Marc Danziger Solves the Jam(a)il Hussein/Burned Mosques Controversy?
I just got off the phone with Marc “Armed Liberal” Danziger. If everything comes together the way he hopes it will, he is going to blow the lid off of this Jam(a)il Hussein controversy. If he’s able to put together what he told me about on the phone, it’s huge.
I wish I could say more.
I asked Marc when he’s planning to put something up. He’s hopeful that he’ll have the post ready sometime this evening. He promised to call me when it’s up, so you can get the link here, or keep an eye on your RSS reader — or just go to Winds of Change this evening and keep hitting F5, over and over and over again, until the post finally appears.
You won’t want to miss this.
P.S. What I’m trying to say is, if this comes together, this is what everyone will be talking about all week.
Do you see what I’m saying?
Yup, I see. Not a bad way to start the week for Time’s man-of-the-year.
Perfectsense (b6ec8c) — 12/17/2006 @ 1:23 pmDoes this mean Michelle won’t be going to Iraq?
Maggie45 (5dc537) — 12/17/2006 @ 2:01 pmYeah, we’ll be talking about it for a week. The liberal MSM will do its best to ignore it.
The Hound (bd15f3) — 12/17/2006 @ 2:13 pmI don’t. Wish I did…now I must go f5 like crazy.
topsecretk9 (f39330) — 12/17/2006 @ 3:01 pmOoops…blockquoted the wrong sentence
I don’t. Wish I did…now I must go f5 like crazy.
topsecretk9 (f39330) — 12/17/2006 @ 3:02 pmI hope it’s what I’m imagining. If so, I think we should send Marc and Curt to Disney World as this year’s blogging MVPs.
DRJ (a5fa81) — 12/17/2006 @ 3:37 pmThanks for the heads-up, both on this and the blog cookbook.
However, pushing F5 does nothing on my Linux computer. Not everyone is a serf of Bill the Gates.
Bradley J. Fikes (19f52f) — 12/17/2006 @ 5:53 pmThere’s a Firefox plugin (actually more than one) that runs in the background and lets you know when a particular page has been updated.
Gosh, it might even work for nose-in-the-air Linux Weenies. 🙂
Merovign (feee99) — 12/17/2006 @ 8:46 pmThanks, Microserf. 🙂
Bradley J. Fikes (19f52f) — 12/17/2006 @ 8:58 pmIt sounds like you’re falling into the common blogger trap of pre-hyping a medium-sized story to make it look huge, only to leave everyone underwhelmed when the actual story breaks. It looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. Here’s hoping that this time, it doesn’t turn out to be a duck after all.
Xrlq (01c9ab) — 12/18/2006 @ 4:04 amShinola Sandwich Watch, Part II…
Patterico’s talked to Marc “Armed Liberal” Danziger about Jamil Hussein and, supposedly, Danziger’s going to post something at Winds Of Change tonight that’s “going to blow the lid off of this Jam(a)il Hussein controversy.” And from the tone o…
The Political Pit Bull (e43591) — 12/18/2006 @ 9:41 am[…] Armed Liberal did yeoman’s work but the results, alas, didn’t match the hype. Here’s what we now know, or what we think we know: […]
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Jamilgate: Many Jamil Husseins, not so many Capt. Jamil Husseins (d4224a) — 12/18/2006 @ 5:21 pm[…] So as of when I hyped his post, it was looking like: 1) Jam(a)il Hussein had been located and determined to be a noncredible Saddam holdover; and 2) we might have the first real photographic proof I’ve seen that four mosques were not burned, despite the AP’s original claim that they were. […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Marc Danziger’s Jam(a)il Hussein Post is Up (421107) — 12/18/2006 @ 6:07 pm