Comments for Patterico's Pontifications

Comment on Hamdan Sentenced to 5-1/2 Years by daleyrocks

daleyrocks — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:56:21 +0000

“Whats your problem? Don’t you think it’s too early in the day to pick a quarrel? Why the name calling? Did you have a nightmare last night?”

Lovey - Can you explain what was hard to understand in my original comment? I try not to go too fast for you.

Comment on Holding America Conservatives Accountable by Carolynp

Carolynp — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:55:22 +0000

I think the better question is: isn’t the Democratic party required to list whatever donations this group receives as direct contributions? They cannot be a non-profit, right? Because they list a partisan affiliation, right?

Comment on Holding America Conservatives Accountable by Stu

Stu — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:54:54 +0000

It might backfire and rally conservatives.

Comment on Holding America Conservatives Accountable by Joral

Joral — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:54:27 +0000

If it weren’t for the stigma associated, I’d say that someone should start giving out ball gags or something similar with ‘democratic policy’ written on them. Between this and the ‘fairness doctrine,’ it seems they are interested in silencing their opponents.

Comment on Sanai’s Litigation Strategy Continues by daleyrocks

daleyrocks — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:53:31 +0000

“Is anyone else getting the feeling that Born Free is Cyrus Sanai?”

Cyrus’s brother was kicked off the litigation team by the judge. That’s a possibility.

Comment on McCain’s Campaign Strategy by james

james — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:53:11 +0000

the problem w/ the rnc’s “praising McCain” internet spot is that the clips are well-aged like a good wine. McCain could once be called a maverick, but he has since abandoned that image so as not to offend the republican base. his maverick image vanished seemingly overnight following his victory in the primaries. now, we are left with a timid maverick at best, afraid of and attached to the base that he hopes will get him elected.

Comment on Sanai’s Litigation Strategy Continues by daleyrocks

daleyrocks — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:51:30 +0000

“The original state judge knowingly appointed a person with a conspicuous conflict of interest to manage portions of the divorce settlement involving Mr. Sanai’s parents.”

Born Free - The local judege specified the division of the marital estate, which Cyrus and his side have conspicuosly impeded and been sanctioned for in court. His father’s medical practice apparently also handled most household bills. In my view, appointing someone who is familiar with the medical practice as special master avoids dissipating the marital estate with needless additional bills. Objecting to the judge’s rulings on the division of marital assets is one matter. Proving prejudice on the part of the special master is another. If the special master is required to submit an accounting of his activities to the court, that is where such alleged improprieties would surface. Land sales mandated by the court are not de facto evidence of improprieties. Although Cyrus makes the legal case for potential improprieties invalidating the process, he certainly has not described any actual improprieties to this audience.

Comment on Sanai’s Litigation Strategy Continues by Tlove

Tlove — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:51:21 +0000

Given Mr. Sanai’s apparent intelligence and command of detail, you flatter me

OK, really?

Comment on Holding America Conservatives Accountable by JD

JD — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:50:33 +0000

But President Bush is the bad guy, dontcha know?!

Comment on Sanai’s Litigation Strategy Continues by JD

JD — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:48:45 +0000

Is anyone else getting the feeling that Born Free is Cyrus Sanai?

Born Free is to Cyrus the Virus as David Petranos Esp is to MDKP.

Hey, that is fun. Kind of like an SAT question.