The Jury Talks Back


Quickly, to the blogs!!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Scott Jacobs @ 10:59 pm

“They do not worship The Jeff, and thus we must act like ass-hats!!”

I’m just going to focus on Part V, which focuses on me.

Scott Jacobs has also made quite a few threats of violence on Patterico’s site. And he, too, has never earned a reprimand from Patterico for doing so.


While I don’t think she meant it in a mean way, I have to say that were I Professor Gates, I would threaten savage beatings from some of Harvard’s finest hooligans should my family not keep their noise-holes shut.

Last thing he needs is every minority cop making him their personal hobby, pulling him over for everything from “safety checks” to failure to come to a full and complete stop at stop signs.

Comment by Scott Jacobs — 8/2/2009 @ 7:21 am

We’ll start here, because apparently, speaking as Professor Gates and what he should do regarding his family and their inability to keep their noise-holes shut is me threatening violence.

But saying that he’s leaving me beaten isn’t.

Is there a flow chart I can use here?  Anyways, we continue…



For Mr. “I’m too retarded to know when I should shut-the-fuck-up” Adkins.

Hey Chuck, you fat fuck, how about you fall in a well and die, huh?

Seriously, you grubby wonder-tard, you would make a rude comment about a guy’s wife? Really?

When was the last time a woman touched you without it being A) an accident B) part of her job (nurse/whatever) or C) have there be money involved?

Nice picture of your mom’s house, douch. How about you go to the basement and show us what your room looks like?

Asshatted fucktard. Seriously, catch on fire, and while you burn, think about how glad all those strippers and whores will be, now that they don’t have to touch you anymore…

Die, and raise the average global IQ. Take one for the team, instead of eatting our food, you lardass.

I’ve shat things that look less pathetic than you. I’ve seen roadkill on the highway that disgusts me less. I’ve seen corpses with more brain activity…

It is actually now my mission in life to live longer than you, simply so I can piss on your headstone, and shit in your coffin. Judging by your girth, I shouldn’t have to wait very long.

Comment by Scott Jacobs — 12/12/2007 @ 2:45 pm

So telling someone to burst into flame and fall down a well is equal to gleefully talking about breaking someone’s ankles…  Interesting.

This is the best one, in my opinion…

we don’t appreciate “art” like this where i live. like most performance “artists”, this guy just wanted to cause sufficient provocation to get his name in the paper. well, you can get your name in the paper after the secret service closes your exhibition, and you can also get your name in the obituary section after angry private citizens part your hair with pool cues.

the first amendment is an interesting constitutional abstraction for which i stand up almost all of the time, but when you start talking about assassinating presidential candidates, then i’m going awol from your unit. then, it’s meet and right for cops to question you to determine your motives and intentions. i’m old enough to remember jfk, rfk and mlk when they actually happened, not from a history class.

this post is a fitting cousin to the tiger attack post. refrain from mocking and taunting dangerous animals. there’s no moat wide enough, no wall high enough to afford you 100% guaranteed safety from some of these animals. ok everybody, go ahead and call me a benighted philistine for the rest of the thread.

Comment by assistant devil’s advocate — 6/5/2008 @ 6:53 am

Nope, you’re dead on here in my mind, ADA…

Comment by Scott Jacobs — 6/5/2008 @ 6:56 am

Note how telling someone that they are dead-on (I forgot a hyphen, so sue me) is a threat of violence.  Really Jeff?  That’s the best you got?

And then there is this:


Now, Jake Tapper (one of the few real journalists left, and one of the VERY few people who report on Washington that I respect) is taking people to task for attacks on Meghan McCain. One of the things he’s on about – maybe rightly, maybe not – is the cowardly nature of talking shit to people over the Internet. Even saying “I’d say it to her face” is pretty empty usually, because most don’t use their real names.

Now, if there have been threats made, then I’d be the first person to step up and put down the jack-ass making those threats. I don’t stand for that. Hate someone all you want, but baring REALLY serious stuff, threats are not acceptable. Flat out not cool. Just like I’d kill with my bare hands anyone who tried to kill or injure the President. There are limits.

He missed where I said I’d kill anyone who harmed the President.  Apparently that’s ok (good), but it isn’t ok to defend someone from threats.  Ok. Jeff.  I think I get the picture…

In addition, Scott Jacobs came over to Jeff’s blog, and tried to escalate what was until then a cyberspace pissing match into an imminent real-world encounter:

Comment by Scott Jacobs on 12/14 @ 8:28 am #

“Comment by Jeff G. on 12/14 @ 1:18 am #”

Bring it, bitch. Any time you find yourself wanting to test your theory, I’m more than willing to give you my address so you can swing on by.

Any day, any time, I will re-arrange my schedule to make the 5 minutes it would take to ruin your manly-man self-image.

Ahhh.  So to answer the challenge is to escalate…

So what does that say about Jeff accepting, and requesting my address via e-mail?

I’d comment on his site, but either he or one of his sycophants would just change my words, mainly because they can’t think of anything intelligent to say.


  1. Conversation with a filet mignon steak (USDA Choice).

    Steak: So are you ever going to defrost me?
    Me: Not today, anyway.
    Steak: Why not?
    Me: I just came back from the grocery store with a package of Vienna Beef franks, Marry Ann buns, and a jar of relish. I have mustard, tomatoes and onions in the refrigerator.
    Steak: You are not doing a single darn thing for my self-esteem.

    Comment by nk — 12/21/2009 @ 1:39 am

  2. So telling someone to burst into flame and fall down a well is equal to gleefully talking about breaking someone’s ankles

    In all fairness, its pretty much the same thing. Because there is as much chance of the harm you wish for befalling them as there is of JeffG hunting you down and breaking your ankles.

    I never saw the full exchange beyween you and Jeff, so I can’t comment on what happened. But I do recall that you got ugly with me very quickly on a thread at this site recently for arguing a point of view that you didn’t agree with. I don’t hold it against you, and understand that sometimes arguments get heated on the internet more quickly than they would in real life.

    It just makes me wonder if perhaps you might not have lauged it off instead.

    With all due respect

    Comment by Bob Reed — 12/21/2009 @ 10:15 am

  3. Though to argue my side, I take “Die in a fire” quite differently than I do “I’m going to break your ankles”.

    One wishes harm while the other promises it.

    I wish harm to many. The list of those that I wish to inflict harm upon (without being physically attacked first) is exceedingly small.

    JeffyG isn’t on that list.

    And for the record, taking a swing at me pretty much guarantees that I’m gonna do whatever it takes to put you down. It’s how I was raised,

    “Don’t start the fight, but always end it.”

    Comment by Scott Jacobs — 12/21/2009 @ 3:36 pm

  4. syarat gadai bpkb

    The Jury Talks Back

    Trackback by dana tunai jaminan bpkb — 4/4/2019 @ 3:29 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress.