Patterico's Pontifications

3/16/2018

O.J. Simpson: That Colin Kaepernick Guy Really Messed Up by Not Respecting Our Flag

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 1:00 pm



Look, I get that O.J. butchered two people and everything (at least according to the Fake News Media), but while I don’t like O.J., you have to admit one thing: O.J. Simpson fights for the culture war issues other people are too scared to fight for:

O.J. Simpson says he agrees with Donald Trump — Colin Kaepernick “made a mistake” taking a knee during the national anthem … and completely disrespected the American flag.

“I think Colin made a mistake,” Simpson told The Buffalo News … “I really appreciate what he was trying to say. I thought he made a bad choice in attacking the flag.”

“I grew up at a time when deacons were in the KKK. I don’t disrespect the Bible because of those guys. The flag shouldn’t be disrespected because of what cops do. The flag represents what we want America to be.”

“When he did it the first time I thought, ‘Well, you took a gamble, and I give you credit.’ But it was him continuing to do it where he made the biggest mistake.”

“I’m a firm believer of doing what you think is right, but I would always stand for the flag.”

We need more firm believers of doing what they think is right in politics. I’m going to say something that may be a little controversial: has this guy ever thought about running for office? I’m not saying O.J. Simpson should be our next President, mind you. But if he ran . . . hey, he’d be better than Hillary, amirite?

And if he did actually kill Nicole and Ron, well, that just shows that he knows how to engage in a street fight. And politics is kinda like a street fight.

Of course it would be wrong to have a murderer in the White House. But Obama droned U.S. citizens without a trial, didn’t he? How is that any different? There are a lot of killers. You think our country’s so innocent?

Again: I’m not suggesting that I would vote for O.J. Simpson to be our next President of the United States. But come on.

You have to like a guy who tells it like it is.

Whoa, wait. I just got through reading to the end of the article:

But Simpson says he doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Trump when it comes to politics.

“Somebody asked me if I’d have voted for him … Probably not, but I only know two of my friends I’d vote to be president. Some of my best, best besties I would not vote to be president. That has no bearing on it, you know?”

Doesn’t support Trump? To hell with him. Forget I ever said a good word about him.

[Cross-posted at RedState and The Jury Talks Back.]

86 Responses to “O.J. Simpson: That Colin Kaepernick Guy Really Messed Up by Not Respecting Our Flag”

  1. the NFL is just trashy anymore

    it doesn’t matter what they do with the silly flag

    that ship has SO sailed

    happyfeet (28a91b)

  2. After reading just a few sentences I went to the bottom to look for the sarc tag/money shot, was not disappointed.

    harkin (df3a15)

  3. Wondering what word/term in my response put me in moderation…….

    harkin (df3a15)

  4. One would normally have to frequent a middle school playground to hear logic as deep.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  5. Obama droned U.S. citizens without a trial, didn’t he

    and how is this different from Mr. Putin doing poison all up in some Russians in the UK?

    happyfeet (28a91b)

  6. I can’t take anybody seriously for President when their entire CV is “football”

    Neo (d1c681)

  7. Wow, I figured he was angling for a pardon from Spanky when I read the Kaepernick comments, and he was probably more than halfway there before he blew it by failing to shower unconditional adoration on President Snowflake.

    Trump is good buddies with convicted rapist Mike Tyson (publicly defended him during his trial, called the conviction a “travesty”, and – according to Iron Mike – promised him a pardon), so he and the Juice would be like two peas in a pod.

    Dave (445e97)

  8. Mirror mirror on the wall, who has the bitterest pill to swallow of them all.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  9. Mike Tyson is a Muslim too, Dave, did you know that? Or at least a Sufi, which is like Kabbalah I think.

    Donald Trump has not lost his Mike Tyson vote, even after his controversial call to ban all Muslims from the United States.

    Tyson, who has been vocal of his support for Trump in the past and is a Muslim himself, told TMZ on Tuesday that the comments of a ‘total and complete shutdown’ on Muslim immigration to America have not changed his views.

    ‘Anybody that was ever president of the United States offended some group of people or some groups of people were offended,’ Tyson said

    ‘He’s still ahead in the polls and he deserves a chance.’

    Daily Mail

    Pinandpuller (0a7cbe)

  10. Someone should compile a list of vile people that don’t like Trump. The comparative association would be most illuminating, right?

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  11. I can’t take anybody seriously for President when their entire CV is “football”

    You’ve obviously never seen The Towering Inferno, Capricorn One, or the Naked Gun series.

    Cretin.

    Dave (445e97)

  12. I’ll start. Louis Farrakhan.

    Just another neverTrump pea in the pod. He’s an anti-Semite don’t you know. wink wink

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  13. Um.

    papertiger (c8116c)

  14. Wait. You’re telling me Capricorn One wasn’t a documentary?

    papertiger (c8116c)

  15. Electing a murderer like O.J. to public office opens the door to electing all sorts of undesirables — like slaveholders and Indian killers, for example. Impeccable logic.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  16. Only in sheila jackson lees mind, father of thanos and da jack coy was also in it.

    narciso (d1f714)

  17. Someone should compile a list of vile people that don’t like Trump. The comparative association would be most illuminating, right?

    Not really, since the problem is not so much that there are vile people who like Trump, but that Trump likes (and is buddies with) vile people.

    Unless you think the fact that, say, David Duke hated Obama excuses Obama for liking the vile people he was friends with (Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, etc).

    Dave (445e97)

  18. Good point Viking. By the way did you know that:

    Adams was supposedly maneuvering to have his eldest daughter married into the family of [British King] George III in order to establish a royal bloodline. He also had purportedly arranged to smuggle a small bordello of London prostitutes across the Atlantic to satisfy his instincts for debauchery within the presidential mansion. Jefferson, for his part, was described as a demonstrable coward who had avoided military service in the Revolutionary War and had fled rather precipitously while governor of Virginia at the approach of British troops”?

    One neverjefferson type wrote:

    In one newspaper article a Federalist critic raised the question about what might happen if “such a man as Mr. Jefferson were to hold the reins of government.” The writer prophesied: “In a short time, licentiousness and immorality would meet with the most public approbation, every restraint would soon be thrown off, and men would soon bring themselves to be infamous debauchees, assassins, cheats, thieves, liars, hateful and hating one another, a curse upon the earth.”

    The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  19. Wait. You’re telling me Capricorn One wasn’t a documentary?

    Not exactly a documentary; they embellished some things.

    There weren’t really any black astronauts in 1977, for example. That’s a dead give-away.

    Dave (445e97)

  20. the problem is not so much that there are vile people who like Trump, but that Trump likes (and is buddies with) vile people.

    So, Trump is buddies with O.J.?

    Did not know that.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  21. I can’t take anybody seriously for President when their entire CV is “football”

    You’ve obviously never seen The Towering Inferno, Capricorn One, or the Naked Gun series.

    Cretin.

    Dave (445e97) — 3/16/2018 @ 2:19 pm

    I thought he was talking about Mr President Ford.

    I know, congressman, minority leader, blah blah blah…

    Did you know this about President Ford? I had no idea:

    Ford was born Leslie Lynch King Jr. on July 14, 1913, at 3202 Woolworth Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska, where his parents lived with his paternal grandparents. His mother was Dorothy Ayer Gardner and his father was Leslie Lynch King Sr., a wool trader and a son of prominent banker Charles Henry King and Martha Alicia King (née Porter). Gardner separated from King just sixteen days after her son’s birth. She took her son with her to the Oak Park, Illinois, home of her sister Tannisse and brother-in-law, Clarence Haskins James. From there, she moved to the home of her parents, Levi Addison Gardner and Adele Augusta Ayer, in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Gardner and King divorced in December 1913, and she gained full custody of her son. Ford’s paternal grandfather Charles Henry King paid child support until shortly before his death in 1930.
    Ford later said his biological father had a history of hitting his mother. James M. Cannon, a member of the Ford administration, wrote in a biography of Ford that the separation and divorce of Ford’s parents were sparked when, a few days after Ford’s birth, Leslie King took a butcher knife and threatened to kill his wife, his infant son, and Ford’s nursemaid. Ford later told confidantes that his father had first hit his mother on their honeymoon for smiling at another man.

    After two and a half years with her parents, on February 1, 1916, Gardner married Gerald Rudolff Ford, a salesman in a family-owned paint and varnish company. They then called her son Gerald Rudolff Ford Jr. The future president was never formally adopted, and did not legally change his name until December 3, 1935.

    Wiki

    Pinandpuller (0a7cbe)

  22. Well, sh1t. Everything’s OK now, I guess. Maybe OJ will be lighting the torch at the 2028 LA Olympics.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  23. Of course, if he HAD said that he supported Trump, some would be counting the minutes until Trump vocally rejected the support.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  24. Electing a murderer like O.J. to public office opens the door to electing all sorts of undesirables

    Impeached federal judges. Former Klan Grand Wizards. Kiddie fondlers who go on the be Speaker of the House. Senators who drown young women while driving drunk. God only knows what might happen.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  25. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    One thing I find funny is that people on both sides pretend to be shocked that the news media isn’t perfectly objective.

    In Jefferson and Adams’s day, people would have thought the idea of objective press was crazy. Each side had their own newspapers, and the faction in power directed all government printing business (which represented a substantial amount of revenue) exclusively to the publishers of the papers friendly to them. And the partisan newspapers of the era printed wild accusations, libelous hit pieces and scurrilous rumors that would make Alex Jones blush.

    Because President Washington (and only President Washington) was off-limits for the harshest criticism, Jefferson-aligned papers focused their wrath on Hamilton as a proxy instead. But after Washington stepped down, it was open season on everyone.

    Dave (445e97)

  26. If it were O.J. vs. Kaepernick for president, I’d vote for Trump.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  27. Selected not elected twice, that’s Gerald Ford. No marches, stupid hats or protests.

    Pinandpuller (0a7cbe)

  28. One thing I find funny is that people on both sides pretend to be shocked that the news media isn’t perfectly objective

    You’ve got it wrong. What’s funny is that people on one side pretend that the news media is objective.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  29. So, Trump is buddies with O.J.?

    Did not know that.

    Where did you read that Trump is buddies with OJ?

    I didn’t know that either.

    Dave (445e97)

  30. Now they are credentialed like Brian Williams (all 18 credits) and Matt layer who didn’t finish his degree for 20 years

    narciso (d1f714)

  31. Wondering what word/term in my response put me in moderation…….

    Probably “money shot” if I had to guess. I retrieved it.

    Patterico (115b1f)

  32. That’s two President’s within 19 years time who adopted the surname of their stepfather.

    urbanleftbehind (ddcc04)

  33. O.J. Hertz Trump?!?!

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  34. Leslie Lynch King Sr would have been great friends with OJ Simpson.

    Pinandpuller (0a7cbe)

  35. Civility we are going to try that one of these days

    http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/16/dc-capitol-police-american-bridge

    narciso (d1f714)

  36. 35- Did you know Sergei Skripal is connected to Steele?

    It seems Skripal was recruited by Pablo Miller, a M16 agent who worked directly under Steele in M16, and also worked for Orbis Business Intelligence, Steele’s outfit, as a security consultant.

    Interesting.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  37. Anyone know where the 2018 United Nations Climate Change Conference will be held?

    The correct answer is who the [carumba] cares? The United States of American won’t be attending.

    And you’re welcome!

    papertiger (c8116c)

  38. Dave,

    I actually know the history of the Aurora and how its editor’s frequent decent into hyperpartisanship (e.g. claiming George Washington had taken bribes from the British during the War) may have singlehandedly brought about the Alien and Sedition Acts. Being the grandson of Ben Franklin didn’t stop the Federalists from arresting him, either.

    Great days.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  39. What’s funny is that people on one side pretend that the news media is objective.

    The ones who so laughingly claim that we’re in a bubble. As if we could get out of theirs.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  40. Its more like a Tyson sphere,

    narciso (d1f714)

  41. But Simpson says he doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Trump when it comes to politics.

    Of course not. He sees eye-to-eye with Patterico. It’s quite bold of Patterico to lead us right up to that conclusion.

    Anon Y. Mous (6cc438)

  42. In other news, it seems Mueller had other leverage on George Nader, the advisor to the emirates, which didn’t deter him being used as a gibwtween by George Mitchell.

    narciso (d1f714)

  43. Of course not. He sees eye-to-eye with Patterico. It’s quite bold of Patterico to lead us right up to that conclusion.

    Hey, look, it’s Anon Y. Mous, the guy who goes to other blogs and says I am simpatico with the Government Consensus.

    So this comment you just made: you realize it makes absolutely no sense, right?

    Oh, I get it! If O.J. Simpson doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Trump, and I don’t either, that means I see eye-to-eye with O.J.!!!

    If you ever took introductory logic you obviously failed. Try a remedial class. This is not difficult. Get someone to put it into symbols for you.

    Patterico (115b1f)

  44. Oh, I get it! If O.J. Simpson doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Trump, and I don’t either, that means I see eye-to-eye with O.J.!!!

    Hmm.

    I realize this is a potentially touchy subject, but where were you on the night of June 12, 1994?

    Dave (445e97)

  45. You could just chalked it up to cte, so is he going to be the new Manson substitute, albeit free.

    narciso (d1f714)

  46. I guess the menendez brothers was the first time I noticed legal mwndacitu

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/russia-collusion-real-story-hillary-clinton-dnc-fbi-media/

    narciso (d1f714)

  47. I figure the continuous antiTrumping will continue until the guy is out of office so I just try and skip as much as possible. Sadly, you all have overdone the neverTrump crap so much if the actually does do something during his tenure as president I probably won’t listen. I’ve gotten to the point of cognitive dissonance where I sometimes think I’ve gone down the rabbit hole into a hating Trump blog. Then I realize it’s the usual suspects who can’t say “good morning” without crapping on Trump in one way or the other.

    I will ask this: Do all you antiTrumpers wish Hillary won instead? Can you name a democrat you would rather have occupying the Oval Office? I assume since Trump is so very bad you have a list of said democrats.

    I went to Ace of Spades and couldn’t find where he dissed Patterico. I will say from my take on Patterico I will stand with him. Patterico has been nothing but a straight shooter and honest guy as far as I’m concerned so if Ace or anyone bad-mouthed him they are making a big mistake.

    Rev.Hoagie (1b0402)

  48. I figure the continuous antiTrumping will continue until the guy is out of office so I just try and skip as much as possible. Sadly, you all have overdone the neverTrump crap so much if the actually does do something during his tenure as president I probably won’t listen.

    That would be like me saying: Trump supporters have overdone the pro-Trump crap so much that he if actually does something good I probably won’t listen.

    I know you believe that to be already true, of course, but I can point to countless things he has done that I have praised. So if you believe that to be true you’re wrong.

    But if I *did* say that you would say: AHA!!! I KNEW IT!!!!!

    Yet you feel no problem about saying that you would be totally non-objective if he actually did something wrong.

    Doesn’t that seem strange?

    I appreciate the kind words in any event.

    Patterico (115b1f)

  49. I could give you the link where he dissed me but at this point why bother.

    He (along with Schlichter) is part of the “relevance” crowd — they laugh at NeverTrumpers as supposedly being “irrelevant” — which tells me what they think is important.

    Patterico (115b1f)

  50. for sure though people are desensitized to “russia” … it’s been thoroughly benghazied

    happyfeet (28a91b)

  51. Slightly OT- Patterico– you might find this engaging; from tonight on CNN

    KASPAROV-COOPER ONE-ON-ONE INTERVIEW, CNN, 3-16-2018

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF31Dtc1mjk

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  52. Capernick was a promising candidate then he got lazy and started to soap box, Michael a.scut out that whole prologue, but ESPN is all about the pose. The more incorrect, Sanford ferguson the more insistent they are.

    narciso (d1f714)

  53. William Kristol is a saint and where’s Kato Kaelin in all this? This dredges up bad memories of schiffbag defense lawyers and inept prosecutors.

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  54. I will ask this: Do all you antiTrumpers wish Hillary won instead? Can you name a democrat you would rather have occupying the Oval Office? I assume since Trump is so very bad you have a list of said democrats.

    Trump should have never been nominated, period.

    I doubt I will convince you or anyone else who thinks the same way you do, but in my view electing Trump will be worse for the country, and for the conservative cause, in the long run than electing Clinton (with a Republican congress) would have been.

    There are short term advantages, certainly, to denying the Democrats the WH in 2016, but I think the longer term damage to the party (and the country) caused by Trump will outweigh them.

    Suppose you had the choice between these two scenarios:

    1) Trump is (barely) elected in 2016 but his unpopularity grows as people tire of his scandals and antics, and he is totally ineffective as leader (this is where we are now). The GOP suffers massive midterm losses and a two-term democratic president, with a solid Democrat congress, is elected in 2020, or

    2) Clinton is (barely) elected in 2016, but unpopularity, scandal and health problems make her even less effective than post-2010 Obama; GOP retains control of congress until an effective, two-term conservative president is elected in 2020.

    This is how I see the choice that was made in 2016. Of course, the future is unwritten, but I don’t believe you can elect a toxic, immoral and completely unprepared moron president without serious and negative consequences eventually catching up.

    There is certainly room for disagreement, but what I’m suggesting is hardly far-fetched. If the choice is between a weak and ineffective one-term Republican followed by a strong two-term Democrat, or a weak and ineffective one-term Democrat followed by a strong two-term Republican, which would you pick?

    Dave (445e97)

  55. Breaking- Sessions has fired McCabe.

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  56. BTW, has anyone seen the Hulu series about the path to 9/11? Comments?

    Kevin M (752a26)

  57. Seeing as they have left out entirely qutbs part and zawahiri involvement in the sadat assassination as I understand it, that weakens the story sarsgaard plays a composite of Clarke and other company men, in a bureaucratic struggle with Daniels o’Neil and rahims soufan,

    narciso (d1f714)

  58. While I think that McCabe needs to answer for his abuse of power, and might lose that pension anyway, this is just petty in the extreme. Tomorrow he would have received an EARNED pension. Today he gets nothing. It’s just ugly, cruel and stupid and does not reflect well on the GOP.

    There are millions of unemployed people out there who will feel this in their gut. Yeah, it plays to the chorus, but there’s muttering down here in the band.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  59. Breaking- Sessions has fired McCabe.

    A federal employee actually gets fired. Didn’t think this was possible. Under any other president, it wouldn’t. One less swamp creature.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  60. I guess Sessions thinks this makes up for his year of slothful inaction.

    Kevin M (752a26)

  61. I don’t think it has anything to do with inaction. Word is that McCabe was at the center of some nasty activities, not limited to leaks, and he figures prominently in the upcoming IG report. I’ve also read that the delay in firing him was due to his threatening to take others down with him, which I would actually hope he tries.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  62. I’m watching “The Walk” about the French highwire walker who ran a cable between the Twin Towers.

    As close as I want to get to looking back on 911.

    papertiger (c8116c)

  63. So instead of a famous murderer that you can pretend in your minds eye is associated with an effective leader, completely divorced from special pleadings, and disdainful of their minions, you would rather have us saddled with an ineffective leader who is also a famous murderer in league with special interests so that her misdeeds will be cloaked or glossed over by the minions?

    Takes a special borderline disabled kind of stupid to try and sell that.

    papertiger (c8116c)

  64. @62. Thinking exactly the same thing. Still, he likely has several paths to challenge it and try to recoup some of his bennies. But it was bad form to do it at 10 PM on a Friday night literally hours before they were officially due to kicked in. Looks far too political and quite petty at that hour on a Friday- and meant to send a broader message.

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  65. 57- left out of your analysis us that Hillary would have actually been a third term for Obama, that is his agenda. By the end of that the transformation would have been too far gone to ever turn back.

    Obamacare would have become single payer, probably Ginsberg and Kennedy would have retired already giving Hillary three seats to fill on top of Obama’s picks, there would have been a whole new global warming tax scheme added to an inflated existing one, a weaponised EPA would have killed the energy industry, gun control would have neutered the second amendment by a thousand cuts, and between an activist judiciary, the weaponised IRS, corrupted intelligence agencies, open borders and amnesty, no Republican as existing would ever be elected again.

    Trump, uniquely, gave us a fighting chance.

    Being blown by conservative pride.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  66. Being blown by conservative pride.
    the Bas (3bcea0) — 3/16/2018 @ 8:29 pm

    I would say “GOPe pride” as opposed to conservative, but otherwise agree.

    Stashiu3 (466cdf)

  67. papertiger, I thought it was called “Man on Wire”. If it’s the same movie, it’s one of the most memorable films I’ve ever seen. There’s one scene where he’s on the wire and a flying 747 is in the background. Very reminiscent of 911, and likely purposely so. That French dude is a definite bad ass.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  68. Yes Stash, that’s probably more accurate.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  69. Clinton could have accomplished nothing of consequence with Republican control of congress.

    But the whole Trump political product is instant gratification, so enjoy the buzz while it lasts. What comes after won’t be as pleasant.

    Dave (445e97)

  70. Just thinking about a Hillary presidency makes me break into a cold sweat.

    On top of what I already laid out, add European level refugee policies, a whole new level of hate speech laws, a hot mess of a military, unchecked nuclear proliferation, Israel isolated and abandoned, radicalization of education on steroids beginning in daycare, an all out assault on property rights, outlawing of gender specific anything, and on and on.

    The left has become unhinged, and anyone saying Trump is even close to being comparatively bad is too.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  71. Yeah Dave, the republicans in congress are a real roadblock all right. Right up there with space aliens and pixie dust.

    the Bas (3bcea0)

  72. On top of what I already laid out, add European level refugee policies, a whole new level of hate speech laws, a hot mess of a military, unchecked nuclear proliferation, Israel isolated and abandoned, radicalization of education on steroids beginning in daycare, an all out assault on property rights, outlawing of gender specific anything, and on and on.

    Clinton could have enacted none of that into law without control of congress, which she wouldn’t have had.

    Trump’s democratic successor WILL have it though. Trump will make your worst nightmares come true. Just wait a few years.

    Dave (445e97)

  73. Yeah Dave, the republicans in congress are a real roadblock all right.

    Well, they *were*.

    With a democrat president to oppose, federal spending fell from 24.4% of GDP to 20.9% of GDP, and the budget deficit decreased almost every year. Non-defense discretionary spending fell to a smaller fraction of GDP than in FY2000, the last year with a budget surplus.

    On the other hand, with Trump in charge, spending and the budget deficit are both heading back up. Bigly.

    Dave (445e97)

  74. Trump will make your worst nightmares come true. Just wait a few years.

    If only we had an adult as president like, say, a Bush. We would be spared a nightmare after like, say, an Obama.

    random viking (6a54c2)

  75. Man, this ConDave’s conservative takes are impressive. He’s a con man…

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  76. I don’t think it has anything to do with inaction. Word is that McCabe was at the center of some nasty activities, not limited to leaks, and he figures prominently in the upcoming IG report. I’ve also read that the delay in firing him was due to his threatening to take others down with him, which I would actually hope he tries.

    random viking (6a54c2) — 3/16/2018 @ 7:32 pm

    Aim for the center mass, they said. Shoot him right in the pension, they said.

    Pinandpuller (868107)

  77. . Thinking exactly the same thing. Still, he likely has several paths to challenge it and try to recoup some of his bennies. But it was bad form to do it at 10 PM on a Friday night literally hours before they were officially due to kicked in. Looks far too political and quite petty at that hour on a Friday- and meant to send a broader message.

    DCSCA (797bc0) — 3/16/2018 @ 8:22 pm

    Get a lawyer, Andy. Everybody’s doin’ it. You don’t want to be a square.

    Pinandpuller (868107)

  78. Clinton could have enacted none of that into law without control of congress, which she wouldn’t have had.


    Had she won her coattails would have guaranteed control of Congress. Nevertheless, by now at least two new radical left SC judges would be seated and that will negate anything Congress will do. Look what judges have done to Trumps policy initiatives.

    Trump’s democratic successor WILL have it though. Trump will make your worst nightmares come true. Just wait a few years.


    So you’ve already decided our party has nothing to offer and because Trump the democrats will win. The last democrat president was a half black son of a communist who came out of nowhere to “fundamentally change” America. And it did. It changed us from an Exceptional nation to a Europe 2.0 with no real direction other than more and more regulation and larger and larger government. But he was half black so he was Mr. Wonderful. I contend it was HE who created the divided hateful America we live in today, not Trump. Seems like you miss the good ole’ Hussein days, Dave.

    You really don’t get how the Deep State is regurgitating its bile because Trump came on and so far won’t play ball. Our nation has been run by autocrats and bureaucrats for at least 50 years regardless which party was “in power”. They were always in power. That’s why so many of us would mumble things like: “nothing changes” or “both parties are the same” or “the GOP is just democrat lite”. Because the Deep State bureaucrats were actually running everything. So nothing did change. They still are but Trump has caused a few cracks in the wall. Or did you guys miss Hillary fixing the democrat election and trying to fix the general? Why do you think all those leftist pigs were so shocked? Somebody goofed and Trump won. All the ballot box stuffing, the dead people voting, the fake early and mail in ballots and the millions of non citizen immigrant votes gave Hillary the popular vote but some dumbass forgot it was the electoral vote that counts and stuffed the wrong ballot boxes.

    BTW Patterico. My little diatribe above wasn’t with you in mind. Guess who it was?

    Yet you feel no problem about saying that you would be totally non-objective if he actually did something wrong.

    Doesn’t that seem strange?


    Not at all, Patterico. That’s the cognitive dissonance to which I referred. One may call wolf only so many times till the ear ignores to the call.

    Rev.Hoagie (1b0402)

  79. Nobody home in there, Hoagie. Yikes!

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  80. @80. ROFLMAO

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  81. Hey, look, it’s Anon Y. Mous, the guy who goes to other blogs and says I am simpatico with the Government Consensus.

    Your name did come up at AoSHQ, not as part of the “Government Consensus”, rather “Washington Consensus”.

    The statement by Ace, referring to Jonah Goldberg, was

    And why is he not throwing cold water on the various members of the Washington Consensus — such as Patterico, Erick Erickson, Bill Kristol, and of course various and sundry members of the legacy media — currently spinning out new conspiracy theories about Tillerson’s long-expected firing?

    Someone in the comments said you weren’t part of the DC crowd and I commented that I agreed, but that you were simpatico with them.

    http://acecomments.mu.nu/?blog=86&post=374303#c28540688

    You are not simpatico with Erickson, Kristol, Goldberg, etc? I don’t recall you publishing any serious disagreement with that crowd, but perhaps I missed it. At any rate, the comment was not about government, it was about opinion writers.

    So this comment you just made: you realize it makes absolutely no sense, right?

    Oh, I get it! If O.J. Simpson doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Trump, and I don’t either, that means I see eye-to-eye with O.J.!!!

    If you ever took introductory logic you obviously failed. Try a remedial class. This is not difficult. Get someone to put it into symbols for you.

    As to OJ/Trump/Patterico, I’m surprised you are having trouble following the logic. Just imagine it said in a sarcastic voice, much like the one you were using when writing your conclusion.

    Doesn’t support Trump? To hell with him. Forget I ever said a good word about him.

    Anon Y. Mous (6cc438)

  82. BTW, I left the thread at Ace’s early, so I didn’t catch your comments there later. I now see that you and some of the other commenters got into it about Kimberlin. You quoted a cheap shot comment directed at you, but in doing so you left out the name of the guy who actually made it (Hikaru) and left in my name (he was riffing off the comment I made about you, but unrelated to Kimberlin).

    Just to be clear: I never discussed the Kimberlin thing at all in that thread, nor did I criticize you regarding anything about that whole incident. Not in that thread, nor at any other time.

    I disagree with you a lot when it comes to Trump, but not so much that I feel the need to demonize everything about you. I’m on your side 100% when it comes to the Kimberlin situation.

    Not sure why anyone saw the need to bring up Kimberlin in the first place, as that had nothing to do with what Ace was talking about.

    Anon Y. Mous (6cc438)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.1201 secs.