I had a few things I was going to post about this morning, but server issues interfered. Look for a flurry of activity this evening. I have some comments about the new Sunday Opinion section (aka “Current”).
In the meantime, if you didn’t read this weekend’s posts, scroll down and read them.
Then go to Kevin Murphy’s to see a graphic depiction of why Arnold wants to redistrict. (Xrlq has challenged Democrats to justify this.)
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Powered by WordPress.
Come on guys and gals, Flap believes in a fair apportionment but there are substantial geographic reasons for this gerrymander.
But, there are also substantial party registration ones as well, but more importantly demonstrated in legislative districts and other areas of California.
Perhaps the California legislature should have more districts? Read my post on this issue here:
Proposition 77: Does SIZE Really Matter?
Cross-posted at Xrlq
Flap (adece0) — 7/11/2005 @ 8:35 pmpost updated to show old and new maps.
Kevin Murphy (9982dd) — 7/12/2005 @ 10:59 am