<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech suggestions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>Dustin, you should look into the family plans.  T-Mobile has a really strong offering there that will save my girlfriend and I a great deal of money for our two Android phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin, you should look into the family plans.  T-Mobile has a really strong offering there that will save my girlfriend and I a great deal of money for our two Android phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s why it really matters what your particulars are.  The phone I have &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailymobile.se/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sonyericsson-c905-camera-sample11.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;takes pictures that are as good&lt;/a&gt; as a typical digital camera.  That&#039;s a big deal for me.  The music player is the typical XMB interface (better than my old ipod, IMO).  Since the c905 is a DLNA device, I can look at my pictures on my PS3, browsing with my PS3 controller.  There are many little details like that.  You&#039;re right about Sony Ericsson... they do a lot of aspects right.  It&#039;s nothing like the droid... it&#039;s a smarter dumbphone, of course, but there are tens of thousands of apps available.

and it&#039;s a much more effective use of my money than a droid.  Two phones are $60 a month.  A phone that handles wifi, has a great browser, has push email, and needs no data plan?  That&#039;s a better deal for a lot of folks.  I know there are things a droid does that my phone doesn&#039;t, but there aren&#039;t very many things.  I save $1700 a year, per phone, over two years.  Damn.

I came very close to getting a droid, anyway. I&#039;m glad Motorola has been saved for the time being, and I think android&#039;s success will grow quite a bit.

There&#039;s a problem, of course, in that the industry doesn&#039;t want people to have phones that are internet capable but don&#039;t pay for a data plan.  My phone, for example, has to be reflashed with the factory firmware (over the ATT firmware) in order to use its wifi chip.  If I didn&#039;t have this option, I would either have to carry a wifi device around, or get a smart phone.

I think the Droid is a foolish purchase unless you really need to upgrade now.  There are so many really strong competitors coming out in the very near future that seem to really outshine it.  Sure, there&#039;s always the next thing, but multitouch and a good camera are important things to some consumers.

And price... well, that&#039;s the end all be all for me.  I could afford a $100 a month contract, I guess doubled since my wife likes this stuff too, if I wanted.  That&#039;s $3400 more than I&#039;m paying now.  Makes it easier to stomach my sincerely felt jealousy at the sweet Droids I see on the way to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s why it really matters what your particulars are.  The phone I have <a href="http://dailymobile.se/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sonyericsson-c905-camera-sample11.jpg" rel="nofollow">takes pictures that are as good</a> as a typical digital camera.  That&#8217;s a big deal for me.  The music player is the typical XMB interface (better than my old ipod, IMO).  Since the c905 is a DLNA device, I can look at my pictures on my PS3, browsing with my PS3 controller.  There are many little details like that.  You&#8217;re right about Sony Ericsson&#8230; they do a lot of aspects right.  It&#8217;s nothing like the droid&#8230; it&#8217;s a smarter dumbphone, of course, but there are tens of thousands of apps available.</p>
<p>and it&#8217;s a much more effective use of my money than a droid.  Two phones are $60 a month.  A phone that handles wifi, has a great browser, has push email, and needs no data plan?  That&#8217;s a better deal for a lot of folks.  I know there are things a droid does that my phone doesn&#8217;t, but there aren&#8217;t very many things.  I save $1700 a year, per phone, over two years.  Damn.</p>
<p>I came very close to getting a droid, anyway. I&#8217;m glad Motorola has been saved for the time being, and I think android&#8217;s success will grow quite a bit.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a problem, of course, in that the industry doesn&#8217;t want people to have phones that are internet capable but don&#8217;t pay for a data plan.  My phone, for example, has to be reflashed with the factory firmware (over the ATT firmware) in order to use its wifi chip.  If I didn&#8217;t have this option, I would either have to carry a wifi device around, or get a smart phone.</p>
<p>I think the Droid is a foolish purchase unless you really need to upgrade now.  There are so many really strong competitors coming out in the very near future that seem to really outshine it.  Sure, there&#8217;s always the next thing, but multitouch and a good camera are important things to some consumers.</p>
<p>And price&#8230; well, that&#8217;s the end all be all for me.  I could afford a $100 a month contract, I guess doubled since my wife likes this stuff too, if I wanted.  That&#8217;s $3400 more than I&#8217;m paying now.  Makes it easier to stomach my sincerely felt jealousy at the sweet Droids I see on the way to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>Dustin, the iPhone and Android phones are great mobile solutions because of their well-designed and highly stocked app stores.  Blackberry&#039;s app store is quite pathetic in comparison.

Ericsson handsets have *always* been some of my favorites, though.  Never much cared for what Sony brought to the table, but I&#039;m very excited to test their Android handset when it comes out.  The phones are well designed and get great battery life.  And, you&#039;re right: the camera functionality on those phones is far superior to anything in the droid or iphone.

For me, however, a camera is not at all important.  As long as it takes a clear enough photo to utilize Google Goggles functionality I&#039;m happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin, the iPhone and Android phones are great mobile solutions because of their well-designed and highly stocked app stores.  Blackberry&#8217;s app store is quite pathetic in comparison.</p>
<p>Ericsson handsets have *always* been some of my favorites, though.  Never much cared for what Sony brought to the table, but I&#8217;m very excited to test their Android handset when it comes out.  The phones are well designed and get great battery life.  And, you&#8217;re right: the camera functionality on those phones is far superior to anything in the droid or iphone.</p>
<p>For me, however, a camera is not at all important.  As long as it takes a clear enough photo to utilize Google Goggles functionality I&#8217;m happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4708</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4708</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t most bluetooth headsets come with several sized earbuds, so you can pick the size that suits you?  You should go that route if you can.

For some reason, I&#039;ve never had a problem with a bluetooth headset.  I currently use a really expensive blackberry branded one (I didn&#039;t pay for it, and wouldn&#039;t have), but I&#039;ve had plenty of luck with crappy cheapo ones.  Everyone else hates almost all of them.  Strange.

Droid is a neat phone, though it&#039;s going to be outdated eventually anyway.  If you&#039;re on a data plan and are in an area where Verizon is the best (a lot of places, obviously), the droid is a good phone.

But don&#039;t let the fandroids fool you, most phones are great these days.  Since I have wifi on mass transit, at home, and at work, I&#039;m fortunate enough to use a Sony ericsson C905a, which is free with a subscription, and with no data plan I can still surf the internet on wifi and use GPS.  My wife has one as well and we pay $60 a month for both plans.  And the camera on these phones makes the Droid look like a POS.  Since we take pics all the time, and always have wifi, it&#039;s a legit point.

Although I still an envious of those Droid apps.  No reason to get an iphone, in my opinion, but there are so many cheap and excellent options out there these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t most bluetooth headsets come with several sized earbuds, so you can pick the size that suits you?  You should go that route if you can.</p>
<p>For some reason, I&#8217;ve never had a problem with a bluetooth headset.  I currently use a really expensive blackberry branded one (I didn&#8217;t pay for it, and wouldn&#8217;t have), but I&#8217;ve had plenty of luck with crappy cheapo ones.  Everyone else hates almost all of them.  Strange.</p>
<p>Droid is a neat phone, though it&#8217;s going to be outdated eventually anyway.  If you&#8217;re on a data plan and are in an area where Verizon is the best (a lot of places, obviously), the droid is a good phone.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t let the fandroids fool you, most phones are great these days.  Since I have wifi on mass transit, at home, and at work, I&#8217;m fortunate enough to use a Sony ericsson C905a, which is free with a subscription, and with no data plan I can still surf the internet on wifi and use GPS.  My wife has one as well and we pay $60 a month for both plans.  And the camera on these phones makes the Droid look like a POS.  Since we take pics all the time, and always have wifi, it&#8217;s a legit point.</p>
<p>Although I still an envious of those Droid apps.  No reason to get an iphone, in my opinion, but there are so many cheap and excellent options out there these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4703</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4703</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the biggest problem with the headset purchasing experience: you can NEVER try before you buy.  It&#039;s a pain in the rear-end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the biggest problem with the headset purchasing experience: you can NEVER try before you buy.  It&#8217;s a pain in the rear-end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>I like the Jawbone, but I often go 7 or 8 days without shaving, and I wonder how they would work with facial hair.

I liked the BlueAnt devices because of the voice-command feature (say &quot;answer call&quot; and it picks up the call), because when I go out (still walking to the bus, damnit), I have a fleece 4-way hood on, plus some thick gloves, and hitting the call-answer button would likely get annoying/be impossible.

You tried the Plantronics Discovery 925?  It seems it mostly be the same thing as the 975.

I wish places would let you try on different headsets to find one that fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Jawbone, but I often go 7 or 8 days without shaving, and I wonder how they would work with facial hair.</p>
<p>I liked the BlueAnt devices because of the voice-command feature (say &#8220;answer call&#8221; and it picks up the call), because when I go out (still walking to the bus, damnit), I have a fleece 4-way hood on, plus some thick gloves, and hitting the call-answer button would likely get annoying/be impossible.</p>
<p>You tried the Plantronics Discovery 925?  It seems it mostly be the same thing as the 975.</p>
<p>I wish places would let you try on different headsets to find one that fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>Blueant is well known for their multi-mic devices.  The audio quality is pretty damn awesome, but the manufacturing quality leaves something to be desired.  Expect a short lifespan if you go this route.

Jawbone makes some really nice and sturdy headsets -- you might want to look into those, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blueant is well known for their multi-mic devices.  The audio quality is pretty damn awesome, but the manufacturing quality leaves something to be desired.  Expect a short lifespan if you go this route.</p>
<p>Jawbone makes some really nice and sturdy headsets &#8212; you might want to look into those, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>@h2u:

Any opinion on Blueant headsets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@h2u:</p>
<p>Any opinion on Blueant headsets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2u</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>h2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>The phone calling ability of the Android phones is perhaps its best feature.  Voice dialing works flawlessly, the speaker phone is excellent, the contact list is very well organized and the black-list feature is simply awesome.

I know you were joking, John, but you do bring up a good point: the number one function of these devices should be making phone calls and, perhaps, sending text messages.  I recommend Android devices for smartphone users because they do this *AND MORE* flawlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phone calling ability of the Android phones is perhaps its best feature.  Voice dialing works flawlessly, the speaker phone is excellent, the contact list is very well organized and the black-list feature is simply awesome.</p>
<p>I know you were joking, John, but you do bring up a good point: the number one function of these devices should be making phone calls and, perhaps, sending text messages.  I recommend Android devices for smartphone users because they do this *AND MORE* flawlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hitchcock</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/jury/2009/12/25/tech-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hitchcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/jury/?p=1882#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>&quot;My cell phone has internet, gps, depth finder, restaurant finder, TV, games, iTunes, a built-in knife/fork/spoon set, a lighter, a cigar cutter and lots more.&quot;

&quot;Can you make phone calls with it?&quot;

&quot;Ya know, I dunno.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My cell phone has internet, gps, depth finder, restaurant finder, TV, games, iTunes, a built-in knife/fork/spoon set, a lighter, a cigar cutter and lots more.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Can you make phone calls with it?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Ya know, I dunno.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
