Patterico's Pontifications

1/19/2017

The Big Speech

Filed under: General — JVW @ 7:35 pm



[guest post by JVW]

I must like being wrong when guessing the content of upcoming speeches, and apparently I am pretty good at it (at being wrong, that is). So I figured I might as well have another go at it.

At this point there is no doubt that President Obama is leaving office on an entirely ungraceful, self-regarding, and petulant note. Why, after observing him for eight years, would we expect otherwise? He’s done virtually nothing to try to scale back (let alone tamp down) the expected mass protests tomorrow by his supporters alongside of anarchists and other elements of the far left, and he is continually lecturing the majority party against trying to undo the damage he has done, much of it via Executive Order, over the past few years. For a man who spent the 2014 and 2016 elections insisting they were a referendum on his policies — only to see those policies strongly repudiated at the ballot box — to now exit stage far left as some sort of sagacious oracle who brought enlightenment to the dull-minded citizenry whom he graciously acquiesced to server is a level of narcissistic self-regard scarcely believable. But it’s hard to not believe that the soon-but-not-soon-enough-to-be ex-Presdent has rankled his successor in such a way that calls for retribution.

So I am now taking virtual and unenforceable bets on how our Forty-Fifth President of the United States responds in kind. The President-elect has declared that he wrote his own speech and given that he is a man who isn’t shy about settling scores the question remains of how he will treat the outgoing President in his speech. First of all, the new President is more or less obligated to throw out a line thanking his predecessor. Here are some notable examples where the two are of different parties:

Ronald Reagan, January 20, 1981
[. . .] “The orderly transfer of authority as called for in the Constitution routinely takes place, as it has for almost two centuries, and few of us stop to think how unique we really are. In the eyes of many in the world, this every 4-year ceremony we accept as normal is nothing less than a miracle.

[to Jimmy Carter] “Mr. President, I want our fellow citizens to know how much you did to carry on this tradition. By your gracious cooperation in the transition process, you have shown a watching world that we are a united people pledged to maintaining a political system which guarantees individual liberty to a greater degree than any other, and I thank you and your people for all your help in maintaining the continuity which is the bulwark of our Republic.”

Bill Clinton, January 20, 1993
“On behalf of our Nation, I salute my predecessor, President Bush, for his half-century of service to America. And I thank the millions of men and women whose steadfastness and sacrifice triumphed over depression, fascism, and communism.”

George W. Bush, January 20, 2001
“As I begin, I thank President Clinton for his service to our Nation, and I thank Vice President Gore for a contest conducted with spirit and ended with grace.”

Barack Obama, January 20, 2009
[. . .] “I thank President Bush for his service to our Nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.”

So based upon that I think it is safe to say that tomorrow’s speech will include a blandishment along the lines of “I thank President Obama for his service to our country.” If it is a grudge time, a different phrasing could suggest a harsher tone: “I thank President Obama for all he has done for me. And I mean that.” But it’s probably a safe bet that the new President will fall back on the bland tradition of his predecessors.

Where it really gets interesting is in whether or not our 45th President paints a dire picture of America and implicitly — or, given whom we are discussing, explicitly — blames the 44th President and his policies. Again, here is Obama from eight years ago:

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our Nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the Nation for a new age. Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly. Our schools fail too many. And each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land, a nagging fear that America’s decline is inevitable, that the next generation must lower its sights.

[. . .]

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. [. . .] And so to all the other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born, know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use. Our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort, even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat and roll back the specter of a warming planet.

In all, a pretty blistering appraisal of the Bush years. Here is what Ronald Reagan had to say about the close of the Carter Era 28 years earlier:

These United States are confronted with an economic affliction of great proportions. We suffer from the longest and one of the worst sustained inflations in our national history. It distorts our economic decisions, penalizes thrift, and crushes the struggling young and the fixed-income elderly alike. It threatens to shatter the lives of millions of our people.

[. . .]

It is no coincidence that our present troubles parallel and are proportionate to the intervention and intrusion in our lives that result from unnecessary and excessive growth of government. It is time for us to realize that we’re too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams. We’re not, as some would have us believe, doomed to an inevitable decline.

Interestingly enough, at a tense time in the Cold War the man whose critics all derided him as a warmonger spent only four short paragraphs on foreign policy in his inauguration, promising to support freedom-loving peoples, oppose tyrannies, and always be willing to negotiate for peace. He did not so much utter the words “Soviet Union,” nor did he say “Iran” or “Afghanistan.”

So given the times, the circumstances, the built-up animosity, what do you expect out of tomorrow’s inaugural address? Will our new President name-check all of the ideas and policies of his predecessor that he finds objectionable? Will he instead be a little more arch and measured, and perhaps speak in favor of “the common man” without explicitly deriding the self-declared elites? Keep in mind that the President-elect has characterized his address as being on the shorter side, so perhaps the betting money is that it will be bland and boilerplate. In any case, here is how I see the odds stacking up:

Angry, score-settling address attacking his critics: 3:1 against
Brief, bland address covering well-trod ground from the campaign: 5:4 for
Long-winded recitation of detailed policy plans: 10:1 against
An emotional, heartfelt appeal for national unity: 7:1 against
A repudiation of every position he took during the campaign: 15:1 against (let’s hope!)

Feel free to make predictions in the comments and we can come back tomorrow night and see how everyone did.

– JVW

23 Responses to “The Big Speech”

  1. Apologies in advance for what is bound to be sloppy editing. I have to run out for the night, so I just barely got this post up in time. I’ll fix anything when I get back.

    JVW (6e49ce)

  2. I predict that I won’t watch it.

    Patterico (115b1f)

  3. My pick is….

    Brief, bland address covering well-trod ground from the campaign: 5:4 for

    I’m just so happy Obama is leaving and taking his copy of “Rules for Radicals” with him. And regardless of what comes after tomorrow, we finally have a president who likes us, doesn’t consider us racists or other manner of polluting bigots. It feels glorious! At least for today.

    Patricia (5fc097)

  4. I have food shopping and other errands to do. It’s my day off from work. If I am home, I will watch.

    I predict a list of what’s wrong with our country but no direct attribution of blame to any specific person, rather
    like the Obama passage you quoted. Also a litany of recycled promises from the campaign, and a demand that everyone unite behind his leadership.

    Perhaps a gracious nod to Hillary.

    And 50/50 that he will include the “Build a wall” chant from the campaign.

    Kishnevi (55d84d)

  5. Trump is a LIFO kind of guy. Replay the topics of the last three weeks of fake news, and he will address all of them in order, first to last, from the standpoint that they are disrespectful to him. If time permits, he may get around to his campaign promises. But CNN and hookers peeing on a mattress may take an inordinate amount of time.

    Or so I would have predicted last June.

    My hope is that we will rise to the Office. Tomorrow is an important opportunity for Trump to show that he can still learn a few new tricks. If he just avoids Twitter, even if he stumbles down the LIFO tunnel, it will show growth.

    BobStewartatHome (d1b2b6)

  6. As these speeches go it’ll likely be short.

    Not tiny. Just short.

    And probably void of any fresh ‘catch phrases’ to bigfoot the one that’s already pre-sold the brand.

    You know, the one emblazoned on the red ball caps. And as all good marketers know, he’ll build to repeat the message at least three to five times in his delivery on camera and close with it. Which is, to say: “Together, WE will make America great again.”

    “Just do it.” – Nike ad tag line, Wieden+Kennedy Advertising, NY, NY., 1988

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  7. Events have a way of imposing themselves. You never could have predicted Iraq and Afghanistan from Bush 43s campaigning or inauguration.

    If Trump reads someone else’s words I’m sure it will be the usual inoffensive “uniter not a divider” boilerplate, and if it’s his own words I’m sure it will be surprising, but I doubt anything he says will give any clue about what he thinks, intends, or does.

    Gabriel Hanna (61adec)

  8. Good post, JVW. Especially for one on the fly.

    It would be funny if Trump was gracious and said something positive about Obama’s tenure, given that #MAGA makes it very clear that he thinks the past 8 years have been anything but…

    Dana (023079)

  9. JVW,

    I certainly hope he doesn’t repudiate every view he had on the campaign trail.

    I don’t know why you want a leftist judge, open borders, mass amnesty, more government increases, Obamacare, and on and on.

    NJRob (e3c509)

  10. It would be funny if Trump was gracious and said something positive about Obama’s tenure

    Trump doesn’t strike me as that imaginative. Nor is he anti-American. So I don’t see this as a likely outcome.

    BobStewartatHome (d1b2b6)

  11. The left became more brazen over the years not only Clinton and obama

    narciso (d1f714)

  12. Pablum, but the poet laureates like Maya angelou speAking of freedom and the Ron silver’s they are our jets now, he grew out of those childish feelings

    narciso (d1f714)

  13. I don’t know why you want a leftist judge, open borders, mass amnesty, more government increases, Obamacare, and on and on.

    I most certainly don’t want it, but that sort of thing was the biggest fear that many of us had regarding his candidacy.

    I must say, the left has really blown it. Carter and Reid and some of the other Dems were telling us last spring that they thought they could “talk some sense” into the guy and that he was malleable enough that Dems could work with him and get what they wanted. Now that they have spent the last two months plus caterwauling over his awfulness, I don’t think he will be inclined to work with Schumer and Pelosi one bit. They have stupidly driven him into the arms of their opponents.

    If our 45th President behaves with a large degree of conservatism and with moderate competence, I’ll take that in a heartbeat over him performing with a large degree of competence and moderate conservatism.

    JVW (6e49ce)

  14. A repudiation of every position he took during the campaign: 15:1 against (let’s hope!)

    Ah, NJ Rob, I see why you might have thought that the above was my preferred outcome. Yeah, that was sloppy writing on my part. What I intended to convey is that I hope the odds are at least 15:1 against the new President trying to make nice with Dems by repudiating everything he said in the campaign. But I still don’t trust the guy enough to be entirely sure that he won’t.

    JVW (6e49ce)

  15. “I thank President Obama for his service to our country.”

    I’d be fine with “Arrest that man!” But probably not.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  16. If our 45th President behaves with a large degree of conservatism and with moderate competence, I’ll take that in a heartbeat over him performing with a large degree of competence and moderate conservatism.

    And he needs to give up Twitter, or at least have a minder. No President should post unfiltered thoughts — there’s no profit in it.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  17. @6. “Together, WE will make America great again.”

    Bingo.

    Ever the marketer. Good speech, Donald.

    DCSCA (797bc0)

  18. I just read the speech on Politico … not a true text, “united” became “you knighted”, etc. … it was refreshingly good. A stark contrast to the fool who preceded him. And no comprises offered to the establishment, in fact, a promise to overturn the existing order.

    A good start.

    BobStewartatHome (d1b2b6)

  19. I heard the speech. It was short. It stated the goals and direction of his Presidency in a clear and forthright manner, and laid out the issues and problems he sees need fixing. It wasn’t Ronald Reagan/Peggy Noonan by any means. But it wasn’t interminable like Obama or terribly delivered, like LBJ.

    If you don’t see the issues as Trump frames them, you probably won’t like it. He went out of his way to (repeatedly) talk about the inner cities and schools, which is unusual for a Republican and will be even more unusual if it’s not just rhetoric.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  20. I mainly noticed three things in the speech:

    1) Assertions that are not true. (this is actually not rare to find)

    2) Promises or vws I don’t want him to do.

    3) promises that I would like but I would like to know how he would do them.

    CBS’s Scott Pelly kept repeating later that this was addressed to his supporters. This is not entirely true and not just because he made a few calls for unity.

    Some of it was addressed to people in the “inner city” They didn’t vote for him in 2016, althouhh he would like to change their votes like FDR did,.

    Trump wants to wipe out poor education, crime and people relying on welfare. he made a point of remarking on the huge amounts spent on education which result in people who know nothing.

    Leslie Stahl said the biggest – and only big – applause was at his vow to wipe radical Islamic terrorism off the face of the earth.

    Sammy Finkelman (6f9f42)

  21. Ah, NJ Rob, I see why you might have thought that the above was my preferred outcome. Yeah, that was sloppy writing on my part. What I intended to convey is that I hope the odds are at least 15:1 against the new President trying to make nice with Dems by repudiating everything he said in the campaign. But I still don’t trust the guy enough to be entirely sure that he won’t.

    JVW (6e49ce) — 1/19/2017 @ 10:55 pm

    Thanks for the clarification. Glad we are on the same page.

    The more the left attacks him for just existing, the more he will push back. That seems to be his nature.

    NJRob (e3c509)

  22. Read the speech. Liked it. If it comes to fruition, our country will be better for it.

    NJRob (e3c509)

  23. #20: CBS? Why not MSNBC? At least the latter is open about their hate.

    Kevin M (25bbee)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0780 secs.