Patterico's Pontifications

4/21/2011

Pigford Blues: Introduction

Filed under: General — Stranahan @ 7:20 am



[Guest post by Lee Stranahan]

Can’t let a week go by without some video for you.

Here’s a brand new rough cut of a segment from my upcoming documentary Pigford Blues, starring President Obama, both Democrat and Republican members of Congress and a cast of angry farmers.

 

– Lee Stranahan

10 Responses to “Pigford Blues: Introduction”

  1. I think you– and all of us– would be better off ignoring political paranoids like Wonkette & its denizens. Let them be. Why obsess over the craziness of others?

    Peter Kenny (f7ccdd)

  2. I wonder why jews support communists such as shirley sherrod and all that?

    DohBiden (15aa57)

  3. Is Obama linked to the alleged corruption? If not, why lead with him?

    Big Median (2b1825)

  4. I thought Pigford II was about vote buying, not fairness and justice.

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  5. “Is Obama linked to the alleged corruption? If not, why lead with him?”

    Big Median – Yes. Read about his relationship with John Boyd the head of the Black Farmers of America and Boyd’s promise to deliver votes if Obama pushes the Pigford II legislation. Familiarize yourself with the story before beclowning yourself.

    daleyrocks (bf33e9)

  6. The democraps are not for states rights although they used to be long ago. what made them change?

    DohBiden (15aa57)

  7. the socialist party of USA supported bush’s war in iraq and supported israel which they no longer do.

    DohBiden (15aa57)

  8. http://thefire.org/case/838.html

    Sorry to go off topic, but that vile liar big median said this never happened to conservatives, or heretics.

    JD (318f81)

  9. I’m assuming that the more I would learn about this would affirm your position on it, Lee.

    What is the plan for distributing this when it is finished, local theaters? I wonder what the odds are you would get plenty of free publicity concerning theaters being intimidated to not show it.

    I’m assuming that the majority of “Tea Party” members would resonate with outrage on this, even though the alleged “Tea Party demographic” shouldn’t be concerned with such an issue (according to “them”).

    I imagine if this was able to get some traction it would do a lot to convince Black voters that their interests are not automatically served by Dems and even President Obama himself, and remind some Repubs that their base will not be satisfied just because they have an R after their name.

    In a more just world, even if some of the events can’t be proven as crimes, one would hope that lawyers who were more interested in making themselves and others rich by gaming the system rather than fair application of the system would face ethics violations from the Bar.

    Another episode of “projection” by the left when President Obama talked about doctors doing unnecessary operations just to make money. I bet it is much more common for lawyers to take and pursue a case because there is money involved even when the facts are not compelling, because it is “the right of the individual to seek legal redress”. It is the right of the individual to consult a physician about having an operation too, but the ethical surgeon will not do the operation if he/she thinks it is not warranted by the facts. Yes, I know the analogy is not perfect, none are, but I stick by the main idea.

    MD in Philly (3d3f72)

  10. So, “big median”, it is pretty apparent that you did not read the post nor watch the video prior to posting your idiocy. Sadly, you seem incapable of shame or embarrassment.

    JD (318f81)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0763 secs.