President Obama Will Not Meet With Netanyahu Next Month
[guest post by Dana]
As if the White House’s angered response to Boehner’s invite to Netanyahu didn’t make them look small and petty already, it was announced today that the president will not be meeting with Netanyahu next month when he comes to the United States to speak before Congress:
The official White House explanation was that Netanyahu’s visit fell too close to the Israeli election and the Obama administration wanted to avoid the appearance of taking sides.
“As a matter of longstanding practice and principle, we do not see heads of state or candidates in close proximity to their elections, so as to avoid the appearance of influencing a democratic election in a foreign country,” National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said.
Honestly, I don’t think there’s any reason to worry that President Obama might be seen as taking sides with Netanyahu in much of anything these days.
–Dana
Added: Commenter “scrubone” points out that President Obama was willing to meet with New Zealand’s PM John Key in the run-up to the country’s election. They met at the White House in June 2014. The election took place in September 2014.
Hello.
Dana (8e74ce) — 1/22/2015 @ 8:10 pmwell since there’s nothing at stake:
megyn-kelly-reports-iran-developing-inter-continental-missiles-that-can-reach-far-beyond-middle-east
narciso (ee1f88) — 1/22/2015 @ 8:26 pmIt is an extraordinarily safe bet to assume that Obama will not be seen as taking Bibi’s side. In anything.
JD (86a5eb) — 1/22/2015 @ 8:37 pmOne rule for New Zealand, another for Israel. Obama was quite happy to meet John Key in the runup to *our* election.
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Duncan-Garner-John-Key-planning-White-House-visit-in-general-election-lead-up/tabid/674/articleID/42287/Default.aspx
scrubone (c3104f) — 1/22/2015 @ 8:56 pmReading the Times of Israel, it seems Bibi arranged the trip, and then rescheduled it for the first week of March without any contact with the White House. IOW, Netanyahu snubbed Obama first. Quite clearly the Israelis think Obama is worthless. But I do remember the line about “too close to elections” to have been used before..and I think it involved Israel that time as well.
kishnevi (a5d1b9) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:03 pmThe purpose of the reschedule is to allow Bibi to address the AIPAC cinvention.
scrubone,
Thanks. I’ve updated the post: President Obama was willing to meet with New Zealand’s PM John Key in the run-up to the country’s election. They met at the White House in June 2014. The election took place in September 2014.
Dana (8e74ce) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:18 pmWith all due respect to Megyn Kelly, Iran reports making super-weapons at the same rate of speed as the sub-atomic particles in the Hadron Collider. The only difference is the collider works sometimes.
Ag80 (eb6ffa) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:19 pmThe NZ case is not quite comparable. That was three months before the election. The Israelis will be voting two weeks after Netanyahu will be here.
kishnevi (294553) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:23 pmI would think that it would be Netanyahu who would not want “Vote for Bibi, Obama likes him!”
nk (dbc370) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:25 pmBibi is sooooo lucky!
askeptic (efcf22) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:28 pm“The NZ case is not quite comparable. That was three months before the election. The Israelis will be voting two weeks after Netanyahu will be here.”
kishnevi – It was more comparable when the trip was scheduled for February. Nevertheless, I’m sure Bibi is not disappointed to miss seeing Obama in person.
daleyrocks (bf33e9) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:28 pmPresident Ferret is not going to worry about Iran until it’s too late, then she’ll blame the TEA PARTY. This schit isn’t funny anymore.
Gus (7cc192) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:30 pmkishnevi,
I considered that but chose not to give this administration that benefit of the doubt. Key and Obama have shared a warm relationship: they’re golfing buddies , Obama praises Key for being a climate change ally , praises Key for his work on nuclear security and so forth. I think he would have met with Key whether a month before the election or three months before the election like he did.
Dana (8e74ce) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:33 pmso as to avoid the appearance of influencing a democratic election in a foreign country,”
[Snort and chortle]
“Avoid the appearance of” emanating from a person who has inappropriately, clumsily, blatantly inserted himself into the middle of — closer to home — sensitive judicial and law-enforcement matters involving people like Henry Louis Gates Jr in Cambridge, Trayvon Martin in Florida, Michael Brown in Ferguson, or, in the international arena, Manuel Zelaya in Honduras or the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. I won’t say anything about “avoid the appearance of” when it came to the affairs of an obscure film maker posting silly (and innocuous) videos to Youtube following the debacle in Benghazi.
I’d feel more confident in both the safety and sanity of the US if Obama would spent ALL his time out on golf courses or in bath houses in Chicago.
Mark (c160ec) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:45 pmanybody think Bibi wanted to meet The One ?
seeRpea (1d44c7) — 1/22/2015 @ 9:59 pmInterestingly enough:
Dana (8e74ce) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:05 pmExactly.
Obama’s declaration is just so he can say he said so first, before some reporter asks Bibi if he even wanted a meeting.
Estragon (ada867) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:29 pmDid President Obama knowingly “campaign” for Sarkozy in France’s 2012 elections?
Dana (8e74ce) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:30 pmYay, my first comment to make it in as an update 😀
scrubone (5d0079) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:35 pmThe funny thing was, I originally was going to comment on the way that the left here in NZ complained bitterly that the government was scheduling a royal visit (Kate and Wills) here in election year, inventing a convention that this was always avoided (except for the dozen times it’d happened previously).
It’s almost like inventing things when the facts don’t suit you is a universal rule of the left or something…
scrubone (5d0079) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:42 pmcongrats scrubone 😀
seeRpea (1d44c7) — 1/22/2015 @ 10:49 pmHoly s – – t. President Goddamn America is doing to Mossad what it did to the filmmaker of the anti-Islamic video on Youtube right after the US consulate in Benghazi was hit by terrorists.
Unbelievable and sickening.
Liberalism truly — most certainly — is a mental illness, and today’s White House is now this nation’s most prominent insane asylum.
Mark (c160ec) — 1/22/2015 @ 11:29 pmMark, you beat me to it by 2 minutes 🙂
seeRpea (1d44c7) — 1/22/2015 @ 11:33 pmLooks like someone is lying, but is it Kerry or The One ?
I guess they weren’t worried about the appearance of petulance.
Kevin M (25bbee) — 1/23/2015 @ 12:21 amThing is, John Key plays golf with Obama in Hawaii, where they both spend their holidays.
Does Netanyahu play golf? Na, he’s probably “running a country” or something silly.
scrubone (d7632d) — 1/23/2015 @ 1:58 amCouldn’t be Kerry lying. He has no track record of that.
Besides, he was in Cambodia at Chrismas.
Dan (d2bbcb) — 1/23/2015 @ 4:49 amnk wins the internets for the day:
Yuppers!
The Israeli Dana (f6a568) — 1/23/2015 @ 4:56 amMark, do you think that either Mossad or the Israeli government in general would trust our government with any secrets as long as this current bunch is in charge?
The Dana who, if President Obama said 2+2=4, would check the math (f6a568) — 1/23/2015 @ 5:00 amWe might as well be completely honest: President Obama doesn’t want to do anything to help Prime Minister Netanyahu win, because he hates Bibi’s guts, and the feeling is more than mutual. But our President cannot say that he wants Mr Netanyahu to lose, because Israelis are so distrustful of Mr Obama that anything he said in support of any other candidate would only help Likud.
The foreign policy Dana (f6a568) — 1/23/2015 @ 5:46 am23.
kishnevi (3719b7) — 1/23/2015 @ 5:57 amThe meeting was with a senatorial delegation. which points to Kerry.
28.
The Israelis don’t trust them even with nonsecrets.
29.
Actually, the important race in Israel is who will come in second, and therefore be the most viable coalition partner. Part of that will be determined by things out of Netanyahu’s hands. Most important being a corruption probe into the Jewish Home party, infighting among Shas, and what Hezbollah does next.
Israelis already know Obama hates Israel and Netanyahu
they didn’t need any extra clarification
happyfeet (a037ad) — 1/23/2015 @ 6:10 amUpdated article from Times of Israel
http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-spat-in-our-face-white-house-officials-say/
Short version…White House throws tantrum, Kerry even mire inclined to throw Israel under the bus.
kishnevi (a5d1b9) — 1/23/2015 @ 6:18 amdo you think that either Mossad or the Israeli government in general would trust our government
Dana, I would hope not, since having faith and confidence in the mentally ill is never a good idea.
I’m posting the following, which really isn’t off topic, since we’re dealing with the deranged judgment and defective perceptions of the aforementioned mentally challenged, and this is to smoking what Obama is to international affairs.
Mark (c160ec) — 1/23/2015 @ 7:17 amToo busy meeting with wacky, green lipstick wearing nut-bags who eat breakfast cereal out of teh bathtub, I suppose.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 1/23/2015 @ 7:21 amMr Feet wrote:
True enough, but that doesn’t mean that our noble and wise President doesn’t want to keep clarifying the situation for them anyway.
The snarky Dana (f6a568) — 1/23/2015 @ 7:45 am22. seeRpea (1d44c7) — 1/22/2015 @ 11:33 pm
One of the Senators who reported what the head of the Mossad had said, or more likely, the person in the government who prepared a summary of what the Senators
had heard and gave it to Kerry.
One possibility: There is a lot of self-interest in government in telling their bosses tghey are doing the right thing. This probably became an argument in internal government documents.
It is not true that Mossad head Tamir Pardo had not said the words that were attributed to an Israeli intelligence official by Secretary of State John Kerry. At least according to the Ha’Aretz report. (although apparently in was not in the minutes)
The problem is that phrase was taken out of context. Pardo indeed probably had said that Congress voting for increased sanctions would “throw a grenade” into the talk with Iran. The only thing is, he said a grenade ought to be thrown into the talks – that is, the applecart needs to be upset. He said, OR ACKNOWLEDGED, it would probably stop the talks for a while. But later hopefully they would resume, AND THIS TIME THEY MIGHT GET WHAT THEY NEEDED FROM IRAN.
Sammy Finkelman (e806a6) — 1/23/2015 @ 9:41 amHe indeed used the word grenade.
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Mossad-in-rare-move-denies-it-contradicted-Netanyahu-by-lobbying-against-stiffer-Iran-sanctions-388616
Sammy Finkelman (e806a6) — 1/23/2015 @ 9:57 amThe typo “Regrading” (instead of “Regarding) is on the Jerusalem Post website!
The sentence “In other words, he said the Iranians needed a shock” is mine.
I didn’t close the quote.
Sammy Finkelman (e806a6) — 1/23/2015 @ 10:00 amTrue enough, but that doesn’t mean that our noble and wise President doesn’t want to keep clarifying the situation for them anyway.
he’s a stupid mass of sputum he makes me sick
happyfeet (a037ad) — 1/23/2015 @ 10:01 am“Too busy meeting with wacky, green lipstick wearing nut-bags who eat breakfast cereal out of teh bathtub, I suppose.”
Colonel – I filled my bathtub with pudding last November for a full body dip, but I passed on the green lipstick. Not my best color. I’m still not feeling any desire to meet with the president.
daleyrocks (bf33e9) — 1/23/2015 @ 12:18 pm#40… empty calories befit Teh Won…
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 1/23/2015 @ 5:02 pm