[by Justin Levine]
I’m pretty much on board with the assessments that the Bush Presidency has been a mixed bag, with more downs than ups. A more accurate assessment of a President never comes until years (sometimes decades) after he leaves office, since the effects of policies that are set in motion continue to make ripples in events long afterwards, even when the country changes direction.
I have always felt that Bush was unfairly maligned for Katirna. I also always considred the “weapons of mass destruction” issue in Iraq to be an irrelevent sideshow that sometimes overshadowed the more important question of the overall handling of how the war was conducted (which itself does not seem all that impressive at the moment, though the jury verdict ultimately won’t come back on this for several more years). Even so, its always a dicey proposition to make hard judgements on issues such as these since its impossible to assess what state the world would be in today had Saddam remained in power. Anyone claiming to know that is simply lying in order to support their own political biases.
I don’t give him as much credit for appointing Supreme Court Justices Roberts and Alito as some in the polically conservative camps do since he was only forced to appoint Alito after an outright revolt over his attempt to appoint Harriet Miers. While the Roberts appointment came first, a Miers appointment had the potential to negate much of the positive effects that Roberts had to offer. So any perceived achievement for judicial restraint and reasoning in this area belongs to the protesters, not Bush.
I have always admired Bush for his decent temperament. He never seemed to have a big ego and never went out of his way to make arguments partisan (unlike the Clintons, whom I continue to despise because of these exact qualities). But an assessment of the Bush Presidency must be primarily based on actual policy decisions, more than personal temperament.
With that all said, everyone assessing Bush’s legacy on all sides seems to have ignored what I consider to be his greatest domestic achievement (assuming that keeping us safe from terror attacks can be properly credited to Bush’s leadership and is also not labeled as a ‘domestic’ achievement).
Bush’s greatest achievement came relatively early on in his Presidency, so many have seemed to overlook it. This achievement has made the quality of millions of people’s lives much better – so much so that nearly everyone takes it for granted. Perhaps this is why nobody is talking about it.
So I will spare you the continued mystery [after the jump].
My vote for the greatest domestic achievement stemming from the Bush Presidency is (drum roll please)….
(more…)