More Evidence That an Associate Producer of the Polanski Documentary Spammed Anonymous Comments Attacking Me
Here is more evidence that Michelle Sullivan, associate producer of the Polanski documentary “Wanted and Desired,” was the commenter named “kitty kat” who spammed several comments onto my site defaming me and my employer, the Los Angeles County District Attorney (for whom I do not speak on this blog).
Namely, kitty kat spammed the same comment on a few threads at The Daily Beast — and then scrubbed them after I connected “kitty kat” to Michelle Sullivan.
If someone were trying to frame her, why would they do that?
The evidence is in the extended entry.
An e-mailer sends me the full text of the comment that was left at The Daily Beast:
Justice for the victim and Polanski cannot be won under a corrupt justice system then and now.
David Wells did not lie in the documentary. The interview was done years ago according to the director. The film premiered in 2008 worldwide. No word from Wells on his big lie until now? Me thinks Cooley is worried he will not be elected again. Clearly the LAJD has no respect for its own system but as we know corruption breeds corruption. The fact that the majority of the PRESS is IGNORING a corrupt judge in 1977 and now a corrupt DA speaks volumes.
RE: Probation Transcripts: So many case facts have been spinned, I cannot even begin to list them all. However the documentary: Roman Polanski: Wanted & Desired interviews MAJOR participants from the case and witnesses to Rittenband’s judicial misconduct who outline this heinous conduct in the film. How interesting that the PRESS also FAILS to mention that Rittenband asked a news reporter (as well as David Wells ) “What he should do with Polanski?” Ethics Violation…big time.
Also, please note that David Wells provided way too many SPECIFIC details. Lying? I don’t think so…. Let’s see if his current statement will hold up under a polygraph test, shall we?
Also, how interesting that the prosecutor Roger Gunson, says in the film ( paraphrase ) ” had he been in Polanski’s shoes, he would have fled as well.” Yes, the highly respected MORMON PROSECUTOR!!!!. The Judicial misconduct was indeed….that bad…. Oh and did I mention the 2 PRETEND hearings that Rittenband concocted? The list of misconduct and ethics violations goes on and on and on.
How interesting that the PRESS neglects to mention… that Rittenband was removed from the case.
The LAJD says its been trying to get Polanski for 30 years. When questioned, they immediately scramble to produce a press release which they post on their website with some dates and blurbs over the years…. Anybody can write a press release. Let’s see the original papers.
Seems evident that a corrupt justice department and a biased sensationalist News Media walk hand in hand. After all, an election year is coming up! Is it not?
No wonder Polanski fled. Anyone in their right mind would.
1:35 am, Oct 4, 2009
My e-mailer gives this link for the comment, but when you click that link, you see this message:
This user is no longer registered.
Apparently “kitty kat” decided to unregister, and thus delete her comments, right after I showed extensive evidence that “kitty kat” was Michelle Sullivan.
However, there are replies to her comment, and the first quotes the last line of the comment that my reader copied and e-mailed to me: “No wonder Polanski fled. Anyone in their right mind would.”
In addition, Google has retained ample evidence of the existence of the comment on at least two different Daily Beast postings relating to Polanski. See and this link for an example:
Or this link for proof that another part of the quote was left at The Daily Beast:
This link shows that “Kitty Kat” was leaving comments there.
As for the name kitty kat:
“You’re a very nosy fellow, kitty kat, huh?”