Trump’s EO to Obtain Data on Everyone’s Status (UPDATED)
[Headlines from DRJ]
Following up on Trump Surrenders on Census Change, NPR reports:
President Trump announced Thursday he would sign an executive order to obtain data about the U.S. citizenship and noncitizenship status of everyone living in the United States.
In a Rose Garden ceremony, Trump said he would drop efforts to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census. Instead, his executive order will direct all U.S. agencies to provide the Department of Commerce all information they have on U.S. citizenship, noncitizenship and immigration status.
Might this data include driver’s license photos?
Civil rights activists complained Monday of the potential for widespread abuse following confirmation that at least three states have scanned millions of driver’s license photos on behalf of Immigration and Customs Enforcement without the drivers’ knowledge or consent.
Public records obtained by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy and Technology provided the first proof that ICE had sought such scans, which were conducted in Utah, Vermont and Washington.
All three states — which offer driving privileges to immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally — agreed to the ICE requests, according to documents shared with The Associated Press on Monday and first reported by The Washington Post.
Twelve states and the District of Columbia allow illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.
Twenty-one states and Washington, D.C., let the FBI access their drivers’ license and identification photos, according to a Government Accountability Office report published last month. The report said the FBI currently has access to 640 million photos — including for U.S. visa applicants — with more than 390,000 photos searched for matches since 2011, the year the agency augmented its fingerprint database with facial analysis.
What other information does the government already have, and do you think there should be a limit on the government using this information?
UPDATE: Asking a Census question may or may not have been the best way to get answers:
The Census Bureau currently asks about citizenship status on the American Community Survey, a yearly survey involving about one in 38 households. But research by the bureau suggests asking all U.S. households about citizenship status could discourage noncitizens from taking part in the national head count and harm the accuracy of the population counts used to redistribute congressional seats and Electoral College votes among the states once a decade.
Still, Ross overruled those warnings, as well as a suggestion by Census Bureau officials to forgo the question and instead compile existing government records about citizenship status. In a memo prepared for Ross, the bureau’s chief scientist said that alternative would be less expensive and produce more accurate citizenship data for Voting Rights Act enforcement.
The memo reviews three possible approaches — no change, adding a Census question, or obtaining existing data from government records — and discusses the costs and benefits of all three.
— DRJ
The only way I think this would be kosher is to ensure that the Census folks treat these data with the same level of privacy concerns as data gleaned from the census itself.
Which I would think so… as, other departments are prohibited from accessing census data.
whembly (51f28e) — 7/12/2019 @ 7:11 amWhatever limits should or shouldn’t be put on the data, I think giving it to the census for broad statistical abstracts to support policymaking is well within them.
Ray (7e810f) — 7/12/2019 @ 7:19 amI updated the post.
DRJ (15874d) — 7/12/2019 @ 7:34 amThe Census may not have been the BEST way, but it was the President’s call to make. NOT a Federal District Judge. How many injunctions have Federal District Judges issued against Trump. Its seems like over 20. How many were issued against Obama? One? Two? Of course “Muh Conservatives” are A-OK with this judicial overreach.
rcocean (1a839e) — 7/12/2019 @ 7:57 amSo I guess “enforcing the Voting Rights Act” really was a pretext, just like the courts said, eh?
Dave (1bb933) — 7/12/2019 @ 7:58 amI say, option 3, get the info from existing government documents. I’m sorry, but the government has the right to know if you are a citizen or not if you are filing tax returns under a SS number, getting food stamps, filing for disability. In fact, the left may regret objecting to the census question.
The alternative is that citizenship itself should be abolished.
Patricia (3363ec) — 7/12/2019 @ 8:31 amI wonder if courts will now have a basis to look into and limit any data mining, in light of how the Commerce Department has mishandled the Census question. Secretary Ross and others may still be deposed in the pending cases, and I also wonder if the plaintiffs will be allowed to ask about the new tactic.
DRJ (15874d) — 7/12/2019 @ 8:37 amAccording to the New York Times, the Census Department collects a lot of data but it doesn’t release the same thing as what it gets and it would be a violation of federal law to release anything to anybody that has any personally identifying detail.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/us/politics/census-executive-action.html
(Well, for 72 years anyway)
In some way or another the Census results for the years up to 1880 were made public. The 1890 Census was destroyed in a fire in 1921. In 1970, the Census Bureau reached some agreement with geneologist or whatever to make the 1900 Census public in 1972, and the same schedule has been followed every ten years since so that now the 1940 Census is public, and the 1950 Census will be made available in three years. The information is not sworn to.
Sammy Finkelman (8b217f) — 7/12/2019 @ 8:52 amFrom the NYT article:
Sammy Finkelman (8b217f) — 7/12/2019 @ 8:56 amMore:
Sammy Finkelman (8b217f) — 7/12/2019 @ 8:57 amBut research by the bureau suggests asking all U.S. households about citizenship status could discourage noncitizens from taking part in the national head count and harm the accuracy of the population counts used to redistribute congressional seats and Electoral College votes among the states once a decade.
One is tempted to wonder if that wasn’t the point of the exercise all along.
JVW (54fd0b) — 7/12/2019 @ 9:15 amOne is tempted to wonder if that wasn’t the point of the exercise all along.
According to the Democrats, that’s exactly what it was (and would logically apply to their opposition to the question as well).
But
Twenty-one states and Washington, D.C., let the FBI access their drivers’ license and identification photos, according to a Government Accountability Office report published last month. The report said the FBI currently has access to 640 million photos — including for U.S. visa applicants — with more than 390,000 photos searched for matches since 2011, the year the agency augmented its fingerprint database with facial analysis.
I’ve always said that any truly effective enforcement of immigration laws as they now stand would mean living in a police state. Perhaps that’s a bit hyperbolic, but it certainly would require immense government intrustion into privacy and everyday living.
kishnevi (496414) — 7/12/2019 @ 11:00 am