Patterico's Pontifications

11/21/2007

The French Transit Strike

Filed under: International — DRJ @ 3:10 pm



[Guest post by DRJ]

French transit workers went on strike last week to protest government action restricting their ability to retire in their 50s. Just hours before talks between the government and the union were scheduled to begin, multiple incidents of arson were reported on four rail lines across France. The sabotage – which may have occurred on train lines operated by workers who want to suspend the strike – suggests it may be aimed at union defectors as much as the government:

“Some SNCF workers – who operate regional trains, the high-speed lines and other long distance trains – voted Wednesday in several major cities to suspend the strike, but others in Normandy and Nantes voted to continue.

On Tuesday, François Chérèque, secretary general of the CFDT, was forced to flee a union rally after jeering members surrounded him to protest his support of negotiations. They hooted and whistled and some carried signs that read, “Chérèque, no knife in our back” and “Yes to unity. No to collaboration.”

On Wednesday morning, Chérèque participated in a radio interview on Europe 1, where he expressed concerns about some of his membership. “French unions have a real problem with democracy,” he said, noting that the majority of his members had decided to return to work.

We have had debates with our militants for four years,” he added, “and they know very well that the change in their special retirement benefits is inevitable. That’s why we have decided to return to negotiations.”

Government officials said Wednesday that the number of striking workers had fallen. About one in five were now absent, they said, compared with the start of the strike last week when 61 percent of workers took part. But a minority of workers can still disrupt most train services.”

As a footnote, the report contained this explanation of the origin of the word sabotage:

“What the government called sabotage – a distinctively French word that dates to the railroad strike of 1910, when workers destroyed the wooden shoes, or sabots, that held rails in place – took place at the start of the commuting day.”


[Edit: Maybe not. See the comments for more thoughts on the origin of the word sabotage. — DRJ]

The report also notes an interesting public response to the transit strike:

“As the negotiations began, public attitudes seemed to be hardening against the strikers, according to a survey for the conservative French newspaper Le Figaro.

The poll showed that almost 70 percent of those surveyed said the strike was unjustified and the government should not back down from its efforts to eliminate special retirement privileges that allow transit workers to retire in their 50s.”

It’s extremely generous to have a program that lets workers retire in their 50s. Maybe Sarkozy’s election and polls like these are signs the French are rethinking their ability to provide generous social welfare programs.

— DRJ

6 Responses to “The French Transit Strike”

  1. I saw an article about France. Did they surrender to someone today ?

    JD (33beff)

  2. I believe this is one of several strikes over revision of retirement benefits and retirements that has taken place recently in France. However, the only important one was by the stagehands at the Paris Opera. I’m not sure if they’ve unstruck yet and have gone back to striking sets 🙂

    BTW, if you want to see an example of Wiki at its weakest, go to this page, which shows the editorial changes made on the article “sabotage”, or more specifically, the most recent, which uses the same sentence you quote as the main definition, and relegates the original definition to paragraph two. And it quotes the news article so precisely that it carries over the last clause (about the sabotage being done early in the day) into the Wiki definition, making nonsense of it.
    The changes are noted here:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sabotage&action=edit&undoafter=172969802&undo=172985313

    The orginial definition is the one I’ve always heard–French weavers throwing their sabots at newly invented industrial machinery early in the Industrial Revolution–although the unedited definition did make it sound like an urban myth.

    Anyone have an OED handy? Or at least subscribe to OED.com?

    kishnevi (8731ef)

  3. How interesting, Kishnevi. Here’s another version that’s similar to yours, and it makes the most sense to me.

    DRJ (973069)

  4. Maybe Sarkozy’s election and polls like these are signs the French are rethinking their ability to provide generous social welfare programs.

    Impulses that would better flourish had Sarkozy had not just demanded and won a 140% pay increase for himself.

    steve (a3c5c3)

  5. Ah wikipedia…

    A quantum encyclopedia where facts both exist and don’t exist, depending on the will of the discordant mob…

    Scott Jacobs (a1de9d)

  6. Steve – So the French members of parliament or whatever they call it raising Sarkozy’s salary to the same level of that of the French Prime Minister and the rame range of other European leaders is an outrage in your eyes? I would have thought the enormous egos of the French would have been terribly embarrassed to discover that their President was paid less than the leaders of other countries. It implies a such a diminished status and the French can’t have that.

    daleyrocks (906622)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0730 secs.