<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking Tommy Christopher on the Attack on Steve Crowder, Part 2: No, Steven Crowder Did NOT Admit Starting the Fight with the Guy Who Punched Him</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135790</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135790</guid>
		<description>Guest (ce6e2f), did you try looking through your browser&#039;s history or cache? If you use Google Chrome you can use a search engine to find likely urls of previously viewed files. Not sure if IE or Firefox have the same functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guest (ce6e2f), did you try looking through your browser&#8217;s history or cache? If you use Google Chrome you can use a search engine to find likely urls of previously viewed files. Not sure if IE or Firefox have the same functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135702</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135702</guid>
		<description>I should add, regarding the &quot;missing video&quot; that I refer to as the &quot;second [missing] clip] at the end of prior comment:

It was a close up and clear shot of both Tony and Steve, without any obstruction up to and including the point of Tony&#039;s fall. It also appeared to show the moment of Tony&#039;s fall with part&#039;s of Tony still in the frame, and Steve in the frame during the fall.

It also showed &quot;Randall&quot; behind Tony at a couple of points, including during some or all of his pushing match with Chris that was just to the rear of Tony.

I might be wrong, but my impression of this clip I can no longer find on the web had a better resolution, perhaps a professional camera, not merely a phone camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add, regarding the &#8220;missing video&#8221; that I refer to as the &#8220;second [missing] clip] at the end of prior comment:</p>
<p>It was a close up and clear shot of both Tony and Steve, without any obstruction up to and including the point of Tony&#8217;s fall. It also appeared to show the moment of Tony&#8217;s fall with part&#8217;s of Tony still in the frame, and Steve in the frame during the fall.</p>
<p>It also showed &#8220;Randall&#8221; behind Tony at a couple of points, including during some or all of his pushing match with Chris that was just to the rear of Tony.</p>
<p>I might be wrong, but my impression of this clip I can no longer find on the web had a better resolution, perhaps a professional camera, not merely a phone camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135687</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135687</guid>
		<description>Much of Crowder’s defense and Tommy Christopher’s now-to-be-documented unfounded assertions depend on the narrative.

Crowder says “that was a melee” and that the union folks were attacking and ransacking the tent with elderly people and women inside, and he and a group of people were basically attempting to hold the fortress.

TommyX not only has a blind eye to that and otherwise downplays it, he even engaged in the “Wheelerization” of it, giving some credence that it was all just a set-up and instigation or provocation, and any reports of union violence ought to be discounted.

For reference all in one place, here in the comments at end of Part 1 starting at comment 44:
 
http://tinyurl.com/cy442jp

1) Another view of end of Crowder fight, but showing nearly immediate tent collapse and intensity of situation – and in clips in comments #46 and #49 showing very clear views of the fight from other angles, including melee inside the tent both before and after the fight (and really good shots of Tony’s uppercut and gut punches as an added attraction).

2) Violent union “strikes”, sometimes shocking against elderly people are shown especially well in clips in comments #46 and #47 and they also show the context of other scuffles that were happening both inside and outside the tent in the 3-4 minutes in which the fight occurred.

3) Several of the dozen clips in the ten comments from #43-52 show aspects of the melee, especially the confusion and dire situation in the tent, at a couple of points nearly frantic with screams and terror – what Crowder is claiming to defend, what Tommy and Wheeler discount or ignore.

Note 1: I have retracted some of my earlier comments on that thread.  I saw a screen shot (and video) of what appeared to be Crowder’s arm extended on to Tony’s back as Tony was going down.  Like the Republican BlueCollarCorner union guy on Hannity with Crowder who asserted that Crowder had pushed Tony to the ground, I also perceived that, but it is wrong.  It is not Steve’s arm, it is Tony’s arm.

Note 2: That’s all context before, during and after the fight, and clips of the end of the fight, but none show the crucial moment when Tony fell.  I have a distinct recollection of two specific clips that do show Tony at the moment that he fell.  I can no longer find them on the web.  Will the owners’ repost them for all to find again and see?

The first clip was a clear shot from the inside of the tent that showed Chris the Gingerhair union instigator charging the tent and the guy in the overcoat he was pushing, who I call “Randall”, who Chris said “has a gun” and Chris has “killed plenty of people with [i.e. who have] a gun”.  It then shows “Randall” pushing Chris like a lineman pushes a tackle back 5 yards into a quarterback – all in the area directly to the rear of Tony. In other clips we can see that the man next to Tony, and others, react to it.  It may show “evidence” relating to the fall of Tony.  I cannot recall clearly, so it may not.

The second clip was a second camera taking shots just to the right and rear of Steve and Tony, and was a very clear shot of them just before and at the moment of Tony’s fall, and after Tony’s fall.  I have a very clear impression in my mind what this video showed because I watched those few seconds over and over and stepped it to see the detail and get it right.  However, given my perception was wrong about the other clip of Tony’s fall (that I have retracted), I am reluctant to state what I perceived and believe to have seen.  I will state that I my recollection is that Steve did two things and Tony did one thing.  None of which are threatening per se beyond the voices where we can hear Tony’s name-calling and Steve’s questioning the acceptableness of the union attacks on the tent that we can hear in other clips. But they do gives clues to what is about to happen next.  I recall (but could be wrong) that I was not able to determine from this clip what actually causes Tony’s fall, or how he initially fell, because when Tony goes down he is obscured by Steve and perhaps others standing in front of the camera.

I cannot confirm this, but my impression at the time was that these clips were shot by people in Crowder’s “Crew”, that is,  from the 3-4-5 phone camera guys that were sort of hanging together and sometimes seen and heard near each other in many of the clips.  I might be wrong.  If anyone is watching and knows where these clips are, would be a fine thing to see them posted here.

If I find any other interested clips, I’ll post them at end of Part 1 comments.  If they are specifically relevant to a subsequent thread, and may post a link if not off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of Crowder’s defense and Tommy Christopher’s now-to-be-documented unfounded assertions depend on the narrative.</p>
<p>Crowder says “that was a melee” and that the union folks were attacking and ransacking the tent with elderly people and women inside, and he and a group of people were basically attempting to hold the fortress.</p>
<p>TommyX not only has a blind eye to that and otherwise downplays it, he even engaged in the “Wheelerization” of it, giving some credence that it was all just a set-up and instigation or provocation, and any reports of union violence ought to be discounted.</p>
<p>For reference all in one place, here in the comments at end of Part 1 starting at comment 44:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/cy442jp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cy442jp</a></p>
<p>1) Another view of end of Crowder fight, but showing nearly immediate tent collapse and intensity of situation – and in clips in comments #46 and #49 showing very clear views of the fight from other angles, including melee inside the tent both before and after the fight (and really good shots of Tony’s uppercut and gut punches as an added attraction).</p>
<p>2) Violent union “strikes”, sometimes shocking against elderly people are shown especially well in clips in comments #46 and #47 and they also show the context of other scuffles that were happening both inside and outside the tent in the 3-4 minutes in which the fight occurred.</p>
<p>3) Several of the dozen clips in the ten comments from #43-52 show aspects of the melee, especially the confusion and dire situation in the tent, at a couple of points nearly frantic with screams and terror – what Crowder is claiming to defend, what Tommy and Wheeler discount or ignore.</p>
<p>Note 1: I have retracted some of my earlier comments on that thread.  I saw a screen shot (and video) of what appeared to be Crowder’s arm extended on to Tony’s back as Tony was going down.  Like the Republican BlueCollarCorner union guy on Hannity with Crowder who asserted that Crowder had pushed Tony to the ground, I also perceived that, but it is wrong.  It is not Steve’s arm, it is Tony’s arm.</p>
<p>Note 2: That’s all context before, during and after the fight, and clips of the end of the fight, but none show the crucial moment when Tony fell.  I have a distinct recollection of two specific clips that do show Tony at the moment that he fell.  I can no longer find them on the web.  Will the owners’ repost them for all to find again and see?</p>
<p>The first clip was a clear shot from the inside of the tent that showed Chris the Gingerhair union instigator charging the tent and the guy in the overcoat he was pushing, who I call “Randall”, who Chris said “has a gun” and Chris has “killed plenty of people with [i.e. who have] a gun”.  It then shows “Randall” pushing Chris like a lineman pushes a tackle back 5 yards into a quarterback – all in the area directly to the rear of Tony. In other clips we can see that the man next to Tony, and others, react to it.  It may show “evidence” relating to the fall of Tony.  I cannot recall clearly, so it may not.</p>
<p>The second clip was a second camera taking shots just to the right and rear of Steve and Tony, and was a very clear shot of them just before and at the moment of Tony’s fall, and after Tony’s fall.  I have a very clear impression in my mind what this video showed because I watched those few seconds over and over and stepped it to see the detail and get it right.  However, given my perception was wrong about the other clip of Tony’s fall (that I have retracted), I am reluctant to state what I perceived and believe to have seen.  I will state that I my recollection is that Steve did two things and Tony did one thing.  None of which are threatening per se beyond the voices where we can hear Tony’s name-calling and Steve’s questioning the acceptableness of the union attacks on the tent that we can hear in other clips. But they do gives clues to what is about to happen next.  I recall (but could be wrong) that I was not able to determine from this clip what actually causes Tony’s fall, or how he initially fell, because when Tony goes down he is obscured by Steve and perhaps others standing in front of the camera.</p>
<p>I cannot confirm this, but my impression at the time was that these clips were shot by people in Crowder’s “Crew”, that is,  from the 3-4-5 phone camera guys that were sort of hanging together and sometimes seen and heard near each other in many of the clips.  I might be wrong.  If anyone is watching and knows where these clips are, would be a fine thing to see them posted here.</p>
<p>If I find any other interested clips, I’ll post them at end of Part 1 comments.  If they are specifically relevant to a subsequent thread, and may post a link if not off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monitor</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135661</link>
		<dc:creator>Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135661</guid>
		<description>I am finding this whole series of stories very well done. Thank you Patterico for this brilliant debunking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am finding this whole series of stories very well done. Thank you Patterico for this brilliant debunking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant Stone</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135483</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135483</guid>
		<description>Nancy is really an under-educated union thug whose namepatch on his Thursday night bowling league shirt probably says Larry, or Sal, or Bud, or...Dogface Marcy Wheeler. (But we&#039;re not ruling out it might be Bathhouse Brynaert or one of his sauna buddies !)

&quot;She&quot; is just employing one of those &quot;when did you stop beating your wife ?&quot; questions in order to attempt to establish that Patterico was discussing whether or not Crowder initiated the assault. Then &quot;she&quot; can go run and tell her under-educated union thug knuckledragging comrades in arms on Twitter that Patterico was discussing the issue, so there &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; be some truth to it.

Even Orwell would take that page out of his typewriter, crumple it up, and throw it in the wastebasket. 

Funny how &quot;she&quot; is inquiring a Los Angeles DA about Michigans&#039;s laws.
Why doesn&#039;t &quot;she&quot; ask these hypothetical questions of, say, a DA in, like, uh, Michigan ?
 
Because again, it is just part of this left wing game they play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy is really an under-educated union thug whose namepatch on his Thursday night bowling league shirt probably says Larry, or Sal, or Bud, or&#8230;Dogface Marcy Wheeler. (But we&#8217;re not ruling out it might be Bathhouse Brynaert or one of his sauna buddies !)</p>
<p>&#8220;She&#8221; is just employing one of those &#8220;when did you stop beating your wife ?&#8221; questions in order to attempt to establish that Patterico was discussing whether or not Crowder initiated the assault. Then &#8220;she&#8221; can go run and tell her under-educated union thug knuckledragging comrades in arms on Twitter that Patterico was discussing the issue, so there <b><i>must</i></b> be some truth to it.</p>
<p>Even Orwell would take that page out of his typewriter, crumple it up, and throw it in the wastebasket. </p>
<p>Funny how &#8220;she&#8221; is inquiring a Los Angeles DA about Michigans&#8217;s laws.<br />
Why doesn&#8217;t &#8220;she&#8221; ask these hypothetical questions of, say, a DA in, like, uh, Michigan ?</p>
<p>Because again, it is just part of this left wing game they play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135465</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135465</guid>
		<description>Nancy,

Why are you asking questions about something for which there is no evidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,</p>
<p>Why are you asking questions about something for which there is no evidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135463</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135463</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nancy&quot; seems pretty desperate to craft a narrative. Facts be damned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nancy&#8221; seems pretty desperate to craft a narrative. Facts be damned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135441</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135441</guid>
		<description>More questions for the ADA: 

&quot;&lt;i&gt;and we didn’t get violent with them — but we did try and push them off the tent.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Does the law distinguish between &quot;non-violent pushing&quot; and battery? 

Who is we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More questions for the ADA: </p>
<p>&#8220;<i>and we didn’t get violent with them — but we did try and push them off the tent.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Does the law distinguish between &#8220;non-violent pushing&#8221; and battery? </p>
<p>Who is we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135437</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135437</guid>
		<description>I have a question about how assault and battery law works in Michigan.  

If Steven Crowder initiated physical contact with Tony by pushing him and knocking him to the ground, can Crowder be charged with assault and battery if Tony files a complaint? 

If the police find in their investigation of Crowder&#039;s complaint that Crowder initiated physical contact, could the police charge Crowder with assault and battery without a complaint (other than Crowders?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about how assault and battery law works in Michigan.  </p>
<p>If Steven Crowder initiated physical contact with Tony by pushing him and knocking him to the ground, can Crowder be charged with assault and battery if Tony files a complaint? </p>
<p>If the police find in their investigation of Crowder&#8217;s complaint that Crowder initiated physical contact, could the police charge Crowder with assault and battery without a complaint (other than Crowders?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley J. Fikes</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/debunking-tommy-christopher-on-the-attack-on-steve-crowder-part-2-no-steven-crowder-did-not-admit-starting-the-fight-with-the-guy-who-punched-him/comment-page-1/#comment-1135219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley J. Fikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=71802#comment-1135219</guid>
		<description>What JD said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What JD said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->