Zombietime has another incisive and photo-filled post covering San Francisco peace rallies. Good stuff. (Via Ace.)
P.S. Zombietime is like what INDC Journal used to be, before Bill Ardolino got bored with blogging and started writing posts (like this one) that say: “I’ve got nothing.” (Yes, I’m pimping him for a reaction.)
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Powered by WordPress.
Didn’t the guys that are into scrotum inflating show up?
Boss429 (d7f947) — 3/21/2006 @ 9:29 amOh boy, pictures of whackos. This really elevates the debate. I know I carry my Karl Marx books with me everywhere I go and a huge placard that says that Bush is the anti-Christ.
Where’s a few pictures of Karmicommunist with a few shrunken heads in the background? And where are all of the swastika loving skinhead photos?
What a cheap shot.
Psyberian (dd13d6) — 3/23/2006 @ 4:32 amHey, Psy, lighten up my friend. It’s all in good fun. Really.
Harry Arthur (40c0a6) — 3/23/2006 @ 5:36 amOne more note, Psy. Take a look at the second picture with the sign. Nothing I haven’t read posted by blu on this very site. Wouldn’t you agree?
Nothing new. Same crowd I saw when I went to Viet Nam in 1971, except some of them have grey hair now.
Harry Arthur (40c0a6) — 3/23/2006 @ 5:40 amI wouldn’t worry much about this kind of thing Harry, except I believe that this tactic does have a political effect on people unfortunately. On a certain level, most people looking at them say to themselves, “Oh, so these people are what democrats look like.”
Psyberian (dd13d6) — 3/23/2006 @ 5:52 amWhen Democrats embrace them (see, e.g., Cindy Sheehan), why aren’t people supposed to think that?
It would be like if, when California was considering Proposition 209, the pro-209 forces, instead of telling them to shut up and get out of our state, embraced David Duke and the KKK’s advocacy of the position.
When one group takes the “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” position, as the Democrats do appear to do on this issue, it shouldn’t then surprise them to be grouped with said friends.
Angry Clam (fa7fff) — 3/23/2006 @ 5:55 amPsy, …except I believe that this tactic does have a political effect on people unfortunately. On a certain level, most people looking at them say to themselves, “Oh, so these people are what democrats look like.”
I couldn’t agree more, whether that thought process is logic-based or not. The democrat party does itself no good either, when it ignores the Liebermans and seats Michael Moore next to Jimmy Carter at its convention.
Add that to Carter’s overseas and editorial comments, Gore’s overseas speeches, Feingold’s “censor or impeach Bush”, Reid, Pelosi, and the current scizophrenia (sp) regarding the NSA monitoring program, and one has to wonder who it is that rational people should conclude represents democrats?
Harry Arthur (40c0a6) — 3/23/2006 @ 7:31 am