Hillary Clinton Outraged Over The Outrageousness Of Republican Men
[guest post by Dana]
Hillary Clinton was outraged yesterday. The patron saint of women voiced her disgust at Trump’s post-debate comments about Megyn Kelly, and she also included in her criticism the candidates who stood on the debate stage with Trump because all Republican men are awful:
“While what Donald Trump said about Megyn Kelly is outrageous, what the rest of the Republicans are saying about all women is also outrageous.”
“I thought what he said was offensive, and I certainly think that it determines the kind of reaction that it’s getting from so many others.
“But I think if we focus on that, we’re making a mistake,” she said. “What a lot of the men on that stage in that debate said was offensive.”
The Republicans get to choose their nominee and they will have to make that decision, but … when one of their major candidates, a much younger man, the senator from Florida, says there should be no exception for rape and incest, that is as offensive and as troubling a comment as you can hear from a major candidate running for the presidency,” Clinton said. “So the language may be more colorful and more offensive, but the thinking, the attitude toward women, is very much the same.”
Clearly, Clinton, who makes no bones about running as a woman, knows the numbers and hoped to begin regaining some lost ground with white women voters.
Apparently, Clinton didn’t hear Trump declare his love for all women, including her:
I cherish women. I want to help women. I’m going to be able to do things for women that no other candidate would be able to do, and it’s very important to me.”
Trump, the man who is going to do things for women that no other man in the running could possibly do… Oh, be still, the beating heart of American women everywhere!
–Dana
Hello.
Dana (86e864) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:07 pmMegyn shot her credibility wad way too early just to help this sad hooch flog some tired tired tired war on women meme
I find it distasteful
happyfeet (5546fb) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:20 pmI completely expected this from Hillary! I expected nothing else, I expect this at every real or imagined provocation until (and probably after) election day in November 2016.
What genuinely annoyed me, though, were the Trump defenders among the supposedly conservative pundits who condemned those who are pointing out that Emperor Trump is spectacularly naked for our sin in “falling into Hillary!’s hands” by expressing our disgust with him.
Political correctness is rampant, yes.
That does not mean that everyone who’s a raving lunatic is immune from criticism for being a raving lunatic. Trump isn’t just “politically incorrect,” he’s plain old “incorrect” — stupid, sexist, offensive, worthy of our disdain and disgust.
And he has no solutions to anything that’s — quite justifiably — making conservatives dissatisfied with the Beltway Republican leadership. But that’s no reason to defend him. Sometimes the enemy of my enemy is just a fool.
Beldar (fa637a) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:21 pmHillary! Clinton can kiss my ass. I wish the lying sow nothing but bad luck in her future.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:22 pmWhite women voters lead the way in ill informed votership.
mg (31009b) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:31 pmAnd rino’s lead the way in crying about trump. lmmfao
We had two elections where every idiot was “outraged” about race. The end result was a President who set back race relations 100 years. So I guess this election the theme will be women and how badly they are treated in America. So get ready for the new battle cry of the perpetually enraged: “Sexist”. I’m so glad. I was gettin’ tired of being called a racist because I don’t like Obamacare. Now I can be called a sexist in the war on women because I don’t like abortion.
Rev. Barack Hussein Hoagie (f4eb27) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:35 pmCount me among the outraged.
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:38 pmBlazing skull update.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/358416.php
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:45 pmNo. It’s effin’ the highest level.
I did not start out despising Hillary! Clinton. It just ended up that way.
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:48 pmI forgot my last paragraph and just added it. D’oh.
Dana (86e864) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:53 pmI have been in on the prosecution of sailors who took less of a calier attitude towaref a cavalier attitude toward the protection of classified than this woman. If it is true. If it can be proved.
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:57 pmcalier = cavalier
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 6:58 pmSo was she saying that no exception for rape and incest is more outrageous than the actual rape or incest?
I can see why she’d support those exceptions, since technically speaking, it’s a form of destroying evidence, which we all know she’s in favor of.
Dejectedhead (ec3741) — 8/11/2015 @ 7:19 pmEx sigint analyst John schindler makes it quite clear.
narciso (ee1f88) — 8/11/2015 @ 7:21 pmI had a Top Secret clearance, but my job never required access to sensitive material, so I never saw any.
ropelight (8383a5) — 8/11/2015 @ 7:25 pmI loathe her.
JD (d03901) — 8/11/2015 @ 7:34 pmThere was a time when the Purple establishment forbid everyone who didn’t have a certain amount of land from casting a ballot. Rich people where the only people who could vote
papertiger (c2d6da) — 8/11/2015 @ 10:56 pmSO the grievance mongers, the melanin challenged or vajayjay adorned, being blocked from government a hundred years ago, that doesn’t make you special. We all came from that place.
The recently passed used to ask, in return, what he knew from his WWII service, can you keep a secret?
And he’d say, “So can I.”
Hillary! got somebody killed. Besides the four in Benghazi.
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 11:11 pm*The recently passed Christopher Lee used to ask, in return, what he knew from his WWII service, can you keep a secret?
It was there, plain as day, when I hit “submit.”
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 11:13 pmOptical mouse strikes again.
Steve57 (5a07a9) — 8/11/2015 @ 11:16 pmBut that’s no reason to defend him.
By the same token, it would be appropriate for you to extend your ire to some of the other Republican candidates, particularly Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham, much less the rotund guy from New Jersey.
Mark (9abec5) — 8/11/2015 @ 11:19 pmIt’s good to see Clinton bounce back hail and hearty from the disturbing planned parenthood revelations.
Good to go now. Brushed those sads about baby murder, dismemberment, and sale, right off.
You could load the dead babies with a pitchfork, for all she cares.
Over it.
papertiger (c2d6da) — 8/11/2015 @ 11:40 pmI will vote for bernie
mg (31009b) — 8/12/2015 @ 2:31 amit’s like nasty hooch volleyball where sanguineous megyn does the bump and nastybutt hillary goes in for the spike but still whiffs it cause she’s fat old clotty-headed and used to having everything done for her
that said Marco Sleazio is just a strange man what has strange perverted ideas about the procreative awesomeness of rape and incest
happyfeet (a037ad) — 8/12/2015 @ 5:32 amGreetings:
Shouldn’t that be the patron saint of non “that” women. ???
11B40 (0f96be) — 8/12/2015 @ 8:03 amYou go Hillary; why don’t you call the Republican men on the stage “bimbos” and “sluts” and have James Carville make some crack about what you get when you troll a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park. I mean you’ve got a lot of practice in that sort of attack whilst protecting Billy Jeff from the depradations he made on women.
Comanche Voter (1d5c8b) — 8/12/2015 @ 8:50 am@ Mark (#21): Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, and Lindsey Graham are far down my ranking of preferences, and I defy you to find anything I’ve written in comments here, or anywhere else on the internet, suggesting otherwise. By contrast, I have written here, and elsewhere, about candidates who I’d prefer and who I think have a realistic chance of getting elected. There’s a very wide range among the announced GOP candidates. But one of these is not like the others; one of these things is not the same: If we apply even the most casual level of scrutiny to his claims, if we look at a shred of evidence beyond what he makes up, on the fly, during this campaign, we’ll conclude that Trump is not a Republican, he’s not conservative, he’s not a public servant, and he’s not even a successful businessman. In deciding what I write on the internet, I prefer to focus my fire on the supposed candidate who’s doing the most harm to the GOP’s chances to defeat the Democratic nominee in 2016, whom I continue to believe will be Hillary Clinton. If you prefer to focus your fire on Jeb or Christie or Graham, more power to you. But if you instead try to persuade people that Trump is anything but a con man, then we’re in profound disagreement, Mark.
Beldar (fa637a) — 8/12/2015 @ 9:15 amJeb is helping Obama through Bloomberg to close down the coal industry, I’m informed by email from the Tea Party.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/10/jeb-worked-with-bloomberg-amid-50-million-anti-coal-campaign/
I think “Jeb worked with Bloomberg” pretty much puts him in bed with every leftist furfy of the last 50 years.
Plannd Parenthood, kill the coal industry, open borders, on and on.
Do I hate him? Haven’t given Jeb enough thought to say I hate him, but it’s looking like just a matter of applying the elbow grease to get there.
papertiger (c2d6da) — 8/12/2015 @ 4:10 pm