MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and her legions of sock puppets
[Guest post by JD]
Socking, socking I tell you.
Rachel Maddow and Teh Gleeeeeeeeeens would be great friends.
I would be surprised if this wasn’t the case for many in the media, but it is especially funny when such a smug sanctimonious pompous holier-than-thou talking head gets exposed.
—JD


Hohophobes
Comment by JD (b63a52) — 3/3/2013 @ 8:52 am
maybe comcast will dump her nasty ass
Comment by happyfeet (8ce051) — 3/3/2013 @ 8:59 am
even if they replaced her with a sleazy propaganda slut like our quasi-unemployed friend soledad they’d still come out way ahead on the ratings I think
Comment by happyfeet (8ce051) — 3/3/2013 @ 9:01 am
I’d be careful of mocking Rachel Maddow. I hear she hangs out with a lot of ruff and tuff chicks who ride motorcycles. Or something.
Comment by Elephant Stone (71e577) — 3/3/2013 @ 10:15 am
ohnoes it’s leather tuscadero at my door right now!
hello ms. tuscadero please come in what’s on your mind
I see
well there must be some confuzzlement we’re a BIG rachel maddow house here
we love her more than pickles!
nonono not them pickles what are a beloved phallic symbol of the patriarchy I meant more like the sweat and spicy bread n butter pickles
you can get them at costco
Comment by happyfeet (8ce051) — 3/3/2013 @ 10:23 am
someone needs to say
that when she isn’t socking
MadCow is sucking
Comment by Colonel Haiku (fd4f20) — 3/3/2013 @ 10:37 am
You see, a proper sock puppet exists solely to mock things.
It’s just obvious.
I mean, really.
Comment by Smock Puppet, 10th Dan Snark Master and Gender Bïgǒt (98ae1f) — 3/3/2013 @ 2:17 pm
Hey Rachel…why don’t you ask the FBI to investigate…perhaps there’s hacking involved… I mean..it worked for Anthony Wei…oh wait…now I understand….
Comment by Pamela (cf9d9c) — 3/4/2013 @ 6:15 am
Of course now she really will be trending on twitter as everyone leverages this story.
Comment by Barry (dd121a) — 3/4/2013 @ 7:04 am
Anyone care to bet whether or not she addresses her perfidy? i bet she “takes full responsibility” and blames it on an overenthusiastic staffer.
Comment by JD (b63a52) — 3/4/2013 @ 7:12 am
My relatives always say that I am killing my time here at net, but I know I am getting experience all the
time by reading thes nice articles or reviews.
Comment by bell motorcycle helemt (95ec21) — 3/12/2013 @ 5:51 pm
Not another word from MSNBC or MadCow
Comment by JD (b63a52) — 3/12/2013 @ 6:16 pm
JD, you have presented no credible evidence to back up your Rachel Maddow charge.
When you have some, please put it up.
Comment by Perry (dc1eab) — 3/12/2013 @ 6:42 pm
Perry – did you read the link in the story, and the numerous links contained therein?
LALaLALALALALALALALALA
Comment by JD (b63a52) — 3/12/2013 @ 6:52 pm