It’s the “Substance”
More reasons why I don’t discuss the “substance.” I’m glad someone does. (Via Xrlq.)
More reasons why I don’t discuss the “substance.” I’m glad someone does. (Via Xrlq.)
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Powered by WordPress.
Question: Why is anyone addressing anything dredged up by the laughable, many-puppeted Greenwald?
This rolling joke belongs in the blogger dictionary right after Frisch!
Frisch: insane, intensely vulgar, sexually predatory personal attacks which often include children and result in loss of employment, public derision and social isolation eventually ending in incarceration and/or suicide.
Greenwalding: Use (and denial of use) of multiple sock-puppets to support a limp and feeble attempt to attain fleeting recognition on the internet. (See flaccid, cowardly, schizophrenic, boob.)
heldmyw (a999cd) — 8/2/2006 @ 7:50 amAh.
More of that very peculiar thing that is thought by some to be Greenwald’s intellectualism.
Dwilkers (a1687a) — 8/2/2006 @ 8:27 ami’ll be surprised if mona responds. if memory serves, she said g.g. didn’t lie about you, patterico (not condemning coulter), in an earlier q and o thread. you proved he did, and she did not reappear.
frendlydude2k (10d431) — 8/2/2006 @ 7:34 pm