Dear Gregg Keller
For officially deciding that GOProud can’t take part in an “official” capacity at CPAC, I would like to say to you the following:
A shame. I was actually hoping to attend this year.
For officially deciding that GOProud can’t take part in an “official” capacity at CPAC, I would like to say to you the following:
A shame. I was actually hoping to attend this year.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Powered by WordPress.
What’s more insulting is that ‘we still want gays to attend, just not this organization in an official capacity’.
Just look folks in the eye and say you refuse to let them stand with you.
I think the bolded aspects really help. This is a conservative approach to a political issue. These are not the people imposing their ways on the rest of us.
I am OK with states doing things differently, though frankly I am not concerned with social issues these days. Everybody on board with limited government, particularly reducing spending, is OK with me these days. We have a larger fight.
CPAC is needlessly divisive. If a member of GOProud is also divisive, call them out by name. Don’t make enemies of groups of people.
It’s true the right is unlikely to win over social liberals on social issues, but hey, we will still win over the sane ones on everything else if we play our cards right.
Comment by Dustin — 8/2/2011 @ 6:50 pm
Never mind that the anti-gay line is a losing one, it’s also wrong. Anyone who thinks it’s something that the Republicans should tar themselves with should talk to a 20-something. “Being gay” to them is like “being Catholic” is to older folks; not much to care about.
Comment by Kevin M — 8/4/2011 @ 9:41 am
Well, I think my opinion of the people who run CPAC is fairly well known…
Comment by Scott Jacobs — 8/4/2011 @ 5:44 pm
Preeetty much sums up why I stopped conversing at HA and stopped reading The Blaze (unless linked) altogether.
Believing it’s none of the government’s business what consenting adults do with their privacy is apparently grounds for accusations of pederasty, sedition, radical libertarianism, and all ’round ass banditry.
Comment by Just sayin' — 7/13/2012 @ 2:14 pm
Social issues these days are mostly related to poverty and health insurance. We would really love all social issues to be solved by the government. .*,*,
Many thanks
http://www.foodsupplementdigest.com“>
Comment by Vinnie Flenaugh — 7/24/2012 @ 5:20 am
A social issue (also called a social ill or a social problem) is an issue that relates to society’s perception of people’s personal lives. Different societies have different perceptions and what may be normal behaviour in one society may be a significant social issue in another society. Social issues are distinguished from economic issues. ;
Our favorite internet page
<'http://www.caramoantourpackage.com
Comment by Alberta Wampole — 2/20/2013 @ 12:11 pm