Patterico's Pontifications

11/16/2009

ObamaCare: A raid on Medicare and Social Security?

Filed under: General — Karl @ 5:19 pm



[Posted by Karl]

Senate Maj. Ldr. Harry Reid intended to introduce his version of ObamaCare for the Senate floor this week, but the New York Times is telling us: “don’t count the days.” As has often been the case, the problem has been getting favorable numbers from the Congressional Budget Office:

About 11 p.m. last Tuesday, the budget office sent Mr. Reid 11 pages of questions about his legislation. On Wednesday afternoon Mr. Reid’s staff met with budget office officials. And the back-and-forth continues.

But Mr. Reid has already received some substantial analysis of his measure, and if the numbers had been what he wanted, he would have released a bill by now.

Instead, he has repeatedly gone back to the budget office with variations of the legislation, trying to figure out how to limit the overall cost of the bill while increasing the number of people who would gain health coverage.

Mr. Reid has put forward a proposal to increase the Medicare payroll tax on wealthy taxpayers, in part to help reduce a proposed tax on high-price health insurance plans, which is opposed by organized labor interests.

But the tax on high-price insurance plans is one of the few proposals still included in the legislation that the Congressional Budget Office has said would help slow the growth of the nation’s health care costs. So Mr. Reid must choose between following the recommendation of experts on health economics and angering a crucial Democratic constituency.

Left unreported is the effect of the two taxes. The intended effect of tax on so-called “Cadillac” health insurance policies is to get people to adjust their compensation, shifting the ratio away from coverage toward wages (whether employees would actually end up with higher wages is debatable). The CBO accounting of the Baucus poposal made clear that its supposed deficit reduction depended on skimming the new Social Security taxes, perhaps the clearest example of “raiding the trust fund” on record.

Reid apparently hopes to appease Big Labor by reducing the effect of the “Cadillac” tax, but plans to do so by increasing the Medicare payroll tax. That looks suspiciously like Reid is planning to siphon funds ostensibly collected for Medicare to fund healthcare for non-seniors — i.e., a raid on the Medicare trust fund. Seniors have consistently been one of the groups most opposed to ObamaCare. Reid’s willingness to raid their safety net will only increase that opposition.

–Karl

9 Responses to “ObamaCare: A raid on Medicare and Social Security?”

  1. I think this is the Achilles heel of the health care bills. They don’t add up. There is a $500 billion cut in Medicare. We know that won’t happen. It never has. There is a 21% cut in physicians’ fees. That won’t happen. It has been overridden each year and if they don’t, doctors will abandon Medicare faster than they already are. That’s $750 billion. The CMS estimates 23 million uninsured after it takes effect. Why bother ? GIve them the money for insurance. It’s cheaper.

    Mike K (2cf494)

  2. Excellent, as usual, Karl.

    Ed from SFV (1333b1)

  3. This is where AARP’s board is screwing over its membership in order to suck up to Democrat leadership.

    SPQR (26be8b)

  4. Features and bugs, people. Features and bugs.

    JD (cecc16)

  5. These are the minor details that Myron always says will get worked out later. What could go wrong?

    daleyrocks (718861)

  6. AARP are in competition with private insurance. They were promised that private insurance would be crippled. This is a business decison.

    MIke K (2cf494)

  7. AARP are in competition with private insurance. They were promised that private insurance would be crippled. This is a business decision.

    MIke K (2cf494)

  8. Macbooks have a too sensitive touchpad

    MIke K (2cf494)

  9. The AARP has sold out our little country. Magazine data out today showed that their stupid magazine barely increased readership, which is meaningful since demographics are still favorable to their growth. If you see your grandma reading a copy of AARP what you should do is snatch it out of her arthritic little paw and smack her upside the head with it. It’s for her own good.

    happyfeet (b919e7)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0749 secs.