Kerr’s Challenge for Those Who Say the Knock-and-Announce Case Defied “Originalism”
Orin Kerr has a challenge for those who say the knock-and-announce decision was not originalist, or somehow a departure from precedent:
What is the first known case of any court in any country suppressing evidence for failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule?
Here’s a related point: the exclusionary rule itself is not an originalist concept.
Um, shouldn’t the “related point” be the main point?
Crank (5f5694) — 6/20/2006 @ 3:46 pm