Patterico's Pontifications

2/5/2016

The Election in Iowa Was Suspicious . . . The Democrat One, That Is

Filed under: General — Patterico @ 9:55 pm



Des Moines Register:

Iowa Democratic Party officials are reviewing results from the Iowa caucuses and making updates where discrepancies have been found.

Party Chairwoman Andy McGuire the day after Monday’s caucuses said no review would be conducted, and that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s narrow victory over Bernie Sanders was final.

But as errors are being discovered, the final tally is being changed, party officials confirmed to the Des Moines Register on Friday.

Party Chairwoman Andy McGuire didn’t want to conduct a review, you say? Well, I’m sure there’s nothing sinister about that.

Wait . . .

9 Responses to “The Election in Iowa Was Suspicious . . . The Democrat One, That Is”

  1. I see no issue there, do you?

    Patterico (86c8ed) — 2/5/2016 @ 9:56 pm

  2. The fix is in.

    Patterico (86c8ed) — 2/5/2016 @ 9:56 pm

  3. As the Dems always say, voter fraud is not a legitimate issue. Nothing to see here, move along.

    Edoc118 (05a689) — 2/5/2016 @ 10:05 pm

  4. Six coin tosses, assuming a fair coin (and since we’re talking Dems, that’s a BIG assumption):

    1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/64 ≈ 1.6 %

    So a 98% chance of that NOT happening and she beat that percentage — lol, yeah right.

    Pons Asinorum (49e2e8) — 2/5/2016 @ 10:36 pm

  5. yup this Andy McGuire hooch seems pretty sleazy

    happyfeet (831175) — 2/6/2016 @ 6:20 am

  6. Greetings:

    “Who needs voter fraud when you’ve got vote counter fraud.” – JoeStalin

    11B40 (6abb5c) — 2/6/2016 @ 8:18 am

  7. People can’t sit home and pout this November if their #1 candidate isn’t our nominee. We have to get out there and vote. The Clinton Mafia Family is going to ensure that all of the Dead-Americans who formerly lived in Democrat-controlled big cities vote early…and often.

    Cruz Supporter (102c9a) — 2/6/2016 @ 9:23 am

  8. HRC2JYL

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0) — 2/6/2016 @ 9:42 am

  9. Ref #4
    “Six coin tosses, assuming a fair coin (and since we’re talking Dems, that’s a BIG assumption):

    1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/64 ≈ 1.6 %

    So a 98% chance of that NOT happening and she beat that percentage — lol, yeah right.
    Pons Asinorum (49e2e8) — 2/5/2016 @ 10:36 pm”
    = = = = = = =

    Well, you’ve gotta remember the marvelous instance of Hillarity!’s investment in cattle futures, where she made whatever-thousand-percent profit the first time out.

    It’s like she’s got the Midas touch, I tells ya.

    A_Nonny_Mouse (12ed4c) — 2/6/2016 @ 1:15 pm


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.0866 secs.