Patterico's Pontifications

6/16/2012

Sarah Palin: “The SWATting Must Stop”

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 12:12 am

At 33:28:

These are futile efforts, though, to get constitutional conservatives to sit down and shut up. And I know that some of you bloggers, oh, especially recently, experiencing terrible harassment just because you dared report accurately about a convicted criminal who’s now funded by left wing organizations.

And you’re not alone and the SWATting must stop, and those responsible for the SWATting must be held accountable by the law.

Thanks to Noodles for the link and pointer.

UPDATE: Also check out Michelle Malkin’s speech at 4:55:

Thanks again to Noodles.

73 Responses to “Sarah Palin: “The SWATting Must Stop””

  1. Hey BK, as they say over at Hot Air, “Sh*t just got real…”
    Oh yeah, and Ding!

    Gazzer (331276)

  2. They are pretty good speeches if anyone is questioning whether or not they want to watch them all the way through.

    Patterico should collect that reward money from Brett and head to Vegas!

    Noodles (3681c4)

  3. Wow.

    Thanks, Gov Palin!

    Dustin (330eed)

  4. Why is Palin wearing a Star of David?

    Mattsky (d39e6b)

  5. why is sarah palin wearing clothes?

    pdbuttons (cce6ad)

  6. Noodles: The check would bounce. Digging through the 990’s for JTMP and Velvet Revolution US shows there isn’t enough money to buy a pack of gum. Or so they claim … where is the money they’ve collected from Babs and the Tides foundation (as well as other foundations)? Could it be it was spent on Neal and his beandogs? Perhaps on sockpuppets? On SWAT’ers? On personal litigation by Kimberlin against his imagined “enemies” and all too real reports of facts and truth? Inquiring minds really want to know!

    plemmen (6cd503)

  7. Sarah and Michelle are both still hot.

    I’m sorry, is that sexist?

    I should have said, these are strong, smart, powerful, confident women who just happen to be somewhat pleasing to the eye.

    And they’re hot.

    /I know, I’m going to Hell. Already reserved a room, right between Jimi Hendrix and the Allman Brothers who died in the plane crash. At least the music will be good…

    Hayabusa (59e303)

  8. /Should have said the Lynyrd Skynyrd guys who died in the plane crash. But you know what I meant.

    Hayabusa (59e303)

  9. lovin’ Teddy wrong?
    an’ he don’t wanna be right
    bearly possible

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ohio-teddy-bear-lover-678234

    Colonel Haiku (b8a395)

  10. Michelle Malkin says… “I am Aaron Walker”… she’s got your back, Aaron!

    Colonel Haiku (b8a395)

  11. Good for,Ms. P. whatever her detractors say, she always says what needs saying.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  12. The partisan danger lurks. I wish someone would notice Kimberlin has glommed onto the left to take advantage.

    Sarahw (b0e533)

  13. Michelle’s talk was far too disjointed.

    She came out blazing as to why her often angry mien was justified (and it soooo is). She was liberal with pejoratives (all richly deserved) too. But, she concludes with a spiel about happy warriors and smiles. Oh well.

    Ed from SFV (68921e)

  14. Clean up in aisle 14.

    SPQR (26be8b)

  15. That anchor baby Malkin is dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks.

    [UPDATED 6/16/2012: This is tpartynitwit.]

    Jerome Corsi (008c05)

  16. “Why is Palin wearing a Star of David?”

    Ask your Jewish friends.

    sheldon (77ac66)

  17. That anchor baby Malkin is dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks.

    I don’t know precisely what a Jerome Corsi is, but thankfully, none of us are forced to continue reading its comments.

    Dana (4eca6e)

  18. They knocked Palin for not reading the NY Times or Washington Post; neither of which would have informed her about SWATing, or who was doing it.

    Perhaps some reporter should ask Obama and Romney what blogs they read, to truly see how they inform themselves.

    Kevin M (bf8ad7)

  19. Kevin M,

    Don’t we already know how President Obama informs himself and through which media outlets?

    Dana (4eca6e)

  20. ==dumber than a bag of used pucks. She can’t string a coherent paragraph together without written notes. What a maroon! Someone should force her to read a transcript of her remarks==

    “Jerome Corsi”–I believe you have Michelle M. confused with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

    elissa (f56a61)

  21. Dana, yes, but let him say it while the public is paying attention. And maybe they’ll ask him about those annoying topics that the NY Times won’t cover.

    Kevin M (bf8ad7)

  22. Although that list does seem to run the gamut from Far Far Left to Uttermost Left.

    Kevin M (bf8ad7)

  23. The right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.

    CrustyB (d4da92)

  24. Jerome Corsi — writes on birther exposed of Obama.
    Obvious troll poster.

    scable (40a8c6)

  25. Yeah, scable, everyone realizes that “Jerome Corsi” is a sockpuppet.

    SPQR (26be8b)

  26. Good speech by Malkin. Occupyanything=poison

    It’s just another version of saying “Death to America”

    scable (40a8c6)

  27. hey I’m an American for prosperity why come nobody invited me into the club?

    you want me in your club I always bring snacks for everyone and like I said I’m a complete and total whore for prosperity

    call me

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  28. Yeah, scable, everyone realizes that “Jerome Corsi” is a sockpuppet.

    Comment by SPQR — 6/16/2012 @ 11:54 am

    I’m a fast reader, slow comprehender.

    scable (40a8c6)

  29. ________________________________________________

    The right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.

    I don’t know about other conservatives, but I was apprehensive about her for purely non-ideological reasons. While I’d easily favor her in a split second over the liberal crud currently in the White House or a Hillary Sniper-Fire Clinton, I’m aware of purely social or superficial characteristics of a person that can easily make or break him or her. So in Palin’s case, her demeanor is too much like that of a happy-talk news lady, and that can be disconcerting.

    I’m sure lots of squishes (or “centrists”) throughout America feel ever more apprehensive about such a quality, and liberals, who resist giving the benefit of the doubt to even someone with the profile of a Margaret Thatcher, would gleefully exploit that, or have done so already.

    Mark (7154e5)

  30. So in Palin’s case, her demeanor is too much like that of a happy-talk news lady, and that can be disconcerting

    So we chose a liberal Republican who speaks well over a constitutional conservative because she talks like Edie McClurg? We need to vote smarter than that. I’ll be staying home November 6 while you libs on the left and right fight over what statist you want to be a slave under.

    CrustyB (d4da92)

  31. she didn’t even run she was too busy burbling on cable Mr. Crusty

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  32. Lures and temptations can lurk around every corner. The continual threat of recidivism is great. Let’s be careful out there, Mr. Feets.

    elissa (f56a61)

  33. good point elissa

    I am weak

    I’m a run and get my friend P’s carpet shampooer thing

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  34. ______________________________________________

    So we chose a liberal Republican who speaks well over a constitutional conservative because she talks like Edie McClurg

    I would have gladly nominated her and been far more confident in her in the White House than someone along the lines of who’s there now, or, yes, someone with the squishy qualities of Romney. But I don’t represent a good portion, much less majority, of the public, and I instead see so much idiotic liberalism throughout this and other industrialized, much less Third-World, societies, that even minor idiosyncrasies in a conservative politician can’t be taken lightly.

    If someone as non-rightist or squishy as Romney still isn’t easily a front runner against a scroungy ultra-liberal like Obama, then that merely proves my point that modern Western society (eg, recent polling in Europe that shows over 80% willing to suckle Obama) is growing absurdly, self-destructively liberal.

    Mark (7154e5)

  35. “23.The right-wing rejected her in favor of a RINO with a $100 haircut.”

    Palin chose not to run. Whatever the reason, right or wrong, it was her decision to make.

    FOAF (afeaef)

  36. 16.“Why is Palin wearing a Star of David?”

    Ask your Jewish friends.

    Comment by sheldon

    Sheldon they wouldn’t know why a shiksa would wear one. I’m guesiing you don’t either.

    Mattsky (d39e6b)

  37. What a maroon

    Bugs bunny’s old line.

    I am guessing that Palin is wearing a Star of David as a symbol of her support for the Jewish people and for Israel. Perhaps there is something more specific to it, but I don’ think there needs to be. As Michael Medved and Dennis Prager point out, “theologically conservative” American Christians as a whole are among the best supporters the Jewish people and the nation of Israel have ever had.

    MD in Philly (3d3f72)

  38. Smart boy, got a mind like a steel trap – full of mice

    Foghorn Leghorn old line.

    Thanks for nothing.

    Mattsky (d39e6b)

  39. Mr. buttons! I just saw you I scrolled past before

    that was careless of me

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  40. The fact that she was ‘hung in effigy’, her church was burned down, her emails hacked, tormented by
    a father and son clique of stalkers, and her most
    recent libeler, McGuinness, drew a route to her front door, she might understand what swatting
    entails.

    narciso (494474)

  41. she’s had a hard time of it bless her heart

    hang in there Sarah it gets better

    the sun, it also rises you know

    and then it sets over russia

    but you knew that

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  42. Well, the Google will lead you to the truth (and other things):

    You couldn’t miss it, the big Star of David hanging around Sarah Palin’s neck as she toured the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island on Wednesday.

    NBC New York asked Palin about the significance just as she boarded her bus outside Fox Newschannel to head off to Boston.

    “Today is the 44th anniversary of Jerusalem being reunited,” she said. “We want to call attention to that.”

    Kevin M (bf8ad7)

  43. Of course that was two weeks ago…

    Kevin M (bf8ad7)

  44. “Sheldon they wouldn’t know why a shiksa would wear one. ”

    Just get their opinion on it.

    sheldon (77ac66)

  45. http://rightonline.com/beta/livestream Rusty Humphries just said “The SWATtings must stop”.

    Noodles (3681c4)

  46. Sheldon, I assume she wears it because she likes it, and because of her love for Israel. When she was governor she had an Israeli flag in her office, so her wearing a magen david doesn’t surprise me. But I don’t think she wears it every day, so that particular day’s choice may just have been random. Anyway, why does it matter? It’s not as if Jews have some sort of trademark on it.

    Milhouse (312124)

  47. Still haven’t asked your Jewish friends eh?

    sheldon (77ac66)

  48. Um, what?

    Milhouse (312124)

  49. Still not getting why Mattsky’s Jewish friends would have some special insight into Mrs Palin’s choice of jewelry. Jews aren’t telepathic, you know. Surely the right person to ask would be a Palin family member or friend. Or maybe just shoot off an email to the woman herself, if you’re really curious.

    Really, Sheldon, you’re going to have to spell this one out.

    Milhouse (312124)

  50. hey I’m an American for prosperity why come nobody invited me into the club?
    Comment by happyfeet — 6/16/2012 @ 12:14 pm

    — They DID invite you . . . but then they forgot to tell you.

    It’s a thing.

    Icy (a3c527)

  51. sheldon thinks he knows something.

    And that’s his first mistake.

    Icy (a3c527)

  52. “Still not getting why Mattsky’s Jewish friends would have some special insight into Mrs Palin’s choice of jewelry”

    I think you kind of miss the point by calling it just “choice of jewelry” or “special insight.” That’s the sort of thing that Mattsky asking his Jewish friends for their opinion on Palin’s habit of wearing a Star of David is supposed to overcome.

    sheldon (77ac66)

  53. I think you kind of miss the point by calling it just “choice of jewelry” or “special insight.”

    No, I don’t. That is all it is, after all.

    That’s the sort of thing that Mattsky asking his Jewish friends for their opinion on Palin’s habit of wearing a Star of David is supposed to overcome.

    Really? What special insight are they supposed to have into why she wears it? What do you know about them that I don’t? Do you even know who Mattsky is, let alone who his friends are?

    Milhouse (2e50ab)

  54. “Really? What special insight are they supposed to have into why she wears it? What do you know about them that I don’t? Do you even know who Mattsky is, let alone who his friends are?”

    I told you it’s not special at all. Now quit playing dumb

    sheldon (77ac66)

  55. it’s been over 24 hours since she said the swattings had to stop and guess what? No new swattings!

    good work, Sarah!

    happyfeet (3c92a1)

  56. the interesting thing about the progress, supposedly wrought by the Stuixtnet, against
    the Iranian reactors, is the fact that the Iranians have enough uranium for five bombs.

    narciso (494474)

  57. #55

    LOL.

    Same thing for my anti-tiger fences.

    Haven’t had a single tiger incursion since I put them up.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  58. However…it was so warm last night, I left my front door open, and forgot to shut the pantry.

    Racoon incursion ensued.

    Dave Surls (46b08c)

  59. Knowing the behavior of Rauhauser, who is much like another character that Stacey has focused on, I wouldn’t be that sanguine, Who even two years after he was uncovered, he was still feeding lies to McGuinness, as well as other sources.

    narciso (494474)

  60. I told you it’s not special at all.

    If Jews have no special ability to answer this question, then why not just ask any random person on the street, rather than specifically a random Jew? You clearly think Jews have some special insight into Sarah Palin’s jewelry choice. What special insight is that, and what gives them it?

    Now quit playing dumb

    Why don’t you spell it out, if you think you’re so smart?

    Milhouse (42299c)

  61. Just got back from WI and can say the state is totally polarized.

    Both sides believe the other is wilfully misinformed, has no data or reasoned argument and doesn’t listen except to pick their next point.

    In that case Walker is the catalyst, naturally BHO is another but may I respectfully suggest their remain many other issues to divide us Right from Center, Right from Right, etc.

    Just so you’re not blindsided, we do not have your back, GOP lovelies.

    gary gulrud (dd7d4e)

  62. Well if I depended on the Wisconsin Journal, and other local papers, I’d be clueless too.

    narciso (494474)

  63. sheldon thinks he knows something.

    Exactly. But he doesn’t.

    Milhouse (312124)

  64. I told you it’s not special at all. Now quit playing dumb

    — Yeah! Y’all are a buncha amateurs. What ya need to do is go pro, like our friend here. THEN yull be a-gittin’ sumwhere.

    Icy (a3c527)

  65. it’s been over 24 hours since she said the swattings had to stop and guess what? No new swattings!
    good work, Sarah!
    Comment by happyfeet — 6/17/2012 @ 5:11 pm

    — Never you mind this one’s snark.

    He’s just mad that Sarah hasn’t swatted him with a moose-leather whip.

    Icy (a3c527)

  66. “If Jews have no special ability to answer this question, then why not just ask any random person on the street, rather than specifically a random Jew? ”

    But I didn’t say random Jew. I said “your Jewish friends.” Those words spell it all out.

    sheldon (77ac66)

  67. 67. Well, Shelly, here’s the Cliff note version from another nutjob Christianist:

    Genesis 12:2 “I will make you a great nation and I will bless you and make your name great inorder that you be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you and him who curses you I will curse.”

    Hope that clears up just a smidge of your confusion.

    gary gulrud (dd7d4e)

  68. Patterico, dude, you aren’t being “SWATted”– you are being pranked.
    conservatives just don’t get popculture.

    wheelers.cat (44a7e0)

  69. 69. How apropos, autoeroticism earns the sixty ninth position.

    gary gulrud (dd7d4e)

  70. I think she may be ‘punking’ us, gary, when even honest progressives have given up the ghost.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/roberto-unger-obama_n_1602812.html

    narciso (494474)

  71. 71. Victor Hugo “traitors always pay for their treachery in the end.” via one of my least favorites, Mirengoff, returned from the gulag.

    Now that we are plainly in the home stretch, let us take care, lest we become traitor to Any who shall prove victorious at the end.

    gary gulrud (dd7d4e)

  72. But I didn’t say random Jew. I said “your Jewish friends.” Those words spell it all out.

    So you know Mattsky’s Jewish friends? How is that possible? I have no idea who Mattsky is, let alone his or her friends; is that another special spidey-sense you have? Do you know my Jewish friends too? What about my Taoist friends?

    Milhouse (312124)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.7055 secs.