History Repeats Itself: Outgoing Democrat Administration Petulantly Screws Israel
[guest post by JVW]
Nearly eight years ago I related how the outgoing Obama Administration was taking out its frustrations at their recent electoral defeat by backstabbing our only consistent ally in the entire forsaken Middle East:
One can make a honest argument that Israeli settlements on the West Bank are hindering any sort of peace process. I might not agree with that particular assessment, seeing as how it is hard to take the Palestinians seriously as a legitimate peace partner, but I grant that it is a legitimate argument. But to advance this proposition now, after the Administration’s cluelessness towards events in Egypt, wrong choices in Libya, and ugly dithering in Syria has made things in that region far worse than they should be — to pivot and blame Israel for ruining the peace process under those circumstances is a level of delusional make-believe that I wouldn’t have thought even these vacuous narcissists would stoop to. The foreign policy of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry has been relentlessly awful for eight years, and good riddance to that horrid crew.
Now, two administrations later, the outgoing Biden Administration has chosen to take out their frustrations at not being able to reconcile their growing anti-Zionist, anti-Israel, anti-Jew caucus with supporters of the only worthwhile democracy in the region surrounding the Holy Land. Noah Rothman at NRO provides the story:
When it was initially announced, the cease-fire with Hezbollah via the Lebanese government, to which Israel acquiesced on Tuesday, didn’t make much sense to me.
Why would Jerusalem agree to put a halt to the war it was prosecuting so expertly with only some of its objectives secured and in response to security guarantees that look a lot like the failed architecture of the past? Now we know. Israel wasn’t persuaded to take a risk on peace. The Jewish state was blackmailed into it.
In a press release, Senator Ted Cruz alleged that the Biden administration muscled Israel into a cease-fire by threatening not just to choke off the aid and materiel flowing into Israel. He threatened to join the cast of Middle Eastern jackals set on throwing the Israeli people into the sea.
“Obama-Biden officials pressured our Israeli allies into accepting the ceasefire by withholding weapons they needed to defend themselves and counter Hezbollah, and by threatening to facilitate a further, broader, binding international arms embargo through the United Nations,” he wrote.
The Netanyahu government has largely confirmed the broad outlines of Sen. Cruz’s allegations, and though the Biden Administration denies engaging in this power play even the center-left anti-Netanyahu Israeli newspaper Haaretz acknowledges that the slowdown in U.S. aid to Israel and no-to-subtle threats by Biden Administration officials to allow anti-Israel resolutions to pass at the U.N. without a U.S. veto — exactly what the Obama Administration did to Israel some 95 months ago — are forcing Israel’s hand.
Joe Biden has always imagined himself as a wise and insightful foreign policy thinker when the truth is that he’s a pompous blowhard idiot who does nothing more than repeat whatever passes for conventional Washington thinking at any given moment. Now even with his increasingly failing mind he has to understand at least at some level that his Presidency will likely be considered an abject failure in so many key areas, a tough pill to swallow for a man who was being told just four years ago that he could be a “transformative” President in the FDR or LBJ mode. President Biden and the people with whom he surrounds himself have always been vindictive and vengeful. Now it seems that just like his former boss, Joe Biden seeks to shred Benjamin Netanyahu’s reputation as well. Jonathan Tobin doesn’t believe this initiative will be successful:
For all of his faults and his stubborn refusal to cede power after so many years in office, as well as the fact that he bears some of the responsibility for the Oct. 7 catastrophe that happened on his watch, what Netanyahu has done in the year since then is truly remarkable.
Only someone with his steely determination and savvy understanding of the tricky dynamics of the U.S.-Israel relationship could have navigated the long months of war so skillfully. No possible successor in his own Likud Party or among his opponents in the Knesset could have stuck to his goals—and do so much harm to Hamas and Hezbollah in the face of the desire of his country’s sole superpower ally to force Jerusalem to accept the continued rule of Hamas in Gaza and avoid direct conflict with Iran’s Lebanese auxiliaries.
Whatever comes next—whether it is a renewed war with Hezbollah caused by their refusal to keep the ceasefire or to abide by its terms that demand they withdraw their terrorist cadres and weapons north of the Litani River, or the bloody continuation of the mopping up of what’s left of Hamas’s terrorists in Gaza—Netanyahu’s leadership has been indispensable.
He may ultimately be judged by Israel’s voters as being too tainted by his association with the worst day in their country’s history to serve another term. But his service as prime minister during the last terrible year of intense battle will still deserve to be remembered with honor. It was a period during which it was only his insistence on sticking to a goal of eliminating Hamas and dealing deadly blows to Hezbollah and Iran—while cabinet colleagues, political foes and military advisers were willing to give in to the Americans and accept far more disastrous deals—that prevented a diplomatic and military defeat for Israel.
If, miraculously, Hamas and Hezbollah (i.e. Iran) both determine that their future is best served living in peace side-by-side with a Jewish state in the Levant then perhaps history will indeed see the Biden Administration has having been perspicacious and wise. Or perhaps history will conclude that even in their moral cowardice they lucked into a positive result. But reality suggests that it will not be long before Hezbollah and Iran resume their hostilities toward Israel, and the IDF will find itself back on the battlefield facing a rested and rearmed opponent. If that day should come, hopefully the United States will be led by a team who recognizes the threat that a collective of bad actors (including China and Russia) poses to the one functional political culture in the Middle East. For now, though, we can only hope that this questionable peace agreement somehow lasts.
Here’s wishing all Patterico’s Pontifications readers a truly happy Thanksgiving holiday.
– JVW
I’m going to be having Thanksgiving dinner tomorrow with my very progressive cousins, whom I adore, and I dread that the topic of U.S. politics or international events will rear its ugly head at the dinner table.
JVW (1f63ab) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:06 pmJoe Biden has always imagined himself as a wise and insightful foreign policy thinker when the truth is that he’s a pompous blowhard idiot who does nothing more than repeat whatever passes for conventional Washington thinking at any given moment.
So true. I remember the days when Senator Biden was a regular on the Sunday morning talk shows. He’s always been a trademark political hack.
Happy Thanksgiving to you, Dana, Patterico (MIA), and all the readers.
norcal (56d72a) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:16 pmThe Gaza peace deal should be way different than the one with Hezbollah, and there should only be two major terms: return all the hostages, and Hamas’ unconditional surrender.
Paul Montagu (ceba6c) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:24 pmIt is not Hamas (which hasn’t agreed yet at all) ad Hezbollah that may have decided to end the war for now, but Iran. If Iran has, this will work out even though Israel hasn’t put Hezbollah as far back to Square One ass it wanted to.
Signs that Iran may have decided to stop:
1) No more talk of retaliation for Israel’s last bombing raid.
2) The Houthis may have quietly stopped and are sending some soldiers away to Russia.
https://www.newsweek.com/yemen-houthi-fighters-russia-ukraine-war-1990763
If Iran has really agreed to stop the wars, or at least all but one, this may make sense.
Earlier the Biden Administration was all set to vote for a Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza but decided to veto it (a week ago) because the sponsors wouldn’t agree that the release of the hostages had to be agreed to simultaneously with the ceasefire not something to be left for some future time.
Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:30 pmIt’s more like that – helped along by the fact that Trump, whom Iran is afraid of, is coming in, and whatever Elon Musk said to their UN Ambassador.
Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:38 pmA lot of Iran’s important military assets have been destroyed,
And while Biden (and many Israelis and Lebanese and others living in Lebanon) are treating it as permanent, Netanyahu secured a side letter with the US saying that if the terms of the agreement are violated, Israel has the right to resume fighting without being in violation of tis agreement.
This time, it may be different.
And the UN was not used.
Sammy Finkelman (e4ef09) — 11/27/2024 @ 2:42 pm1. So, no responses like “elections have consequences,” and “get in their faces?” Silly me. Of course not: its always up to one side to keep peace by keeping their piece, b/c the tolerant Ones explode when exposed to a fact or an argument. Enjoy!
Harcourt Fenton Mudd (9f154c) — 11/27/2024 @ 6:19 pmJan. 20 is not that far away so reasons you did not give also played a part in Israel’s decision like netanyahu’s arrest warrant and being bogged down in lebanon like last time. My support for Israel does not include its present corrupt government. I can support the destruction of hamas with out supporting likud.
asset (254825) — 11/28/2024 @ 1:37 amThis is what the New York Times published about this idea in today’s paper:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/27/world/middleeast/israel-ceasefire-hezbollah-gaza.html
Sammy Finkelman (c2c77e) — 11/28/2024 @ 12:49 pm