Patterico's Pontifications

12/15/2015

GOP Debate Open Thread

Filed under: General — Dana @ 4:38 pm



[guest post by Dana]

I’ve been listening to the undercard debate for about 45 minutes now, and the discussion has primarily focused on terrorism, foreign policy, and national security. The big question is whether it’s time to put American boots on the ground to fight and defeat ISIS.

The top-tier debate coverage starts at 8:30 p.m. ET on CNN. I think you can also go here to watch it online.

–Dana

UPDATE BY PATTERICO: Ben Carson seems to be fading fast. The folks to watch are Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. Of course, there will be the usual other chumps, including but not limited to Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina, Chris Christie, the ever-annoying John Kasich, and (barely making the cut) Rand Paul.

*winks at Dana*

CNN will probably try to make people fight again. The fools will fall for it. The wise will not.

252 Responses to “GOP Debate Open Thread”

  1. Should be a good debate. I think it was Graham who repeatedly hit Cruz and Rand as “isolationists”.

    Candidates at the earlier debate are all in for sending troops to the ME. Some disagreement about whether just Iraq, or Iraq and Syria…

    Dana (86e864)

  2. Funny, Hillary (or Funny Hillary!) gave a speech today before the undercard debate, and instructed the GOP:

    “You’ll probably hear it tonight: They will say that guns are a totally separate issue, nothing to do with terrorism,” Clinton said. “Well, I have news for them: Terrorists use guns to kill Americans, and I think we should make it a lot harder for them to do that ever again.”

    She then said that the GOP candidates should explain their insistence at supporting current gun laws.

    Dana (86e864)

  3. Terrorists use guns to kill Americans, and I think we should make it a lot harder for them to do that ever again.

    How does she intend to prevent terrorists from getting guns? Maybe we need French gun control.

    Any GOP candidate who supports gun rights should be able to crush that argument.

    Gerald A (949d7d)

  4. I expect Kasich to agree with the gun grabbers. Christie wants to, but he knows better.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  5. Should be a good debate. I think it was Graham who repeatedly hit Cruz and Rand as “isolationists”.

    We could use some more “isolationism” — if the opposite of isolationism is “killing a bunch of innocent people (as well as guilty ones) to destabilize a region.”

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  6. Their opening credits show Chump again and again.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  7. long term military expeditions have been rare in the American experience, there was Phillipines, which was successful, and Haiti, which was not,

    narciso (732bc0)

  8. Cruz reaches inside his suit to put his hand on his heart.

    That should be good for three hot-take think pieces tomorrow.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  9. Oh my gosh, Dana Bash annoys me SO much.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  10. Dr. Ben Carson’s a fruit loop but everyone else needs to start focusing on pinning down Mr. The Donald to where he’s committed to more conservative policies

    that would be doing a service to America and I would say thank you very much you guys

    not sure i’m up for a debate with so many squidgets in it though

    happyfeet (831175)

  11. Those below the knee skirts will make any woman’s legs look stubby. I noticed that when my daughter had to wear one to visit a Catholic school and she is a slender, leggy girl. Above the knee, ladies, trust me. (Not some gay fashion designer).

    nk (dbc370)

  12. Nk,

    I think she struck just the right note: she’s not an ingenue, length is conservative. She’s serious in red, but her suit has a nice balance of femininity and professionalism. I think she tried to soften up the look.. She took her cue from not enough smiling comments, etc.

    Dana (86e864)

  13. How did I miss Chump talking about shutting down the Internet? I hadn’t heard about that until Rand Paul mentioned it.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  14. I guess Christie decided to use the school closure to talk about terrorism even though it was apparently a hoax.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  15. Fiorina hits Trump right from the get-go.

    Dana (86e864)

  16. Hey Dana did you like my update?

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  17. These people are pathetic and they are all coming across as pathetic.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  18. Ha! Just saw it.

    Dana (86e864)

  19. They’re coming across weak, Patterico.

    Rev. Barack Hussein Hoagie™ (f4eb27)

  20. I don’t care for Rubio but at least he is showing some energy.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  21. Cruz, whom I love, is coming across wooden as well.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  22. Are they all tired or what?

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  23. They seem timid, don’t want to stir the waters yet, I guess.

    Dana (86e864)

  24. Actually, they seem to be moving at Carson’s usual pace…

    Dana (86e864)

  25. they’ll go voom any minute now,

    narciso (732bc0)

  26. The big discussion is opened up, Patterico!

    Dana (86e864)

  27. Cruz being inauthentic in presentation is death to his candidacy.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  28. Rubio so far wins the intros. However, he’s a good talker and we’ve already had a good talker. Ben Carson wants a few seconds of silence for the San Berdo victims. That’s Pollyanna virtue signaling.

    Now Trump is talking (glitch) sense, not attacking other candidates yet, but Wolfe Blitzer is attacking Trump and now asking Jeb to engage in a game of let’s you and Trump fight.

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  29. Oh my gosh, Dana Bash annoys me SO much.

    Patterico (86c8ed) — 12/15/2015 @ 5:47 pm

    count your blessings, could’ve been Dana Priest.

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  30. Didja notice Jeb! did not re-affirm his attack on the “unhinged” Trump? Trump just slaughtered him.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  31. Hey, stop picking on Danas!

    Dana (86e864)

  32. “It’s not a war on a faith.” Nice answer by Cruz. Well said.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  33. john kasich? get offa my lawn!

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  34. Carly is wearing a crucifix. Good for her.

    nk (dbc370)

  35. Cruz was very good. He also showed that no one needs to get in the mud if they disagree with their opponent. They can refuse to play the game the media wants. He kept the focus on the issue, not the person.

    Dana (86e864)

  36. so tired… tired of waiting… tired of waiting for Bluuuuue

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  37. Kasich wants us to be Saudi Arabia’s armed forces?

    nk (dbc370)

  38. Fiortina would bring the house down if she grabbed that crucifix, turned to Trump and started chanting “the power of Christ compels you… the power of Christ compels you!”

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  39. Both Hewitt and Bash decided to go after Cruz. Had he not become the leader in Iowa, neither would be bothering. Excellent.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  40. Fight! Fight!

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  41. HUGE mistake by Cruz to not fight back after Rubio’s defense of his attack on Cruz. Worst mistake of all debates that Cruz has made.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  42. Rand did it for him.

    nk (dbc370)

  43. HUGE mistake by Cruz to not fight back after Rubio’s defense of his attack on Cruz. Worst mistake of all debates that Cruz has made.

    Under the rules he should have been allowed to, but that moron Dana Bash did not allow it.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  44. Rand is against open borders? Ron must be disowning him.

    nk (dbc370)

  45. But yeah, he could have tried harder. I’m guessing he’ll come back to it.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  46. Christie comes across strong here.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  47. Luntz says Cruz took a big hit in focus group by attacking Rubio. Ugh

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  48. I don’t like his approach, but the attitude is good and helped Cruz, I think, because it belittles Rubio.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  49. Rubio is a complete hack embarrassment. Don’t expect I’d vote for Rand Paul, but he was completely correct.

    Bugg (fa64ec)

  50. They ask questions that pit people against each other and then allow them to go back and forth running their mouths, ping, pong.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  51. wolf shizzle

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  52. Luntz says Cruz took a big hit in focus group by attacking Rubio. Ugh

    Was he the one who attacked?? Maybe I was not paying close enough attention.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  53. I like Carson’s suit.

    nk (dbc370)

  54. They ask questions that pit people against each other and then allow them to go back and forth running their mouths, ping, pong.

    Patterico (86c8ed) — 12/15/2015 @ 6:22 pm

    Which will NEVER be allowed in any debate with Hillary!

    Bugg (fa64ec)

  55. Every parent is checking social media. Great line from Fiorina.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  56. Go, Carly!

    nk (dbc370)

  57. Make the bad guys fear what we’ll do to them, their families and their friends

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  58. No need to compel private companies. Just ask them. Who’d’ thunk! Fiorina was very good.

    Dana (86e864)

  59. Shut up Kasich.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  60. Pat – I am with you. Cruz did not attack Rubio. However, the dials went way south on Cruz when he asserted Rubio was a liar.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  61. My daughter thinks Rubio has really big ears.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  62. Wolf is beyond transparent – get Rubio to attack Cruz. We just had this same tactic by Bash three rounds ago.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  63. OK, Cruz HAS to get a chance to respond here.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  64. Sounded like Rubio agreed with Cruz on ISIS.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  65. I told you they would try to get people fighting.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  66. Going on offense. Supporting Obama and Hillary! Boom!

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  67. The dialers need shock collars, Cruz brought some facts they in the CNN audience, but we are aware.

    narciso (732bc0)

  68. Miranda rights: non sequitur.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  69. Wolf had a plan from the get-go.

    Dana (86e864)

  70. No, Chump, you do not kill innocent people.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  71. Rubio is winning 1 on 1 vs. Cruz. The audience is clearly not with Cruz. Cruz is notably lacking in specifics in this debate. The sooner this debate ends, the better for Ted.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  72. Deliberately. That is insane.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  73. Sounds like Bush has one line for this debate “Lack of seriousness”

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  74. Luntz group LOVED Cruz’ plan to defeat/degrade ISIS. In the 90s!

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  75. Trump just ate Jeb’s lunch. Jeb showed his ass and Trump spanked him.

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  76. Is it necessary, Hugh, to bomb hundreds and thousands of innocent children??

    Is this the “toughness” we need?

    This country is going insane.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  77. You have to bomb hundreds of thousands of innocent children Patterico because when the terrorist bomb hundreds of thousands of innocent children, the US gets blamed.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  78. Carson handled that well, with a little help from the sane people in the audience.

    nk (dbc370)

  79. Ladies and gentlemen: Your CNN contributing correspondent and Sunday Show quisling, Hugh Hewitt!

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  80. Rand is right, we did create a Safe Space for ISIS.

    That’s probably why Liberals support ISIS.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  81. Toldya. The stoners want their internet untouched — I thought Trump was sensible on the issue.

    nk (dbc370)

  82. I’m going to have to wait for the transcript to see if that’s what he really said. Surely I misheard it?

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  83. They didn’t want it untouched when they cheered Net Neutrality.

    You just have to lie to them about it.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  84. Carson handled that well, with a little help from the sane people in the audience.

    Yes, I was pleased that a large group of people sounded as appalled as I feel right now.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  85. Pounce, Ted. This is Marco’s weak spot.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  86. I don’t know why servers serving Iraq and Syria have not already been compromised. By us, I mean, I’m not discounting the Russians, Chinese, or Anonymous.

    nk (dbc370)

  87. Christie attacking the sequester.

    Oh, our military has been degraded by the HORRIBLE SEQUESTER!!!!

    Puh. Leeze.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  88. This is just a lot of freaking chest-beating to try to get cheap applause. This debate is making me sick.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  89. Wolf Shizzle looked like someone had spoken ill of his mother, when Fiorina told him what was what re: bureaucratic incompetence and Obamacare

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  90. Carley just played the gender card and fell flat on her face. She hasn’t got the gravitas…

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  91. Carson has the surgeon’s attitude. He talks specifics, actual operations, and sounds credible.

    nk (dbc370)

  92. This is a terrible debate.

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  93. I don’t like Rubio tonight.

    nk (dbc370)

  94. Luntz group is HEAVILY weighted for Trump. So far, not a single attack on Trump was affirmed by even half of them. Typically, it is 3-1 against any attack. If this group is a true representation, we are in BIG trouble as conservatives.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  95. THIS IS CRUZ’S TOPIC. KILL RUBIO (FIGURATIVELY) NOW!

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  96. Yes. Libya. And RUBIO SUPPORTED IT.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  97. Cruz not attacking Rubio directly though, which may be the smart way to get him.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  98. EXACTLY.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  99. The questions are terrible. Wadda? No, Wolf, it’s not “preserving” dictators vs. “promoting democracy”, you bearded sissy-boy. It’s knowing who your enemies are and which fronts to fight on.

    nk (dbc370)

  100. See? Rubio does not get it. He’ll go around toppling dictators and creating terrorism zones everywhere.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  101. Nobody’ feeling sorry for Qaddafi, Rubio. It’s the damage that our country incurred when we took him out.

    nk (dbc370)

  102. SHUT UP KASICH!

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  103. Cruz did ok on this.

    Bite me, Kasich.

    nk (dbc370)

  104. Nobody’ feeling sorry for Qaddafi, Rubio. It’s the damage that our country incurred when we took him out.

    BINGO. Plus it was an illegal undeclared war.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  105. I don’t even have to watch the debates. All I have to do is come over here and read the yellow.

    John Hitchcock (9578f0)

  106. Leave it to wolf to dumb the room down, by his sheer physical presence.

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  107. Why is Kasich on the stage? Are they polling Democrats registered as Republicans?

    Dejectedhead (81690d)

  108. I agree with Trump. GOOD ANSWER.

    nk (dbc370)

  109. Exactly muammar worked with us, as with Mubarak.

    narciso (732bc0)

  110. Reading the posts, I am glad I have not watched one second of the cnn crap shoot.

    mg (31009b)

  111. Carly? What did you say?

    nk (dbc370)

  112. I like the oxygen analogy from Carson.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  113. Carson is speaking my language, too.

    nk (dbc370)

  114. Cruz is ALWAYS better when he us unapologetic. His response to the dictator question was wonderful and it resonated deeply. Cruz finally wins a round tonight!

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  115. Rand had something but could have said it better.

    nk (dbc370)

  116. Cruz does not look good talking over Blitzer even though I’d rather hear Cruz talk than Blitzer. I think he’s rattled.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  117. I hate it when I like Trump.

    nk (dbc370)

  118. Hewitt again casting the question in terms of the ugly reality that there are no perfect solutions. He is a tool and he will lose his radio show audience, as small as it already is.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  119. Rand Paul, you are dead to me.

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  120. I hate it when I like Trump.

    Heh. Do like I do (thanks, JVW!) and call him Chump. If you must agree with him, at least you’ll feel better.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  121. Rand talk good this time.

    Muting Kasich from here on.

    nk (dbc370)

  122. Why can’t Kasich put his karate hands down!! He’s already starting at a deficit.

    Dana (86e864)

  123. There is a parallel with Kirkpatrick authoritarian vs totalitarian prism.
    Iraq had been a long term threat, libya was neutralized for the most part.

    narciso (732bc0)

  124. Dana Bash is like a long-faced dog with a bone, she really thinks she had a hot point there.

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  125. I saw the idiotic question Wolf Spritzer asked about killing all those babies and chilwinnnn during a war and went back to NBA TV.

    I would have responded:

    “America, if you don’t know what a gotcha question is, that is it. But I will answer it differently. My job as POTUS is protect you, not foreign citizens. If you are naive enough to think that in war only the guilty die then vote for the other guy. If I conduct War as your President my job is to finish it. That means unconditional surrender or annihilation of the enemy and, sadly, innocents always suffer in war. That is why ending it quickly and with massive force is the right choice for the the American People. Thanks”

    Rodney King's Spirit (2b29eb)

  126. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are responsible for the growth of ISIS. Yay, Carly!

    nk (dbc370)

  127. Almost all Medved tweets so far have been to minimize/attack Cruz. That’s two of Salem’s biggest personalities who have used this occasion to try to belittle/minimize Cruz. This is no coincidence.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  128. Christie is an idiot.

    nk (dbc370)

  129. Christie beats his chest and Paul knocks him as the World War III candidate. This may not be a popular viewpoint but I’m with Paul here.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  130. Rand is right. What right do we have to impose a no-fly zone in Iraq and Syria against Russia who has been invited there by Iraq and Syria?

    Christie is a thug and an idiot.

    nk (dbc370)

  131. Ed from SV,

    I feel disappointed in Hewitt.

    Dana (86e864)

  132. Trump is now objecting to everything being about him? Ok, then.

    nk (dbc370)

  133. Shut up, Kasich.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  134. Hair pull, hair pull!

    nk (dbc370)

  135. Trump was actually making a good point there. Then he became Donald Chump again.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  136. The Jeb/Chump brouhaha is making me nuts. Kasich is playing dad, Carly sounds like mom. Oh lord, Kasich is now lecturing on leadership with his karate hands.

    Dana (86e864)

  137. Hugh likes Kasich. Clearly.

    Dana (86e864)

  138. Wolf won a yooge meta goal – he got the debate to devolve into a neener neener neener free for all. Now, all the immense policy responses will be ignored. ALL sound bytes will be the fight.

    Ultimate cover for HRC and BHO.

    America just lost the debate.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  139. Jess weakness shows every time he takes the bait from Chump.

    Dana (86e864)

  140. Wax on wax off kasichson.

    The expanse has good production values.

    narciso (732bc0)

  141. *Jeb*

    Dana (86e864)

  142. Can a surgeon be a general?

    Good answer by Carson. “Political class”; “I don’t do a lot of talking, I do a lot of doing”.

    nk (dbc370)

  143. hewitt and medved
    dumb and double dumb

    mg (31009b)

  144. Rubio-daring to lie through his teeth. Nobody is “paying a fine and back taxes”.The lesson we’ve really learned is he is FULL OF SHIT! There again is a lot of happytalk AND NO ENFORCEMENT.

    Bugg (fa64ec)

  145. Rubio, I don’t want to hear your ideas about amnesty.

    Even if you are right that there must be a path to citizenship — we cannot have a permanent immigrant underclass.

    nk (dbc370)

  146. Cruz killing Rubio now.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  147. And I’ll get Donald Trump to pay for it — HAHAHA line of the night, even if he rehearsed it.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  148. Cruz skewered Rubio. Just gutted him.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  149. Put a fork in Jeb, he’s done.

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  150. Nice touch, make Trump pay for wall. That played well.

    Dana (86e864)

  151. Shut up, Dana Bash!!

    Dana (86e864)

  152. My question: After this debate, will Cruz still be leading Chump in the Iowa polls? Or will Chump be leading again? Also, will anyone drop out?

    John Hitchcock (9578f0)

  153. Wow. Too bad the Trump/Bush exchange will be the sound bite. Cruz shines brilliantly.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  154. Oh, shut up Dana Bash.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  155. Damn it, Mr. Trump.

    nk (dbc370)

  156. Do you think this is the tone — SHUT UP, DANA BASH.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  157. As Dana said: shut up, Dana!

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  158. Jeb looks like W from a distance.

    nk (dbc370)

  159. This Bash beyotch just intentionally added kerosene to the debate fire and goes to Bush decrying the tone?!!!!!!!!!!!! The ultimate hypocrisy. Best example I have ever witnessed.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  160. EXACTLY Ed from SFV. Totally premeditated.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  161. Terrorist malpractice!!! Awesome.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  162. Love the point Paul is making now, whacking Rubio’s bill.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  163. Kasich should slink away while the spotlight is on Trump or Cruz, he’s more finished than Jeb or Rand Paul. BTW, what happened to the Jersey Pumpkin?

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  164. Rand Paul sounds like Nicholas Cage if you don’t look at him when he’s talking…

    Dana (86e864)

  165. Rubio talks out both sides of his mouth on *everything* involving the border and immigration and it’s showing.

    nk (dbc370)

  166. So… the world is on fire and wolf blitzer wants to know if it was a good idea to remove Saddam Hussein?!?! #Sh*tForBrains

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  167. Carla Hernandez vs. Christie. Mismatch. Christie by KO.

    nk (dbc370)

  168. Kasich muted.

    nk (dbc370)

  169. Turrible decision by CNN to use THAT, of the thousands of Facebook video questions, given that we just had the thrashing out of this issue. Classic attempt to frame the election.

    I am calling it now: The crying and wailing by innocent-looking folks against the meeeeeeeannnnn Republicans is the 2016 version of the War on Women.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  170. On border security, New Jersey thug is good way to be.

    nk (dbc370)

  171. i need to ‘fess up, Ed, i totally ripped off yur 159…

    Colonel Haiku (2601c0)

  172. I am happily stunned that Wolf allowed cruz a THIRD unfettered bite at Rubio on the Gang of 8 discussion.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  173. Colonel, I am honored.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  174. Like Ann Coulter said, Ted Kennedy has the only confirmed kill in the War on Women. I saw that somewhere today.

    ropelight (b1d3d2)

  175. Drudge
    trump 53
    cruz 21
    paul 9

    mg (31009b)

  176. So its been a day and Serrano hasn’t updated his twitter feed, much less the paper.

    narciso (732bc0)

  177. Be forewarned: Rubio and the media have some evidence that Cruz once offered a legal path to citizenship. Medved has already retweeted such.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  178. But robinabcarian has her pulse on the nation.

    narciso (732bc0)

  179. I don’t think Trump knew what the nuclear triad is.

    Dana (86e864)

  180. Oh, here we go.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  181. The temperment thing.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  182. Luntz says Cruz won each 1 on 1 against Rubio in his focus group.

    So…what’s the turnout gonna be – moderates or conservatives. That’s the primary, folks.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  183. Trump just destroyed Bash. I love him, sometimes.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  184. Carson did pretty good this round, as did rand on immigration and the Syrian Gordian knot.

    narciso (732bc0)

  185. Shut up, Dana!! No one wants to hear you!

    Dana (86e864)

  186. She does not lay a glove on Cruz.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  187. Cruz is great! Shut up, Dana!!

    Dana (86e864)

  188. They were SO excited about that and it went nowhere.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  189. Cruz: Dana, stop trying to distract us with stupid stuff!

    Dana (86e864)

  190. Heh. Trump will say anything that needs to be said at the moment. I love the Republican Party… For now.

    Dana (86e864)

  191. Chump rules out independent run.

    For today.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  192. JINX YOU OWE ME A COKE

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  193. Trump commits to “remaining” a Republican.

    Carson did not. I don’t know that I hold that against him. I don’t find much in the GOP to be loyal to these days, either.

    nk (dbc370)

  194. Well he uses that tactic as leverage, he sees no need to make that claim now.

    narciso (732bc0)

  195. Commercial break…

    Col Haiku, you made me laugh out loud at 38!

    Dana (86e864)

  196. I writed a post, because this debate is stupid.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  197. Nk,

    Perhaps that’s because Carson wouldn’t be honest in saying that, and he appears to be, if anything, an honest man.

    Trump, on the other hand…

    Dana (86e864)

  198. Cruz started nervously and inauthentically. When he finally let go, especially when finally being given a real chance to nail Rubio, he won Iowa.

    The question is what the Trump-ets do in NH. Do they break to their customary “moderate” instincts and go to Rubio, or do they reward Cruz for having respected the Donald? I don’t see the yankee squishes voting Cruz. But, if they do? Cruz is the nominee.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  199. Bye Jeb, you’re done.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  200. Ed from SV,

    I agree re Cruz being inauthentic and almost unsure of himself. It took a while for him to kick into gear. I wish he’d work on that. Too much rigidity makes him appear unsure. And if there is anyone more sure of his positions, it’s Criz.

    Dana (86e864)

  201. Err, Cruz…

    Dana (86e864)

  202. Bye Jeb, you’re done.

    Who??

    Dana (86e864)

  203. Ed- that all may pass. But why do we let 2 small states hold such power? Makes less sense than Bush, Christie, Rubio and way less than Kasich.

    Bugg (fa64ec)

  204. Rand — the debt!
    Kasich — on mute. What is it with the sign language; I thought Christie was the Italian?
    Christie — remember 9/11.
    Carly — beat Hillary!
    Jeb — sigh.
    Rubio — mucho nada. Very disappointing tonight.
    Cruz — Obama sucks, Amrica rules, I will be another Reagan.
    Carson — I like to be in America.
    Trump — America is in bad shape; hope in me and I’ll change that.

    nk (dbc370)

  205. It’s strange, Dana. Things I find annoying in Trump, I find tolerable, even endearing, in Carson.

    nk (dbc370)

  206. Is a deal in play between Paul and Cruz? Would Paul fit in a Cruz cabinet?

    mg (31009b)

  207. Chump in post-debate interview really seems convinced he has the nomination wrapped up.

    Patterico (86c8ed)

  208. Carson exudes sincerity and judgement. This is why they attacked his primer on the constitution, along with the slanders against his integrity.

    narciso (732bc0)

  209. Paul, Cruz and Lee are the wack-birds of the Senate, remember, mg? They agree on most things.

    nk (dbc370)

  210. *wacko-birds*

    nk (dbc370)

  211. Trump’s answer to Hewitt’s question about defense spending made absolutely no sense. I literally had no idea what he was talking about. But I assume his backers thought it made a lot of sense. If I have time I’ll read it after the transcript’s up.

    Gerald A (949d7d)

  212. Krauthammer denying Cruz his victory sets the tone for the Fox coverage. Stand by for the direct attacks on a Cruz flip-flop on immigrant legalization.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  213. Paul and his voters should be worth something.
    A czarship?

    mg (31009b)

  214. We had the Chinese, and later all Asians who looked like them, barred from naturalization until 1943. I don’t want to see a law like that again. Permanent residency should have the goal of citizenship or it should not exist at all. If they are not going to be loyal Americans eventually, we don’t need them here for any longer than we have a need for their services.

    nk (dbc370)

  215. Listening to O’Reilly I think he has the best answer to why Trump is winning …. he is emotionally connecting with Voters who are mostly angry about the Country’s direction. And all the policy discussions don’t mean much when folks are that angry.

    Only once the house is razed can the builders reconstruct. Trump is razing it. Maybe Cruz and Company can reconstruct later.

    Rodney King's Spirit (2b29eb)

  216. Yes the Chinese exclusion act was stupid, this proposal, has a different purpose.

    narciso (732bc0)

  217. Toldja. Megyn Kelly and Hume at the top of the show, went after Cruz with a pre-produced segment on legalization.

    Ed from SFV (3400a5)

  218. he is emotionally connecting with Voters who are mostly angry about the Country’s direction. And all the policy discussions don’t mean much when folks are that angry.

    This nation is in such a mess right now that a very visceral emotion fueled by disgust with political correctness gone berserk instead of what animated much of the electorate in 2008 — that being a love of touchy-feely and “we are the world,” and thinking George W Bush had destroyed that loveliness — is cropping up.

    Republicans like Jeb Bush can’t figure that one out, Republicans like Kasich are appalled about the whole thing (while they stand around with their finger up their nose), Republicans like Rubio are uneasy and anxious to say “please don’t be so candid about demographics and socio-economic failings…that’s rude!,” and Republicans like Cruz and Carson must feel like they’re increasingly trapped between a rock and a hard place.

    As for that other segment of the American public that has been and always will be the perfect enabler to Democrats like Hillary, that could be hog-tied and whipped by her ilk until they’re a bloody pulp, yet would still love such liberal loons no less, that runs home just how screwed up this country is in the 21st century.

    Mark (f713e4)

  219. I already have a winning platform as you all know,
    Which candidate should I send it to,
    or should I send it to them all, including Walker and Jindal, and see who will take the advice?

    MD in Philly (not in Philly) (deca84)

  220. We could use some more “isolationism” — if the opposite of isolationism is “killing a bunch of innocent people (as well as guilty ones) to destabilize a region.”

    I sense a lot of the public is (or should be) increasingly leaning in that direction.

    My one major pet peeve about too much of the right is its tendency to be overly pro-military-state even when it comes to very complicated, murky socio-political situations, reminiscent of the way much of the left becomes overly pro-welfare-state when it comes to, again, complicated, murky socio-political situations.

    One of the few international issues where I haven’t minded What’s-His-Name generally taking a hands-off approach to matters and shying away from going rah-rah about the US military, unlike the French and their combative approach to one portion of the Middle East, has been the quagmire of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, and all the rebels he and that country are facing.

    Mark (f713e4)

  221. Under the rules he should have been allowed to, but that moron Dana Bash did not allow it.

    There needs to be a limit on the 30-second responses. It’s been gamed in the past, where two candidates monopolize the debate by “arguing.”

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  222. I see a Trump-Kasich ticket. This way:

    * We get to see Kasich find new ways to suck up.

    * They can both lose debates. Hillary could beat Trump without speaking.

    * Trump has assassination insurance, at least on the Right.

    * Anytime Trump seems annoying, he can always trot out Kasich for perspective.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  223. As Steven Green pointed out last night, Trump flubbed the Triad question a month ago, and hasn’t since taken the 2 minutes it would take to correct that ignorance.

    Lazier than Obama.

    Kevin M (25bbee)

  224. 94. Ed from SFV (3400a5) — 12/15/2015 @ 6:55 pm

    Luntz group is HEAVILY weighted for Trump. So far, not a single attack on Trump was affirmed by even half of them.

    If it is the same group he used before, that he mentioned on Face the Nation Sunday, it is. That group consisted of Trump supprters, and nothing could shake them, at least not quickly.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nation-transcripts-december-13-2015-kerry-kasich-burr/

    DICKERSON: We turn now to campaign 2016 and the Trump phenomenon.

    Last week, Republican consultant and CBS News contributor Frank Luntz gathered 29 past and present Donald Trump supporters in Virginia to get their thoughts on the Republican front-runner, including his controversial comments on Muslims….

    DICKERSON: And Frank Luntz joins us now from Las Vegas, where Republicans will be debating on Tuesday.

    So, Frank, sum that whole experience up for us. What’s the big headline for you?

    LUNTZ: Well, the big headline for me is that political correctness is alive and well, and it is found in the Trump candidacy.

    Three things. Number one is that these Trump voters are much more optimistic that any other Republicans, because they believe that Donald Trump can actually turn back Barack Obama [sic?]. Number two is that these voters were more salty in their language than any focus group I have ever moderated.

    They have taken the tone and the demeanor of their candidate, and they’re proud of it. And number three is that if Donald Trump should decide to run as independent, the Republican Party will be in deep, deep trouble.

    This one consisted of 27 Republican voters – I so far did not find an explanation of how they were picked.

    They probably would have been about 40% Trump supporters, anyway. (10 or 11)

    Sammy Finkelman (4d9cfa)

  225. MD in Philly (not in Philly) (deca84) — 12/16/2015 @ 5:43 am

    I already have a winning platform as you all know,

    Which candidate should I send it to,

    Ben Carson, if you really think it is right. He is the only one likely to pay serious attention to it, if you can get it past the gatekeepers. Try church connections. You might have to meet him in person, which might mean a trip to New Hampshire, or giving it to someone in New Hampshire.

    or should I send it to them all, including Walker and Jindal, and see who will take the advice?

    No reason not to send it to everyone, but don’t make it look that way too much. Send it to other outlets, too. You could try mailing it to 150 or 300 random voters in New Hampshire.

    But where is it, if we all know it?

    Sammy Finkelman (4d9cfa)

  226. Where is Beldar?

    mg (31009b)

  227. My platform:
    1) a. Immediately by executive order do what I can to make all fed officials and employees obey the same laws as everyone else does, eg ObamaCare, SS etc.
    b. I will never sign a law in the future that grants exceptions/exemptions.
    c. I will ask Congress to reverse the things they need to do, shame them into doing it, and campaign for new candidates in primary against my own party incumbents to make this as broad as possible.
    2) I will never sign an omnibus budget bill. Give it to me in separate spending authorization by category. If they won’t, when the fed govt. shuts down I will not close national parks and memorials just to spite the American people like President Obama did.
    3) I will never sign anything until every member of Congress as well as myself and my own staff will swear before a notary that we have read it.
    4) When a bill is available for officials to read, it will be posted for the public to read,
    and I will keep this promise, not just make it like President Obama and too many elected republicans in Congress.
    5) We will improve the budget situation or vote me out the next election. we cannot keep spending money we don’t have. no one else in America gets too.
    6) Any vacations I take while in office will have the expenses for myself and my family (and any friends) taken out of my salary. The taxpayer will have to pay the security tab, but not mine. The same with our household (not official entertainment) grocery bill. Any guest performances in the WH will be put on Youtube for all to see, or they will not happen.
    7) I will work to get rid of bureaucrats not responsive to the people. the administrative state must be reined in.
    8) I do not believe the United States is responsible for the problems in the world. We have made mistakes and need to strive to make fewer ones, but we have been a force for freedom in the world and I will not condemn the American people to sit in the back seat of world events while others have hold of the steering wheel. I will also not commit American troops to measures which cannot be finished during my time in office. I will not commit our troops to lose blood simply to have their sacrifice spat upon by a new administration.
    9) I lock my front door and back door at night, we should for the country as well. Border enforcement measures will be signed by executive order and bills presented to Congress before I get off the podium at the swearing in ceremony.
    10) I will honor the memory and legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. by filling all levels of the federal government as is possible under my direction with people judged by the content of their character.

    That is my working platform as of 12/16/2015.
    Now tell me, what platform is in your wallet…

    MD in Philly (not in Philly at the moment) (deca84)

  228. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/12/ominibus-bill-rewards-department-of-education-overreach.php

    Never happen in my administration…
    Just sayin’.

    MD in Philly (not in Philly at the moment) (deca84)

  229. MD,

    Your PowerLine link verifies why we were right to be leery of supporting Paul Ryan as Speaker. He is proving to be a disappointing establishment Republican whose agenda is focused on cronyism and DC politics.

    DRJ (15874d)

  230. ryan is same as boehnerfilth

    greasy useless whorish and cowardly

    happyfeet (831175)

  231. It reportedly also repeal the Cadillac tax that unions hate. Whose side is Ryan on again?

    DRJ (15874d)

  232. do they bother to do any fact checking before embarassing themselves,

    “Asked to respond to Burr’s comments, a Cruz campaign spokeswoman, Catherine Frazier, passed along news reports from the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal from 2014 that contained the 20 percent to 30 percent figures Cruz used, along with congressional testimony from an NSA official suggesting the USA Freedom Act could expand the universe of calls available to the agency to search. The material, Frazier noted, is “all publicly available.”

    narciso (732bc0)

  233. has trump said anything about the republicans and their greasy useless whorish and cowardly budget?

    trumpytrump manhattanslut needs to speak up i think

    happyfeet (831175)

  234. but wait, I thought he said everyone was unhappy with the bill, what did we get out of it ‘a year’s worth of rice a roni, and a copy of the home game,’

    narciso (732bc0)

  235. the bill slops the holy hell out of the pentagon piggies

    let’s go out on a limb and predict all this slop slop slop will be to no discernible effect whatsoever

    unless maybe they put some of it toward a tattoo removal program

    that would be nice

    happyfeet (831175)

  236. btw, they finally did convict phillip chism, how this wasn’t an open and shut case?

    narciso (732bc0)

  237. wonder why they would be cagey,

    https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/677260407053094912

    because the tribune, the post, et al, have been hermetically sealed from acquisition by conservatives,

    narciso (732bc0)

  238. also let loose the dogs of why is shopping for wine at amazon so hard

    i can’t work like this

    happyfeet (831175)

  239. OT: now i’m glad Ryan is not running for President.
    sheesh. the warnings about Ryan being a sheep in wolf clothing were correct.

    seeRpea (52281f)

  240. try the wines and more place, they advertise on the radio,

    narciso (732bc0)

  241. total wines and more,

    narciso (732bc0)

  242. tried – that one’s kinda tough too
    I’m a wait and see on this one i think

    it’s the last thing i have to buy

    happyfeet (831175)

  243. after reading more about the omnibus bill, i’ve changed my mind.
    i so want Trump to win now.
    not saying i’d vote for him, but dang…

    seeRpea (cf8aaf)

  244. They’re small people, all the professional politicians.

    nk (dbc370)

  245. sheesh. the warnings about Ryan being a sheep in wolf clothing were correct.

    Squish-squish (or “centrism” or quasi-conservatism) in the context of 21st-century America is a killer, merely a slow-timer version of flat-out liberalism. But a lot of the blame for that has to fall at the feet of the millions of people in this country who in previous opinion polls, on the question of the federal budget being held up, have rated the Republicans/Tea Party more harshly and negatively than the Democrats/liberals. Much less that large part of the electorate that allowed the worst, most leftwing president in US history to be slotted into the White House not just once, but twice.

    Ted Cruz is really the only Republican candidate out there who I have greater confidence in about not being corrupted by decades of squish-squish, whereas Donald Trump could easily be another Ryan. But even the shoddiest of the Republican candidates is not as bad and frightening as a scroungy character like Hillary.

    Mark (f713e4)

  246. I guess now we know the answer to Beldar’s question. Yes, Ryan is just as bad as Boehner.

    DRJ (15874d)

  247. worse cause he has cheesy douchebag facial hairs all over his face

    happyfeet (831175)

  248. We got rid of Boehner and the worst part is that nothing can dislodge Ryan now. It must be nice to be the establishment and know that even if Cruz wins and they “lose” the Presidency, they still have Ryan to protect them.

    DRJ (15874d)

  249. narciso@ 239: http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/16/guest-worker-program-expanded-fourfold-under-new-provision-in-spending-bill/#ixzz3uXdTt7JJ

    It looks to me like that’s a lie (and on principle, anything coming from Senator Sessions should be distrusted.)

    It doesn’t raise the cap at all!

    What it does do is exclude from the cap any worker who has already received an H-2B visa in the last three years. So apparently Senator Sessions multiplied the cap by 4.

    The only problem with that is, many current or previous workers, were already exempt from the cap. And obviously, it won’t be different workers every year.

    Also, the way the cap works, it is actually 33,000 every half year. (applications cannot be made more than six months in advance of when a job is supposed to start) So maybe he should multiply the current number by 8?

    The maximum duration of a H2-B visa is one year, so I guess that’s his excuse for using one year. But it can be extended up to 3 years total.

    http://www.workpermit.com/us/employer_h-2b.htm

    The system, as it works now, is, as they say, broken. (In fact it is this kind of thing that the word “broken” is properly applied to.)

    It is not doing what it is supposedly doing. It becomes a game and a lottery, with employers having to carefully time their applications, and applications accepted after winning a lottery, and the successful applications going more and more to those who know how to game or work the system.

    This results from the fact that the law qualifies certain people for such visas, but then sets a quota that is now far less than the number of people who qualify. The one thing you can say then is that the law is not doing what it is supposedly doing.

    The 33,000 cap for employment beginning in the first half of the fiscal year 2015(October 1 – March 31) was reached on January 26, 2015, meaning employers who wanted or needed H-2B visas after January 26, 2015 but wanting the job to start before April 1 were out of luck. The cap for April 1- September 30 was reached on March 26, 2015.

    If this was not to disrupt numerous businesses, something had to be done. So now all previously hired workers are excluded from the cap.

    Sammy Finkelman (a69e24)


Powered by WordPress.

Page loaded in: 0.1601 secs.