<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrat Proposes (Barely) Increased Penalties for SWATting in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillep Harding</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1156794</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillep Harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1156794</guid>
		<description>SWATing is not a prank. It should be called &quot;attempted murder&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SWATing is not a prank. It should be called &#8220;attempted murder&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estragon</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1155402</link>
		<dc:creator>Estragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1155402</guid>
		<description>Agree with Steven and Dustin above:  better to improve detection, penalties are meaningless if no suspect is caught.

I suspect the FBI can do it with their Patriot Act and other anti-terror powers.  Why they are not is the real question.

But I am against &quot;mandatory sentences&quot; and &quot;zero tolerance&quot; in all cases.  If you have a problem with judicial discretion, appoint more discrete judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Steven and Dustin above:  better to improve detection, penalties are meaningless if no suspect is caught.</p>
<p>I suspect the FBI can do it with their Patriot Act and other anti-terror powers.  Why they are not is the real question.</p>
<p>But I am against &#8220;mandatory sentences&#8221; and &#8220;zero tolerance&#8221; in all cases.  If you have a problem with judicial discretion, appoint more discrete judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JVW</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1154168</link>
		<dc:creator>JVW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1154168</guid>
		<description>Ted Lieu is my state senator (regrettably).  He is one of those liberal Democrats who aspires to climb the political ladder and he thinks that getting his name on a lot of bills that get signed into law is the way to build a record he can run for statewide office on.  It doesn&#039;t really seem to matter much to him whether or not the bill is very effective as long as he can claim credit for sponsoring it.  Better yet, he loves to pander to specific interest groups so this one is probably his valentine to the Hollywood crowd who has recently started to be regularly SWATted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Lieu is my state senator (regrettably).  He is one of those liberal Democrats who aspires to climb the political ladder and he thinks that getting his name on a lot of bills that get signed into law is the way to build a record he can run for statewide office on.  It doesn&#8217;t really seem to matter much to him whether or not the bill is very effective as long as he can claim credit for sponsoring it.  Better yet, he loves to pander to specific interest groups so this one is probably his valentine to the Hollywood crowd who has recently started to be regularly SWATted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy Finkelman</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153986</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Finkelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153986</guid>
		<description>9. The original post disappeared. I don&#039;t know how I wound up in this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9. The original post disappeared. I don&#8217;t know how I wound up in this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: askeptic</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153947</link>
		<dc:creator>askeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153947</guid>
		<description>We should.
There should be very limited immunity for LE when they seriously bend the rules that the rest of us are supposed to observe under the threat of criminal prosecution (making a false report seems to be still a crime).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should.<br />
There should be very limited immunity for LE when they seriously bend the rules that the rest of us are supposed to observe under the threat of criminal prosecution (making a false report seems to be still a crime).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153941</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153941</guid>
		<description>Are we going to increase the penalties for a few cops who make (or cause to be made) fake 911 calls so they can make an illegal &quot;exigent&quot; entry into a home where a warrant is otherwise required?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we going to increase the penalties for a few cops who make (or cause to be made) fake 911 calls so they can make an illegal &#8220;exigent&#8221; entry into a home where a warrant is otherwise required?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tek</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153813</link>
		<dc:creator>tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153813</guid>
		<description>Because it is likely that someone will either die or be seriously hurt from this, it&#039;s time for everyone to stop calling this a &lt;i&gt;prank&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it is likely that someone will either die or be seriously hurt from this, it&#8217;s time for everyone to stop calling this a <i>prank</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pious Agnostic</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153725</link>
		<dc:creator>Pious Agnostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153725</guid>
		<description>Send them to jail for a jillion years, but catch them first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send them to jail for a jillion years, but catch them first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: askeptic</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153679</link>
		<dc:creator>askeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153679</guid>
		<description>#1 &amp; 3- Sammy, do you even look where you&#039;re posting before you do?

Isn&#039;t it interesting that nothing happened until they could attach the names of a couple high-profile celebs to the problem?

#7- first there has to be an honest effort to discover the ID of the &quot;swatter&quot;.  We don&#039;t seem to have that element yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 &amp; 3- Sammy, do you even look where you&#8217;re posting before you do?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting that nothing happened until they could attach the names of a couple high-profile celebs to the problem?</p>
<p>#7- first there has to be an honest effort to discover the ID of the &#8220;swatter&#8221;.  We don&#8217;t seem to have that element yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f1guyus</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2013/01/24/democrat-proposes-barely-increased-penalties-for-swatting-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-1153654</link>
		<dc:creator>f1guyus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=72522#comment-1153654</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d toss in pimps, drug dealers, and child molesters but that might be racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d toss in pimps, drug dealers, and child molesters but that might be racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->