Seems the IDF didn’t actually fire on that school after all…
Don’t expect this to get a lot of airtime, however, since I’m sure the MSM considers attacking a school to be the sort of thing the IDF would do…
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Profile
Frequently Unasked Questions (FUQs)
Contributor:
Oh,
That
Liberal Media
CaliforniaRepublic.org
Linked by:
Best of the Web
The Corner
How Appealing
Hugh Hewitt
InstaPundit
Kausfiles
Power Line
The Volokh Conspiracy
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | Mar » | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | |
Powered by WordPress.
Well, of course blood libel against the IDF in particular — and Israel and Jews more generally — is so increasingly common as to be unnoteworthy, but, two points:
1. Pardon me while I question the timing. It was obviously known to the UN that this didn’t happen from the moment that it, well, didn’t happen. Why did the UN pimp the story for so long?
2. On what basis would it be wrong for the IDF to attack a school when it’s, say, being used as a firing position by combatants? Aren’t the Geneva Conventions very clear that the presence of protected persons cannot be used to protect combatants?
Comment by Joel Rosenberg — 2/3/2009 @ 11:00 am
Joel,
When it comes to Jews, the world has only one answer, to kill them.
Comment by PCD — 2/4/2009 @ 5:42 am