ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You?
Obama has released his health care plan (we are now allowed to call it ObamaCare), and it will cost us $1 trillion. (What’s another trillion?) The AP weighs in with its timeless even-handed treatment:
President Barack Obama is putting forward a nearly $1 trillion, 10-year health care plan that would allow the government to deny or roll back egregious insurance premium increases that infuriated consumers.
“Egregious.” The fair and balanced treatment doesn’t end there:
Posted Monday morning on the White House Web site, the plan would provide coverage to more than 31 million Americans now uninsured without adding to the federal deficit.
Would it, now? Or, does it merely claim to?
Just how are we going to spend $1 trillion without adding to the deficit? Let’s look at the proposal itself for the details:
It puts our budget and economy on a more stable path by reducing the deficit by $100 billion over the next ten years – and about $1 trillion over the second decade – by cutting government overspending and reining in waste, fraud and abuse.
Ah. It’s OK to spend $1 trillion more, you see, because we’ll get it back by cutting fraud and abuse. That oughta work great. Who better to cut government spending than Barack Obama?
I wonder if I could secure a bank loan that is twice what I could afford with that argument. “Mr. Bank Man, I will make up the difference by reining in waste, fraud, and abuse in our household.” I doubt it. (Five years ago, I probably could have — and we all saw where that lax attitude towards debt got us.)
The plan lacks a public option. Hey, that part comes later. First we just have to get that $1 trillion camel’s nose inside the tent.
According to the New York Times, it also lacks a Stupak amendment:
And the bill offers the Senate’s less restrictive language on abortion; it does not include the so-called “Stupak amendment,” which would bar insurers from offering abortion coverage to anyone buying a policy with a federal subsidy. The absence of the Stupak provision, named for Representative Bart Stupak, the conservative Michigan Democrat, could complicate matters for Mr. Obama in the House, where conservatives, led by Mr. Stupak, are adamant that the provision be included.
Federal dollars for abortions? This just gets better and better!
But you had me at $1 trillion.
They just won’t give up….
November can not get here fast enough.
Dopey (a812c5) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:48 amThe usual fraud about this nonsense saving money.
SPQR (26be8b) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:49 amLet’s not and say we did.
Mark L (dffa7e) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:55 amTime to send Dumbo and his circus packing.
PCD (1d8b6d) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:58 amBO does not know when to quit. I just hope that the next congress and specifically the R’s have the balls to repeal this crap if it gets passed.
BT (74cbec) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:59 amLike the insurance companies don’t make enough revenues as it is.
Comment by imadouchebag
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:02 amBut what about Booosh’s exploding deficit?
Comment by Smiley aka Sh-itEatingGrin
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:03 amEvery time they claim that it is deficit neutral or will reduce the deficit, people should point out how insulting of a lie that is.
JD (3b62be) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:13 amHow is Obama going to guarantee $1 trillion in deficit reduction 11-20 years from now? He can’t bind Congress that far in advance.
Some chump (050674) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:16 amObama Health Care Bill Does Not Include Stupak Language…
Obama Details Plan to Expand Health Care to Uninsured
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Published: February 22, 2010
WASHINGTON — President Obama
Defend America (516879) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:17 amon Monday laid out for the first time a detailed legislative……
Government creates nothing. Well, except winner and losers.
TimesDisliker (7a4255) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:38 amThe biggest fraud in this proposal in terms of the claimed “deficit neutrality” is the fact that to get to that point you have to count the $400 billion in cuts to payments to Medicare providers — doctors.
Yes, that is in the bill.
And there is a separate bill in Congress to restore those cuts called the “Doc Fix”.
So, in reality, the bill adds $400 billion to the deficit over 10 years.
shipwreckedcrew (3dde12) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:55 amShipwrecked – you should have said that it adds AT LEAST that much.
JD (6a0bfc) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:02 amThe BASTARD needs to be IMPEACHED, or tar and feathered, which ever comes first it doesn’t matter to me.
Sarah (98927a) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:08 am[…] DOT Spokesperson’s ACORN-y Background ‘Very Telling’ Big Business As Opponent of Free Markets ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? Progress Into […]
WANTED: One BLUE-DOG DEMOCRAT for California GOVERNOR! « Temple of Mut (79446d) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:16 am[…] For Using Filibuster to Stall His Takeover of 1/6 of US Economy Patterico’s Pontifications: ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? Frugal Café Blog Zone: How Much Are Americans Willing to Pay to Insure Everyone on ObamaCare? Most […]
Showdown Time: Obama’s Health Care Plan… Congress, Like It or Lump It… 78% of American Voters Believe Health Costs Will Skyrocket « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:24 amLike the insurance companies don’t make enough revenues as it is.
Comment by imadouchebag
Comment by Dmac — 2/22/2010 @ 8:02 am
Preemtive trollstrike. Excellent!
Matador (176445) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:32 amPreemptive, duh.
Matador (176445) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:35 amThe 1 Trillon will be offset by the 100 Million the administration will cut from it’s budget every year (like it did last year). Now, let me get out my calculator to see how many years that will take. 10 right? Er, or is that 100? Wait… 1000? Can’t be.
Corwin (ea9428) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:36 amI get the feeling the Magic 8-Ball is in charge.
“Answer unclear – ask again later”
mojo (8096f2) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:52 amOF COURSE it still has a “public option.” In fact, it’s got single-payer in it! It’s just hidden.
By claiming the power to roll back “egregious insurance premium increases” which are largely fueled by government cost-shifting in the first place, the government would have the power to simply drive private insurors out of business entirely, leaving their “voluntary public option” plan the only game in town.
Tully (4dce1a) — 2/22/2010 @ 10:32 amOh yeah, let’s not forget that not only will those Medicare cuts never actually happen, but that they’re being double-counted in the first place.
Tully (4dce1a) — 2/22/2010 @ 10:39 amThe biggest fraud in this proposal in terms of the claimed “deficit neutrality” is the fact that to get to that point you have to count the $400 billion in cuts to payments to Medicare providers — doctors.
Let’s not forget that not only will those Medicare cuts never actually happen, but that they’re being double-counted in the first place, so you have to double up the reverse entry there.
Tully (4dce1a) — 2/22/2010 @ 10:39 amThis won’t win him any GOP votes:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting/republican-ideas
imdw (d6bd12) — 2/22/2010 @ 10:45 amAdvances medical liability reform through grants to States: Provides grants to States to jump-start and evaluate promising medical liability reform ideas to put patient safety first, prevent medical errors, and reduce liability premiums.
Yes, troll. The bill also did, and may still, bars this and any other incentive to states that cap liability, like California did in 1975. They used to call something like that a “shell game” but not enough people remember what that was.
MIke K (2cf494) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:01 amMichael Moore probably read “$1 Trillion” and creamed his maternity jeans.
Icy Texan (449fea) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:14 amMike K – they have tried to insert that language and claim it as “tort reform” before. It is beyond dishonest, but the media let’s them get away with it.
JD (f0742b) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:16 amRight after setting up a commission to figure out how to reduce debt.
Well that sounds serious doesn’t it.
bill-tb (541ea9) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:41 amTeh Won better start being nice to the bankers; they might be the only thing standing between him and the pitchforks.
AD - RtR/OS! (93f531) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:47 amimadouchebag’s expected idiocy never surprises.
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 11:52 am“imadouchebag’s expected idiocy never surprises.”
What you think it will win him GOP votes? then you’re an idiot.
imdw (e6c812) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:18 pmSo, imdw – how about you tell us what in that list of water-thin gruel is supposed to entice any GOP votes?
Phil Smith (1cf25d) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:28 pm31, imd-dumbass, can you eat by yourself or do you have to breastfeed from your mommy?
Man, you are so stupid. There is nothing this socialist does to win GOP votes, except to resign office.
PCD (1d8b6d) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:45 pmimdw:
The GOP ideas that Obama included consist largely of ways to reduce costs. Typical. Democrats figure out new ways to spend taxpayer money and it’s up to Republicans to figure out how to pay for it.
DRJ (6a8003) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:48 pm“So, imdw – how about you tell us what in that list of water-thin gruel is supposed to entice any GOP votes?”
I said it wont.
“Man, you are so stupid. There is nothing this socialist does to win GOP votes, except to resign office.”
There was a good moment during SOTU when the GOP didn’t know whether to clap for tax cuts or not.
imdw (8f8ead) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:50 pmThere was a GREAT moment durint the SOTU, when Alito told us exactly what to make of the Male Socialist Pig’s rhetoric.
Icy Texan (449fea) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:56 pmOh, so you agree that it’s a farcically cynical ploy.
Phil Smith (1cf25d) — 2/22/2010 @ 12:57 pmI find it relentlessly hilarious when imadouchebag’s own inanities are thrown back in it’s face. If it had ever heard of the term cognitive dissonance, at least then it would have a tiny smidgen of self – recognition regarding it’s asshattery.
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:18 pmSince imadouchebag only listens to the rampant Obama fanboy tape within it’s head, nevertheless the interview by noted lefty hack Deborah Solomon in last Sunday’s NYT will help explain Obama’s problem in terms even it can comprehend (note hacky – sack’s attempts to try to get Ryan to look foolish, and only looks foolish herself in the process):
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/magazine/21fob-q4-t.html?scp=1&sq=paul%20ryan&st=cse
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:23 pm“There was a GREAT moment durint the SOTU, when Alito told us exactly what to make of the Male Socialist Pig’s rhetoric.”
But we even knew that was coming from just reading obama’s speech on the alito nomination.
imdw (de7003) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:23 pmLooks like the little president man has shifted his focus from establishing dirty socialist health cares to demolishing the private and capitalistical kind.
It’s more honest at least.
happyfeet (71f55e) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:26 pmI admit it is Monday afternoon and I haven’t yet opened the Sunday Times. But since you got to it before I, I’ll thank you for the heads up. I think the president and the democrats in congress would be quite eager to put the Ryan plan up for a vote. Even happier if they could trade that for a vote on up or down vote on health care.
And you gotta love the New York Times for giving Ryan the space to declare “My kids, you know, we don’t eat sugar-loaded stuff at home. I eat organic.”
Anything good in the Ethicist this week? Bill Cunningham?
imdw (76df6f) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:37 pmDeflect! BUNNIES!
JD (b5a4c1) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:47 pm“There was a good moment during SOTU when the GOP didn’t know whether to clap for tax cuts or not.”
Comment by imdw
That was either because they were trying to be polite and not have another “you lie” moment. Or they were dumb founded by Obama’s inability to understand fundamental tax jargon.
The majority of the “95% of Americans that got a tax cut” got no tax “cut” at all. What they got was a tax “deferral”.
That was the whopping extra $12 a month people got in their paychecks that was going to stimulate the economy and keep unemployment under 8%.
These people’s taxes weren’t cut. They’ll pay what they would have anyway for 2009 income. They just pay it now rather than last year in deductions from their pay checks.
A bewilder response is most appropriate to the claim: 95% of Americans got a tax cut in 2009, for any thinking person. Done you taxes yet?
JayCee (00f5a1) — 2/22/2010 @ 1:54 pmPeople are tired of hearing about health care. I think they want the little president man to shut up about it. Even dirty socialists are sick of him droning on about it.
Remember how he said there could be no recovery without health care reform?
He’s such an idiot.
happyfeet (71f55e) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:02 pm“That was the whopping extra $12 a month people got in their paychecks that was going to stimulate the economy and keep unemployment under 8%.”
A month? Looking at the reports it is a credit for 12-8 bucks a week. That adds up. Helps me out at least.
imdw (215ff9) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:05 pmSEIU hospital workers must be thrilled!
PJPony (3ba756) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:10 pmMore sock-puppetry! YIPPEE!
JD (5375e6) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:10 pm“…defenders of Medicare and Social Security…”
Why wouldn’t they defend it?
AD - RtR/OS! (93f531) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:18 pmFor Half-a-Century they opposed first SS, and then Medicare, and were crucified for it politically, and in the press, as both became the proverbial “Third-Rails” of politics.
So, spare us your great concern for GOP ethics and morals over defending Social Security/Medicare.
And, were you even alive when RR was President?
Or, is that what the Seminar script told you to say?
“Remember how he said there could be no recovery without health care reform?”
Hey remember when TARP was needed for health care reform? we’ve come a long way. Chill out.
“Paul Ryan has some worthy suggestions about how to cut entitlements by, well, cutting them. But no one in the GOP is likely to take those proposals seriously, since the Reagan model has always been to talk about cutting entitlements while expanding them for key constituencies, cutting taxes and saying deficits don’t matter, unless Democrats are in power, then they do.”
One addendum: the way to attack entitlements is to means test. This way they make the program not something universal but something for “those people” and then you can cut.
imdw (55b119) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:21 pmMore douchebaggery, none of which has anything to do with the topic, that BarckyCare’s pricetag is $1,000,000,000,000 +, at the very least, and no amount of accounting gimmicks and mendacity from the likes of dimwit will change that.
JD (5375e6) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:32 pm“Lawn Order” was Hax, so the comments were removed and deleted as Patterico’s ban is still in effect.
Stashiu3 (44da70) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:38 pmSHOCKA – He is on about his 5th name by now.
JD (5375e6) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:50 pmDRJ: i really don’t see what the problem is with the price tag….
after all, the Treasury Department still has plenty of checks, so we can’t be broke. %-)
redc1c4 (fb8750) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:53 pmHe’s used more than 5 in a single weekend. They just don’t usually last long enough for anyone to notice. 😉
Stashiu3 (44da70) — 2/22/2010 @ 2:55 pmAbout as many sock-puppets as IMP has personalities.
JD (5375e6) — 2/22/2010 @ 3:01 pm“A month? Looking at the reports it is a credit for 12-8 bucks a week. That adds up. Helps me out at least.”
It adds up as a liability, a tax debt you now owe and will pay by 4/15 or before.
I fail to see the “cut”, or the “credit”, anywhere in that.
JayCee (00f5a1) — 2/22/2010 @ 3:03 pmA month? Looking at the reports it is a credit for 12-8 bucks a week. That adds up. Helps me out at least.
You must have been thrilled with both of Bush’s “stimulus checks” then.
Another Chris (2d8013) — 2/22/2010 @ 3:21 pmimdw – How do you reconcile this with Scott Brown’s jobs bill vote?
daleyrocks (718861) — 2/22/2010 @ 4:35 pmOn the White House site, Obama said his proposal contained the biggest middle class tax cut EVAH. WTF is he talking about?
Bueller?
daleyrocks (718861) — 2/22/2010 @ 4:36 pmOnly a trillion? Boy, they’re smoking the good stuff there.
htom (412a17) — 2/22/2010 @ 4:48 pm“It adds up as a liability, a tax debt you now owe and will pay by 4/15 or before.”
You can’t be the only one that’s on to this. right?
“imdw – How do you reconcile this with Scott Brown’s jobs bill vote?”
this what? I think all the GOP should be voting for cloture.
“You must have been thrilled with both of Bush’s “stimulus checks” then.”
Like the JB’s sang — “You Can Have Watergate Just Gimme Some Bucks and I’ll Be Straight”
imdw (b75942) — 2/22/2010 @ 4:50 pmNaturally, imadouchebag not only doesn’t read the link provided, but portrays more ignorance by opining on it anyway. Brilliant.
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 5:41 pmD, I read it. I quoted it. I’ll get to the rest of the Sunday Times. I mean, unless there’s other parts you want to recommend?
imdw (bd4f90) — 2/22/2010 @ 6:08 pm“More douchebaggery, none of which has anything to do with the topic, that BarckyCare’s pricetag is $1,000,000,000,000 +, at the very least, and no amount of accounting gimmicks and mendacity from the likes of dimwit will change that.”
Maybe we’ll have to have our next war off budget or something.
imdw (bd4f90) — 2/22/2010 @ 6:12 pmBUNNIES!!!!!
JD (22c46b) — 2/22/2010 @ 6:35 pm“You must have been thrilled with both of Bush’s “stimulus checks” then.”
Comment by Another Chris
No, you’re right, I wasn’t.
But at least he didn’t ask for them back 10 months later.
JayCee (00f5a1) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:40 pmJayCee says: “It adds up as a liability, a tax debt you now owe and will pay by 4/15 or before.”
imdw says: “You can’t be the only one that’s on to this. right?”
No, I’m not the only one that’s on to this.
But you and Obama may be the only two people in the country that are not.
JayCee (00f5a1) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:46 pmMaybe we’ll have to have our next war off budget or something.
Do you realize that I posted this exact expected response from you (before you posted it here) on the later thread regarding the CBO?
Dmac (799abd) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:48 pm_____________________________________________
Pure arrogance and gall on the part of the idiot in the White House to be manuvering the way he is right now. But hardly surprising. After all, in the words of his former close spiritual leader:
“Goddamn America! Your chickens are coming home to roost!!”
Mark (411533) — 2/22/2010 @ 7:59 pm_____________________________________________
“Do you realize that I posted this exact expected response from you (before you posted it here) on the later thread regarding the CBO?”
See it’s not such a bad idea.
“No, I’m not the only one that’s on to this.”
Are you talking about the problems identified by the inspector general?
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2010reports/201041002fr.pdf
Or something else?
imdw (603c39) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:04 pmhttp://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2010/02/what-me-worry-credit-default-swaps-on-us-treasuries.html
SPQR (26be8b) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:20 pmPeople on this blog were against raising the debt limit. Wouldn’t that be the default these are meant to insure against?
imdw (66b9ba) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:26 pmThat is like its 8th attempt to deflect the discussion away from the topic. It is dizzy from spinning.
JD (f56a68) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:33 pmNo, imdw, you are once again pretending not to understand the topic in order to pretend to making a good faith comment that is in fact a troll.
The debt limit specifies how much debt the Treasury can take on, ie., how much it is authorized to sell as debt instruments. The CDS mentioned by Prof Bainbridge are insuring against the US failing to pay those obligations.
Understand, imdw, that no one is fooled by your act other than you.
SPQR (26be8b) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:42 pm“The debt limit specifies how much debt the Treasury can take on, ie., how much it is authorized to sell as debt instruments. The CDS mentioned by Prof Bainbridge are insuring against the US failing to pay those obligations.”
So the debt limit is used to pay out different obligations? We’d still pay out interest on treasuries?
imdw (017d51) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:45 pmAgain, imdw, your act is fooling no one but yourself.
SPQR (26be8b) — 2/22/2010 @ 8:47 pmI asked at the time what the consequences would be of not raising the debt limit. Now I’m presented with a link that says that CDSs on treasuries are rising in prices, but doesn’t link to such a thing happening. I’m putting this together with instapundit talking about default, people talking about the US not meeting its obligations, and trying to figure out just what path wingnuttia is on.
imdw (cd4b7a) — 2/22/2010 @ 9:41 pmif you figure out where you are, that will be a first for you….. have someone take a picture.
redc1c4 (fb8750) — 2/22/2010 @ 10:10 pmNo, imdw, you are not. You are doing your usual act of pretending not to understand the topic as cover for trollery.
The debt limit has nothing to do with default itself. And you know it.
SPQR (26be8b) — 2/23/2010 @ 9:49 amSPQR – neither of which have anything to do with the actual topic.
JD (4a4e35) — 2/23/2010 @ 10:10 am“The debt limit has nothing to do with default itself. And you know it.”
Without the debt limit we can’t meet obligations. Does that include obligations on treasuries? Does that include obligations for which CDSs are available? Should they be available when so many argue that we should fail to raise the debt limit? What happens if one day congress decides to kook out and not raise the debt limit?
imdw (613d03) — 2/23/2010 @ 10:22 am[…] His Takeover of 1/6 of US Economy HillBuzz: A Queen Gone Insane Patterico’s Pontifications: ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Boston Herald: Health bill […]
Graffiti’s on the Wall: Consumer Confidence Drops to Lowest Since April 2009, Bill Clinton Sees Political Atmosphere Similarities for Dems between 2010 & 1994 « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/23/2010 @ 12:42 pm[…] His Takeover of 1/6 of US Economy HillBuzz: A Queen Gone Insane Patterico’s Pontifications: ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Frugal Café Blog Zone: […]
Kill the ObamaCare Beast… “Fiscal Gimmicks and Gamesmanship,” Krauthammer’s “Masquerading Travesty” Analysis (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/24/2010 @ 2:49 pm[…] For Using Filibuster to Stall His Takeover of 1/6 of US Economy Patterico’s Pontifications: ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Another Black Conservative: […]
Deliberate or Accidental White House Blunder? GOP Alternative Health Care Links on WH Dot-Gov Website Since Last Summer « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/24/2010 @ 3:47 pm[…] Obama Unveils Health Plan! Patterico’s Pontifications: “Because I’m the President” and ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Philip Klein, American […]
Olbermann Will Freak Out & Call These Health Care Protesters “Racists” & Obama’s Nose Picking During Summit (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/25/2010 @ 7:52 pm[…] Obama Unveils Health Plan! Patterico’s Pontifications: “Because I’m the President” and ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Philip Klein, American […]
Olbermann Will Freak Out & Call These Health Care Protesters “Racists” & Obama’s Nose Picking During Summit (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/25/2010 @ 7:52 pm[…] When Country Needs Jobs Patterico’s Pontifications: “Because I’m the President” and ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? Philip Klein, American Spectator: Zogby Poll Shows Americans Unwilling to Pay Higher Taxes to […]
Radio Gold: Glenn Beck & Pat Gray Act Out Letters that Obama Reads Every Night (audio/video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/25/2010 @ 9:09 pm[…] Patterico’s Pontifications: Obama Gets Schooled and “Because I’m the President” and ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? Philip Klein, American Spectator: Zogby Poll Shows Americans Unwilling to Pay Higher Taxes to […]
If Looks Could Kill: Obama’s Face During Rep. Paul Ryan’s Dismantling of Dems’ Health Care Costs (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/26/2010 @ 9:22 am[…] Patterico’s Pontifications: Obama Gets Schooled and “Because I’m the President” and ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? Philip Klein, American Spectator: Zogby Poll Shows Americans Unwilling to Pay Higher Taxes to […]
If Looks Could Kill: Obama’s Face During Rep. Paul Ryan’s Dismantling of Dems’ Health Care Costs (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 2/26/2010 @ 9:22 am[…] Gone Insane and The 2010 Obama, the best Government Motors can do Patterico’s Pontifications: ObamaCare Revealed: Hey, How Does Spending Another Trillion Dollars Grab You? and Can the Democrats Push Through Health Care Using Reconciliation? Another Black Conservative: […]
Scapegoat Weather: White House Blames Rising US Unemployment Numbers in February on Cold, Storms « Frugal Café Blog Zone (a66042) — 3/2/2010 @ 2:27 am3/08/2010
To see the true Health care Tax forum you must stop thinking in 3-D,This multi tax forum is against a $100 Trillion Dollar system.. …
To force pay into another system of failures within Health Care Insurance Groups.
This economy will not balance with this concept of a tax forum against the Health Care System. The issue of how to force pay into this system of Health Care may have worked but I am still troubled over the progressive tax forum within this Bill. It covers so many items and Countries that it only forces the system to adjust itself. In some areas, increases against the people and the troubled economy, and in other areas, less effects will be felt.
But this is my big problem, Government Officials seek help and they are to proud to ask us, “the true working force of Government.” It is understandable they have failed the People and within the United States Of America all we ask is to see us as who we are and not try to bring us into this world of the intellectual. I guess our Prime Directive is that of Star Trek, so it must be understood that for millions of people we are just as happy as can be making $13.00 per hour and we have no interest in this world of politics, and how to be a Enstine. Government Officials must understand that there is a level of people within different parts of this Country, that seek to be only that they find to make them happy.
As for this economy well, it is said that the U.S.A. Arms Division has created enough arsenal to destroy every last creature in the world 2 times over,built with tax dollars. This would be funny if not for the irony of it. And now as time has passed Government Officials keep failing. Before 9/11 all the way to today.
As it is in a world of a system, when employees continue to fail, one or two things happen, one; you get fired, two; if you see into a person a good, then it is political correct to implement a penalty or roll back in pay. But this implement of penalty is more favored in the course of action in the Federal Employment World. So how to fix the economy and unite it with the Health Care issue. It would be in the Countries best interest to implement a 10% per cent penalty against every State, County and Government Official within this Matrix of failures. Hey what is that old saying, what is good for the Goose is good for the Gander. I am serous about this, it is past due to show that our Government Officials they have failed, their system failure reaches into this world of warnings that they brush aside as if the information is not worthy noting. From Pearl Harbor to 9/11/2001 to 3/07/2010 of our tax system and Health Care Reform. This 10% per cent penalty should go into the Health Care Forum.
The big problem that Government Officials have is that they have no street credit. President Obama still has some but if he does not take his family and step away from these dueling Parties, that fight over this Health Care Dollar, and stand with Us he will lose all credit from the streets to the county.
President Obama, I would say to you, you have one last chance to regain the hopes and dreams of the American People. To reach out in a concept that states, if there is 250 million people in trouble because of these failures, I would give all my money to them and then I would say to all that I gave money to, “I have no money left, would you all please give me $1.00 back and then I would have $250. million dollars to start all over again.”
As for this $100,trillion dollar in site………….
Results 1 – 10 of about 685,000 for net worth of medicine development industry
Just to show how deep this Health Care Tax split petition reaches. The term split petition is used because of the Tax factor plan that is not seen because of the intent not to show a capital Taxing of close to a $100 trillion dollar package, a yearly system income, not profit…..
Some have stated that I clam to have spiritual in site or something of the sort. I assure you this is not true, so when I state that I asked God to help, it is my way of saying hey Bobby show me how to work on theses Chevy engines. But I do thank you for the consideration. Consider me a cross of Jethro Bodine from the Beverly Hill Billies with my 10th. Grade education and Vin Diesel from the move Pitch Black.
Henry Massingale (c2c24a) — 3/10/2010 @ 9:57 amSo drop on by and see page 100 at our site and follow the blue pill link
Henry Massingale
FASC Concepts in and for Pay It Forward
http://www.fascmovement.mysite.com on google, look for page 1 american dream official site