Their Risk For Freedom
[guest post by Dana]
Last weekend, the National Organization for Women (NOW) held a Strategy Summit in New Mexico.
A number of resolutions were on the docket for consideration. Here are a few that were passed by the feminist organization: Reframing Abortion Rights Advocacy, Creating a National Monument To Honor Our Foremothers, and the ubiquitous Dismantling White Privilege.
What didn’t pass muster? Ironically, a resolution titled Culturally Oppressive Laws Against Women and Girls.
All the resolution called for was a public education campaign. However, it specifically singled out Sharia law and listed the human and women’s rights violations performed in its name: forced veiling, forced child marriage, normalized beating, honor killing, purdah, stoning to death, hanging, and flogging for non-compliant women.
The language of the resolution was specific:
“Whereas, one of NOW’s official priorities is to eliminate violence against women…we urge NOW members to educate law enforcement, educators, medical professionals, and community leaders to the danger of Sharia law.”
NOW just could not bring themselves to pass the resolution, but tabled it for more discussion.
In light of the absurdity that is NOW, I want to draw attention to a unique group of women who don’t have the luxury of debating a resolution – as if such a resolution would have one iota of impact on their daily lives. And although facing an extremely difficult circumstance, these women are choosing to put themselves at risk in their defiant and courageous fight for freedom. This movement is about individual action. Their acts may seem small, but in their proper context they are enormous.
London-based journalist Masih Alinejad began a Facebook page, which she called My Stealthy Freedom. The site provides a place where women from Iran can post their photos without wearing their head scarves. The risk associated with this act is great as it defies the oppressive religious laws and dress code for women. Alinejad’s objective is not to ban the head scarf, but rather that women be given the choice whether to wear one. The movement has exploded since its inception in May, 2014.
Here are a few of these defiant acts done in the name of freedom this July 4th weekend (the commentary below each photo is the individual’s reaction to appearing in public, unveiled):
here is one of the work regions of Asalouyeh. I toke off my scarf to take some pictures.Then I saw some women with their families came after me and dared to take off their scarves in that place which was full of men and started to take pictures. I was so happy that I was the starter of such an action, although it was a small act but it was a pleasure.
Names and addresses of all my country’s alleys, streets and squares are Azadi (freedom). I’ve been fasting freedom for years but now I’ll be a muezzin and I call freedom Azan. I break my fast by all freedom that I just saw its name in the city just for being a woman.
Stealthy freedom, Ghadir Blvrd., Bandar-e-Abbas. I’ll say this simply, I want freedom. It is my right as a human being to be free. I want to shout out my freedom! Exactly in front of the bill board behind me!! I was pulled over on time while driving, because of “inappropriate dressing”. They towed away my car and called me to court. We are suffocating here under the ruling of this tyranny.
As a result of Alinejad’s My Stealthy Freedom page, she is facing grotesque attacks from Iran state television:
Vahid Yaminpour, a conservative Iranian commentator and TV personality, is alleging that Alinejad was raped on the streets of London by three men as her son was made to stand by as a witness.
“Masih Alinejad is a whore, and not a heretic as some people claim her to be,” Yaminpour wrote on his Facebook page. “We shouldn’t elevate her to the level of a heretic. She’s just trying to compensate her psychological (and probably financial) needs by recruiting young women and sharing her notoriety with younger women who are still not prostitutes.”
Alinejad denied all allegations in an interview with ABC News, citing the comments as a weak attempt by Iranian officials to smear her reputation and quell the explosive activity around her Facebook page, which has now gained more than 450,000 likes.
“They want to keep journalists silent,” she said. “I’ve been attacked several times, but this was the most fabricated, most disgusting news about me.”
The movement brings mixed feelings, as well:
“In Iran, being an Iranian journalist means that if you always break censorship, break the barrier, you’re going to get attacked,” she said. “It means you have to live in danger all the time.”
…
The backlash against her campaign has taken away any hope Alinejad had of returning to Iran, because “if they can rape you in their imagination, they can rape you when they are close to you.”
Still, the choice between going home and reuniting with her family or giving the women she considers to be her sisters a platform weighs heavily on the journalist.
“Do I go back to my country and keep silent, or stay abroad and be louder and louder, to be the voice of those mothers who lost a loved one and do not have any voice inside, and to be the voice of those women who do not believe in a mandatory hijab who need a voice, who need a platform?” she asked.
For Alinejad, there is only one answer.
“If you look at my inbox and read the messages that women send to me,” she said, “they knew the dangers and the risks, but they wanted to send their own message.
“I can’t leave them.”
An Iranian grandmother who posted her unveiled photo, eloquently sums it up:
I take my scarf off whenever and wherever I get the chance to do so. Flying inside the cage is the most expressive sort of objection… Alas the broken wing bird doesn’t have the chance to do it.
–Dana
h/t PJ Tatler
Ding?
Dana (99e2ea) — 7/6/2014 @ 11:52 amOppression is not having 4 of 16 contraceptives/abortifecits not paid for by your employer
Wearing the scarf/hajib is freedom
joe (93323e) — 7/6/2014 @ 11:53 amWe all learned what NOW was when they fired Tammy Bruce for attacking OJ Simpson as a murderer. Ralph Nader actually had a great comment about them. He said their only function now was fund raising.
Mike K (b5c01a) — 7/6/2014 @ 11:56 amAmerican feminists – let alone those around the globe – have NEVER taken issue with little 8 or 9 year old girls, around the world, being routinely held down on kitchen tables so that their clitoris can be snipped off with a pair of scissors, without anesthesia.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:09 pmOr “honor killings”, etc.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:10 pmWhy would they have a problem with white privilege in America?
Michael Ejercito (becea5) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:11 pmAmong the American left, being a “brave woman” means expressing opinions that are common staples of thought among the media and academic left and that have no consequence for being spoken aloud. I think these Iranian women put them to shame in terms of real courage.
JVW (feb406) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:19 pm3 cases of murder.
The third one is this:
http://www.israellycool.com/2014/07/03/i-bet-youve-never-heard-of-omaima-jaradat/
From: http://betweenjerusalemandtelaviv.blogspot.com/2014/07/compare-and-contrast.html
Sammy Finkelman (cd2969) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:32 pmduring the protests back in 2011, clotty-headed Hillary’s State Department created a twitter account to support the womens and they tweetered this historic tweeting
reading that still gives me chills even today
happyfeet (8ce051) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:48 pmNOW proved how much they actually cared about women during the Clinton impeachment fiasco. They stood by while the Clintons used the “Nuts-n-Sluts” defense. Sorry gals, NOW had to make sure abortion remained legal, or something. As if Roe vs Wade was going to be overturned because BJ perjured himself.
It takes a special kind of advocay group to ignore their mission statement because of political correctness. I doubt NOW was the first, and it definitely won’t be the last, to succomb to this type of nonsense. But ignoring one of the worst ideologies with regard to women’s rights is pretty disgusting. You’ve come a long way baby!
Huitzilincuatec (7fc17e) — 7/6/2014 @ 12:57 pmWTF… Sammy57?!?!
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 7/6/2014 @ 1:41 pmShe Being Brand New by E.E. Cummings
she being Brand
-new;and you
know consequently a
little stiff I was
careful of her and (having
thoroughly oiled the universal
joint tested my gas felt of
her radiator made sure her springs were O.
K.)i went right to it flooded-the-carburetor cranked her
up,slipped the
clutch (and then somehow got into reverse she
kicked what
the hell) next
minute i was back in neutral tried and
again slo-wly;bare,ly nudg. ing(my
lev-er Right-
oh and her gears being in
A 1 shape passed
from low through
second-in-to-high like
greasedlightning) just as we turned the corner of Divinity
avenue i touched the accelerator and give
her the juice,good
(it
was the first ride and believe I we was
happy to see how nice and acted right up to
the last minute coming back down by the Public
Gardens I slammed on
the
internalexpanding
&
externalcontracting
breaks Bothatonce and
brought allofher tremB
-ling
to a:dead.
stand-
Hadoop (f7d5ba) — 7/6/2014 @ 1:42 pm;Still)
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zyhu2ysqKGk
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 7/6/2014 @ 1:45 pmIt takes a brave woman to love me. A couple of Syrian and Iraqi girls gave it a shot back when I was dating. Knowing what I know now about honor killings I’m more than a little surprised. I feel I owe them a debt of gratitude.
A little something for the effort.
It’s wrong o run out like this.
Steve57 (efd576) — 7/6/2014 @ 1:50 pmI would bet my life that she is lovely.
https://patterico.com/app/uploads/2014/07/Untitled-1.gif
Too lovely for any poem I’m capable of writing.
Steve57 (efd576) — 7/6/2014 @ 1:59 pmThis is a very nice post, Dana. I fear many of the trends and not-positive probabilities that are going to occur and be experienced in the world before my time on earth is over-and after. But I think that a few hundred million affected women bravely coming together to say “hell no, in the 2lst century we’re not going to be shrouded in Burkas and hijabs anymore” is increasingly very likely to succeed. This has nothing to do with “religion” and everything to do with male dominance and power over females’ freedom. I hope they succeed, anyway, although some will certainly be killed for their bravery in the process. It would be nice if they, rather than shallow Sandra Fluke, would get the verbal and financial support and the attention of American women.
elissa (e00883) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:03 pmI would bet my life that she is lovely.
I immediately had the same thought. No doubt she could gaze upon me but for a mere moment and capture my heart forever.
I almost don’t want to see her face since she couldn’t possibly live up to the image I have created for her in my mind.
JVW (feb406) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:12 pmhttp://legalinsurrection.com/2014/07/arab-violence-against-israel-and-jews-continues/
narciso (24b824) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:19 pmThanks, elissa. I agree re the Flukes of the world. However, with that, I am keenly aware of the fact that just like the dolts of NOW, I essentially risk nothing to experience the freedoms I have. I may speak out on conservatism, I may post here, I may live a life of faith that is mocked, but so what? It really doesn’t cost me anything in terms of risk-taking. I am so thankful for that because I honestly don’t know how brave I would be in the face of such a threat. I’d like to say I would dare to go without a head scarf, too, but none of us really know what we’ll do in the face of danger. One’s courage isn’t usually known until put to the test.
Yes, there are indeed some lovely Iranians at the site and some great photo compositions, too.
Dana (4dbf62) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:33 pmthe American Left is only brave when no courage is required.
at the first sign of personal danger or sacrifice they run away in shrieking terror.
redc1c4 (abd49e) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:39 pmGood heavens, the Iranian Selena Gomez!
JVW (feb406) — 7/6/2014 @ 2:42 pmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukURt2TsEwY
Two days late and a dollar short.
Still, enjoy.
Steve57 (efd576) — 7/6/2014 @ 3:48 pmThanks for this post, Dana.
Dustin (739ea2) — 7/7/2014 @ 12:41 amSeeing Iran in the 1970s and comparing it to Iran today is probably the clearest illustration of the tyranny of pure evil since Stalin and Hitler.
Many places have been oppressed by idiots, but I don’t think many have fallen so sharply. They used to partner with Israel on massive capital improvements. EPWJ snarks aside, Jewish history is actually a rich part of Persian culture.
The only chance they’ve had, in recent memory, is Iraq joining the 21st century, and I fear that that hard won hope, paid in American blood, has been squandered obnoxiously for the stupidest political calculations.
Dustin (739ea2) — 7/7/2014 @ 12:48 am