Yes, I was surprised to see how negative the Times’ article was. The LA Times was even worse — it read as though the theme was “Life was better under Saddam.”
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
Ironic there is no mention of President Bush in this article nor the expanded NYT report. Without him, there would be no purple fingers in Iraq.
Comment by Dana — 1/31/2009 @ 10:22 am
And the only mention of the American military that made this possible?
Screw the NYT. God bless the American soldier and Iraqi democracy.
Comment by AKA Pablo — 2/1/2009 @ 6:59 am
Yes, I was surprised to see how negative the Times’ article was. The LA Times was even worse — it read as though the theme was “Life was better under Saddam.”
Comment by Kevin Murphy — 2/1/2009 @ 10:48 am