Disclaimer
The author is a Deputy District Attorney. He does not speak for his office on this blog, but rather in his private capacity under the First Amendment. He expresses no opinion about the sentence Roman Polanski should receive, and will leave that argument to be made by the appropriate people in his office.
[…] P.S. Standard disclaimer here. […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Polanski in 1979: Everyone Wants to Fuck Young Girls! (e4ab32) — 9/29/2009 @ 8:12 pm[…] P.S. Standard disclaimer here. […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Robert Harris: Polanski Did It, But It’s YOUR Fault (e4ab32) — 9/29/2009 @ 9:09 pm[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Stopped Watch: Steve Lopez Has Excellent Column on Polanski (e4ab32) — 9/29/2009 @ 10:55 pm[…] But as for these Internet lefties . . . I will lose my bearings if I start to think of these people as sensible. Please, someone mention Obama and Bush, so we can get them frothing at the mouth again.* […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Leftists and Conservatives Can Agree: Polanski Is a Child Rapist Who Should Face Justice (e4ab32) — 9/30/2009 @ 7:18 am[…] I think it’s time for the disclaimer. […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Harvey Weinstein: Hollywood Has the Best Moral Compass (e4ab32) — 9/30/2009 @ 11:28 pm[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » AP: Swiss Will Hold Polanski in Custody (e4ab32) — 10/6/2009 @ 7:19 am[…] further remind him of his portrayal of Polanski as a man “hounded” by my employer, the Los Angeles County District Attorney: Polanski belongs to a rarefied subculture: celebrities hounded by the state. His case brings to […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Tom Shales: I’m Shocked to Be Told Minimized Polanski’s Crime!! Here, Let Me Do It Again! (e4ab32) — 10/6/2009 @ 7:52 pm[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Patrick Goldstein: Hollywood Doesn’t Support Polanski, Silly! What? They Gave Him a Standing Ovation?? HEY, LOOK OVER THERE!!! (e4ab32) — 10/7/2009 @ 11:26 pm[…] Thanks to R.R.* […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Well, Well: Polanski Supporter Frederic Mitterand Is a Pedophile Too (e4ab32) — 10/8/2009 @ 6:36 pm[…] fame is why he got the deal in the first place: my employer (the L.A. County D.A., for whom I do not speak) dismissed the most serious charges because of the potential harm to the victim, stemming from the […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Polanski Lawyer and Eric Holder BFF Lobbies DOJ to Drop Extradition (e4ab32) — 10/10/2009 @ 5:09 pm[…] the victim? A depression that is constantly blamed on my employer, the L.A. County D.A. (for whom I do not speak), but which is fairly blamed on the rapist: Mr. […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Roman Polanski Is Depressed (e4ab32) — 10/11/2009 @ 1:20 pm[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Your Daily Polanski Report (e4ab32) — 10/14/2009 @ 9:43 am[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Saletan: Polanski Just Made A “Spontaneous” Error of “Judgment” in Going After a “Womanly Body” That Happened to Be 13 Years Old (e4ab32) — 10/14/2009 @ 9:44 am[…] throw a monkey wrench in one or two conspiracy theories about my office, […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Swiss Notified Us About Polanski (e4ab32) — 10/20/2009 @ 9:39 pm[…] people working at the L.A. District Attorney’s Office — for whom I work, but for whom I do not speak on this blog: It is unclear from the e-mails why Los Angeles officials were concerned about Austrian cooperation […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » Polanski Did Not Plead in Exchange for An Assurance That He Would Receive Only 90 Days (e4ab32) — 10/22/2009 @ 7:24 am[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » L.A. Times Does Good Piece on Polanski (e4ab32) — 10/24/2009 @ 1:58 pm[…] * […]
Patterico’s Pontifications » HuffPo Writer Spreads Another Polanski Falsehood . . . and Calls Polanski Case a “Lynching” (e4ab32) — 10/28/2009 @ 7:24 am[…] I don’t know this because I have some secret knowledge as the result of working in the D.A.’s office — I have no such knowledge. Nor do I purport to speak for my office — my Polanski posts are most definitely made in my private capacity. […]
Patterico's Pontifications » Steven Mikulan Errs on Characterization of Polanski Plea Agreement (e4ab32) — 11/12/2009 @ 8:38 pm[…] * […]
Patterico's Pontifications » Associated Press Misstates Polanski Plea Bargain — Again (e4ab32) — 11/20/2009 @ 7:16 am[…] * […]
Patterico's Pontifications » Associated Press Misstates Polanski Plea Bargain — Again (e4ab32) — 11/20/2009 @ 7:16 am[…] * […]
Patterico's Pontifications » Swiss Officials Will Not Appeal Court’s Grant of Bail to Polanski (e4ab32) — 11/26/2009 @ 9:56 am[…] Disclaimer. […]
Patterico's Pontifications » Judge: Polanski Must Be Present for His Sentence (e4ab32) — 1/22/2010 @ 6:22 pm[…] wouldn’t think I’d need to explain this to a Deputy District Attorney for a major city like Patterico, but here are some of the definitions Merriam-Webster includes for […]
Patterico Confirms NYT Owes Its Readers a Correction | No Bull. news service. (ef0eb9) — 2/11/2010 @ 1:03 pm