country which is fighting for its survival”

    And what is Trump president of? It looks like a once-great nation consumed by self.

    Thankfully, the boys of Pointe du Hoc are all dead now or it would kill them.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  88. I dunno where you’re getting this from, but from my circles at home and online

    Problem identified.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  89. The voters! Pah! The voters don’t know sh!t from Shinola.

    The midterms are going to suck for the GOP.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  90. Nobody was allowed to blame Blinken and Biden for the war. That was un-American, anti-American. Shameful.

    Still is.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  91. Thankfully, the boys of Pointe du Hoc are all dead now or it would kill them.
    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 9:30 am

    How humbling that you would speak for them.

    lloyd (62b299)

  92. WWII ended in total victory, with half of Europe under the Communist thumb. Including Ukraine and Poland. So, keep making those WWII analogies.

    lloyd (62b299)

  93. Trump won the election by convincing the center that he was a less radical option than Harris. One month after taking office he has shown that was not so.

    The 2026 Senate elections will be interesting. Will MAGA still have enough power to control the primaries, or will they be declining and Trump opponents growing? Trump is burning through political capital at an amazing rate. Will he have more than his Trumpbot supporters left?

    A preference cascade is a terrible thing.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  94. WWII ended in total victory, with half of Europe under the Communist thumb. Including Ukraine and Poland. So, keep making those WWII analogies.

    1) None of it ended up under Nazi rule.
    2) How did that work out for the USSR?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  95. How humbling that you would speak for them.

    How annoying that appeasers would be offended.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  96. I’m marveling at the bravery and courage of those heirs of Pointe du Hoc valor who have the balls to send other people’s money and other people’s sons into the meat grinder.

    lloyd (62b299)

  97. New documentary on Netflix about Black Hawk Down. Illuminating for the armchair gung ho war crowd.

    lloyd (62b299)

  98. Mark Levin is not a fan of Trump’s Ukraine comments.

    Here’s a question: when will Russia hold a real election, without Putin’s opponents disappearing?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  99. I’m marveling at the bravery and courage of those heirs of Pointe du Hoc valor who have the balls to send other people’s money and other people’s sons into the meat grinder.

    I’m amazed at the cowardice and self-centeredness of folks who will abandon an ally because The Leader is still pissed about a phone call 6 years ago.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  100. Nineteen Eighty-Four was a cautionary tale, not a users manual.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  101. Haley admonishes Trump for Ukraine stance: ‘Exactly what Putin wants’

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  102. Wonder shat South Koreans are thinking. Is Trump going to side with Kim Jong Un and say that South Korea was responsible for the Korean War? Then pull out our troops?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  103. My spellcheck didn’t flag that.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  104. McConnell hangs ’em up.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 10:03 am

    Haley admonishes Trump for Ukraine stance: ‘Exactly what Putin wants’

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 10:09 am

    Two people who have absolutely no influence.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  105. Kevin, I’m glad to know that “shat” made it through the filter.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  106. I’ve started using voice to text for comments. I definitely start need to proofreading them better.

    I’m using a pre-launch tool instead of the Siri/Gemini. Seamless from Meta is a pretty cool tool, and there are a number of projects on github that leverage the model for specific functionality, like vtt.

    Colonel Klink (ret) (96f56a)

  107. The EU should be the ones doubling that of the US’ efforts, as it is in their back yard.

    whembly (b7cc46) — 2/20/2025 @ 7:21 am

    On military aid, Europe’s support of EUR 62 billion ($65B) is on a similar level to that of the United States, which has allocated EUR 64 billion ($67B). in total. However, Europe has long surpassed the US when it comes to financial and humanitarian aid allocations (EUR 70 billion vs. 50 billion ($73B v. $52B). Total aid allocations by all donor governments to Ukraine amount to EUR 267 billion ($280B) as of Dec 2024, or about EUR 80 billion per year.
    ………
    Germany is the single most important donor, providing EUR 17 ($19B) billion in total, closely followed by the UK with EUR 15 billion ($16B) and Denmark with EUR 8 billion ($8.4B). …..(S)ome donor countries are much larger (in terms of GDP) than others. ………The data show that the Baltic and Nordic states have allocated the highest share of aid as a percentage of their pre-war GDP. Estonia and Denmark, for example, have allocated over 2.5% of their 2021 GDP, and Lithuania and Latvia around 2%. These shares include both bilateral aid and aid channeled through the various EU donor mechanisms………The United States has allocated 0.53% (through December 2024) of its 2021 GDP in bilateral support to Ukraine. ……..If we measure new aid per year, Germany, the UK, and the US have mobilized less than 0.2% of GDP to support Ukraine, while other rich donor countries like France, Italy or Spain only allocated about 0.1% of GDP annually (in each 2022, 2023, and 2024). This is not a major effort…….

    EU institutions have also made $120B in financial commitments.

    Source

    Far more European countries have provided aid to Ukraine as a percentage of their GDP than the US, which ranks 17th at .35% (as of 6/30/24), just below Belgium and above Bulgaria.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  108. Rip, I’m arguing EU should double the US allocation in pure dollar amount. At least.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  109. Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 10:17 am

    Is Trump going to side with Kim Jong Un and say that South Korea was responsible for the Korean War?

    That’s what the Communists said, including American Communists.

    Nobody else.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  110. One of the problems with Donald Trump is that he willing to lie to support political positions he takes. (sometimes worse are the positions themselves that he takes, so I wouldn’t call this the worst problem with Donald Trump.)

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  111. @77

    @71 whembly, given the available information do you believe the DOJs statement is credible and consistent with past practices?

    Time123 (424bb0) — 2/20/2025 @ 8:00 am

    Bove’s?

    Yes, it’s credible. Everything he’s laid out lines up rationally.

    whembly (b7cc46)

  112. That’s what the Communists said, including American Communists.

    Nobody else.

    Back to you, Don

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  113. 108-RIP-Charts like that mislead, like charts that “show” that women do more work for the family because they do more than 50% of the work around the house. Ignoring that Dad goes to work 5 or more days a week, funding the house and all in it, and does work around the house. In 2 parent incomes, Dad is generally the one with the more demanding and high-paying job.

    US ships patrol sea lanes that benefit everyone. US aid provides (aside from USAID), food and military aid, supports Israel’s military, donates billions to the UN, and maintains troops in europe and elsewhere. And the war is in the EU’s own back yard–its absurd that the Eu isn’t doing more. As that crazy man Boris Johnson has noted, the EU needs to step it up.

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd (0c349e)

  114. 99. That is obviously the only motivation.

    Not the ongoing death and attrition, not the billions some think the US should be prepared to borrow and spend indefinitely, not the risk that the war could escalate, not the drain on th US when there are other fish to fry in Asia.

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd (0c349e)

  115. An almost intact Iranian drone that was rendered inert Ukraine shot down was exfiltrated secretly (to avoid the possibility of Russia attempting to destroy it) and exported legally to the United States after being disassembled, aboard a Polish Air Force C-130 (the Office of Foreign Assets Control granted a license in record time) and is now in Queens after being reassembled (it actually arrived first at Joint Base Andrews Maryland) and will put on exhibit in Washington, D.C., at the Conservative Political Action Conference this weekend.

    It is owned by a non-profit called United Against Nuclear Iran, whose head is now Mark Wallace, a former Ambassador to the United Nations while George W. Bush was president.

    Part of its purpose is to sow the alliance between Russia and Iran (although I think the two are on opposite sides between the main parties in the Sudanese Civil War) and to emphasize the dangers of Iran having a nuclear weapon and other weapons.

    The Shaheed drone (called by Russia the Geran-2) has a flight range of up to 1,600 miles and is eleven feet long with a wingspan of just over eight feet and carries a payload equivalent to 110 pounds of TNT (nobody uses actually TNT anymore and hasn’t for decades but explosive power is still measured in tons of TNT) and costs $80,000 to manufacture (minus the explosives, and the fuel, I presume)

    https://www.wsj.com/opinion/an-iranian-drone-lands-in-queens-irgc-military-war-russia-ukraine-new-york-f078b1a6

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  116. As for the EU, I agree they have to step up. Not because they “should” but because someone has to. And very soon, before Russia rolls its tanks over a demoralized Ukraine.

    Air power, for starters and particularly ground support air power.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  117. n anyone recommend a good, free voice to text tool that also works with earlier versions of Windows? Or by making a regular phone call from any phone, even if it costs money?

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  118. the risk that the war could escalate

    Then Biden was your man.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  119. Sammy what version of Windows are you using?

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  120. Two people who have absolutely no influence.

    Both have more balls than the rest of the GOP.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  121. Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 9:45 am

    Trump is burning through political capital at an amazing rate.

    It will take awhile for things to sink in.

    Now he’s compared himself to a king (in service of a more or less popular position)

    https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114032082899254855

    Donald J. Trump

    @realDonaldTrump

    CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!

    7.97k

    ReTruths

    39.7k

    Likes
    Feb 19, 2025, 1:58 PM

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  122. It isn’t necessarily dead. In the first place the Secretary of Transportation sent a letter to the Governor asking for talks to wind it down in an orderly manner. In the second place, they’re being sued. And what he is using to stop it – well the Secretary of Transportation found a semi-good reason. Some highways constructed with federal highway funds are somehow involved and they cannot be tolled except in a congestion pricing pilot program (which this is characterized as) and he’s arguing that the purpose of this is more to raise money than to reduce congestion. (But, besides this, the toll is on city streets not the bridges or tunnels or highways and you can exit them without paying a toll)

    See:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/nyc-congestion-pricing-legal-fight-trump-administration

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/02/19/nyregion/congestion-pricing-termination-letter.html

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  123. Instead of being a good guy, you think it’s funny that now we’re on the side of the bad guys.

    We were on the side of the bad guys (actually more neutral) in December 1971 when there was what Henry Kissinger called a “tilt toward Pakistan” India won anyway. Most people in the U.S. were not familiar with the situation.

    Also, the Carter and Reagan Administrations sided with the allies of Pol Pot after the Vietnamese toppled the government there. This kept a low intensity war going for ten years that was fought over a vote at the United Nations.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  124. In 1971, India was a Soviet client state.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  125. Paul Montagu (84c026) — 2/20/2025 @ 12:46 am

    How will voters weaned on the idea that their country is a force for good react to seeing their leader renounce that idea and buddy up to ruthless villainy?

    Everything that Trump is doing (or most of it) is aimed at weaning Americans from the idea a that they should be force for good in the world.

    That’s what he means by “America First”

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  126. And this America First philosophy goes unchallenged by the Democrats because it’s not about voters’ personal lives – which they lie about. They try to make a personal connection between voting for someone where it’s not there.

    They are criticizing anything that’s bad or regarded as bad (like egg prices) without regard to the cause and having numerous crazy positions themselves besides.

    Trump is actually doing something about that – he’s getting a plan together that will fight bird flew without killing so many chickens.

    Some things he does are good when he’s not out there promoting selfishness.

    Birds in zoos don’t get killed by the way. I guess they care more about people involved in zoos

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  127. @69 german war guilt. I noticed know one commented on the 11 year old girl from texas who committed suicide after being bullied by her class mates pretending to arrest her and holding her for ICE to take her and her parents away.

    asset (9175a2)

  128. @127 Hitler made nice autobahns. So?

    asset (9175a2)

  129. I think it is because broilers are worth $3-5 and zoo birds are worth thousands. A scarlet macaw gets a house call from a vet. Laying hen gets killed because its cheaper to cull than it is to treat the flock

    They’ll possibly be vaccinated soon, or they will breed a resistant strain

    steveg (c55fba)

  130. @112. That’s sad for you.

    Time123 (cb2fd6)

  131. asset (9175a2) — 2/20/2025 @ 2:28 pm

    11 year old girl from texas who committed suicide after being bullied by her class mates pretending to arrest her and holding her for ICE to take her and her parents away.

    I didn’t read that they pretended to arrest her – they just bullied her about her parents being arrested

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  132. Sammy what version of Windows are you using?

    Windows XP (to use DOS programs and get GMail since I can’t verify myself on any other computer) and also Windows 10. Which will stop being supported in October.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  133. nk (7727c6) — 2/20/2025 @ 8:14 am

    What would Putin feel like if he let the likes of Trump get the best of him in what may be the capstone of his and his family’s legacy?

    He got divorced 10 years ago, around the time he first took over Crimea:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26850204

    He gets along abit better with his daughters:

    https://www.npr.org/2022/04/07/1091340068/vladimir-putin-daughters-sanctioned-russia-ukraine

    “We believe that many of Putin’s assets are hidden with family members and that’s why we’re targeting them,” a senior Biden administration official said in a call with reporters on Wednesday.

    Putin has refused to publicly acknowledge the names of his children, but the Treasury Department identified the daughters being sanctioned as Maria Vladimirovna Vorontsova and Katerina Vladimirovna Tikhonova. One is a pediatric endocrinologist, the other a former competitive dancer turned tech executive.

    He had a mistress and two secret sons with her.

    https://english.nv.ua/nation/journalists-reveal-putin-s-secret-sons-with-alina-kabaeva-born-in-2015-and-2019-50448250.html

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  134. Ukraine had a plan for ending the war. It was to invade Russia and exchange captured territory.

    The invasion was a surprise but they captured too little and didn’t get enough help.

    Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09)

  135. Everything that Trump is doing (or most of it) is aimed at weaning Americans from the idea a that they should be force for good in the world.

    You say that like it’s a good thing, Sammy. I don’t.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  136. 108-RIP-Charts like that mislead…

    BS, Harc.
    The Kiel Institute is credible, go-to source. They’ve been tracking the flow of aid from Day One.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  137. Trump is actually doing something about that – he’s getting a plan together that will fight bird flew without killing so many chickens.

    His “Secret Plan” to end bird flu? Talk about facts not in evidence. To the contrary, Musk, Trump (whomever) “accidently” fired the USDA staff dealing with bird flu, and is now trying to rehire them back.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  138. Two people who have absolutely no influence.

    Both have more balls than the rest of the GOP.

    Kevin M (a9545f) — 2/20/2025 @ 12:52 pm

    Apparently not enough for Halley to win a major primary or for McConnell to stand up to Trump.

    Rip Murdock (d2a2a8)

  139. Doesn’t matter .. the entire vaccine advisory board has been told to go frack themselves.

    https://wapo.st/3CZR2iR

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  140. Windows 10. Which will stop being supported in October.

    Windows 10 has its own text-to-speech function. In any text box type windows-H

    And they won’t end support. Windows 11 sucks.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  141. As of this moment, Windows 10 is on twice as many machines as Windows 11. When Windows 7 faced this fate, Windows 10 was already twice as popular. This time it’s inverted.

    My response: Since Windows 365 won’t be supported on Win10, I’ll stop that subscription and get one of the freeware workalikes. If my AV won’t be supported, I’ll stop that and go with some freeware. Hell, I still run Outlook Express on Win 10. I never used Vista either.

    Kevin M (a9545f)

  142. As many continue to focus on Ukraine, they ignore Israel and yet more atrocities committed by Hamas.

    Is that because Trump is pro-Israel or because you agree with him and don’t want to publicly admit that?

    NJRob (6a57b7)

  143. The Volk, always whatabout squirrel.

    The world is a complicated place, different things happen in different places at the same time and you have to deal with all of them, at the same time.

    I know the Volk have the attention span of a gnat and the intellect of a toddler. Reality doesn’t care that they’re too dense to comprehend it.

    Colonel Klink (ret) (96f56a)

  144. 137-Paul–I’m sure its an accurate chart for its purpose. But its misleading, and presenting it as if the US is a laggard is misleading. One may as well chart the manual labor put in for a heart patient and give all the credit to his survival to gurney pushers, while ignoring what the cardiologists and nurses have done.

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd (b14778)

  145. 137-Paul–I’m sure its an accurate chart for its purpose. But its misleading, and presenting it as if the US is a laggard is misleading.

    Again, BS, Harc. It shows the level of aid as reported. The US doesn’t get extra credit for committing to NATO as we agreed to do.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  146. As many continue to focus on Ukraine, they ignore Israel and yet more atrocities committed by Hamas.

    Israel has the military advantage, even without all the extra military aid from us.
    The deal is that Israel is fighting a terrorist entity, just like Ukraine is fighting a terrorist entity. The difference is who has the military advantage in terms of personnel and weaponry. Israel has the advantage against that evil, and Ukraine doesn’t.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  147. And let’s be clear about who the bigger terrorist is, and it’s Putin.
    Yes, Hamas murdered 1,200 on 10/7, but Putin is the bigger terrorist, murdering tens of thousands of Ukrainian civilians, precision-bombing a thousand hospitals, schools and churches, and tens of thousands of residential buildings, and abducting tens of thousands of Ukrainian children out of Ukraine into Russia, and Putin has received thousands of drones from the Iranian terrorist state.

    Come to think of it, when you add Putin’s airstrikes in Syria over the years, it’s a fair claim that Putin is the biggest terrorist of this 21st century, which is why Trump is the Baddie for taking Putin’s side. Which terrorist in this century has killed more civilians and launched more terrorist attacks? This is what Trump doesn’t get.
    You don’t have to be a dark-complected Muslim to be a preeminent mass-murdering terrorist. You can be a 5’6″ white-skinned Russian autocrat, and get away with it because he’s a 5’6″ white guy.

    Paul Montagu (84c026)

  148. Trump had an interview with Brian Lilmeade this morning,. He said that Russia could have been talked out if it (the big invasion of Ukraine three years ago) so easily…but they (the Biden Administration) didn’t know how to talk.

    (What Biden did was let Russia know they knew about his plans. Maybe he could have been warned they would not win but Trump didn’t say that or say anything else,like offering some concessions.)

    At one point Kilmeade repeatedly tried to say that all the destruction was the fault of Putin but Trump continued talking right over him.

    Brian Kilmeade said Zelensky made three mistakes: Criticizing Trump, complaining about not being in the Saudi meeting, and turning down the rare earth deal, which would have given the U.S.a stake in it that Russia would not want to challenge,

    Kilmeade also quoted a very recent tweet from the Polish (president I think)

    Sammy Finkelman (7e5f34)

Leave a Reply


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.1190 secs.