Patterico's Pontifications

5/16/2016

The Constitutional Vanguard Forum

Filed under: — Patterico @ 10:13 pm

Until I can figure out something better, this is the place for the Constitutional Vanguard to meet and discuss ideas. It is intended to be only for members of the Constitutional Vanguard. (You can sign up here.) If you are a member, leave your comments below!

11 Responses to “The Constitutional Vanguard Forum”

  1. Welcome! If you have ideas about better ways to communicate, I am open to those as well. Until then, use this as a place to leave your thoughts.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  2. Thank you !

    Are you considering using a closed FaceBook group ? One where, once set up, one can only see its contents if one has been accepted as a member ?

    Alastor (2e7f9f)

  3. You can call the place Old Valeria. I feel like one of those greyscale afflicted Stone Men from Game of Thrones after this the 3rd heartbreaking Presidential election since America squandered our hard-fought and oh-so-costly gains towards peace in the Middle East.

    Jack (ff1ca8)

  4. Alastor,

    The Facebook group is a great idea. I will look into it.

    Patterico (e2dce3)

  5. I’m with Alastor. A closed Facebook group is probably the single best way to get this going.

    Michael van der Galien (54114f)

  6. I have set up a closed Facebook group at https://www.facebook.com/groups/ConstitutionalVanguard/. Members of the mailing list can ask to be added — but you must be part of the Constitutional Vanguard.

    If you’re not a member, sign up here.

    Alastor: I don’t know offhand how to create a page here where only approved people comment. The Twitter list and Facebook Group are the best bets for now. I will delete trollish comments from this thread when I see them. For now, it’s trollish if it’s not from a member of the list.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  7. Alastor: I don’t know offhand how to create a page here where only approved people comment. The Twitter list and Facebook Group are the best bets for now. I will delete trollish comments from this thread when I see them. For now, it’s trollish if it’s not from a member of the list.

    Pat, you could set up a page where you have to log in to access. The only caveat is you would have to vet whoever you have sign on. I know Ace has talked about the same thing whenever he feels he has to tamp down some really egregious commenting (yah, I know- Ace’s). You may also want to talk to HotAir, since they went with Faceplant commenting, or even about their previous registration method. I haven’t a clue if you would need to set up another blog for that, or if you can just target a specific page.

    Bill H (971e5f)

  8. So, is your name Richard or is it Sarah? Ach, doesn’t matter. TL;DR

    Bill H (971e5f)

  9. So whatever happened to this? I got a few emails and then nothing.

    Milhouse (5a188d)

  10. I got very busy at work. Two murder trials virtually back to back. I hope to get back to it soon.

    Patterico (bcf524)

  11. More of Mr. Trump’s lowboy nominees disposition done unencumbered the Senate. More Obama charge policies disposition be tossed out. When the president addresses a connection session of Congress http://kamagrajelly.us/ kamagra on Tuesday, Democrats intent find almost nothing to cheer. (Some have busied themselves weighing the merits of shaking the president’s hand.) At the constant fix, the protests induce left side Republicans with a more energetic challenge http://kamagrauk.us/ kamagra 100mg as they try to demonstrate the fruits of one-party supervise in the White Domicile and on Capitol Hill: determining whether the hag directed at lawmakers is more than anecdotal, and how to retaliate accordingly.

    Jesj70y (a594b0)

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.1869 secs.