Patterico's Pontifications

6/22/2010

The Best Thing About the LA Times

Filed under: Dog Trainer,Media Bias — DRJ @ 4:57 pm



[Guest post by DRJ]

I don’t even live in California but I’d subscribe to the L.A. Times if it had a few more reporters like Andrew Malcolm. I’d especially subscribe if they were all as clever, and occasionally sarcastic, as Malcolm. So read the whole thing.

— DRJ

5 Responses to “The Best Thing About the LA Times”

  1. What unmitigated arrogance.

    With an attitude like that, I am surprised that newspapers are not becoming a money sucking black hole.

    Oh, wait…

    FLBuckeye (212dea) — 6/22/2010 @ 5:15 pm

  2. minuscule two-out-of-three that is tiny. I mean “two” is only one more than one. Is there any number less than one? Well none. It’s not like it was eleven.- Nigel Tufnel

    Gazzer (d79016) — 6/22/2010 @ 5:17 pm

  3. Yes, the LA Times needs a few more folks like Andrew Malcolm — and a lot fewer folks like Sandy Banks, Hector Tobar, Tim Rutten, Michael Hiltzik . . . you add your own names to the list.

    Brother Bradley J. Fikes, C.O.R. (fb9e90) — 6/22/2010 @ 7:21 pm

  4. Enh, I once chastised a friend who had the LA Times at the bottom of his parrot’s cage. I suggest he not do that.

    It was too insulting to his parrot to subject him to such a low class paper.

    {^_^}

    JD (9ac83d) — 6/22/2010 @ 11:01 pm

  5. A little background on Malcolm: He was Laura Bush’s press secretary, and worked on Bush’s 2000 campaign. So he isn’t your average journalist — even if he did work for the New York Times for many years.

    I would guess that he is now quite happy being able to say all the things he couldn’t say while officially working for the Bushes.

    Jim Miller (d77521) — 6/23/2010 @ 4:12 pm


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0825 secs.