Patterico's Pontifications


New York Times Paints Portrait Of Seething, Vindictive Donald Trump In Final Days Of His Campaign

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 2:03 pm

I know, right? On the one hand, it’s the New York Times. On the other hand, it’s Donald Trump.

The New York Times has a long piece on the final days of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign titled Inside Donald Trump’s Last Stand: An Anxious Nominee Seeks Assurance. That sure sounds like an account of a loser, doesn’t it? The first name on the byline is Maggie Haberman, of whom the Hillary Clinton campaign said: “[W]e can . . . do the most shaping by going to Maggie.” Haberman has specialized in stories portraying Trump as a “beleaguered” candidate hiding in his “fortress” — and with the election just two days away, it would be very good “shaping” to have a piece portraying Trump as sleepless and constantly seeking reassurance:

Donald J. Trump is not sleeping much these days.

Aboard his gold-plated jumbo jet, the Republican nominee does not like to rest or be alone with his thoughts, insisting that aides stay up and keep talking to him. He prefers the soothing, whispery voice of his son-in-law.

He requires constant assurance that his candidacy is on track. “Look at that crowd!” he exclaimed a few days ago as he flew across Florida, turning to his young press secretary as a TV tuned to Fox News showed images of what he claimed were thousands of people waiting for him on the ground below.

And he is struggling to suppress his bottomless need for attention. As he stood next to the breakfast buffet at his golf club in Doral, Fla., eyeing a tray of pork sausages, he sought to convey restraint when approached by a reporter for The New York Times.

“I’m on message,” Mr. Trump asserted, with effort. “I’m not playing around. In fact, I’m a little nervous standing here talking to you even for just a minute.”

But Haberman’s name is not the only one on the piece, and there is plenty in the article that rings true. (So true!) I am speaking, in particular, of the sections of the article that remind us that, while his handlers have been snatching away the keys to Donald Trump’s Twitter account and gluing him to TelePrompTers, his greatest dreams these days are the ways that he will take revenge on those who have dared criticize him:

On the surface, there is the semblance of stability that is robbing Hillary Clinton of her most potent weapon: Mr. Trump’s self-sabotaging eruptions, which have repeatedly undermined his candidacy. Underneath that veneer, turbulence still reigns, making it difficult for him to overcome all of the obstacles blocking his path to the White House.

The contrasts pervade his campaign. Aides to Mr. Trump have finally wrested away the Twitter account that he used to colorfully — and often counterproductively — savage his rivals. But offline, Mr. Trump still privately muses about all of the ways he will punish his enemies after Election Day, including a threat to fund a “super PAC” with vengeance as its core mission.

The childish elevation of personal grievances above all else does not feel like it’s made up. And we have the evidence of the Gettysburg speech to prove that Trump’s penchant for threats sometimes overcomes any common-sense notion of restraint for the greater good. Haberman & Co. have more on that as well:

Mr. Trump’s aides were just as thrown by the [Access Hollywood grab them by the p***y] tape. But they saw a chance to salvage his candidacy — on a Civil War battlefield.

His aides outlined 15 bullet points for him to deliver during an Oct. 22 speech in Gettysburg, Pa., to focus voters on a new theme of cleaning up government, even as several women came forward to accuse him of groping them just as he had described in the recording.

But Mr. Trump grew frustrated with the instructions. By the time he was done revising the proposed speech, only about a half-dozen of the original suggestions remained. And over the firm objections of his top advisers, he insisted on using the occasion to issue a remarkable threat: that he would sue all of the women who had gone public with the accusations.

As the advisers begged him to reconsider — it would make him seem small, they warned, and undermine a pivotal speech — Mr. Trump was adamant. There had to be a severe penalty for those who dared to attack him, he said. He could not just sit back and let these women “come at me,” he told one of them.

The speech was roundly criticized and seemed strikingly out of place on such sacred and historic ground. “The Grievanceburg Address,” one journalist deemed it.

Another interesting detail: Trump does not use a computer.

Mr. Trump, who does not use a computer, rails against the campaign’s expenditure of tens of millions on digital ads, skeptical that spots he never sees could have any effect.

By the way, I thought I had followed this campaign pretty closely, and I have to admit I did not realize that Donald Trump doesn’t use a computer. (After reading this passage, I did some Googling and see it has been reported before, but I had missed it.) I’m going to guess that everyone reading this right now relies on their computer as a way to gather news and information. The Internet is the single greatest tool for spreading knowledge that humans have ever invented. And Donald Trump, to the extent he takes advantage of it, apparently does so by proxy: whatever his aides spoon-feed him is what he gets. Otherwise, apparently, he gets his information from “the shows.”

This is reassuring for a potential president, isn’t it?

There’s much, much more in there, and I encourage you to read the whole thing.

Yes, Donald Trump is an awful, vindictive person, even if the New York Times agrees.

AND YET, WHAT THIS STORY MEANS MIGHT SURPRISE YOU: I don’t think this is what Maggie Haberman and company intended . . . but, on reflection, this article tells us more about Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the state of our country than it tells us about Donald Trump.

Because — placing idiot fanatics and Nazi triumphalists aside — most sentient Americans know all this about Donald Trump. And yet, almost half of them are considering voting for Trump over Clinton anyway.

What does that say? On one hand, it says a lot of voters are stupid . . . but that’s not all it says, by a longshot. It also says that this country must be reeling so badly from the staggering premium increases of ObamaCare; the job losses, malaise, and slow growth of the overregulated Obama economy; the doubling of our national debt in just eight years; the endless revelations of dishonesty and corruption by the Clintons; the leaks of media collusion between the left and Big Media . . . the American people must be really, really fed up with the wretched state of our country, to be even thinking about putting a man as manifestly awful, deceitful, narcissistic, pig-ignorant, and utterly worthless as Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

What does that tell you about how mad people are, Maggie Haberman?

You might want to reflect on that a little.

[Cross-posted at RedState.]

BREAKING: Comey Says Email Investigation Over, Hillary Will Not Be Charged

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 1:15 pm

How’s that for a November surprise? FBI Directory James Comey has written a letter to several members of Congress, saying that the FBI has completed its review of additional emails relevant to the investigation of Hillary Clinton. Comey says “we have not changed our conclusions” from July, when Comey said he would be recommending against prosecution.

And so, with two days to go in the election, Hillary Clinton is, once again, officially off the hook.

Donald Trump is about to go ballistic. I wonder if his handlers will be able to restrain him any further.

UPDATE: To be clear, Comey did not officially say the investigation is over, and technically it could always be reopened. However, with this announcement, make no mistake: it’s over. There’s no reason to pull any punches about what this means, as a practical matter; hence the headline.

[Cross-posted at RedState.]

Hillary Clinton’s Housekeeper Printed Off Classified Emails At Clinton’s Direction

Filed under: General — Dana @ 12:30 pm

[guest post by Dana]

Standard operating procedure. Because apparently anyone without a security clearance is able to handle and view classified information if Hillary Clinton deems it. The rules be damned. And worse, national security be damned. It’s not enough that Clinton was forwarding her daughter classified emails and arrogantly blowing off the rules in place to safeguard such sensitive materials, but now we are learning that Clinton’s maid, Marina Santos, was also allowed to access them – at Clinton’s direction:

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.

Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.

Clinton would first receive highly sensitive e-mails from top aides at the State Department and then request that they, in turn, forward the messages and any attached documents to Santos to print out for her at the home.

Among other things, Clinton requested Santos print out drafts of her speeches, confidential memos and “call sheets” — background information and talking points prepared for the secretary of state in advance of a phone call with a foreign head of state.

Santos also had access to a highly secure room called an SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility) that diplomatic security agents set up at Whitehaven, according to FBI notes from an interview with Abedin.

From within the SCIF, Santos — who had no clearance — “collected documents from the secure facsimile machine for Clinton,” the FBI notes revealed.

Included in the “sensitive” materials that Santos had access to as she printed them off for Clinton, was the Presidential Daily Brief, described as “a top-secret document prepared by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies”.

And to frustrate the situation even more, the report claims that the FBI never requested Santos turn over the MacBook on which she received the emails, nor the printer used to print the classified emails. Further, the FBI never even interviewed Santos.

Moreover, according to Clinton aide, Monica Hanley, the MacBook and USB drive used to download the trove of Clinton emails are… “lost,” with the FBI saying they do not have them in their possession.

And, to top it all off, the Wall Street Journal is now reporting:

FBI’s Comey Says New Emails Don’t Change Conclusions About Clinton

FBI Has Reviewed All New Material Found In Probe, Director Tells Congress

FBI Had Recommended No Prosecution Earlier This Year

So, they just interviewed the housekeeper? And the missing MacBook and USB drive just turned up and they reviewed them? That’s some really fast investigative work there…


Nate Silver: Hillary Clinton Is One State Away from Losing the Election

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 12:30 pm

If your top priority in this election is to be entertained (and let’s face it, that’s a pretty good description of an electorate that nominated Donald Trump), then you should be thrilled. You want drama? You got it!

NATE SILVER, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT: So, we show a three-point lead nationally for Clinton, and she’s about a 2-1 favorite. The electoral college map is actually less solid for Clinton than it was for Obama four years ago where four years ago we had Obama ahead in states totaling 320 some electoral votes. Clinton has about 270, so she’s one state away from potentially losing the electoral college. You’d rather be in her shoes than Donald Trump’s but it’s not a terribly safe position.

Whether all this excites you or depresses you depends on who you’re rooting for. Are you a fan of the vindictive New York leftist under multiple investigations who favors single-payer health care and amnesty? Or are you for Hillary Clinton? (Make sure to tip your waitresses; I’m here all week!)

Silver goes on to explain that, while the national polling is about the same for Hillary as it was for Obama in 2012, her lead is softer in several key battleground states. Turnout will be important.

Luckily, the GOP nominated a candidate who spared no expense on his ground game, and showed great attention to detail in terms of creating and carefully maintaining sophisticated voter turnout mechanisms.

Oh wait, sorry, I was just dreaming that the GOP had nominated Ted Cruz. Never mind!

[Cross-posted at RedState.]

UPDATE: This is crazy:

“Journalist” John Harwood to Clinton Campaign Chair Podesta: “What Should I Ask Jeb?”

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 11:30 am

The newest Wikileaks email from the Podesta archive shows John Harwood, of the New York Times and CNBC, asking Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta what he should ask Jeb in an upcoming interview:


Harwood was a moderator at the October 28, 2015 Republican primary debate, and was widely panned for his highly partisan questions.

I wonder if he asked Podesta what to ask the Republican candidates at that debate.

[Cross-posted at RedState.]

Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0722 secs.