Video: Tapper Slams Trump For Accusing Hillary Of Being Unfaithful: “An Unhinged And Wild Accusation”
Jake Tapper unloaded on Donald Trump this morning for casually suggesting, with no evidence whatsoever, that Hillary Clinton has been unfaithful to Bill Clinton. Watch how bug-eyed Rudy keeps trying to change the subject to what he wishes Trump had said — that Hillary Clinton has attacked Bill Clinton’s female victims and taken money from misogynistic Islamist regimes — instead of what Trump actually said, which was that Hillary had been unfaithful:
TAPPER: Donald Trump launched a wild and unsubstantiated attack against Hillary Clinton last night. Take a listen.
[TRUMP ON VIDEO:] I don’t even think she’s loyal to Bill, if you want to know the truth. And really, folks, really. Why should she be, right?
TAPPER: Mr. Mayor, is that normal, stable behavior for a presidential nominee to launch an unsubstantiated attack?
RUDY GIULIANI: After she called him a racist, a misogynist, a, xenophobic, I don’t know, schizophrenic, and I don’t know what else she called him at the end of that debate. I think it’s fair game.
TAPPER: Just to make stuff up? Just wild accusations, Hillary Clinton’s cheating on Bill? No proof of it whatsoever? Everything’s fair game?
GIULIANI: That was a sarcastic remark pointing out that Bill Clinton has, you know, quite a past and Hillary Clinton has done quite a job on attacking the people who were victims of Bill Clinton. And not only that, she poses as a feminist and she’s taken money from countries that stone women, kill women, have women —
TAPPER: Bill Clinton is not the nominee, sir. Bill Clinton’s not the nominee. And this is my last question for you. Is the Trump campaign, is Donald Trump and the people around Donald Trump really the ones to be casting aspersions on the marriages of anyone else?
GIULIANI: It isn’t the marriage, it isn’t the marriage. It’s the way she goes on the attack and tries to hurt victims of sexual predations. She is the one that says victims should be taken seriously.
TAPPER: That wasn’t about her marriage? Him saying that she’s not loyal to Bill isn’t about her marriage?
GIULIANI: I am saying the problem with Hillary Clinton has nothing to do, as far as I’m concerned, with her marriage. It’s her protection of Bill Clinton for 20 or 25 years against allegations of rape, taking advantage of an intern, and going on the attack and trying to make those women appear to be insane in some cases. Also it’s her posing as a feminist and taking millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars from countries that kill women, stone women, don’t allow women to drive, don’t allow women to have rights, and use women as property.
TAPPER: I mean, I just find it hard to believe that Mr. Trump would want to start leveling accusations about people’s marriages. But that’s all the time we have Mr. Mayor.
GIULIANI: I think the accusations are about Hillary Clinton taking money from countries —
TAPPER: The accusation was that Hillary Clinton was cheating on Bill. That’s what the accusation was. It was an unhinged and wild accusation. I can understand why you can’t defend it because it’s indefensible.
No doubt the Dilbert guy and other Trump defenders have blog entries explaining that this is eight-dimensional chess: raising the issue of Hillary’s fidelity and the evidence be damned; taking the focus off his tax returns, etc. etc. Trump is a TV candidate for a TV culture, and I guess we’re past the notion of needing actual evidence of some kind before leveling an accusation. It’s nice to see people here and there like Tapper speaking out against it.
UPDATE: It is probably worth noting that Hillary has engaged in some baseless smears in the past, very similar to Trump’s more recent ones.
Hillary even said in an interview with Vanity Fair that year that a wealthy Atlanta businesswoman had told her about an alleged affair that her husband’s rival, George H.W. Bush, had had with a close aide. It’s all “apparently well known in Washington,” she said slyly. Hillary was referring to Jennifer Fitzgerald, with whom Bush was rumored to have had a romantic relationship for years. “I’m convinced part of it is that the Establishment—regardless of party—sticks together. They’re gonna circle the wagons on Jennifer,” she said.
The way to deal with that, for Trump and his surrogates, is to point out what Hillary has done in the past — not to engage in baseless smears of their own.
[Cross-posted at RedState.]
Ding.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 11:59 amshe has enough diseases without getting bill’s nasty herpes
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:01 pmyes, she was a party to a fraud, like when she financed those ads blaming the shawwal offensive on a video, try to keep up,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:03 pmhillary was like oh no way in hell herpes boy
you want some hot monkey love you can go rape juanita
this candy shop is closed
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:11 pm“Trump is a TV candidate for a TV culture, and I guess we’re past the notion of needing actual evidence of some kind before leveling an accusation.”
I know, huh? And I can see why a DDA would be especially sensitive to such an unscrupulous tactic.
Oh, but wait…
https://patterico.com/2016/09/29/usa-today-issues-very-rare-presidential-anti-endorsement-trump-is-unfit-to-be-president/#comment-1932835
LBascom (2f3828) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:15 pmI guess we’re past the notion of needing actual evidence of some kind before leveling an accusation
kinda like there’s absolutely zero evidence Mr. Trump did anything wrong with his taxes
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:17 pmBesides, as nevertrumpers never get tired of telling us, Trump has been friends with the Clintons forever. Maybe he does have evidence…
LBascom (2f3828) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:20 pmGeorge Stephanopoulos’s Wife On CNN: ‘Is Monogamy Killing Your Marriage?’
cnn lol
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:24 pmthere’s no indication tapper started out for working for chelsea’s motherinlaw is there?
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:28 pmDemocrats level unsupported charges all the time. Now we have one doing the same while running as a republican.
crazy (d3b449) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:32 pmYes, because Tapper is such an upstanding man. As a purported “journalist”, providing the list of softball questions he’d be asking of the Democrat to be “interviewed”.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:37 pmhe’s kinda sleazy huh
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:39 pmJakey Boy looks very metro with his salon-shaped eyebrows.
Cruz Supporter (102c9a) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:42 pmSowell:
Binary.
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:42 pmoh my goodness zero hedge found four tapper gems from this same interview what make him look like an incredibly sleazy bought and paid for clinton propaganda slut
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:50 pmUpper middle-class #nevertrump thinks we’re too stupid and inconstant to remember their depravity.
Not hardly.
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:50 pmoh dear – he apparently really actually said that out loud
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:51 pm“I think that there are a lot of very very successful businessmen and women who pay federal income taxes and don’t look for every single opportunity there is to avoid paying them.” – Jake Tapper
oh dear
I guess we’re past the notion of needing actual evidence of some kind before leveling an assertion
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:52 pmoh dear
does lil jakey pickles, boy journalist, have any evidence to back up the assertion that Mr. Trump didn’t pay every penny he owed
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:53 pmAttkisson:
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:55 pmoh dear
how many tax monies at all levels of government does jakey pickle-biter thing Mr. Trump’s endeavours have generated at all levels of government?
how many tax monies at all levels of government does jakey pickle-biter thing the diseased stinkypig’s endeavours have generated at all levels of government
pls to show your work jakey
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:55 pmugh *think* i mean
not thing
i bolloxed up the spelling and it’s all my own fault
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:57 pmUPDATE: It is probably worth noting that Hillary has engaged in some baseless smears in the past, very similar to Trump’s more recent ones.
The way to deal with that, for Trump and his surrogates, is to point out what Hillary has done in the past — not to engage in baseless smears of their own.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:57 pmRed HouseRed StateThere’s a Red State over yonder,
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 10/2/2016 @ 12:58 pmThat’s where Patterico flays
Lord, there’s a Red State over yonder
Lord, that’s where Patterico flays
He ain’t votin’ for the Republican candidate
In thirty five and one half days
Wait a minute, something’s wrong here
His quest has become a big snore
Wait a minute, something’s wrong, lord, have mercy
His quest has become a big snore
Something’s goin’ on here
We have a bad bad feeling
Pontifications don’t matter no more
15. Tapper is also hippy, his pants work upwards.
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:00 pmheck of a deal, isn’t it george will,
http://babalublog.com/2016/10/02/russia-signs-deal-with-cubas-state-sponsor-of-terror-regime-to-sell-them-nuclear-technology/
yes, I recall joe conason circulated that piece in kurt anderson’s publication, spy, he of the ‘short fingered vulgarians’ fame,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:01 pmTAPPER: “The accusation was that Hillary Clinton was cheating on Bill. That’s what the accusation was.”
No, Jake. And Patterico is perpetuating it. The statement was: [TRUMP ON VIDEO:] I don’t even think she’s loyal to Bill, if you want to know the truth. And really, folks, really. Why should she be, right?
Nobody mentioned anything about being ‘unfaithful’– except Tapper. This has been a recurring weakness in him as a ‘journalist’- projecting. Cartooning is more his forte, but then print is dead. “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” eh, Jake?
TAPPER: “That wasn’t about her marriage? Him saying that she’s not loyal to Bill isn’t about her marriage?” No, nitwit. But it’s quite revealing about where you mind is at Jake.
“Loyalty is a fine thing.” General Savage [Gregory Peck] ‘Twelve O’Clock High’ 1949
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:01 pmi don’t think you understand the zeitgeist Mr. Colonel
everyone’s defending their class prerogatives
it’s the way that they wanna live
this is operating on a level far far above right and wrong
it’s tommy hobbesian
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:03 pm“baseless smears”
Bubba says “Hill has eaten more pussythan he’d had.”
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:05 pmAnd yet you’re still here.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:07 pmDCSCA: most laughable spin yet. Congrats.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:07 pmhere’s the observation the null set hedgies make and I’m sure you’ll agree it is very compelling
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:08 pmif they are deplorable, any action is justifiable,
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/10/02/team-clinton-spray-paint-graffiti-on-new-trump-international-hotel-in-dc/
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:11 pmomg Mr. narciso that dumb cop in the pic can’t even figure out how to take a selfie
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:12 pm26. And the only way they have $1.1 Billion is via TFG and prog tourism.
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:14 pmSoon to be rectified.
Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:14 pmWow. On the one hand, we have my years of blogging and the community we have (or at least used to have before Trump). On the other hand, we have my refusal to support a dishonest con man. I can see why the latter would outweigh the former!
Well, it’s up to you. I’m not changing.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:19 pmOK, Bob23. Then get off my site. Goodbye.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:19 pmI mean, Bob23, why would you want to be here? You call me “Junior” and do nothing but insult me.
I’m not banning you, but as far as I am concerned you can f**k off. I didn’t ask for your opinion and I don’t care what you think. You don’t like me? Go far, far away.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:21 pmI owe you nothing.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:22 pm39. “I’m not changing.” Sorry dude, too late for that.
DNF (755a85) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:22 pmThe next time you call me “Junior” I will ban you, Bob23.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:22 pmpoking the bear
bears are terrifying i thought of getting hypnotherapy with that thompson twin guy back when i was in LA for to help me get over my oft-times crippling fear of being eated by bear
but then i thought maybe that wasn’t a super-smart idea
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:23 pmHow have I changed? I support the same principles I have always supported.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:23 pm@32– The truth can set you spinning. 😉
“You’re bound to lose control when the Rubberband, starts to jam…” ‘Rubberband Man’ The Spinners, 1976
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:28 pmooh the best of the spinners is free on amazon turdlord jeffy bezos’s prime music
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:30 pm@45– Surely you won’t object to Shirley? 😉
“And don’t call me Shirley.”– Dr. Rumack [Leslie Nielsen,] ‘Airplane,’ 1980
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:32 pm#46 mr happyfeet, if you should ever come across a bear in the woods, I recommend against serenading it with Thompson Twins songs such as Hold Me Now or Lay Your Hands on Me.
Cruz Supporter (102c9a) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:38 pmOtherwise, you’ll be needing a Doctor, Doctor. (LOL)
Nope. You don’t know a thing about me, obviously. But that doesn’t stop you from offering a firmly held and entirely incorrect opinion. A perfect Trumper.
So nice of you to give me permission to post what I like on my own site!
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:41 pmAnd one more voice of reason has left.
Anyway, it is no shame to leave the GOP. It is a shame not to do anything in one’s power to stop the corrupt Hillary Clinton from gaining office at this critical time in history.
Donald Trump has warts. Clinton has treason.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:42 pmThat’s the spirit.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:43 pmi never come across a bear my whole life
but i make noises and such when i’m in the woods
which means i never come across hardly any kinda woodland creatures
I wanna backpack in back country someday though it’s my destiny
but to do that i’ll have to face my fear
pikachu will have to triumph over nature
it’s like a jack london novel really
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:44 pmAnyway, off topic, in addition to the four other ways I observed or am, based on evidence, common sense, and intuition, quite convinced Lester Hold corruptly colluded with Hillary Clinton, there is likely a fifth that I didn’t even notice.
Holt wore an earpiece, against the Debate Commission rules.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:45 pmHere is the format for a Bob23 comment:
1. Make up things about wild tirades by the site owner, and the site owner being “junior” at his workplace, and other complete fantasies and utterly fabricated horseshit.
2. Generously grant permission to the site owner to post what he likes on his own site.
3. End with “All the best, Bob”
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:46 pmIt’s not any more critical than any other time. Every four years we get the same handwringing from the same people about how THIS TIME it is the most important election in history. It’s crap, especially this year with so little to distinguish the two leftist candidates. This is far and away the least important general election of my lifetime — although the primary was the most important.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:48 pmMy apologies. Wrong link. Here’s the link to Lester Holt using an earpiece at the debate. Seriously, what could possibly have been his reasoning? The other ways he cheated worked. This one could backfire.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:48 pmThe only person in Holt’s ear will be the commission’s longtime executive producer, Marty Slutsky, who has produced all of the debates since 2000.
srsly?
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:49 pmOK. You’re banned until you tell me how you know about me personally. Because that’s freaking creepy. Send me an email detailing how you know about me personally. Until I receive that email, you’re gone.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:50 pmNo, it is. Europe is falling to Islam with resulting rise in far-right policies. As Mark Steyn points out, correctly, demographics is destiny. The effects of the 1965 Immigration Act are beginning to likewise affect America, up to and including the rise of the far right you detest, but also lots of terrorism and whatnot.
As Ann Coulter says, and she’s right, the immigrants the left prefers vote overwhelmingly for the Democrat Party, which is increasingly corrupt, treasonous, and radical.
This IS a more critical moment than the norm, by far. It’s now or never.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:51 pm*far-right parties
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:51 pmPatterico, for all his faults, did Carter broadcast classified information all over the place?
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:59 pmIt’s not any more critical than any other time.
the situation with the disposition of our sleazy ivy league trash infested supreme court belies this assertion it just does
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 1:59 pm@61 ‘And I do know about you personally, but I choose not to jump into the fray’.
Pull the ripcord, dude– you’re closer than you think.
“Bail out, Joe. Bail out!” – Twelve O’clock High, 1949
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:05 pmoh my goodness them hedgies is on fire
happyfeet (28a91b) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:06 pmI think each election does become the most important of our lifetime, simply because we continue to incrementally move down the wrong path.
So in 2008 it was true, as it was in 2012, and now in 2016.
If illary wins next month, the 2020 election will become the most important.
Ultimately, however, there may be a tipping point when it could become next to impossible to thwart the Left at the ballot box in a presidential election due to the increased number of voters who take a check from the government, as well as due to the floodgates of immigrants who tend to become Democrat voters.
Also, we can’t foresee events that might occur during the next 4 years.
Cruz Supporter (102c9a) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:07 pmThat’s why I entirely reject the notion that we can just concede the next 4 years to the perceived status quo administration of illary.
There’ve been too many times in history when we “slept.”
That’s how 9/11 came to fruition; we (that’s the Royal ‘we’) let down our guard following the devolution of the Soviet Union.
What Cruz Supporter said, in its entirety.
Which also wholly undercuts Patterico’s position.
Denver Guy (4750ec) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:10 pmPatterico, this is what I have been saying for some time.
There are folks who disagree politely.
Then there those who crap all over your floor at your party and claim it’s not your party.
Toss out whomever you please. You created the site.
Simon Jester (485863) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:15 pmAdulterer Trump paraded his mistress in front of his wife.
Adulterer Giuliani paraded* his mistress in front of his wife.
They accuse Hillary of adultery.
Baselessly and basely accusing someone else of what they’re provably guilty of.
A consistent Trump(kin) tactic.
New York values.
*Literally, in a New York City parade.
nk (dbc370) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:18 pm@60- It’s not any more critical than any other time. Every four years we get the same handwringing from the same people about how THIS TIME it is the most important election in history…
Welcome to middle age.
Wait ’til you break 60 and it sounds even more lame. Which is why all you can really do is laugh about this entire farce. Like you said on another post- ‘the country is going to crap.’ Just bring a long your USA Today— or a good magazine– and when you’re done, be sure to wash your hands in the can while you can.
Next election cycle, the next ‘important’ one in history- soap may be rationed, there may not be running water or clean towels!
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:20 pmSomeone who insinuates that he knows something about me personally is giving me a full explanation or is gone yesterday.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:24 pmYeah, I said that in direct response to your justification of lies as entertainment.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:24 pm@59- An assist for Patterico:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7rF4s4hAow
“Don’t call me Junior!”– ‘Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade,’ 1989
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:30 pmYeah, not finding the full quote. All I can find is this:
But on Saturday, Trump told thousands of supporters that Clinton’s handling of classified emails and destroying of 33,000 emails that she had deemed of a personal nature meant that “she should be in prison, let me tell you.”
Trump did not stop there. He said he did not believe Clinton would be loyal to her supporters and chuckled, “I don’t even think she’s loyal to Bill, to tell you the truth. And why should she be, right? Why should she be?”
So, was he accusing her of sexual infidelity to thousands of people when he said “not loyal to her supporters”?
File this one with Trump’s calling for Hillary to be ASSASSINATED and calling for foreign governments to HACK HIS OPPONENT
#NeverTrump gotta #NeverTrump.
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:41 pmPretty dismayed to see Patterico taking cues from the Dog Trainer, but #NeverTrump.
Arguing that Clinton is a corrupt politician who belongs in prison, Trump said she shows loyalty to nobody but herself and her donors.
“I don’t think she’s even loyal to Bill, to tell you the truth,” Trump said. Alluding to former President Bill Clinton’s extramarital affairs, he added: “And really, folks, really — why should she be?”
See that, where they mad it up out of whole cloth and put it inside a quote where there was no space for it?
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:44 pmAnyway the official #NeverTrump position now seems to be that loyalty is only sexual loyalty, so Trump was accusing Hillary of cheating on literally millions of people when she said Hillary was only loyal to her donors and not her supporters.
Or #NeverTrump has to pretend the previous sentence to the out-of-context quote doesn’t exist, even though you can dig it up if you look.
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:46 pmgood work Mr. Hanna
happyfeet (be47b7) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:53 pmTapper and others keep talking about paying ones “fair share” in taxes.
Fair share is determined by tax code. If a return follows tax code and the law, the end result should be the amount that is fair.
Trump’s return showing the yuuuuuuuge loss was probably flagged for audit as soon as it was opened.
There is no way the IRS just accepts your word for it that you have a loss of almost a billion dollars, so I’m guessing that if the loss amount went unchanged after audit (and it may have changed, because god knows the IRS put its best people on it and tried), if it went unchanged, then the amount was fair, and then the amounts paid or not paid in subsequent years were also fair.
If after audit the amount was adjusted to a lesser loss, that wouldn’t mean Trump cheated, it just would mean that there had been a difference of opinion and after all the codes were hashed through, the IRS’ view had prevailed. Cheating and lying on taxes is not “avoiding” tax it is evading tax. Avoiding taxes is what everyone does whether they realize it or not… lets say Tapper takes a wardrobe deduction, or he itemizes charitable donations, he declares his children as dependents, he is avoiding taxes. Evading taxes is a crime that the feds prosecute relentlessly, and since it has been 20 years, we’d have seen this go to court.
Here is a recent case of a local billionaire that got dinged for evading: http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/14/justice/ty-warner-beanie-babies-tax-evasion/index.html
steveg (5508fb) — 10/2/2016 @ 2:54 pmI may be wrong, Patterico, I didn’t read you 13 years ago, only started about 8 years ago. But I had the impression that you started blogging because you couldn’t stand the drive-by distortions featured in the L. A. Times.
But now what I see you doing is jumping right on to repeat them as soon as they come out.
Trump’s statement was in the context of political loyalty. It is only the Clintons’ public marital history that gives it the ambiguity, which may well have been intended (but I suspect Trump was winging it as usual). That much of the full quote at least is available, to show that context, but the media has distorted it into an unambiguous statement about marital loyalty, which it was not, and the L. A. Times in a particularly egregious way.
In your effort to keep true to your principles by opposing Trump, you may be losing sight of some of your other principles.
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:12 pm@58 Denver Guy
It was probably just a monitor. He is a bass player after all.
Right?
Pinandpuller (5432cc) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:12 pmhttps://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=t-bone+walker&qpvt=t-bone+walker&view=detail&mid=CBCCA580FCEBEC7B6FDFCBCCA580FCEBEC7B6FDF&FORM=VRDGAR
mg (31009b) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:12 pmRECONSIDER
@61 Bob23
But you did jump into the Frey.
Pinandpuller (5432cc) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:13 pmChicago values –
mg (31009b) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:18 pmin moderation
@77– Yeah, I said that in direct response to your justification of lies as entertainment.
They are. You posted an example yourself just today on your own blog: ‘Saturday Night Live.’
And when SNL’s Amy Poehler and Tina Fey did a skit some years back using the actual, true transcript of an interview with Sarah Palin, it was devastatingly entertaining, too.
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:21 pmIt’s to get Hillary cheating searched and her intimate connection with Huma uncovered.
Dirty pool, but Hillary went there with her false attacks about Miss Universe.
NJRob (298290) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:23 pmLarry Nichols is a nut who once claimed to have been a hit man (he now says that was just the pain meds talking) but he was right about Bill Clinton using the resources of his office as Governor of Arkansas to conduct affairs with several women, including Gennifer Flowers.
Clinton told Nichols there was no way, because he was sterile. Nichols says he then asked “what about Chelsea?”
Nichols has always maintained that Hillary had affairs with both Webb Hubbell and Vince Foster while she was working with them at Rose Law Firm.
So, he is a nut, but he was right about Bill’s affairs, so maybe he’s right about hers
steveg (5508fb) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:26 pmI deleted a sentence. Sorry
Larry Nichols is a nut who once claimed to have been a hit man (he now says that was just the pain meds talking) but he was right about Bill Clinton using the resources of his office as Governor of Arkansas to conduct affairs with several women, including Gennifer Flowers.
Evidently a woman was claiming Bill had gotten her pregnant, but
steveg (5508fb) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:29 pmClinton told Nichols there was no way, because he was sterile. Nichols says he then asked “what about Chelsea?”
Nichols has always maintained that Hillary had affairs with both Webb Hubbell and Vince Foster while she was working with them at Rose Law Firm.
So, he is a nut, but he was right about Bill’s affairs, so maybe he’s right about hers
If you guys see any references to a “Bob23” in the comments, ignore them. He just received this site’s equivalent of the death penalty. Every comment he ever left on this site was deleted a few moments ago.
It was easy. The negligible time to delete those comments in bulk is surely a tiny fraction of the time it took him to write those comments.
In case you were wondering what earned him the death penalty, it was his decision to quote from a judge’s summary of a plaintiff’s allegations from a frivolous lawsuit against me — a lawsuit so frivolous that it has been dismissed without my paying a penny or retracting a word.
So you see, for his veneer of politeness, Bob23 is, and has always been, a very nasty and dishonest guy. And with that said, he is now but a memory that will quickly fade.
I’ve forgotten him already.
Patterico (aa3be1) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:35 pmI have read the context. I believe your interpretation is spin. It’s clear what he meant and clear that it was taken in exactly that way by the crowd. It was a wink and a nod and a clear reference to marital infidelity.
Patterico (aa3be1) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:39 pmactually it was based on an edited transcript, by the ignorant debutante from south darby,
https://twitter.com/cerenomri/status/782673719667855360
you’re still in i spy territory, man of mystery,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:42 pmin the ironic category,
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jul/22/business/fi-ct-saban22
that’s the head of univision, red queen supporter ‘whose also a client,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:44 pmNote that Giuliani did not offer that ridiculous context argument, Gabriel — because nobody took it as anything but an accusation of marital infidelity.
Patterico (bcf524) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:57 pm@88– It’s clear what he meant and clear that it was taken in exactly that way by the crowd.
Nice try.
What he meant is what he said. That’s clear from the text, context and the video. How the crowd interpreted it is on them, but impossible to get in the minds of the masses, is it. Or is it.
You can’t have it both ways- holding him to his words to the letter in one setting then applying implication in the next. Well, I guess you can. It’s election season.
_______
@87- Winston at work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmY_bniRT2U
The Ministry of Truth. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 3:57 pm‘The Uncola.’ 7-Up ad, (1976)
“Someone who insinuates that he knows something about me personally is giving me a full explanation or is gone yesterday.”
– Patterico
Trump’s candidacy has blessed this site with a passel of drive-by cowards who think they can squash disagreements by trying to influence the offline lives of others.
Of course, living in their mothers’ basements, they forget that real social capital is built in the real world, with real people.
Leviticus (9d0fa2) — 10/2/2016 @ 5:03 pmwe understand that in the people’s republic of california, a nazgul who should still be in prison, sends his flying monkeys to attack law enforcement, and we understand who supports,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 5:06 pmTrump’s probably been talking to Roger Stone again.
crazy (d3b449) — 10/2/2016 @ 5:09 pm@93. Of course, living in their mothers’ basements, they forget that real social capital is built in the real world, with real people.
Pfffft.
“Just a little hard times. Everything’s jake now.” – ‘The Sting,’ 1973.
DCSCA (797bc0) — 10/2/2016 @ 5:16 pmTapper acted all morally outraged about Trump’s remark about Hillary’s fidelity. But he is NOT concerned with Hillary’s horrible and vile attacks on both Bill Clinton’s lovers and his sexual assault victims. Even though she had been informed by Bill’s attorneys that he had been having an affair with Gennifer Flowers for years, she STILL went on national television with bill and attacked Flowers as a liar and a “failed cabaret singer” who only wanted money and her face on the cover of magazines. It makes me ill https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUOhUei6aTM
To see Tapper act all high and mighty and morally outraged today was sickening. He should remember that the women attacked by Bill Cosby were ignored for years. For the love of God, will anyone in the mainstream media take these women under their wings and go to bat for them?
Victoria (ca7a2a) — 10/2/2016 @ 6:17 pmTapper can run down an entire state, mine, if it achieves his goal, maybe he’s shown some occasional random acts of journalism, but in the end, it’s right out of the god of copybook headings,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 6:22 pmWell, when you look at pictures of Chelsea Clinton and Webster Hubbell side by side, it does make you wonder about who Chelsea’s real daddy is.
tom (1e059e) — 10/2/2016 @ 8:12 pmI don’t, she has red queen’s rather gaunt features, she was born into a crime family like the corleones, or whatever clan is in that series gomorrah,
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 8:16 pmHey, since this half-quote stripped of its context comes from a Trump rally…
Whatever happened to all those uncritically-reported stories of Trump supporters engaging in violence? Seem to have stopped, haven’t they, ever since it came out that the vast majority of violence was being committed against Trump supporters.
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 9:17 pmDid all the Trump supporters get sweet and reasonable? Are they being tranquilized?
Gabriel Hanna (bc876a) — 10/2/2016 @ 9:20 pmyes, what preceded that passage, a little dowdifying, ala gibson and couric,?
narciso (d1f714) — 10/2/2016 @ 9:24 pmAll taht Donald trump said was, that it as opinion, that she had cheated on her husband. That kind of story has bene around for years, spread probably by Bill Clinton’s aides.
Usually it is Vincent Foster she had an affair with or maybe could be Webster Hubbell (paertners at the Rose Law Firm), or she’s a lesbian,, and in recent versions, it’s Huma Abedin she’s in a lesbian relationship with. I don’t believe any of it, but what’s so strange about Donald Trump saying he thinks it is true. He’s not making anything up. In this case, he may actually believe it.
He didn’t even get specific, but just endorsed the general idea.
Sammy Finkelman (643dcd) — 10/5/2016 @ 2:39 pm* it is his opinion.
This doesn’t come from no place.
I think these rumors are deliberately spread, and actually, she’s extremely loyal to Bill.
Sammy Finkelman (643dcd) — 10/5/2016 @ 2:40 pm