Anthony Weiner “Favorites” Tweet By Woman Whose Profile States: “Indulge Your Sexual Fantasies by Having an Affair”
This guy is going to keep trying to re-emerge in political life, so it’s useful to note that he hasn’t changed a bit. Gawker has the story about Weiner favoriting this tweet from September 24:
#WCW I love myself. pic.twitter.com/WJQhwVYegM
— Sugarfuzz (@JoslynStevens) September 24, 2014
At her Instagram account there are scads of pictures of her in her underwear, with numerous close-ups of the parts you would expect close-ups of.
So he’s looking at pictures of an attractive woman and happened to favorite it, right? That’s it? No, not quite. This particular woman is really into talking about how she likes sleeping with married men. Gawker has this screenshot from the woman’s Twitter bio:
Note:
Filling in for your wife since 2001. Indulge your sexual fantasies by having an affair.
Look a little deeper, though. In this tweet, “Sugarfuzz” embeds a video in which she talks about how she dates only married men — especially accomplished married men over 40 years old. She explains that this allows her to have a purely sexual relationship with them without being controlled.
I love dating married men http://t.co/QtQ1G5RBcG #marriage #dating #infidelity #sex
— Sugarfuzz (@JoslynStevens) October 25, 2014
Even before this latest scandal, her timeline was filled with tweets about cheating and affairs and sex with married men.
"Monogamy is the most difficult of all human marital arrangements." #marriage #affair
— Sugarfuzz (@JoslynStevens) September 23, 2014
Sneaking around & concealing an affair is not easy but if you do it right, the benefits outweigh the risks. #marriage #cheating
— Sugarfuzz (@JoslynStevens) September 29, 2014
All this follows an incident in June when Weiner favorited a story about hookup app Tinder. He explained: “I accidentally hit the star thingy” (hitting the star “favorites” a tweet). Then it emerged that there were a lot of other tweets that Weiner had “accidentally” favorited:
Meanwhile, the Village Voice looked at Weiner’s 27 Twitter favorites and found posts about an online column he writes, NHL hockey tweets — and racy photos of a California woman
“There were were a bunch of favorites there that I didn’t either didn’t recognize or mean to favorite,” Weiner explained in a statement.
“I’m not clear on how they got marked in the first place, but I assume I hit the little star thing accidentally as I scrolled through stuff.”
I wonder if there is a long German word for “guy who is a really bad liar mostly because he just doesn’t seem to care whether you believe him or not.”
Schlechterügnervorallemweilereinfachnichtzuinteressierenobsieihmglaubenodernicht.
Patterico (9c670f) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:17 pmThere are two short ones that my daughter taught me that you could combine. “Arschloch” and “Saukerl”. A**hole and pigboy. Arsclochsaukerl.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:24 pmHe is a sick, out of control man who continues to expose his pathology because he has no filters. The Dems who literally forced him out of congress in disgrace at least got this one thing right.
elissa (dc9413) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:35 pmSneaking around & concealing an affair is not easy but if you do it right, the benefits outweigh the risks.
As long as you keep spooning out that sugar, sugardaddy, my pimp won’t beat you up and I won’t tell your wife.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:37 pmFarmisht?
Kevin M (b357ee) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:38 pmHey, look, she’s old enough, better looking than his wife and apparently willing. On the Weiner scale of inappropriateness this is only 0.1W at most.
Kevin M (b357ee) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:41 pmI’m guessing that Hillary will fix it so that her pal Huma’s husband meets with an untimely accident.
JVW (60ca93) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:48 pmHmmm. Narcissistic Personality Disorder? Straight up sociopathy?
Regardless, the guy’s name reflects his central ethos.
Simon Jester (c8876d) — 10/25/2014 @ 1:49 pmshe’s one of the more attractive trannys i’ve seen recently…
redc1c4 (34e91b) — 10/25/2014 @ 2:02 pmWienerschmucksel
Leviticus (100d46) — 10/25/2014 @ 2:11 pmLeviticus, I left you a message on the “Remember When They Said This Wouldn’t Happen?” thread.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 2:14 pmhow’s she hanging, redc1c4?
mg (31009b) — 10/25/2014 @ 2:22 pma little lower every year…
redc1c4 (34e91b) — 10/25/2014 @ 2:32 pmI’m guessing that Hillary will fix it so that her pal Huma’s husband meets with an untimely accident.
Don’t think so. David Garth was once asked why he called Bess Myerson and Ed Koch “The Smith Brothers”. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-T5qjudy8RdA/UkTT_sK2g8I/AAAAAAAAB4g/XBnhu9O44TQ/s1600/Smith+Brothers.jpg
His answer: “Two beards, shmuck”.
Art Deco (ee8de5) — 10/25/2014 @ 3:01 pmAt least Anthony’s toaster is still loyal, I think.
daleyrocks (bf33e9) — 10/25/2014 @ 3:08 pmI wonder what his sex-toy budget is.
Kevin M (b357ee) — 10/25/2014 @ 4:11 pmRetch… not even with Anthony’s weiner.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 10/25/2014 @ 4:17 pmI dunno what the German is, but there is an English title for that type of person: White House Press Secretary.
edoc118 (c37322) — 10/25/2014 @ 5:39 pmThis isn’t surprising at all. After Carlos Danger’s first debacle, I commented that if he were truly remorseful and sought full restoration of his marriage, the first thing he would do would be to delete his twitter accounts(s), and give his wife his password for anything else he might have. IOW, come completely clean and then quit whatever was problematic. This as a good faith showing to her that he would not entertain nor tempt himself (or keep the door open to be tempted) in any way. He didn’t do that. Huma should have known better.
Dana (200ad1) — 10/25/2014 @ 6:02 pmThis thread needs music to go with the discussion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-sb8e3P4LM
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 6:13 pm==Huma should have known better.==
elissa (efe8f0) — 10/25/2014 @ 6:54 pmDana–I really do not believe that Huma cares. Theirs is clearly not a love match now and i suspect it never was.
lmao, steve57
mg (31009b) — 10/25/2014 @ 7:40 pmThe really odd thing is that nobody seems to care, when usually certain somebodies care very much. And not in a way normal people would welcome.
If you recall the recent case of Meriam Yehya Ibrahim in the Sudan, she not only was sentenced to death when she convicted of apostasy for becoming Christian even though her Muslim father abandoned the family when she was an infant. She was also sentenced to 100 lashes when she was convicted of zina. This is normally translated as adultery, but really the Arabic term means unlawful sex. Since Islam condemns women to the status of property, a Muslim woman can not legally marry a non-Muslim woman. Since Meriam per Islamic law a Muslim, she was not married to her husband and thus had illegal sex outside of marriage.
Yet Huma Abedin visits her mother in Saudi Arabia where her marriage to a Jew is just as much a crime as Meriam Ibrahim’s was in Sudan. And nobody cares. Despite the fact Huma Abedi’s family is eyeball deep in the Muslim Brotherhood. Despite the fact that she herself was a board member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s earliest front group in North America, the Muslim Students Association. Despite the fact that she was assistant editor for the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), which is the rag put out by the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), from 1996 to 2009. Which is closely allied to the Muslim Brotherhood and shares its goals. Preventing Muslims from integrating into non-Muslim majority nations, and eventually destroying them from within. It would be fair to describe the IMMA as a foreign policy arm of the Saudi government’s Ministry of Religious Affairs. The same outfit that funds radical, rabidly anti-Western Wahhabist mosques and Islamic Centers in the West. The same outfit that radicalized the 9/11 hijackers.
Perhaps it’s just a coincidence, but the founder of the IMMA Abdullah Omar Naseef remained on the masthead of the JMMA until 2003 when he was named as a defendant in civil suit by victims of 9/11 (forgot to mention in addition to his ties to the MB he also funded AQ).
Yes, the Abedin/Weiner marriage isn’t a love match. Why, it almost seems as a complete fraud. Like it’s just a front for something else, and everybody knows it. Which is why maybe Abedin’s family and the rest of the MB isn’t bothered by it and calling for her blood. Like they would be if she was a nobody like Meriam Ibrahim.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:23 pm*…a Muslim woman can not legally marry a non-Muslim woman…
Well, yes. That too.
But what I meant to say is that while a Muslim man can legally marry a non-Muslim woman, a Muslim woman can not legally marry a non-Muslim man. That would bring great shame on the family. The kind of shame only an honor killing can fix.
Which probably explains why Meriam Ibrahim’s brother seemed eager to kill her himself.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/05/world/africa/sudan-apostasy-brother-claims/index.html
Indeed it is not. As we have seen in Syria. We’ll be having none of that “indulging one’s humanity” BS around here.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:32 pmSteve57, I know of a highly educated modern Muslim woman who married an American Jew last year. Several friends of mine attended the wedding so I know about this first hand. Not only did no member of her family attend the wedding, but she’s been disowned and has been warned that she can never return to visit any of her family in their home country. I think that is more the SOP for these kinds of things.
elissa (efe8f0) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:37 pmI saw an interesting article by a Russian prostitute somewhere a week or so ago. She said she was very expensive and her clients were mostly older men. She also added that the few young men who could afford her weren’t very good lovers because they had been practicing “self abuse” with porno until they were 25. Interesting comment on society these days.
Mike K (90dfdc) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:44 pmIt depends on the country. My family married into a European Muslim family — Christian man, Muslim woman. There are no problems (expect the usual in-law ones). Her family has visited us several times, and she goes to see her family often and comes back with her head still on her shoulders.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:46 pmI still maintain Weiner and Spitzer, as was DSK was a lesser evil
http://therightscoop.com/democrat-war-on-women-alarm-charlie-crist-loves-donations-from-strip-clubs-charged-with-prostitution/
narciso (ee1f88) — 10/25/2014 @ 8:57 pmnk, the country in question is Saudi Arabia. Which is most definitely not a European Muslim country, to say the least.
It is true that Human Abedin wasn’t yet married to Anthony Weiner when she accompanied Hillary! to SA in February 2010. But she had been formally and publicly engaged to him for a year. And yet…you could here crickets chirping when normally you’d have the traditional Muslim “Day of Rage.”
elissa is right about the SOP if you are a serious Muslim from that part of the world. And Abedin’s family are serious Muslims. The lack of a reaction to her marriage is, as Sherlock Holmes noted in Silver Blaze, the dog that didn’t bark in the night.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:10 pmIslam doesn’t give the family any other choice. By marrying a non-Muslim man their daughter committed an act of apostasy. There is no way for them to condone it and remain Muslims themselves.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:23 pmwell he was notably among the most anti Saudi, although against Gitmo and any real constraints on them:
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/145233-ban-all-foreign-aid-to-saudi-arabia-for-exporting-terrorists-says-weiner
narciso (ee1f88) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:31 pmNo disagreement about Saudi Arabia or most Muslim countries outside Turkey and the Balkans. But did Islam corrupt them, or did it corrupt itself to suit their already barbaric nature*? What was their previous religion? Was Mambo-Jambo, god of the Congo, a kinder, gentler god than Allah? Moloch? Baal? We’re talking cannibalism and human sacrifices tossed alive in furnaces.
*There are Anglican churches in Africa that permit polygamy, right now.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:34 pmHey, give the guy a break. He’s practically a novice at this Twitter thingamajig.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/07/nyregion/wife-knew-of-online-past-but-not-photo-post-weiner-says.html?_r=0
I mean, they only got married in the Summer of 2010. And as part of his “rakish” (Is that the new codeword for “pervy?”) he used social media for sexual communication before that.
So it’s only been over half a decade. Obviously you need a decade or two of using social media for sexual communication before you start getting the hang of it and stop making amateur mistakes.
I wouldn’t know first hand (ahem) since I’ve never used social media for sexual communications. But clearly it’s really, really complicated like rocket surgery or something.
*Pro tip: when you need anonymous sources to advance the narrative via the NYT that the marriage is “for real,” the marriage isn’t for real.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:35 pm*… And as part of his “rakish” (Is that the new codeword for “pervy?”) past he used social media for sexual …
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:38 pmFrank Sinatra bedding half the starlets in Hollywood is “rakish”. Weiner playing with himself while looking at pictures on his cell phone is pathetic.
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:44 pmThis particular intolerance comes with Islam.
Or rather it comes from becoming Arabized, which is impossible to separate from Islam because it is an Arab-supremacist religion.
Which isn’t to say that societies that were to became Islamicized and Arabized didn’t already have their own forms of intolerance, which found different expression in the new religion. As far as I’m aware marrying outside your caste in caste-conscious India was a definite no no, too.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 9:49 pmhttp://quran.com/5/33
When a Muslim woman becomes too “westernized,” and most especially when she marries a non-Muslim man, she is causing corruption among the faithful. And Islam is clear about what her penalty must be.
There is evidence that this was simply part of the traditional clan culture of the Arabs that predated Islam. So much of Islam is taken whole cloth from pagan Arab culture. For instance everything Muslims do on the Hajj to Mecca (circling the Kasba so many times, kissing the black stone) is exactly what the pagans did and exactly how they did it when they visited those same “holy” sites back when Mecca was home to shrines to 360 gods.
Fun fact: Muhammad made Mecca the Qibla, the direction of prayer, while it was still home to those 360 pagan gods. So the early Muslims prayed toward a pagan religious holy site.
But whether it was something that Muhammad introduced or something the Arabs just continued to do, they exported it across the world.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 10:02 pmintriguingly though, the Caliphate went from Raqqua to Baghdad to Istanbul, at no point was their an Arab Caliphate.
narciso (ee1f88) — 10/25/2014 @ 10:08 pmI’m thinking along the lines that Christianity took root in the Roman Empire and had time to grow and strengthen in every place until at least the 8th century. Like the parable of seeds being sown on fertile soil or among thistles. Would Christianity look like Santeria if Peter and Paul had gone to Africa instead of Rome, I wonder. What would Islam look like if Mohammed had to preach it to people who knew Aristotle, Plato and the Stoics?
nk (dbc370) — 10/25/2014 @ 10:14 pmMuhammad himself? Or his “Peter and Paul?”
Because like the disciples Muhammad’s companions did spread Islam (very differently) after Muhammad’s (very different) departure from this earth.
And oddly enough they did spread it to people who knew Aristotle, Plato and the Stoics. The libraries of places like Alexandria were full of their works, as well as others.
It didn’t make a damned bit of difference.
Conquerors have nothing to learn from the conquered. I am literally paraphrasing early Muslim “evangelists.” If Muslims needed to know it, it was already in the Quran. If it’s not in the Quran then Muslims don’t need to know it, so burn it.
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 10:25 pmWhy Anthony Weiner’s political career must be destroyed reason number 429,493: the presidential limo arrives for a state visit abroad circa 2025 A.D.
http://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/admin/ed-assets/2014/10/Weinermobile-copy.jpg
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/25/2014 @ 10:44 pmI don’t know what she’s talking about there. Monogamy is easy. You just gotta be too broke for hookers and too ugly for other women.
Chuck Bartowski (3e0e89) — 10/25/2014 @ 11:02 pmSaw your message, nk. Replied on the other thread.
Leviticus (566eb4) — 10/26/2014 @ 1:46 pm“I wonder if there is a long German word for . . . “.
Actually there is such a word. German swear words are wonderfully inventive. We’ve all seen the phrase “Schweinehund” for “pig dog”.
But a better German swear word for Little Tony Weiner is “Schafshacker”–literally meaning “sheep’s prick”. That word fits Little Tony to a tee–after all his favorite song is “Only Ewe”–and it looks like he found a black sheep to sleep with.
Skeptical Voter (12e67d) — 10/26/2014 @ 6:27 pmEh. . .while stranger political “rehabilitations” have happened, Weiner is simply not likely to seek (let alone hold) public office again.
So what he does behind his wife’s back (or with her knowledge) is their problem. The rumor was that his marriage was a “marriage of convenience” even before his first pee-pee Twitter scandal. . .given his ongoing behavior since then, that seems probable to me.
anon (2f436d) — 10/26/2014 @ 8:14 pmThe German word you are looking for is Politiker.
Ken in NH (e7f3bf) — 10/27/2014 @ 9:57 amWhat would Islam look like if Mohammed had to preach it to people who knew Aristotle, Plato and the Stoics?
If at the time when there were still Greek pagans – Mohammed would have declared Aristotle to be a Moslem.
They were in very great disfavor with the Byzantines by his time. And his works maybe got preserved more by the Moslems – after a time.
Sammy Finkelman (d22d64) — 10/27/2014 @ 2:39 pmIf Muhammad had known about Aristotle, there’s no doubt he would have done exactly that. Muhammad simply appropriated well-known historical figures and wove them into the Quran to gain favor and influence with the people he was attempting to convert.
http://quran.com/18/83
And who was Dhul-Qarnayn, you might ask? Excellent question. He was the “two-horned one.”
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2703&Itemid=73
(Don’t get me started on Muslim science, in this case astronomy.)
It is almost universally accepted among the Muslim authorities that the figure known as Dhul-Qurnayn in the Quran is Alexander the Great. A few claim it’s another historical figure who fits the description and has the attributes of Dhul-Qurnayn such as Cyrus the Great, but again the they’re a tiny minority.
But the important thing is that this historical figure was, like Jesus and his followers, true Muslims. So, if as is widely accepted, Dhul-Qurnayn is supposed to be Alexander the Great then the Macedonian polytheist who called himself the son of Zeus was according to Muhammad really a monotheist.
And nobody knew it until Muhammad came along!
Steve57 (e92787) — 10/27/2014 @ 4:00 pmI was commenting on this bit, and I wondered in passing, since the Koran mentions Moses as Musa
http://www.hollywood-elsewhere.com/2014/10/christian-purists-riled-less-reverent-moses-depiction-exodus/#more-57085
narciso (ee1f88) — 10/27/2014 @ 4:41 pm